JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EOS R5 : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EOS R5 is a mirrorless camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 45 megapixels manufactured from 2020. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 102400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 20 FPS x 180 RAW, 350 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 3287 €;

164 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10

Sensor
Format	Fullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	45 megapixel (pixel pitch 4.39 μm)
Sensor type	CMOS (sensor readout: 1/60)
ISO sensitivities	50 - 102400
File formats	JPEG, RAW
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/8000
Exp. compensation	+/- 5 stops at 1/3 steps
Exp. modes	M, S, A, P
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Canon RF (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	Yes
Autofocus (AF areas)	1053
Continuos shooting (with autofocus)	20 FPS x 180 RAW, 350 JPEG
Pre-Burst	No
Live View	Yes
Video mode	C8K (8192x4320p) @ 30 FPS
WiFi	Yes
GPS	No
USB	USB-C (3.2 2x2)
USB Charging	Yes
Computing Features
ND Long Exposure	No
Pixel Shift	Yes, in-camera (400 megapixel)
Focus Stacking	Partial, it requires computer software to merge the photos
Startrail/Composite mode	No
Astrotracer	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	Yes
LCD	3.2", 2.1 Mdots, 1024 x 680 pixels, fully articulating
Viewfinder	Electronic, coverage 100%, 0.76x
Viewfinder resolution	1600 x 1200 px
Flash	No
Storage	CFExpress Type B
Storage, Slot 2	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II)
Shutter	Mechanical and electronic
Battery	Canon LP-E6NH, 15.33 Wh
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	740 g
Dimensions	138 x 97 x 88 mm
Buy
Canon EOS R5, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Ecka

sent on October 10, 2023

Pros: High image quality of both stills and video. Wonderful AF system. A very handy flippy-touchscreen. Good IBIS. Great ergonomics. Nice EVF. Impressive burst speed for 45mp FF. Well implemented manual focus assistance.

Cons: Two different types of memory card slots (SD+CFX). The longest exposure time in electronic shutter mode is only 1/2sec. It doesn't recognize people automatically and you have to switch people/animal modes, because while it does track people in animal mode, it does much better in people AF mode.

Opinion: I'm using the R5 for almost two years now. It's the best camera I have ever owned. The most amazing thing about it must be the AF system. It can literally track insects. It's amazing. I've shot flies in flight )). Birds, animals, people, objects - easy task, no problem at all, even in low light. The battery life is better than I expected, but it's not DSLR level, not even close. My 6D could last for a week of stills on the same LP-E6 battery, while the R5 can only go for a day or two. Not a huge problem, but the batteries will wear out much faster due to more charging cycles. The flippy touchscreen is excellent. High quality picture, good brightness and contrast, very responsive. Fantastic. I would really prefer to have two identical card slots, for two CFX-B cards. Because using two sets of incompatible cards is inconvenient to say the least and rather pointless. Because SD cards can't handle the highest bitrate video modes. Plus, SD cards are just less reliable. Perfect size for my hands. Well balanced. But I would prefer to have the Menu button and the on/off switch on the right side of the camera. Not a deal-breaker though. I don't shoot much at high ISOs. But those few times that I did "crank it up to 11", I mean up to 12800, didn't disappoint (for stills). It's capable of producing very usable results at high ISOs. And the colors are not simply falling apart like they used to on older cameras. Low ISOs are beautiful with good dynamic range. Lastly, it has the anti-aliasing (AA) filter, which affects sharpness, color and contrast, while reducing moire pattern and Bayer CFA artifacts. Which is good for video and people photography. But not so good for stills like wildlife, landscapes or macro (which I love). However, the AA filter in R5 is surprisingly good, not too destructive. So, no complaints here. Great camera. Best experience. Highly recommended!

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Sabbiavincent

sent on November 27, 2024

Pros: Density sensor, CFexpress B memory card, AA filter, light meter, white balance, stabilizer etc, has so many pros

Cons: Noise, SD card, AF lock lower than R6 but only in low light, pixel shift only jpeg

Opinion: Decisive leap towards the super dense sensor by Canon for its class 5, unfortunately. The car itself is not bad, on the contrary. The sensor is of good quality, the raw decent, only that it is a purely studio camera, with meditated landscapes, thoughtful portraits. We no longer have the ALL-AROUND we were used to with the 5 series. Can it be used in other areas with good results? Definitely, but it's not his field. I would have preferred to have a camera with fewer pixels and more high ISO resistance and the option of a superpixelated version eventually. The AA filter, exposure meter, white balance are good for those who shoot in Jpeg. The pixel shift only in jpeg is absurd, a joke. On the video side, on the other hand, it has many useful things starting from the ALL-I, but also here: RAW shooting only on the CFexpress, when Blackmagic saves in raw on SD. It is the usual Canon that positions the cameras in market segments always giving the impression of having bought a good product but a bit neutered, it is true that no one gives anything away, but this is its only superpixelated mirrorles, an effort could have been made and instead even in its Mk2 it has remained anchored to this philosophy, never mind. My opinion is: it makes sense to buy it only if you practice certain genres listed above.

