|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ermannocazzola www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ermannocazzola  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R5 Pros: live and real colors, superlative quality sights Cons: unable to register in small RAW Opinion: I've had this camera for two days and it's already love at first sight. Let's start before the "defects" if we can define them: 1) there is no longer the possibility, as in all the latest cameras, the possibility to record in RAW of small size, very useful when you do not need a thousand pixels. 2) Cost of CFexpress cards still absurdly high... I took a Sandisk from 1700 mbps from 128GB at a price of over 300 euros. They are not defects of who knows what gravity, you learn to live with it but you make themselves heard, especially the files from 45megapizze The positive aspects are then divided into two categories: 1) those strongly touted 2) those passed almost muted on the first even I do not even dwell, they have already talked about it far and wide and I can only confirm them. On the merits not so much told among the various reviews I have identified the following: 1) electronic viewfinder greatly improved both as sharpness, due of course to the double of the px, but especially in the quality of the colors and in the correspondence with the reality of lights and shadows. The previous R-1 crosshairs that I already praised, when approaching extreme exposures tended to show pixels burned earlier than due... this is much more reliable. 2) Joystick's responsiveness: it was my strong fear... instead I found a very fast and fluid command without any kind of snag or slowdown. I was afraid that the thousands of Af points would slow the movement of the Af point while it is quick and accurate. You press the joystick and the dot immediately passes to the center of the frame, not like the R you need to search for and press the trash can button. Configurable the fact that the jostick for the choice of af point is always active and activates at the preemptive press of the button in the upper right dedicated. The position of the joystick is finally perfect... best series 1. 3) the build quality of the body feels that it is of a different class than the R; seems to be holding a flagship. Plastics that actually give a strong metal feel; significantly improved button that returns a beautiful and durable pressure sensation over time. 4) File processing: even with files underexposed to high ISO (below I attach an example to 6400 ISO without corrections) you can recover unthinkable lights and shadows without the grain becoming unmanageable. I dare say that at 6400 ISO exposing right returns a file type the 1Dx2 (which I know well) to 800 ISO... so by eye and cross. 5) the 3 dials: this novelty has gone quite muted... they did not want to enhance the comfort of always having ready the values of the triad times-diaframmi-iso ... I assure you that being able to act on ISO without first having to press any buttons is really a wonderful, fast, responsive thing... Instinctive. A little like you could customize the dial on the new RF optics but having it on the body is available with any optics and a totally different ergonomic comfort. 6) the return of the double card is an indispensable thing in my opinion: it offers the ability to record in double format simultaneously without losing speed or for backup... even though I've never ruined any memorycard the fact of having a copy makes you sleep peaceful dreams. Since there the 8K in the video the CFexpress becomes indispensable otherwise 2 SD would have been the best choice as it is for the R6... lower expenses and a card goes well in both slots as well as being a format more easily found even by a friend outgoing with us. 7) ability to control the external speedlight directly from the camera without the need to purchase external controls... are still another 300 euros about saved that justify the price of the camera sent on August 05, 2020 |
 | Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: sharpness, blurred, construction, weight, clutter Cons: aesthetics when at 200mm Opinion: I start by saying that my yardstick for making comparisons remains the old Canon EF 70-200 F2,8 IS Mk2 so NOT THE THIRD VERSION. This new RF got me excited right away; sharpness, as was now obvious, reached an embarrassing level as it was sculpted. The blurry as always in full line with the f/2.8 of the House Canon... it does not disappoint, indeed... creamy and soft as always. I would simply say that they have brought back on the RF series all the qualities of the EF improving even important points as the clutter slits as closed at 70mm and stuck with leverage... takes up exactly half the space and that helps a lot. The weight is also lower but above all it is optimally balanced, more towards the machine body and this I think helps a lot also to force less on the rings of attacks. Really nice and useful the opening on the lampshade cap that allows you to adjust the rotation of a possible polarizing filter without needing to disassemble anything and/or stick your fingers in front of the frame... maybe the last EF optics had it too but I could not see... still a great idea. Fabulous construction; sturdy materials. Solid metals but with a matte finish that gives an almost plastic look to the sight but as soon as you put your hands on it you feel all the classic robustness of the L optics. Another wonderful aspect is the stabilization system... really good. Efficient: I sit quietly at 200mm at 1/60 if you have enough steady hand... If you rest an elbow, you also go down to 1/30 Excellent focus: for now no sign of uncertainty. The downsides are basically 2: FIRST: when stretching to 200mm, since the focus is no longer 100% internal, it is aesthetically less afhering than the old EF but is easily forgiven for the positive aspects arising in space. SECOND: The balance of weights towards the body is very comfortable when working and shooting but remains disliked when you have to rest the camera with optics and foot on a table... it no longer stays in balance but falls towards the body... nothing transcendental but if you were used to it, well this thing now stands out a thread. sent on December 12, 2019 |
 | Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: No aberrations, fast af, superlative sharpness, improved bokeh, customizable adjustable dial, button to limit AF depth. Cons: Size... absence of the stabilizer but only on R and RP Opinion: He arrived to me this morning and I immediately tried it because I had been waiting for him for months. It's simply the optics that have excited me the most in all these years of photography. I divide my review for days because obviously everything can not be understood at the first impact. Part 1) The image quality is superb and the price is proportionate if we were already fine with the price of the previous version. The detachment of the floors is spectacular: the blurring is as creamy as ever. The lack of chromatic aberrations makes its blurred even more homogeneous. All this having increased the sharpness on the subject focused. The weight is slightly higher than the previous version but does not stand out and does not bother. As always in The History of Canon's 85 mm, the colors remain soft, rich in gradations and creamy as well. I'm not here talking about technicalities. I focus only on the emotional aspect that this lens conveys: it is pure poetry. It takes the best merits of the previous version and has eliminated all flaws. The focus isn't as fast as the EF f/1.4 version, but it's still gotten immensely faster than before; Even limiting the focus field above 150 cm now allows you to speed up the work a lot by avoiding long scrolls when the subject is noticeably out of focus. part 2) The construction of this optics is impeccable; some may not like plastic materials (so at least to the touch) and no more metallic than before but the construction is solid and in the hand returns a handleability and an ideal mince. The optics amaze me more every day even in the backlights; for the moment I still haven't been able to find ugly flare... seems to respond really well to light coming from every direction. Part 3) today I got to make comparisons with the old 85mm is one thing impressed me: for having the same exposure with the old I shot at 1/200 while with the new at 1/400. Part 4) Stabilization. If you come from version f/1.4 the lack you feel. Being able to take freehand portraits at 1/30 was really convenient; made it possible to take more advantage of the low ambient light. I think it also depends on the question of costs and clutter this choice but as a user I would not have regretted having it at all. UPDATE OF August 20, 2020 on POINT 4: Combined with R5 or R6 stabilization becomes a spectacle. goes from ZERO for lack on the lens to as many as 8 stops with that of the sensor... works better on this OPTICS-free optics than on lenses already equipped with IS system ... a wonder. Part 5) the dimensions: the optics are larger than the old version and very similar (at least in length) to the version f/1,4... Note, however, that the focus is internal and no body protrudes forward or stretches in any way... so the need to retract the lens before storing it in your bag also disappear. sent on July 01, 2019 |
 | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: Small, compact, cheap, precise, solid. Cons: Lack of standard lampshade Opinion: I come from EF 35 f/1,4 mk2, so from a lens with a capital L but I was really excited about this RF. First of all, being an optic designed for the R system obviously does not need adapters and therefore has reduced the footprint a lot. The sharpness is superb; The blurry is superior to the old 35 EF f/2 but naturally slightly more nervous than the L series. The programmable die is really comfortable... I have set up the ISO adjustment which makes me everything faster for a precise exposure. Programmable ghiera, stabilizer, contained footprints and high-quality materials together with an uncompromising assembly... all qualities that SECOND ME make paradoxically cheaper than its predecessors. I used 1Dx2 and switched to R for clutter and comfort; the transition from EF to RF was almost forced... and I don't regret it. Ps: the transparency of the lens with respect to the L series however you notice... I would say that it remains a 2/3 stop more underexposed with equal settings. I would like to answer who, in the review, points out the lack of the dial of distances: the system RF - ML LE DISTANZE shows them directly on display. sent on June 23, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS USM Pros: Beautiful, comfortable, solid, charming. Cons: Basically still no cons Opinion: In the pros I did not add the word sharpness on purpose because I think that a similar lens should not make this value of his workhorse but I assure you that, even at full aperture, will leave you speechless for the immense quality that gets in any condition. That said, let's move on to the other features that I consider to be the fundamental ones.rnIt's really nice to hold in your hand, much more comfortable than the f / 1.2 although it's noticeably bigger; but, precisely these dimensions, they give a better ergonomic look, both while using it and while handling it detached from the camera; the external coating is rougher and maintains a firmer grip.rnThe focus ring no longer gives that feeling of empty turning that gave the f / 1,2 .... now flows smoothly and consistently, you feel that drags something (said in a positive way) and does not have that very light game that had the old 85mm.rnThe MAF is internal, so there's no more%3B that front that comes out and makes (at least psychologically) more fragile the optics in addition to