RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Canon 1DX Mark II : Specifications and Opinions




Canon 1DX Mark II, front

Canon 1DX Mark II, back

Canon 1DX Mark II, top



The Canon 1DX Mark II is a reflex camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 20.2 megapixels manufactured from 2016. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 409600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 14 FPS x 170 RAW, unlimited JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 6000 €;
76 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  


SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuyPhotos


 Sensor
 Format   Fullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)
 Resolution   20.2 megapixel
 ISO sensitivities   50 - 409600
 File formats   JPEG, RAW

 Esposure
 Shutter speeds   30" - 1/8000
 Exp. compensation   +/- 5 stops at 1/3 steps
 Exp. modes   M, S, A, P
 Metering modes   Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot

 Features
 Mount   Canon EF (click here to view al compatible lenses)
 Stabilization   No
 Autofocus (AF areas)   61
 Continuos shooting (with autofocus)   14 FPS x 170 RAW, unlimited JPEG
 Continuos shooting (without autofocus)   16 FPS x 170 RAW, unlimited JPEG
 Live View   Yes
 MLU/SS   Yes, Silent Shooting and Mirror Lock Up
 Dust reduction   Yes
 Video mode   4K (4096 x 2160p) @ 60 FPS
 WiFi   No
 GPS   Yes
 USB   micro-USB (USB 3.0)
 USB Charging   No

 Built and notes
 Touchscreen   Yes
 LCD   3.2", 1024 x 768 pixels, fixed
 Viewfinder   Optical, coverage 100%, 0.76x
 Flash   No
 Storage   CFast
 Storage, Slot 2   CF
 Shutter   Mechanical
 Battery   Li-Ion (Canon LP-E19, capacity 29.16 Wh)
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   1530 g
 Dimensions   158 x 167 x 82 mm
Buy Canon 1DX Mark II, buy on Ebay


Reviews

What do you think about this camera?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 182000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





avatarjunior
sent on March 27, 2017

Pros: ISO, Speed, AF

Cons: Oil spatters on CMOS !!!!

Opinion: The 1DX MK II is a great upgrade to the old 1dx, the raws files are a lot cleaner, the AF-Trackingspeed form the AI-Servo III shows a great improvement to the older one...My only problem with this camera are the oil spatters on the sensor, it is not normal that the entirely sensor is dirty after only 1000 shots with a such type of camera, i hope Canon will fix this problem in the near future !

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on November 14, 2019

Pros: Series 1, reactivity AF, AF to f/8 on all points, RED AF POINT, IQ, high ISO hold, top tropicalization, commands, 4K to 60fps, FullHD at 120fps, GPS, size and weight, etc. etc.

Cons: I would have preferred a double Cfast 2.0 slot

Opinion: Of the series 1 I had the 1D Mark III and then the 1DX (both fabulous), and now waiting for the release of the 1DX Mark III, I wanted to take this 1DX II... Na beast! I had to think again that it was a slight upgrade of the 1DX, the changes are there, among many things it is much more responsive, the AF of the latest generation and finally the point of RED AF (configurable in two lighting intensity), in Under the 5D Mark III and 5D Mark IV, I was having to try to figure out where the AF's point was, no more. The files are much more workable, and allow greater recoveries of the shadow areas. The HIGH ISO estate is superior to the fantastic 5D Mark IV. The 20mp are for my needs more than enough, I do not make exaggerated crop, I always prefer to compose the frame well according to my needs, then if you need a few megapixels more use the 5D Mark IV. The only flaw in my opinion, is the use of two CF and Cfast 2.0 formats, I would have preferred to have both slots with Cfast 2.0 (-5) Conclusion, I was very pleased with this 1DX Mark II (9.5)

avatarsupporter
sent on November 05, 2019

Pros: It is and does to everything I expected.

Cons: Knowing what I was buying, nothing.

Opinion: Purchased to flank the 5D4 and 5DsR for cars/bikes. Fantastic ergonomics, well balanced even with the 100-400 L II and the 500 L II that I often use freehand, feeling robust, responsive and burst modular, even the af is modular and better (but not much) than the af of mine 5. The file is easily workable, if I really have to make a note sometimes I miss the 30mpx of the 5D4. In my case its use is confined to only use "on the track", preferring for obvious reasons one of the 5 without battery grip for other things. I don't make videos, so I can't write anything about it. I took advantage of an opportunity to purchase, well-maintained machine and with a few shots. After a "season" of intense use, very but very happy.

avatarjunior
sent on September 19, 2017

Pros: General quality, robustness, autofocus system, speed, battery life, dynamic range, reliability, high ISO quality, customization, Full HD and 4k video performance, unique color science, 4k 50/6op