Cirillo Giovanni

sent on November 27, 2024

Pros: viewfinder , articulated screen , file , white balance , AF

Cons: Power button on the left, batteries last short, overheats, operating speed, dominant magenta

Opinion: So let's start from the assumption that I love this car, in my opinion it is a body that allows you to do everything from wedding, landscape portrait to naturalistic ,,, the file is very malleable it scrambles as you want. The AF system is excellent especially the locking of the subjects and the eye focus, it focuses even in very little light, but the general operating speed remains a little slow especially when you wake up the camera quickly from standbye, I took many photos I find the file wonderful for how it manages to give me the opportunity to work it but it has a very big flaw this dominate magenta really invasive when you shoot with little light. The power button on the left I have not yet got used to it and I will never succeed, another problem is overheating especially when you work in the summer it happened to me that it also crashed with photos unfortunately not only with video, in addition the batteries do not last long. Even in the studio with the use of flashes it behaves very well, in short, overall I still consider it an excellent camera with which to really do everything in an excellent way.

Andre-3-89

sent on September 24, 2024

Pros: PRO Background Camera -

Cons: Photo-video switch

Opinion: I have been using this camera for some time now and I have been lucky enough to use it in the most diverse contexts. As for the photographic compartment, the consideration I can make is that it is 100% performing in all contexts. The professional who equips himself with this tool finds in his hands a series of functions that leave no misunderstandings, It is a PRO camera and it does it very well. If you want, the only exception lies in the "nature \\ sports photography" environment where, to date, we have undoubtedly more specialized and adapted cameras such as 1DXmk3 (in the Olympus of cameras) and R3-R1 (the latter, never personally tested), but we are still talking about cameras ultra devoted to operational speed in all its forms and therefore it is normal that they are more performing in this sense, But I can assure you that we are talking about a complete and high-performance tool in all its parts. As for the video compartment, I can say that, in addition to the huge number of possible settings, it knows how to return wonderful files. 4K 120 fps is something fantastic, 8K I have never even tried it so as not to put PC, HD and the whole file management system in crisis. I encountered the problem of overheating on one occasion, in Spain, in July it was 40 degrees outside, in the sealed shed almost 50, after a few minutes of video it began to report overheating and shortly after it went into lockdown. We are talking about a critical condition for a human being, let alone for the camera. Common only negative note, but just to point out something, in switching from video to photo you have to do a combination of 3 buttons (mode-info-select) instead of operating the classic mechanical video-photo selector. It seems like an idiot but in an excited context it annoys a lot. I think it's something solved with the MK2 As a final consideration I would say that it is a 100% PRO camera intended for an audience decidedly beyond the amateur; I certainly don't deserve it!

Mattia Campos

sent on June 04, 2024

Pros: After the R3 there is still it, some components are of "old" conception, but the performance is still superior to all the other R's after 4 years.

