|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Augustocampo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Augustocampo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 Pros: Light, great alternative to 28-70 zoom for sharpness, great blurry. Versatile.Price Cons: Plastic effect, inaccurate AF Opinion: All in all a good fifty who does his job, also giving good shots. Tested by me on the Sony A7 with alternate returns due to the lack of precision of the AF solvable with a few more shots however it is some working conditions. Great for human portraits but for the macro I prefer to pair it with a moderate Raynox 150.Versatile and great alternative to the kit zoom that satisfied me little. Bought on offer with black friday at 149 euros: at this price you do not buy anything, that's why I gave 9 as a vote. sent on December 04, 2019 |
 | Sony A7 Pros: Quality, FF, excellent functions, brilliant sensor. Cons: Battery life, set targets not vast. Opinion: Given that despite owning an FF reflex (D750 Nikon) for reasons of practicality and weight I found on many occasions winning the mirrorless that I own, but this despite being a little bigger than the others manages from the first days to donate gorgeous shots. The lens provided (28/70) is discreet, neither bad nor good, and in everyday practicality it is nice even if the use of the classic 50 Sony 1.8 prefers it. The menu is complete and intuitive. sent on December 02, 2019 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: Price, viewfinder, sensor, lightness. Cons: Touch controls. Opinion: Having several e-mount lenses and the younger sister alpha 5100,I purchased in the body version the a6000 (also because personally disappointed by the 16/50 3.5-5.6 zoom they give supplied). Very nice as lightness and wearing I compared with the sister 5100 some shots with the same goals obtaining for the 6000a better quality even if the 5100 also reproduces excellent results. As a sixth mirrorless is practically at the top of my favorites along with the Panasonic Gx80 (micro 4 thirds). It suffers a bit on high iso but I prefer to set a maximum of 800isin in the evening and 100iso by day in posixion P. The autofocus is great and fast. With fixed goals (7artisans, sony, samyang) with excellent results and for its lightness is for me an alternative to my D5300 making the comparison of aps-c. Purchased from Amazon for 396 euros (body) is a fundamental brick for those who want to make great photos using specific lenses. sent on August 11, 2019 |
 | 7artisans 55mm f/1.4 Pros: Blurred, feeling of solid materials Cons: Nobody Opinion: Of course, as a portrait lens, I don't regret any autofocus automation. The lens is solid, the lenses are sharp and the size is small. The price is a gift (I own a Samyang 85mm for Nikon which cost me a lot more but which I can't compare for use in completely different cameras). The blurry 1.4 is very nice (to my taste). You don't even buy a used one with these features at 129 euros. sent on July 17, 2019 |
 | 7artisans 7.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Solidity, quality, well done. Cost Cons: It requires small corrections but is a fisheye Opinion: Bought on Amazon for 169 euros I consider it a great purchase. I own an Opteca 6.5 (aka Samyang) for Nikon F, a Meike for Nikon1 and an 8mm Olympus micro four-thirds pancake and the winning photos are right with that goal. The typical corrections that need to be made are on the shadows because of the vignette and a pinch of variation in tone (the latter is a subjective choice). sent on July 01, 2019 |
 | Samyang FE 35mm f/2.8 AF Pros: Cost, quality, blurry great, details. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Purchased a Sony alpha 5100 I found it necessary to enrich the kit with an average daily fixed canvas , so the choice fell on this goal. Great choice over the supplied zoom (16-50). The results are satisfactory and there is a very good chance of blurring. I think I'm unlikely to disassemble this view from mirrorless. sent on June 20, 2019 |
 | Sony A5100 Pros: Size, sensor, practicality. Quality/price. Cons: Lack of function keys. Zoom lens 16/50.Sensor cleanup. Opinion: I had a great approach with Sony's sensors with the compact RX 100 and the mirrorless of the Xianoyi the YI M1. The mirrorless has a great grip, although it does give you the impression that the zoom (poor 16/50) provided unbalances everything forward. Full and nice menu that seems to me a hybrid between the sony rx100 and the Panasonic Gx80 and all in all I find it very practical. They could insert the wheel that selects the shooting mode that is missing (even if it can be integrated with the trash button). I equipped myself (considered the zoom 16/50 which is not to my liking as quality in my opinion) with medium fixed canvas (35mm 2.8 Samyang exceptional) a wide angle (the 16 2.8 Sony great) a fisheye (7.5 7artisans great) and a canvas for portraits (7artisans 55mm great) and adapters to use my Nikon/Samyang /Olympus /Yashica lenses due