Cons: No audio during slowmotion, 4k and slowmotion fully usable only with CFast 2.0, no external 4k recording cards

Opinion: At a first superficial examination Canon EOS-1D X Mark II would seem a slight facelift of the older sister, but in reality it is a new generation tool that, without prejudice to the incredible photographic qualities, offers a series of tools of high Level also to videomakers. Given the high quality of the 1D X Markk II, it is justifiable to think that the improvements are few, but just use it a few days to understand that, notwithstanding some limits incomprehensibly imposed by Canon, this machine would risk being perfect. Dynamic range of the RAW file incredibly extended, JPG much softer but nevertheless of excellent level, burst of reference, infallible autofocus system and deeply modulable to your own needs, performance at high ISO incredible, robustness, Reliability, extreme battery life are the strengths ID this model. On the other hand, the touch screen is very little exploited, the body is (inevitably) very heavy and the menus are as always very complex and sometimes unclear. The video compartment offers 4k of excellent quality that however denounces a crop very obvious and can not be recorded externally. The full HD is exceptional, with the possibility of turning at 50p or 60p, there is the slow motion 100/120p, and you can turn even 50/60p in 4k. But in this context, it seems that Canon has wanted to neutering this monster of performance, perhaps to protect the C series. Very controversial choice, because C100 Mark II, C300 and the new C200 are still struggling to keep up with the products of other brands. Why offer an exceptional slowmotion, but amputate the audio? Why not allow the ability to shoot in 4k with external device to get a 422 10 bit color depth? Yet it allows you to shoot in 4k 50/60, feature that many competitors do not offer! Ultimately, great machine, which maybe a serious firmware update on the video side could become absolutely perfect.

avatarjunior
sent on April 20, 2017

Pros: Autofocus, maneuverability, disturbance to 1d m IV, robustness etc. etc. RECOMMENDED!

Cons: Silent shot of de stappa! ;-) sorry! But the silenced shutter is noisier than a distracted tractor! 2) caricature lan link, only succeeded with eos utility, and not via ftp protocol. 3) High battery consumption compared to 1d m IV at least twice as high.

Opinion: When I try the field I will update. For the moment I have done some tests and I have to say that it is at least 2 steps forward to the unforgettable 1d M IV, which I am AFFECTABLE! In fact it was difficult for me to replace it I confess it. In these tests I saw a latitude of pose (dynamic range to mean ;-)) absolutely fantastic, the "asa" yield (sorry but i'm "iso" i can not say it) and its disturbance are absolutely out of the ordinary, revealing As canon engineers have worked us well. Great setting af and its picture style that have at least 3 different factors to adjust for definition. It has infinitely configurable configuration for all needs. Well-tune LCD monitor that returns a well made prew. It has an exceptionally brilliant delay of just 0.055 which can further be reduced to 0.033 (I'll let you know how it will just happen to have its baptism of fire) .rnRimane the tare of the "clickSilent "silence is not (it was more than 1d m IV) .nn BATTESIMO DEL FUOCO: Then yesterday I tried it on the field, during a well-fed dance and work load. Rn As" review "there was Even the unknown "light" (that is, each participant can ask for the variations of scene lights as he wants, which he can not do in the competition because an "atmosphere" could influence judges by distracting them from the technical and artistic aspect that each dancer expresses) .FREE FIRE: absolutely perfect at all times engages the subject and keeps the fire even with very little light. The only thing to be aware of is the speed of fire to settle well because for example I was slow and in a couple Of cases did not make time to fuze (though a couple of cases over 4,000 shots) .rRITART OF ROTATE: Further reduced. However, giving up the stabilization check (with the mono piAnd even deactivating it to gain in definition) it can further reduce 0.033. Done! And you have the real feeling of immeasurability. In fact, too, I have to do my hand, because used to the old car, initially I had some difficulty, nothing can not be exceeded though.rnPOSITION: I lowered the contrast of the picture style to the minimum, which theater is important to keep under control As much as possible, cut lights etc. etc. A great dynamic range that can contrast with exposure differences of at least 3 stops more than the previous models, so you have a total of 5 0 6 stops total latitude on which you can rely on 25,000 and broken iso ( However, to be checked EVER case by case), let's say that all iso, even h3, the range remains completely under control and returns an absolutely natural grayscale. Even the "ISO yield" in my opinion is better (but it could be a "feeling" dictated by enthusiasm), whichEqual adjustment has a much better result in display response, certainly due to the best dynamic range.rnDISTURBO (PIXEL GRAN ASA / ISO ECC. ECC): Absolutely another planet compared to the 1d mark IV. I worked quietly up to 25,000 asa! I pushed up to 40,000! NO problem of disturbance. Although, objectively, the image is overwhelmed by sensitivity, due to the "high-pitched noise control", which is increasingly heavy, and to me this is a nuisance. So I recommend a lower intensity adjustment to return more naturalness to the image. However up to 1,600 asa the grain is absolutely absent as if you hit at 50! Up to 6,400 is really as minimal as the old 400. Up to 12,600 as the old 800! So compared to my reference model I bought about 4 stop disruptions! DEFINITION: ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT PREVIOUS! BnBATTERIA: Consume 'in digit! With the old car and battery I faced at least a coupleOf events of this amount of photos. With this and its new battery I came to 2/3 of the event with lan and gps turned off. I put the old battery to end the show and at the end of the job I had consumed about 55%. My advice is, if you work, to buy it, even working in the studio, unless you have to do particular magnifications. Why take a good step. I understand that it is costly, but believe me in a job prospect in which you seek uncompromised quality, the price difference with the 5th series is less than what you can think and is well damped anyway in a very short time.rnMy advice Even to the evolved hobbyists who want to move towards the 5th series, that price difference is largely "repayed" by the difference of yield. R Lan connection for the moment only succeeded through eos utility and not via ftp protocol