remove the mess from having to turn off the AF every time before turning off the camera to "shorten" the lens before storing it in the bag. It is not a trivial thing for those who, working, must often change octopuses quickly and maybe (I think of a matrimonialist, put it on some mobile.rnThe back lens is now "safe", far from scratching and this also makes it much more fluid the moment it fits ... you do it without looking or paying special attention as before.rnThe colors are really beautiful, slightly fuller than the old f / 1,2 but have no obvious dominant ... beautiful, rich and full.rnChrome almost non-existent ... also tested against metal on TA and I was stunned.rnNitidity on the whole frame: MAF in liveview on the edge of the frame and has the same detail (or almost) of the old f / 1 , 2 in the central zone.rnLaheld to flare is really remarkable even if, I admit, in these conditions I have not tried well well.rnrn The stabilizer, which until today on similar lenses I did not know, returns much more useful than I thought.rnRitratti also posati to 1 / 25 second freehand allow me to significantly lower the ISO value and maintain the highest quality. I did not think I could find it so useful.rnrnEstetically this optics takes the line of all the new canons; someone calls them plasticosis but it is not. Assumoni instead a look much more solid and robust and you can see it immediately in your hand.rnThe hood is now much smaller and more enveloping; not cumbersome like the previous one. Before it was detached and easily lost in the bag in moving the lens, now it is firmly attached. The fact of having created it more adherent to the lens has evidently given the possibility of keeping it shorter and this means that, once the hood is mounted, it is moreIt is short of the old f / 1,4.rnMododontal frontal ... more than the previous f / 1.2 ... and perhaps this has maintained its best qualities.rnrnUltimo but first in order of importance in my opinion, the blurred. .. Canon has not disappointed.rnIts bokeh is identical to f / 1,2 ... nothing has changed .... spectacular, enchanting and magical as the old man of the house Canon.rnSoft, silky, mellow, balanced ... a bokeh did not take away any doubt about which of the two optics tener.rnrnPS: I evaluated the new having the old man still in support .... I have compared them well (in a domestic way of course) in common use, that is to say these optics were born ... lab tests do not interest me. I rate a car on the road and not on rollers. sent on January 20, 2018 |
 | Hasselblad X1D Pros: the truly outstanding quality of the. High ISO really good. Ergonomics and very exciting style. Cons: Many, too many ... all unjustified price for so little. Opinion: Hasselblad X1D that egregious delusion ... I tried it far and wide because it was my intention to buy it but ..... rnrnInizio first of all the positive aspects, that is a really excellent files in all respects; resolution, cleaning, detail, dynamic range and malleabilità.rnSotto the appearance of image quality no objection; the camera returns highly workable files and already beautiful in naturale.rnrnGli downsides however are so many and nothing short of unacceptable; I tried to justify saying that must be for a specific use camera but I could not place it in any studio environment fotografico.rnIn certainly no let alone around passeggiate.rnrnSe the size and portability of this medium mirrorless format should be the its strength, the fact that the screen remains active and not disconnectable ALWAYS makes the exorbitant battery consumption, so that after 150 shots battery was in reserve ... so for a stroll camera turned on as with any fuji succeed you can forget... With Reflex comparison is not even to be taken into considerazione.rnrnUn single point AF ... absurd that a Mirrorless has one single focus point ... I can figure it out on a LEICA optical viewfinder but on a mirrorless is something aberrante.rnIl point AF is really huge in the frame and in the portraits or landscapes makes it impossible to accurately MAF on a particular detail .... for a classic half-length, the AF point takes two eyes and nose ... . assurdo.rnrnOra I can also be disputed that it is an essential machine and intended only for a certain kind of purist use but in 2016, compared to 10,000 Euros I expect a body that make me pure coffee ... pay twice a high-end SLR to have less than half is just a stylistic choice and fashionable to extort money at what idiot who may fall ... as was the Leica Monochrome who are now all in the viewfinder dell'usato.rnrnQualità market electronic and the really bad screen; not even hold a light range such as Fuji X100T ... really deludentand their coloration which tends strongly to the green ... unacceptable to me .... as they say in Milan caxxo PAGO, FIXA DEMAND :-) rnrnAltro large mole, not essential but certainly annoying every time you think of the money spent, it is the fact that the camera in the file view does not indicate the excess of the highlights as any other existing camera on the market. It is not essential but if you evaluate the spending addressed, well it is pretende.rnrnI JPG are virtually unusable in mixed or variable lighting situations as there is at all a balancing mode AUTOMATIC ... everything manually, you need to select the source of light and, in case changes, your JPG's left ruined. This, too, I consider it really insulto.rnrnSistema AF really slow and very often does not reach the MAF ... you must release the button and riprovare.rnProvo to make me fit the single AF point but if that works evil, then someone has only played on "commercial" factor of the first mirrorless license plate Hasselblad.rnrnIl menu is really ridiculous; functionsThey are really basic, so what the hell need a quick menu facade? I swear, there will be yes and no 5 possible settings to customize your camera ... however the ones that changes once boh.rnrnOra ... I could go on for a whole day to describe the defects; I do not discuss the cost, if you talk about Leica or Hasselblad, the price should not be even considered regardless, it's like to want a Rolls Royce, but all you need to achieve a photographic purpose there must essere.rnStiamo talking about a camera that costs as a car ... if you put two lenses as i've had you arrive early to 22.000 euro between body, 45mm and 90mm, however, even f / 2.8 but f / 3,5.rnrnIn substance? just a rip-off camera for those who want to show around that has a Hasselblad ... but then better to aim a series H that at least over time can be updated by changing the back and has a myriad of optical proprie.rnrnCara Hasselblad this time I've really so disappointed, so, tanto.rnGrande home in the digital backs but in mirrorless ... light years away. sent on December 18, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: jpg quality, ergonomics, style Retro Humor Cons: lack of an integrated flashlight for emergency use ... lack "Panorama" function room. Opinion: B bellorndefinito really tired and not the three-dimensional vistarneffetto garantitornrndisplay back really well fattorncopre the luminous range, without breaking as in many other Fuji.rnrnpensavo to keep it just for the trip to Russia and then sell it ... I think I've changed my mind and keep her .. .rnrnun largest neo? rnl'impossibilità creates panoramas during shooting that I consider essential for an ideal camera to take in jpg and churn out "ready" rnrnprovare files for credee sent on July 24, 2016 |
 | Canon 1DX Mark II Pros: white balance, AF video department, AF red, photo-video switch lever, CFast cards, low-end price, the MAF area Cons: Lack crop factor Opinion: I possess a month about this beautiful camera and I wanted to wait to use it well before making judgments affrettati.rnPartiamo from the price; truly exceptional when you consider that together with the camera are given away a player and a CFast CFast Card 64GB, the final price is significantly decreased by about 500 Euros than the first 1Dx versione.rnPoi there are technical aspects and describe them in order as put WHITE sopra.rnBILANCIAMENTO; besides being improved the balances in generating them, Canon has included an automatic balancing function that is called PRIORITY 'FOR WHITE ... unbelievable how under any yellow light this function returns the whites from real still life ... I had two weddings in the closet type room with two incandescent bulbs and the white dress of the bride was wHITE without dominante.rnAF DEPARTMENT VIDEO; beyond the obvious quality of 4K images, but these require cards MINIMUM 128 GB for a few minutes of recovery and then the next costs 500 euro, the thing that makes apprezzare is the AF system truly effective and widely customizable as in the photo department. Interesting the possibility of moving the point Af is the joystick that with a touch of the finger on the touch screen display during shooting and to adjust the speed of movement of fire from one point to another. Before the 1Dx was a video camera for only static images, now it is really two products in one, and I'm using it very much both at the racetrack for the classic video to my children. Can shoot movies with optical f / 1.2 at full aperture without having to play on depth of field in order to have a decent fire is magic pura.rnPUNTI AF ROSSI; It looks like nonsense to those who have never tried the first version 1Dx or 5D3 or 7D series but blacks AF points were really absurd in situations of dark scenes or subjects still blacks or dark. In a marriage is really important moments lose not seeing the active AF point and having to spend time to do it flashing a moment with the joystick ..... now the points are red and you can clearly see anywhere without infastidire.rnLEVA SWITCH; finally anche appeared on the flagship that blessed linkage that allows you to instantly switch from one camera to video mode ... first with 1Dx you had to first set the menu and assign the Livewiev button the desired function ... now it's like to have two buttons. .. one for photos and one for video.rnSCHEDE CFAST; fast, fast .... formatting in 1/10 time than the best commercially CF .... much safer when they occur and without any chance to break or bend any pins as CF ..... still cost a lot but are appreciated by subito.rnAREA MAF; read the features on the site canon that 15% of increased area seemed nonsense no tangible ... instead with eye in the viewfinder the area on which are distributed the 61 AF points appear much wider and pushed beyond the segments of the classic rule third .... all this facilitates possible or not need to redial after the MAF and even the eventual tracking of moving subjects. The difference is there are notevole.rnrnrnPoior all other aspects that other users have already praised but I count now much more accurate scontate.rnAf, Stronger file, 2 mpx more than upset ... but you notice many improvements but that does not make any adequate transition from mk1 mk2 according to me .... the 1Dx was already a great favola.rnrnPiccola note of praise about two factors; post production room and computer.rnI really reveal extremes in processing files, in the light and shadow recovery by returning images to the border with HDR.rnElaborazione of sharpness factors in truly amazing room to have the JPG files ready for use of a quality never vista.rnrn sent on July 05, 2016 |
 | Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5 L II Pros: goal aesthetically pleasing and comfortable in your hand; It is used with relative simplicity. Attractive price by virtue of what it offers. Cons: Conversely known only two deficiencies; the absence of a lens correction profiles for various Adobe software (I have not found) and the lack of LOCK lever for the shift movement. Opinion: Technical data; excellent sharpness throughout the frame (albeit not as the new 16-35 f / 4 or 24-70 f / 2.8 mk2) but sbalorditiva.rnResistenza to flare and really good for backlighting perspective wide.rnTecnicamente optics is perfect and shows no signs of debolezza.rnrnMa the best thing is to creativo.rnQualcuno wrote around that with the digital optical TSE have no reason to exist; I think a great nonsense ... probably those who have denigrated has never used or exploit bene.rnrnUn 24 TSE provides the ability to straighten the vertical but also the possibility of joining in a panoramic shots without distorting anything ... and to have a 14mm view, but with the prospect of a 24 ... essentially a SUPERWIDE that does not excessively stretch the edges ... and just call it !!! rnrnTrasformare a sprint from 18 mpx (my 1Dx) in a file to be 33 mpx at the highest quality and without problems of overlapping geometriche.rnrnRipeto lines; Some say that the digital does not serve well ... does not know them properly. sent on April 23, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X100T Pros: weight and dimensions; aesthetics and ergonomics ... pleasant to the touch and vintage style really exciting. Cons: activation of the menu on the LCD when shooting from optical viewfinder, a little cumbersome advanced commands. Opinion: I start from the end; It is a camera that I like a lot and I think we will stay with lungo.rnrnPiù specifically say it is a camera that, in the manner of use, allows you to take a leap into the past with the quality of presente.rnE 'camera whose peculiarity is certainly the optical wide (35mm equivalent of FF) fixed and not interchangeable; some call his handicap, I consider myself his point forza.rnQuesta choice of Fuji gave this camera a taste of particular challenge; in essence is how to take a cell phone with which very often we were able to capture great moments but with a poor quality ... there is this camera in a pocket, weighs little and is ready ... it leaves in the handle pockets without risk of breakage and if necessary turns on in an instant and is a true point and shoot ... rnAF fast and fairly accurate even if the area of ??the MAF is very wide to prevent the choice of point precided in subjects piccoli.rnDiciamo not a camera for all; is a camera for those who can give up a few shots ... not all the photos you can do but the challenge it tastes impareggiabile.rnrnQuando took my first Canon 1Dx did not feel the same emotions ... this take it in hand, turns and reversals, you look at it, the taste you, I'll scrutinize the ... disassemble with occhi.rnrnLa file quality is very good; Tonight I made 4 photos to my daughter's dance recital .... to 3200 ISO at full opening gave me back the file spectacular printed 20x30 leave stucco also 1Dx or D4S ... is a real thrill shoot with the X100TrnrnPer who this camera: for who is carried away by the emotions of touch, for those who can see the scent of fotografia.rn sent on December 22, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto 054 QR2 Pros: Relatively inexpensive, sturdy, lightweight, strong Cons: Nobody Opinion: Head beyond expectations; It mounts above the 1Dx with 70-200 f / 2.8 IS2 and does not give off any slightest vibration Moreover provides the horizontal movement on the board to make panoramas from multiple scattiFrizione adjustable facilmentePer me is the best head in his range ... robust materials and modern. I recommend the version with quick release. sent on September 26, 2015 |
 | Canon 5Ds Pros: Beautiful as the 5D3, some updates to firmware and to control picture, light, good to the touch, ergonomic ... a classic body 5D ... Cons: tightness of the iso, kneading details, enormous price Opinion: I got to use it for a whole day and I must say that, all in all, aside from an initial enthusiasm for the 50 megapixel, I was a little deluso.rnLe expectations were many but the evidence shows, the results are been poor. rnAnche 100 iso raw files are mixed when it opens 100% .rnLa same photos I shot with 18 mpx of 1Dx and interpolandoli in PP, I took them to 50 mpx ..... better 1Dx. .. paradoxical but vero.rnIngrandendo the file to 100% the photo loses incisiveness, exactly as I had seen it happen on the D800 Nikon.rnPer of everything else, is a very good car as the whole series 5 but the high ISO have made quite .... step back to 3200 ISO is identical to the 5D2 ... not bad but less than what you would buy the aspetta.rnrnSe? no ..... I take a Leica M9 rather that at least gives me emotions forti.rnLa 5Ds, in my opinion, not good even for the still life and controlled light and I say this in light of my all Canon L series lenses and all last serious, both zoom and fixed, so nothing due to factors esterni.rnrnCome already expecting,It is a camera designed to meet the marketing; Who owns a 6D or 5D3, discourage the passage ...... interpolated in Photoshop that you get the same file.rnrnqui you can download a file esempiornhttps: //www.dropbox.com/s/0g2wqqwed1y5an1/senza%20titolo .cr2? dl = 0RN sent on June 17, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: robustness, sharpness, speed, compactness, light weight, price, especially stabilizer Perfect for mounting infrared filters without classical problems of many lenses. Cons: for now no one except that it is f / 4 instead of f / 2.8 or greater Opinion: I had the 24 f / 1,4 I loved and still love as optical sharpest-ever all; I can say I tried all the L series complete canon latest version and the 24 was and is the most nitido.rnFacendo much landscaping was looking for something even more wide of 24mm but it was impossible to find a comparable sharpness; the 16-35 and 17-40 do pity compared with this new jewel f / 4 and all fixed more than 24 non-mountain wide circular filters, so impossible a upgrade.rnAvevo afraid to leave my disk for this Zoom but are fully appagato.rnNitidezza BREATHTAKING up to 16mm at the edges ... just the latest cm pulls slightly but remains unparalleled to losses of 16-35 