to high optical prices. Bought from Mediaworld for 349 euros for me it was a bargain. For sensor cleaning lacks the function so I have to be careful of the lens change (fast and in non-dusty places). sent on June 18, 2019 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Pros: Excellent aesthetics, wide menu, excellent material quality, micro 4/3 system. Cons: 4k is missing but we are talking about a camera and not a camera. Opinion: I've started from a very good SLR D750 & D5300 with the Nikon 1j5 the world of mirrorless. Both the purchase of the Xianoyi Yi M1 (Sony 20MP sensor) and the Panasonic gx80 and Zuiko Optics and Panasonic made me put almost to the side of the small Nikon1. The experience with Olympus is gorgeous. It is not compact but not even massive or heavy like a reflex. Nice to see (I chose the grey and black) reminds me of the om20 I own. The wide menu beats the Xianoyi too simple but nice and remains an alternative to the GX80 of equal quality but less pleasant aesthetics (it is obviously a subjective judgement). sent on May 31, 2019 |
 | Panasonic Lumix TZ100 / ZS100 Pros: Compact, versatile excellent optics with excellent zoom (wide range). Optics marked Leica Luminous 2.8 Cons: Fixed Display Opinion: Provided that I have mirrorless (D750 and D5300) SLR (Gx80/YI M1/Om-d e-M10 Mark II/Nikon1 J5) and Bridge (fz1000) but the need to have a good price a compact first addressed me in the xp120 (also underwater) then in the Sony RX 100 Mark 1 and now alternatively in The Panasonic Lumix Tz100. The menu, the possibility of the photo post and the 4k photos at hand in the newspaper I was really surprised about this product. Of course everything needs to be put to every situation and never can fix a camera or a mirrorless or a bridge but nevertheless I consider it true complementary to the outfit of each photographer. It is for me in its category struggling with the Sony RX100 Mark 1 (1.8 Carl Zeiss Sonnar T) but except that it is not underwater beats (even the aforementioned Sony) the xp120 without any shadow of a doubt. sent on May 31, 2019 |
 | Sony RX100 Pros: Excellent quality sensor, pocket, 1.8 diaphragm, versatile even in manual. Cons: I can't find Opinion: As an alternative to the Fujifilm FinePix 120 (which is underwater) no doubt it is really small offering pleasant results. While owning the D750 (my top that remains unquestionably outstanding) I needed also a small handyman machine with fixed lens as an alternative to my mirrorles. My choice fell in the RX100 and was well satisfied by my passion for the goals:p Ossedere with a few euros a Carl Zeiss optic that I recall the satisfactions received in the past with the planar Carl Zeiss. But I found a defect: it has a constitution so compact and limited that together with the N1j5 gives me the impression of having an all too compact cameras with the risk of breaking it (but it is a sensation). Fantastic the blurry and depth of field. Excellent for journalistic photos, portraits, panoramas but a little less for photos at a distance of which you need a tele pushed... but in a few centimeters you can not have everything. Nice alternative to Mirrorles although it is to be taken into account that it does not possess the salient characteristic of the versatility in terms of choice of lenses since fixed. Purchased at Amazon at €335. sent on May 18, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm XP120 Pros: Versatile, small, great menu, nice image quality Cons: Fixed screen, a few extra megapixels. Opinion: Great for travel, especially at the beach and for artistic photos on a rainy day. The image quality is good. In hand by way of strength. Purchased lime original color. Nice underwater. Panoramic photo opportunities and excellent performance in macrophotos. 16 megapixel camera while being sufficient could be greater. sent on April 29, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm FinePix XP80 Pros: Versatile, small, great menu, nice image quality Cons: Fixed screen, a few extra megapixels. Opinion: Great for travel, especially in rainy days and beach photos. The image quality is good. In hand by way of strength. Purchased lime original color. Nice underwater. Panoramic photo opportunities and excellent performance in macrophotos. 16 megapixel camera while being sufficient could be greater. Mistakenly I reviewed the XP80 but my review is about the XP120 sent on April 29, 2018 |
 | Panasonic GX80 / GX85 Pros: Menu, quality sensor, 4 k, post picture focus Cons: Heavier than the Xianoyi YI M1 Opinion: Is my third mirrorless despite having a 16 mp sensor against 20 of Xianoyi YI M1 and Nikon has great image quality and performance 1j5. Beautiful menu to me met with bridge Lumix Fz 1000 practical and functional. Almost put my Nikon SLR side Z520 and D5300 looks comfortable and versatile. The viewfinder though is the only flaw of versatility. Definitely great as daily machine. sent on April 28, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R Pros: Very good quality, lightweight Cons: None Opinion: Used in the Xianoyi YI M1 (Sony sensor), compared the Lumix 14-45 mm and Xianoyi 12-40, it is in my opinion the winner while not underestimating the other two goals. The only drawback, if you can say, the lock key. Excellent quality and very light. In conjunction with the 40-150 is the ideal Kit. Bought second hand in about €100. sent on April 22, 2018 |
