JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 169000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Low price, fast and precise AF, sharp, non-CA, lightweight, construction
Cons: Nothing from lens itself, but tripod ring not included.
Opinion: This was my upgrade from the 70-300mm non-L. I don't know where to start: first I noticed that the construction is excellent, it deserves the "red-L-ring". The image quality is just fantastic, it can be used even at f/4 and the image isn't so soft like other lenses. The AF is very fast and very accurate. I can't complain about it's non-IS or just f/4 aperture, for this price it's just fantastic as it is. I wish that it would come with the tripod ring included. It can be used for portraits, wildlife and events.
Pros: less expensive (poor man pro tele lense); lightweight (perfect for travel); good sharpness; not-too-intimidating lens (good for candid)
Cons: slightly soft at 200mm (for the best result, take at 135mm f/4 or 200mm f/5.6); sometimes non IS affects shake-blur
Opinion: The lens is perfect for travel, & also perfect in term of price/quaility. The only thing you can't get is beautiful bokeh blur - it is not really necessary when we do landscape, reportage or even human interest portrait during travel (you could capture the environment background as a part of story, anyway). To me, combining with another lightweight 85mm f/1.8, or 135mm will be a wise choice. Just my 2 cents ;-). Www.budiharyantophoto.com
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:sharpness, internal zoom, content weight, auto focus
Cons:No stabilizer, Lens hood
Opinion:It's really amazing the performance in terms of sharpness, fast and precise autofocus. Even the low weight makes it particularly "comfortable" even in long outputs. Very versatile lens that best of itself in portraits with a nice bokeh effect, even if I happened to use it with satisfactory results in landscape photos. All in all, value for money very inviting. To be absolutely revised the lens hood: decidedly bulky and aesthetically ugly.
Pros:Colors at the TOP, Lens does not escape. Certainly a true L-series.
Cons:Lack tripod ring
Opinion:Although not a professional, I used it both for Matrimionio (my son) and for portraits (excellent) and, with multiplier, for shooting avi-fauna. I must say that I was really surprised despite the many positive criticisms on the net. If you are interested in a portrait target, you have found it. Very believable blurred. I happened to use it outdoors and also took some rain without consequences. I use it with my 7d Mark II and it seems like a really good pairing. Although I didn't believe it before, in the photo gallery I think it's the best lens I have of the 4 I have (also fixed). I also tried version 2.8 not stabilized and it seems to me that it loses something in terms of sharpness.
Pros:A true L-series, very good images and colors, construction, internal zoom and very good AF
Cons:Old project, not weather sealed and lack of tripod ring (remember it's a L series)
Opinion:A lens with a strong personality, usable even at full aperture as I expect from a professional lens (obvious that I talk about portraits or fauna, certainly not for landscapes). As I do not expect from a professional lens lacks the tropicalization, at least stated. The 24/105 pass it for tropicalized, but with the zoom I would be careful to sand and similar, here the zoom and the Af are internal, it will be hard to put it ko. But the fact remains that it is not tropicalized. And there is also a handy accessory for a zoom like that, the tripod mount. For the rest is a very good goal, it is reasonably priced and does its job in an egregious way despite being a slightly outdated (and perhaps forgotten?) Project of Canon Home
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