Cons: Outdated key ergonomics and viewfinder

Opinion: It's a camera that has never "taken" me that much, but I wanted to try it to get an idea.. and I did well.. In fact, after the R3, this R5 remains Canon's second (and only) purely professional mirrorless camera. It is no coincidence that the CPS had "warned" me that my R6ii is considered by them to be an amateur camera only and with R5 I would have seen a "nice" difference... Actually, nothing tragic... It is just a matter of having personally ascertained that the autofocus performance of the R5, understood as the ability to recognize and lock on to a subject and to keep it in focus, is still slightly superior to the most recent R6ii and especially compared to the R7. In the forum (unfortunately it was obvious) the idea has passed that the most recent products must always be superior to the older ones ( thought unfortunately typical of fanboyism ) , and you often read scary absurdities such as that an R7 is superior to an R5 or even an R3 or that an R50 is superior to an R6 , just because maybe it's equipped with a cooler processor and a greater set of features. In fact, for example, the R6ii can shoot at 40fps without blackouts for a much greater number of shots and boasts more AF customization functions, including the latest and very useful tracking that can be activated over the entire area, while the R5 shoots "only" at 20fps with blackout and uses the classic tracking.... But still, as I always remember, Canon is not stupid at all... indeed... If you think that it will "give" you a new R7 for 3000 euros less than the R5 and that it is even better, well... you are very wrong.... Ditto for the R6ii, although the difference in this case is smaller than the one with the R7. As I said at the beginning, however, the R5 has never "taken" me too much, also because Canon for now continues to be only my second kit and at least for now I am not going to put too high figures, also 45mpx for what I have to do I do I don't need anything, the 24 are already enough... I think they are useful only if you want to enlarge a passerine bird to enjoy the details (a game that after a while leaves the time it finds) but to shoot sports JPEGs or if you can properly fill the frame in photo hunting, all those mpx are of no use to me... However, there are some aspects where the R5 has now been surpassed by the R6ii, in particular the ergonomics of the buttons: the joystick is old-fashioned, the button (or rather the button) AF-ON is small and above all recessed and too close to the joystick. all things that in the R6ii have been revised and improved for the benefit of comfort. but above all the age difference with the R6ii can be seen in the brightness and visual comfort of the viewfinder. that of the R6ii, although less resolute, is brighter and more comfortable. and in general the gap between the viewfinder of R5 compared to Z8/9 and Sony A9iii/A1 and also to my Olympus OM1 is "abysmal" .. Another aspect that doesn't make me crazy, which I had already noticed some time ago, regarding files, is a certain tendency towards magenta especially in certain light conditions, which can be a problem especially with regard to JPEGs. With the R6ii and R3, new, more "pleasant" color sciences have been adopted... In the future, an R5ii with the right improvements and even without mounting a stacked sensor could be a winning weapon ...

There are 30 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EOS R5

Sparrowhawk

by Dvdgoli
164 comments, 25092 views [editors pick]

Martinfisher

by Loris Polidori
154 comments, 16063 views [editors pick]

But it rains, it rains.... (Buzzard)

by PannaeFragola
101 comments, 15180 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Kestrels

by Brunocioni
123 comments, 10009 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Lince pardina: family portrait

by Alessandro Beconi
167 comments, 15615 views [editors pick]

Venice of Africa

by Mauro De Bettio
108 comments, 12342 views [editors pick]

Quarrel

by Samuele Sereni
151 comments, 12234 views [editors pick]

Kestrel

by Brunocioni
91 comments, 11078 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Kestrel

by Brunocioni
115 comments, 10823 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The hope of better times...

by Alessandro Callea
204 comments, 13722 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Wall Surges 2021

by Luciano Casagranda
96 comments, 23923 views [editors pick]

Garganey

by Brunocioni
77 comments, 7594 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Zaanse Chanse's cottage

by Carlopremus
113 comments, 12059 views

HI RES 44.8 MP

Garganey

by PannaeFragola
109 comments, 12605 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Cartacuba

by Bo Larkeed
204 comments, 6386 views

HI RES 12.8 MP

Myllykoski vortex

by Carloalbertoconti
90 comments, 6207 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Family

by Alessandro Beconi
91 comments, 6902 views [editors pick]

Imperial eagle

by Nejadi
74 comments, 14312 views [editors pick]

Lesser Tenrec Hedgehog

by Maurizio Lanini
90 comments, 6141 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Saltimapalo

by PannaeFragola
67 comments, 5191 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Rollers

by Nejadi
89 comments, 5321 views [editors pick]

Lamborghini on the hunt

by Pupazzz
54 comments, 5975 views

HI RES 15.3 MP

A magical moment

by Alessandro Beconi
76 comments, 8654 views [editors pick]

Sunset visions

by Essezeta
73 comments, 3294 views [editors pick]

The Po in the floodplain

by Gian Antonio Zapparoli
87 comments, 4901 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Jeep n.2

by Giuseppe Tognarini
115 comments, 6881 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Passo Gian

by Danielevecchi
61 comments, 4835 views [editors pick]

Fuego Volcano

by Stefano Ceci
34 comments, 5461 views

HI RES 10.4 MP

Brothers

by Bo Larkeed
151 comments, 5877 views

HI RES 14.6 MP

Untitled Photo

by Stefano Ceci
73 comments, 6034 views

HI RES 4.0 MP

Panthera leo

by Stefano Bonfoco
76 comments, 3200 views

HI RES 41.8 MP

Buzzard

by Cirillo Giovanni
134 comments, 7477 views

HI RES 4.2 MP

Dawn of a New Day

by Nangi
86 comments, 9194 views

HI RES 5.4 MP

Kestrels

by PannaeFragola
65 comments, 5616 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Ermine

by Emilio63
60 comments, 5915 views [editors pick]

The odd couple

by PannaeFragola
64 comments, 7532 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Southern shrike with prey...

by Paolorossi
95 comments, 6783 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Canon » Canon EOS R5

Canon EOS R5 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Canon EOS R5