f / 2,8 and 17-40 f / 4 ... the fretellone f / 2.8 I never wanted to take because I've always considered one of the worst optical canon.rnQuesto new 16-35 instead highly recommend it to TUTTIrnNon add anything else .... spettacolarernrnFlare and clarity as well as color clearly on another planet compared to f / 2,8rnrnrnrnrnio I paid € 1,000.00 VATinclusarn sent on July 04, 2014 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: High iso but nothing sensational Cons: Lots: AF slow with any optical joystick absence, missing buttons for fast adjustments, lackluster screen and reddish and many other difettucci Opinion: Before giving my opinion precisely my present set of cameras to better expose from that point of view I parlo.rnAttualmente: Eos 1Dx - Eos 5D3 - EOS 6D - Eos 5D2rnCredo this Centre that already suffice to adjust my thinking and make it clear that My words are to be evaluated well because obviously I'm talking about a "cheap" in comparison with the EOS series ... MUST weigh up my parole.rnrnSull 'wave of the thousands of excellent reviews of this 6D, I wanted to take it as a whim for have fun and put in the hands of my son a camera body Easy to start the photo (sorry but I never conceived the idea of ??starting with an APSC ... is counterproductive in my opinion). rnrnSubito excited about the high iso so this camera is famous now and I would say VERY resemble the 1Dx ... kudos to canon that has well married and ISO quality file.rnrnDopo an initial enthusiasm, however, the 6D has been a disappointment after another. rnCome ever? rnNon so much for the prerogatives of the camera which I think have the best price-quality but since the Recently from the previoussions I was expecting much more in the basic functions ... and the precise subito.rnrnrnAFrnsistema fast AF almost like the 5D2 ... nothing more, I would say that in low-light conditions and when times are tight even peggio.rnSui points side is much better than the 5D2 but the central is nothing to do ... a disappointment compared the expectations described in recensioni.rnIl backlight sends the ball ... went to church entrance ... Put it on a slow AF and imprecise (of course I had two bodies ready and I quickly recovered without losing the moment) .... and all this by fitting an EF 50mm f / 1,2 perspective that I would be in lightning MAF ... with the 5D2 and the 135 f / 2 instead ... no problem even without the help of the ST-E2 as did the 6D.rnIl AF system has disappointed me a lot .... in optimal conditions is faster but when the situation is critical, better the old carroarmato.rnrnrnTVrnin TV mode the camera I was stunned ... I would have expected a rather underexposed, out of the church, measurementspot on the bride in the sun more complete, the camera has overexposed by at least 2 stops .... that precise time was 1/4000 iso 200rnAnche here luckily I had the second 5D3 body ... that does not sing a shot ... only a few stylus bruciachiatino curves gown but my fault that I had not dictated a great time at MODE? MANUALE.rnrnCOMANDIrni buttons at the top of the camera are pietà.rnarrivato from other cameras you really feel so much the lack of pulsed "dual option" ... rnad example on the other with the AF button adjusts the AF mode and the mode ONE Shoot or burst with the 6D ... no ... well, there are two buttons distinti.rne this obviously brings its repercussions ... if you want to adjust the white balance, you must enter the menu with the button Qrnidem for other adjustments. rnrnGrandissima lack even the M-fn button next to the shutter release button; for those who make flash photography (I use them more and wirelessly) this button is a must for accurate readings and measurements and not random .... 6D is missing on me and very annoying ... who uses flash knows how this blocks the flow of lavoro.rnrnAltra great lack is the Joystick ... this is a flaw for those who do not come from xxd bodies because it is essential for be able to exploit it in the selection of the AF point ... with a click selects the center point or the active one already selected, and then move where you want ... with the 6D instead you have to remove your thumb, move the button most uncomfortable of all (top to the right) and then move the finger and go back to the ring and move around but not so simple ... every point movement requires physical movement of the finger ... instead of the joystick is ideal for rapidità.rnrnrnPDCrnil preview button PDC is really non-existent ... small, very low and uncomfortable ... for those who make landscaping is impraticabile.rnrnrnWI-FIrnhi-fi really slow ... too slow ... used with a macbook pro retina 15 "of 2013, we employed about 10 "to move an image to 2 meters away so the maximum range of the Wi-Fi set to q hoc.rnDireilmost inutilizzabile.rnrnrnUn positive side in comparison to the 5D2 in LiveView mode ... the "bubble" is also visible image while superimposed on the 5D3 you have to turn off the liveview and activate the bubble .... this is a great comfort to work in real-timernrnrnrnrnPRECISAZIONE: rni files are of excellent quality, nothing to ridirernle my opinions are a little biased since arriving from foreign series 1 and 5 from semprernè a great camera for those who are not in a hurry in the photographic process; for landscapers is a godsend as well as for ritrattistirnda strongly advise to matrimonialisti and to sportivirnrnrn sent on June 22, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: very solid, quiet, practical, reasonable price considering the qualities ... great alternative to the 1Dx Cons: Two major flaws for me coming from the 1Dx: 1) inability to see the bubble with LiveView enabled (the 6D does) 2) vertical grip joystick positioned to really cu ... or to say the least unusable Opinion: until a few days ago I was the owner of only one series of Canon ... I sold my 1DmkIV and my 1Dx.rnAssurdo but vero.rnNon know how he would manage the 