|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fedepix www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fedepix  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D7200 Pros: Sensor and dynamic range, sharpness, autofocus, ISO yield excellent, Weight, Battery life, Time Lapse Function integrated, Price Cons: Nobody Opinion: After more than a month of use I can confirm the value of this camera body, I had the D7100 for a few months in late 2013 and noticed many improvements from the point of view of the sensor and the workability of the RAW file. Really good dynamic range, low noise even at high ISO, used safely under special conditions up to ISO 5000/6400 without great loss of quality. I use mainly for landscape photos on a tripod and weather, produces excellent file.rnCon good lenses in front always gives razor-sharp pictures and does not regret much more expensive cars with sensors FF.rnL'AF is great, fast and affidabile.rnE ' light, you hold very well and gives the impression of still having a solid and professional in his hands, commands rapid and optimal duration of batteria.rnHo found very convenient function integrated roll Interspersed with exposure compensation, easy to set to create excellent timelapse.rnHa additional features like WiFi and GPS that personallynot use, but can be comfortable in many people for fast sharing of clicks on tablets and smartphones and geolocation of foto.rnIl price in my opinion is great for what it offers, I have purchased with new European guarantee below 900 euro. The council. sent on September 07, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto MT 055 X PRO3 Pros: Stability, excellent construction and materials, maximum height, folding central column, 10 years guarantee. Cons: Nobody. Opinion: Really a good buy, I am very satisfied, I bought a kit with the valid ball head Manfrotto MH055M0-Q2. rnInizialmente I was torn between this and the cheapest (but still valid) 190XPro3, I went into the store and trying them both my choice fell on 055XPro3.rnGrande stability (also fully open and extended column) and construction, gives the right ' impression to have a reliable product on which to mount the cameras and that theme also special weather conditions, such as long exposures during days with strong vento.rnInoltre through product registration on the site Manfrotto will enjoy 10 years of weight and garanzia.rnIl clutter are plus points in my opinion, give greater stability and security! I recommend it to anyone looking for a professional tripod without many compromises! sent on August 25, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Sharpest, Colors, Stabilizer, Building, Weight, Filter diameter 77mm, No Distortion, Tropicalisation Cons: No one Opinion: On the advice of some member of the forum and after seeing several reviews, I replaced this with the 17-40 Canon 16-35 f4 IS.rnFinalmente also has a wide-angle lens for landscape artists would envy, they did a great lavoro.rnSe already 17-40 is a good optic, especially for the quality / price ratio, this is currently the top of acquistare.rnNitidissimo at all focal lengths, already at room temperature, excellent edges and especially without any distortion even at 16 mm.rnCostruzione great weather sealed , light and with a little hood ingombrante.rnLa to 4-stop stabilization makes it ideal for handheld shooting in low light and video. 10 VOTING AND PRAISE! sent on October 30, 2014 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Price, Yield Color, Sharpness, Weight, f2.8, Ultra-Wide, Filter Plate Cons: Distortion, "problem" just as solved! Opinion: This disk can not be missed for those who love landscapes and visions ultra-wide in general. Purchased for Canon to just over 300 euro, the new 2014 version with red stripe and the distance scale enough precisa.rnLa manual focus is anything but a defect and a perspective of this kind is not a problem, it works in iperfocale.rnChiuso between f / 8 and f / 11 becomes as sharp as a blade, wide open but has a slightly cartoon sharpness is very good, at the first opportunity I will try to do some shooting at night on 6d to verify the resa.rnC'è also possibility to mount a plate Cokin filters through its Holder Samyang SFH-14 is lightweight and well built. Highly recommended! sent on October 08, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM Pros: Sharpness, f2, Price, Yield unique Three-dimensionality, Construction Cons: Become a drug. Opinion: Optics made from lovely on FF, razor sharp already wide open, spectacular especially for portraits, weddings and events in places chiuso.rnNon think there's much else to say, take a look at the various samples here on the forum and let the pictures speak .rnAggiungo only that, in my opinion, is the best L series as value / prezzo..io I found a good used 650 euro.rn sent on October 08, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Versatility, Weight, Price Cons: Not exceptional sharpness, flare, vignetting and distortion at 24mm f4, Widespread problem with the flat cable. Opinion: Optics with which I began just switched to full frame, certainly covers a range of focal lengths very comfortable when you are around and allows you to avoid frequent changes of ottica.rnIl price is attractive for those seeking an all-rounder, who is on the new MMT , is weather sealed and has a weight not eccessivo.rnRiguardo quality but I was not happy and would not recommend it, do not yield constant, little sharpness, even at small apertures, intense vignetting at f4, no resistance to flare, noticeable distortion at 24mm, AF not always very fast .... the worst series in L commercio.rnInoltre is good to know that, after a certain number of shots and use, the lens has a problem breaking the flat cable internal forces to replace the entire circuit with diaphragm consequent cost of repairs on the 200 euro that Canon does not pass under warranty, all this for a design error. Problem that tends to recur ... rnVenduto then after a few months! RNLA best level of quality and comfort, personally, I found using two corpwith the 17-40 f4 L and 70-200 f4 IS L, plus of course a series of fixed according to the situations and needs. Anyone looking for a handyman like me at this point orienterei the Sigma 24-105 f4 OS, maybe waiting for Canon to update this model. sent on September 21, 2014 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Good construction and performance, crisp, precise AF, Weight, Color Cons: For what it costs just a few flare in backlit but nothing outrageous Opinion: A good optics, I used the Nikon D7100 for paesaggi.rnOttima sharpness even at the edges, especially if prepunched a bit ', lightweight, accurate AF, solid construction and excellent performance of colori.rnQualche chromatic aberration but nothing unsolvable in post-production. rnSi is used on the 350, but even less, and it is up for grabs if you look at a wide angle. sent on August 09, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Price-performance ratio, stabilizer, Good Sharpness but unpretentious Cons: Yield that worsens over 200mm AF slow, plasticky construction, Darkness at longer focal lengths Opinion: For what it costs is a good choice, especially if purchased used on 200-250 euro.rnResa and good sharpness from 70 to 200, the stabilizer helps, is certainly no miracles but does his duty, as the construction is plasticky discreet and not tired when used for several hours, I recommend it to those who do not want to spend too much for a tele and has no great pretensions. The AF is a bit 'slow and sometimes misses the focus, we must learn to know him. I used it for several months last year on D7100 and some good shooting me are brought to casa.rnIn that price range there is not much better, but if you can raise the bar on slightly better than the Canon 70 to 200 f4 L and on the good old Nikon 80-200 f2.8. sent on August 09, 2014 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Exceptional FF sensor, Image Quality, Yield of colors, ergonomics and reduced weight, precise AF, estate at high ISO, dynamic range of the sensor, battery life, Customization Cons: None in particular Opinion: Purchased used as a second body to match the 5D3, I was amazed .. what to say .... except that the autofocus Mark III is obviously more powerful (center point aside), everything else is in favor of the 6d.rnInnanzitutto Price, now the new is about 1250 Euros and used on 1100 file cleanup incredible color rendition, held at high ISO and higher above no color noise and vertical banding problem that the 5D Mark III instead I encountered in recovering shadows in landscape photos .. very fastidioso.rnI limits of this machine are all deliberately created by Canon to maintain high sales also 5D3 that would inevitably collapsed, if there are 61 AF points, shutter to 1/8000 and dual-slot 1000 to save yourself those passes for € L series optics, and take their eyes closed the 6d, has a yield that is above chance! sent on July 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, AF lightning, Lightweight, Ergonomic, Quality, very effective stabilizer, color rendering, Tropicalized Cons: No one Opinion: Purchased used 750 Euros as collateral in impeccable condition, a bargain. The new intake would in any case, is the perfect lens for every situation and weighs only 760g.rnUna outstanding optical quality, beautiful color rendition, sharpness throughout the frame at all focal lengths and apertures, 200mm f4 is also perfect for do portraits, I have a beautiful bokeh.rnLo stabilizer is very effective, I brought home shots without the slightest shake-200mm with times of 1/30, what about ... Highly recommended! sent on July 25, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Light, Crisp