Photos taken with Canon 1DX Mark II

Foto
Blue Tree Frog
by Fabrizio Moglia
112 comments, 7695 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The flight dell'ulula
by Alessandro Beconi
168 comments, 15546 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Golden Dawn with Grizzly
by Alessandro Beconi
129 comments, 5253 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Exchange of gift from Albanella Minore
by Samuele Sereni
119 comments, 9208 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Deadly mouth .....
by Luca Ferranti
77 comments, 13305 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP
 [editors pick]
Foto
Family Lite
by Samuele Sereni
97 comments, 7423 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
You're my Prey
by Alessandro Beconi
96 comments, 4571 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Howls
by Nangi
105 comments, 3420 views  
HI RES 5.4 MP
 [editors pick]
Foto
Steppe eagle
by Nejadi
70 comments, 4381 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Furcifer pardalis.
by Fiora Andrea
68 comments, 3341 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Diving training
by Stefano Ceci
84 comments, 2537 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Quarrel
by Samuele Sereni
84 comments, 2643 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Sunset with Dinner
by Roberto Parmiggiani
65 comments, 3252 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Long-eared owl
by Steve Mackay
60 comments, 3800 views  [editors pick]
Foto
A strange enemy .....
by Alessandro Beconi
75 comments, 7297 views
Foto
Egret
by Paolo Piccolino
81 comments, 5146 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Benjamin's theory
by Corradini Corrado
69 comments, 3821 views
Foto
A walk with mom
by Alessandro Beconi
88 comments, 5873 views
Foto
Inca Terns!
by Sjvirum
100 comments, 3560 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Teal
by Claudio Cortesi
127 comments, 4784 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Lake Rosset
by Luca Casale
38 comments, 8530 views
Foto
Blades of light on the Giau
by Diego.armando.parafango
112 comments, 4494 views  
HI RES 10.8 MP

Foto
Pin-tailed Sandgrouse - Pterocles alchata
by Tomás Martins
50 comments, 2832 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Jump!
by Steve Mackay
57 comments, 4174 views
Foto
Sofy
by Mpar
32 comments, 4251 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Eyes in the storm
by Nangi
98 comments, 4232 views  
HI RES 8.4 MP

Foto
Among the colors
by Giovanni Antonini
48 comments, 3538 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Spllllaaaaaaassssshhhhhh2!
by Diego.armando.parafango
96 comments, 2973 views
Foto
Fight between buzzards
by Loris Polidori
105 comments, 2708 views
Foto
Snowy owl in golden light
by Alessandro Beconi
86 comments, 3225 views
Foto
Frosone vs Verdone
by Roberto Parmiggiani
51 comments, 2892 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Magic Mondeval
by Diego.armando.parafango
100 comments, 3090 views  
HI RES 17.1 MP

Foto
Shake!
by Memy
48 comments, 1806 views
Foto
Finch
by Loris Polidori
107 comments, 2587 views  
HI RES 4.5 MP

Foto
Muskox
by Alessandro Bormida
89 comments, 4457 views
Foto
Eurasian Wigeon
by Claudio Cortesi
66 comments, 2682 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Air fight
by Loris Polidori
113 comments, 1876 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.






 ^

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me