 | YI M1 Pros: Price, line, excellent sensor, versatile in manual. Flash mode, micro attack 4/3, you can recharge the battery with a mobile battery charger. Cons: Few keys (but there is a touchscreen), discreet optics, lack of flash. Fixed display Opinion: I wanted to buy a YI M1 as a daily machine to be alternated with nikon1 j5.In fact, as regards the lack of flash can be defined both as a positive and negative point: Avoid (especially in museums or other occasions) the involuntary opening of the flash and against must always take one in (according to need). The line is very nice even if it reminds me a lot of the Leica. Strong point is the sensor (it should be a Sony) but as a negative element is the Af slow and inaccurate (12-40 mm) but corrected with firmware update of the machine (to be done right away) It is not a noble but it does well. The photos taken are pleasant and bright but with a pinch of sharpness in less, however, can be easily adjusted with photoshop.Eccezionale the coupled with the Olympus 40-150 1: 4-5.6 R (nothing to envy to the other my daily machine at the same focal length, on the contrary). The price compensates everything and sincerely as quality / price is; ottimo.La image quality decays after 800 ISO but there is. sent on February 21, 2018 |
 | Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 Pros: Versatile, lightweight, excellent video. Super photo quality. You can push it to 800mm, excellent macro.Quality / price excellent.For its affordable price features. Cons: 30 minute video limit, decentralized tripod hook. They drop decidedly closed diaphragms (but I'm not a lover). Opinion: Fed up with the change-swap optics in my Nikon SLR (sensor dust), excited about Leica optics and also in consideration of the wide zoom scissors I bought this wonderful camera.Pur video limitations (duration of 30 minutes and zoom smaller than photography for 4K) I found great photos and a great alternative to my D5300 and D3100 but not the D750 that I use for more demanding photos. I was surprised at the quality of the photos that I consider excellent combined with a flash Olympus FL 36. I gave the highest marks for its practicality. The battery could have a longer life. Despite having a very good optics I prefer the Samyang 85mm 1.4 for close-ups. sent on December 03, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 D Pros: Wide range of focals. Cost-effective as used. Excellent travel target. Intermediate focal length and excellent contrast. Cons: A bit heavy and the cap that is likely to get lost. Opinion: Tested alternatively for both 28/70 D and 70/210 D and the results are excellent (at least avoid disassembling). Obviously, I prefer Fixed Optics (50mm 1.8D) (Samyang 85mm 1.4) but as rendered as contrast and sharpness it is excellent. In my Nikon D750 it is ok. Comprised as used at 220euro. The filters are 72 and not 62 as the card shows. RnMacro nice. sent on July 25, 2017 |
 | Tamron 20-40mm f/2.7-3.5 SP Pros: Used cost, linear. Cons: Slightly heavy Opinion: Bought as used at about € 250 for Nikon in both the FX (D750) and DX (D5300) reflexes, it looks almost everywhere (where there is no need for a canvas). Great performance ... but the weight is certainly not the Its strong. It does not regret some fixed optics for the value of its brightness (2.7). Very closed diaphragm I find it not very good. Good at 5.6. Clearly, the D750 can also be used in AF, unlike the D5300. sent on July 11, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 D Pros: Great color rendering, lightweight, cost-effective use. Cons: nobody Opinion: With the transition to the FX system I needed a "trip" lens that would allow a wide-angle excursion to the small tele. Considering that I have seen photos taken by Juzaphoto users, my choice has fallen on this lens after having Looked at nearby focals. I spent 140 euros and I think I've done a great deal. I think that compared to the more lucrative optics it performs terribly. I think that the photos taken will hardly get rid of it from my D750. sent on May 16, 2017 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Lightweight, versatile, great sensor. Built-in Wi-Fi. Very intuitive. Function U1 and U2. Cons: Screen not rotating and rotating like the D5300 even if tilted to 90gradi. Opinion: I get both the D5300 and the D3100 Nikon and have to make a leap of quality, both as a format (from DX to FX) as well as sensor and screen usage, the choice I did in my opinion has been made. From the first shots the difference with the other two is remarkable. Use in Raw. Simply the double sd slot and the double wheel that gives independence to diaphragms and timing. sent on May 07, 2017 |