5DmkIII nell'avifauna but I'm happy for the rest of the downgrade done ... I recovered money, I have the exact same satisfactions and not feel the lack of any function ... in fact I gained in portability and leggerezza.rnRitengo the 5DmkIII on par with the 1Dx as the quality of the file ... I took in long and wide around today to see what this passage from getting worse and I have to say that the files are no known perfetti.rnNon differenza.rnLa I guessed most of the machine until oggi.rnSempre holder of Canon 1Dx, now I have to think again on purchases and I admit I first spent extra money to not have gained nulla.rnIl AF system will respond very well ... maybe a little burst but I've never used it even on my old ammiraglia.rnrnPoteva have more burst? rnPoteva have two CF ? rnPoteva have built-in flash? rnPoteva have GPS? rnPoteva have WiFi? rnrnè a semiprofessionaland very professional ... it's the right balance between spending and resa.rnfile sensational qualities and really sorprendenti.rnrnLa choice of a CF and SD is ideal; CF prefer the rapidity while the SD prefers the ability to insert it into your notebook without the need for card readers ... what do you want to più.rnrnBah ... I read so many complaints about anything ... and I think that surface ... is perfect as was his predecessor for his time .... a really nice shot. sent on February 26, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: lightweight, compact and crystal clear view ... really excellent ... great travel companion for street and reportage city or landscapes ... Cons: There are two flaws, one of which is important and one not. 1) vignetting marked but easily correctable but I always leave ..... 2) inability to be used with infrared filters as the antireflection coatings create significant disturbances in conversions ... Opinion: is a great fixed lens ... does not pull the edges, Nidito until the last pixel of the external part is that the corners to lati.Leggerissimo, discreet if we consider that it is a f / 1.4 and excellent solid construction and pleasant to the touch ... as then all the L series of Canon.rnE 'perspective as not to miss in your backpack if you love to use fixed lenses ... when combined with the 50mm and the 85mm kit complete a dream sent on December 28, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Lightweight, compact, pleasant to the touch, sharp enough at f / 1,4 in relation to the type of lens, very fast. Cons: of course if the price was lower than most would like, but obviously part of the game ... if you do not have enough money, that's fine also the younger brother f / 1.4 Opinion: All describe heavy but for me it is absolutely ... indeed, coming from 85 f / 1,2 I find it even lighter and comodo.rnLo already knew from a previous purchase, at the time I did not like but then increased my knowledge of the camera and now I find I really wanted tanto.rnNon defects particular, I consider the perspective ambientati for portraits and reportage ... then the sharpness is not the most important factor ... but the blurred and his pleasure in the colors are its real strength ... then if you close the aperture to f / 2, then things change dramatically and it is also used for still life and architecture, but in those diaphragms advice Brother f / 1,4 which results from turning a little to the almost famous identici.rnRispetto 85 f / 1,2 flaw just a little bit at full aperture for sharpness but especially for aberrations evident when the light is strong ... even in low-light situations aberrations svaniscono.rnrnrnun suggestion: to shoot in low light series of 5:01, I highly recommend the use of Canon St-E2with its infrared helps the MAF ... or the flash in IR mode but is much heavier sent on December 20, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Pros: a lens ultra defined from center to edge. Bright and adapts to any genre. Putty in his blurred, fast AF and in his light in the uses Cons: only the lens hood that binds very old system in rotation with the camera body, but apart from the unpleasant feeling nellavvitaggio, does not create any problem. Opinion: Paradoxically lower price if he considers the high quality ... equal to various mkII other optics (see 85 and 24, and 24-70) ..... of course, the cheaper the better :-) RNE my optical preferita.rnHo a park optic envy but this ugly duckling is what gratifies me more ... excellent quality in everything and for everything to do tutto.rnUn real lens ... great trips to be light and have that light required for portraits notturni.rnrnE 'quite wide but retains a degree of blur at the best suitable optical ritratti.rnCome Street is really perfettarnCome landscape has a three-dimensional ineccepibile.rnrnSono happy with this purchase ... . bought and then resold to monetize ... then, just could, immediately resumed .... if it feels too lack when it is left sent on August 29, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x Pros: Optics really convenient for those individuals moving back and forth .... football, basketball, volleyball, cars, motorcycles, rally and more. rnRapido and precise ... sharpness with multiplier really stupefacenternPossibilità to add additional external multipliers Cons: is an f / 4 when used from 200 to 400 and a smooth f / 5.6 x 1.4 incorporatornil inserting the cost I consider it proportionate to the wide possibilities offered by the use though still very high and the reach of most Opinion: What can I say? RNE as always with a view of canon L series and then you expect the best ... and does not disappoint in this respect .... rnVeramente razor-sharp optics and also fast although it is a f/4rnIl internal multiplier has a yield whose presence is not absolutely known .... bringing this or not bringing this is the same thing qualitatively speaking, it gives those who are often most in mm oro.rnAnche f / 5,6 maintains sharpness and velocità.rnPer those who love the