from fear, autofocus, ergonomics, Price, Bokeh, Colors, VOTE 10! Cons: No one really. It is tropical conditions. Opinion: Fantastic lens that I got to try it for a period, L series in all respects, razor sharp throughout the frame, AF very fast, good bokeh, light weight and very practical for the small size. It is not tropicallized for someone can be a mancanza.rnMontata on the camera body is not tired all day and gives great satisfaction. Great for portraits, street, and stolen shots paesaggi.rnPer the price at which it is sold (520 € new and also used under the 430) is a must have if you do not want to spend too much and to enjoy a high optical quality, take this rather than the classic 70-300 economic stabilizer in my opinion is not necessary if you shoot mostly in daylight conditions. sent on July 11, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: 61-point AF system, sensor, Robustness, Tropicalization, ergonomics and controls, ISO, Burst, Customization, Image quality, Viewfinder, display, Autonomy, Light Meter Cons: No, maybe not her .. Opinion: Purchased in February 2014, I was struggling like many in this and 6d, try both, and the choice fell on the body better though more expensive. rnDopo months of use I can now give a judgment on the quality of this machine that I have NEVER disappointed in the various situations in which I found myself photographing. Nell'impugnarla you already have the idea to get your hands on a professional body and gives a sense of strength, excellent ergonomics, all controls in the right place where you would like them, I came from a Nikon D7100 with which I have never had a large feeling and with whom I had a sensor problem that prompted me to sell everything to switch to Canon 5D3 .. with a whole different sensazione.rnAutofocus customizable to 61 points of which 41 are double-cross, sensitive both central the side, never a photo out of focus. The strength of this high macchina.rnQualità image of RAW, this means to greatly reduce the PP, except for those situations where you want to give special effects to your photos. rnResa remarkable high ISO up to 25,600 had no problems,usually I do not, however, over 12,800 spingo.rnOttimo the rear display 3.2 ", great battery life, dual-slot CF-SD.rnL 'only comment that I would do as a negative is that I was hoping for a better recovery of shadows, the only thing at the moment perhaps best handled by the sensors Sony / Nikon that I've tried before (Nikon D7100 and Sony Nex 6), however, resolved with an update firmware.rnPer the rest as mentioned above is a great machine that moves from the from the first time you use it. The price is high but is justified by all the pros listed above for a photo lover like me who does the photography work has been a drain buy it but it was worth it, recommended! sent on June 28, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, fast AF, optical quality in relation to price, Lightweight Cons: None Opinion: Optics Highly recommended, I bought it used with the lens hood under warranty at 280 €, a bargain. Keep with se.rnNitida already in TA, AF always fast, very nice bokeh, on FF (5D Mark III) has positive effect. Aberration light purple TA solved in two seconds PP.rnLa use for portraits and street primarily for stolen shots, one of my best purchases. sent on May 17, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Price, weight, optical quality, sharpness, fast AF, bokeh Cons: No lens hood, AC TA but correctable Opinion: Optics that I love, on full frame (5d Mark II) is a performance, razor sharp already at f1.4 at the point on fire! Make effort to remove it from the car .. fast AF and low weight, the yield is great, just a little 'AC wide open, fixable in PP in seconds! RnConsiderando that new now is 300 € and used on the 200 / 250 is a must have, much better than the 50 f1.8 II as resa.rnIl 50 L f1.2 I've never tried it and will definitely be higher .. but it also costs 4 times the 1 .4 .. it is really worth ? sent on May 16, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Lightweight, Sharpness, Color, optical quality, Series L, Resistance to Flare, Price Cons: I do not have it Opinion: Optics spectacular, an L-series at a honest price, 600 euro new, crystal clear over the whole range of focal lengths. The use of 5D Mark III will be released very soon soddisfazione.rnA new 16-35 f4 IS but at what price? The double .. I'll hold this for a long time yet! rnOttima construction, AF always very fast, very resistant to flare buona.rnAdatto landscapes, architecture, portraits settled, street .. also a focus very close (28cm) and a great bokeh TA! rnInsieme to a 70-200 L and some fixed light (f2 35 - 50 f1.4 - 85 f1.8) forms the basis for a perfect outfit for every situation photographic quality, ultra recommended! sent on May 16, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