 | Nikon 100mm f/2.8 Series E Pros: lightweight, compact, bought 120 EUR almost new. Cons: lack diaphragms automation. Opinion: Excellent product, very light and compatto.Se while plastic offers the alternative to my Samyang 85 mm for lightweight and small (though with some point less for quality ... but not too much!), Then combined with 50mm and 24mm it is a good alternative both for quality and for weight to zoom tradizionali.Non regret the lack of autofocus ... indeed! sent on April 06, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Great, light, nitido.Utilizzabile almost always. Cons: AF manual on my D5300, but I think it is a flaw. Opinion: No doubt ottima.Utile perspective aims wildcards to be used in almost all occasioni.Provato with D5300 .I surprised than the Sigma 50mm 2.8 macro, but of course not on macro of portraits, etc. Great for its leggerezza.Trovato used by ebay at a good price 112 euro in excellent condizioni.Penso aim of using it as the basis for a future purchase of a body FX machine. sent on March 28, 2017 |
 | Nikon 200mm f/4 Ai-S Pros: Lightweight, inexpensive, great manual lente.Fuoco. Cons: use in my D3100 D5300 // only in manual mode. Opinion: Compact than the optical zoom and sharp .rnLeggera "vignetting" diaphragm 4. rnOttimo for nature photos and particolari.Assieme to Samyang 85mm 1.4, Sigma 50mm EX DG macro 2.8 and Walimex 500mm, made me put in "the attic" the zoom af-s 55-300.A ft diaphragm 32 to par with the Sigma 50mm loses in sharpness. sent on March 10, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Cost, autofocus, useful on every occasion. Cons: nothing Opinion: Bought on ebay auction at a paltry price £ 86 no doubt that is a focal always on my D5300 use because with the right factor should be approximately 52mm FX.Nelle old digital SLRs not by chance that the lens was not wild but the 50mm zoom .in effects attached to the 16mm and 85 and a 50mm macro with these lenses I put two zoom side, namely the 18-55 and 18-105.La yield is great and I use it with a ratio of three times longer than other fixed lenses .a good extension tube or a good filter close up macro beautiful photos allow. sent on November 26, 2016 |
 | Samyang 800mm f/8 DX Mirror Pros: Great, low price, excellent yield. Cons: Lack the diaphragms transmission. Opinion: The walimex, Samyang brands are excellent for those who want to engage in spectacular photos with low costi.Trovo mine is a Walimex Pro 800mm (which is a Samyang) and great for photos outside common schemes precisely particolari.Ottima made at low and medium distances a little less high distances except particolari.Peccato weather conditions that the T2 attack does not allow the transmission aperture (which is the case with 16 and 85 mm Samyang in my possession) .Funziona well freehand without a tripod (just increase time speed and ISO sensitivity) sent on November 26, 2016 |
 | Samyang 16mm f/2.0 ED Pros: Excellent focal with my D5300 Nikon.Senza doubt bright lens and excellent qualità.In right format lens is a 24mm, excellent yield for landscapes, macro and photos of monuments. Cons: Hood a little uncomfortable with tappo.Nessuno. Opinion: After purchasing a 85- 1.4 of Samyang for portraits, I had the need to support both my sigma 50mm ex dg macro a macro lens though for details and with this aim I trovato.rnGrazie JuzaPhoto I could compare shots by fishaye and wide angle and no doubt I found the right balance in 16mm for photos of several monuments (for other use the classic Nikon 35mm f 1.8. G) and something not too pushed for the fisheye (I always have to be included in an additional 00:35 35 ) .I was surprised by the quality of the photos, very sharp and clear. sent on November 09, 2016 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Pros: great lens macro.ottimo value for price, very crisp Nothing to envy more expensive lenses. Cons: Some diaphragm more. Opinion: Bought on ebay auction as used without doubt is the middle ground between my Nikon 35mm 1.8 G and my Samyang 85mm 1.4 .The find it very versatile and coupled with a 2X kenko no doubt you can do a little more. £ 86 well spent! if there was even the diaphragm as 2 or 1.8 would eccezzionale.in Anyway my vote is 9.I a Nikon D5300 and d3100 and in both cases are satisfied. sent on October 17, 2016 |
 | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Pros: Great price compared to other lenses Nikon and other brands, sharp pictures, fantastic Fuzzy 1.4.Messa manual focus and versatility of diaframmi.Luminoso. Cons: Perhaps for moving sports photos unsuitable for those who wear glasses. Opinion: Since I bought it I no longer use the other objectives except the Nikon 35mm 1.8. that alterno.Ho made wonderful pictures is portrayed as both as paesaggi.Ottimo.Il manual focus except for the quick photo is a winning pregio.Accoppiata with my Nikon D5300 still not proven with the Nikon D3100 but for now I have neither reason. rn sent on October 04, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