ability to zoom in, it is certainly better than a 400mm f / 2, 8 fixed ..... but perhaps of greater sharpness fruibilità.rnOvvio we lose one stop of light .... how important it is up to the buyer only dirlo.rnrnrnqui are some sample shots nitidezzarnhttp :/ / www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=46905&l=it sent on May 30, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: great lens, sharp and fast ... excellent stabilizer in mode 2 really effective for panning at 1/100 to hand liberadirei also pretty light considering its kind and size prestazionila new pack now includes two compartments for the multipliers 1.4x and 2x ......... .. very comfortable trips Cons: there are no cons in this context ... obviously unnecessary to reiterate that does a bang Opinion: perspective without really confrontornnon we still find no fault or limiternè a lens which of course is for those who would not otherwise exploits it really pays for itself for its cost really altornnessuna aberration, vignetting really minimal to nonexistent limit (on FF) , deformation assenternnitidezza fabulous even at full aperture ... obviously remains a perspective that requires determination in the grip otherwise it undergoes the effect of the sail on its size when montanto monopiedernSi makes necessary a head from easel / monopod that supports a nice weight and good torsionirnrnOttimo also the fact that in the housing is included a second leg (short) for special needs sent on May 16, 2013 |
 | Canon 1DX Pros: AF really beyond all limits ... ad hoc adjustments extremely precise and simple. With optical light last series 2X multiplier and third series, you do not notice any decline it will gust of quality. Impressive files that develops this camera body. Iso truly exceptional high, I could take some photographs at a wedding with 17mm at ISO 51,200 well and the picture is still very usable. At 3200 ISO, the hottest value, the machine goes there for a walk ..... is like the noise of the 5DmkII 800 iso .... practically an excellent picture. Cons: I still have not found any downside. I tried to search far and wide but I do not really want to vedo.rnse call it a flaw, what's not to like is that the magnification on the monitor goes well beyond the 100% misleading assessment of the focus .. . i did not know I was deleting several files and saying bad words because the MAF was not working .... morality?? on the computer instead were super focused and incisive beyond all expectations ..... is not a defect but you have to know and believe that the eye ricordarlo.rnAd maximum magnification even gets to 200% ... imagine the result :-) Opinion: As someone said before its release, Canon has redeemed the great and this time he's centered in the middle of the needs of users. Simplicity and accuracy. A body to which, considering the price-performance of the above, there are very few 6000 euro (metaphorically of course). Worth every euro spent. And 'the best body I've ever picked up and I do not mean just because it is my ... try it and then you'll understand what it dire.rnrnIl price? rnbeh, all in all not so high when you consider that the 1Ds mkIII out addirittua cost 9500 Euros ... This only costs $ 6100 as the first blow ... and then maybe scenderà.rnFino it comes out a 1DsmkIV this is the flagship of 1 and the price seems to me dropped sent on September 25, 2012 |
 | Canon 1D Mark IV Pros: This is my first series body 1, and then I do not have many proper comparison but I can say that, coming from the 5DMKII I found myself just fine although a little upset menu is crowded. Cons: The sensor aps-h, characteristic sports, takes a little bokeh in portraits but not that much. Opinion: I consider it a very formidable machine. In tests the competitor Nikon often seems to bypass it but then on the field, things are very different. The sensor denser (in line with the density of cmq 5DMKII) returns a frightening detail while the Nikon cmq more softness. Obviously, the more pixels requires more precision but for a true pro should not be a problem, I perform panning at 1/125 sec 300mm don the freehand ... with monopod go down a little more. ISO management excellent; differences over the 6400 does not perceive HY sensitivity beyond that no one ever goes, so any comparison is useless to the practical side. It 's true, to monitor the Nikon looks better but then in print, without correcting any noise, canon files are the best; printing alone eliminates 80% of the noise ... few people point out this and evaluate only those files to monitor unfortunately. Tests magazine I do not I rate them because they speak only of evidence in the "wind tunnel" ..... actually on the field, things change and much .... either for better or worse. has a fantastic exposure that you can entrust with your eyes closed. In bright light scenes (in AV mode) is not overexpose to recover strange readings and ditto with dark scenes ...... say that law all well and realistically. Has the ability to also have a multi spot metering in strong contrasts in handy. I consider it a machine that grandmother no way inferior to anyone except the FF for portraits and landscapes, but who does, you know, she was born for the sport ;-) sent on June 07, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: lightweight, compact, rugged, sealed, excellent color, excellent sharpness Cons: is "only" an f / 4 and distortion at 17mm rather obvious but easily corrected in PP Opinion: I consider it very good perspective. When compared to big brother lost 16-35 in a comparison of distortion and maximum opening but wins hands down for color management ..... greens and blues eats them for breakfast, lunch and dinner. The yield on incarnate is nothing short of spectacular (although it is not a perspective for portraits). If you evaluate the price, it remains one of the best optics. sent on June 06, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
