JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 176000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Weight. Ergonomics, though coming from the Nikon D7000 and D7100 it's feels natural. High ISO Noise control and the quaility of the pixels when there is noise, is easier to smooth out while still retaining more detail that my D7100. Very fast auto-focus and especially excellent low light auto focus. Color rendition. Sharpness/detail more than satifisfying enough when mounted with very good to excellent glass. 6.5 FPS is good enough for birds in flight especially when this camera can get so many in focus.
Cons: Would be nice to have had a dedicated AF-On button though I have assigned AF-L for this action as per my D7100. Only 1/4000th max shutter speed though when I look at the metadata for my images there are only a few birds in flight shot that have exceeded this on my camera bodies that have 1/8000th capability.
Opinion: The cons are only minor and very minor when you compare them to the quality/price ratio for this camera. I use this mainly for bird/wildife photography and am over the moon with it's overall performance. Even when having to commit to a larger crop for bird photo's in PP compared the the Nikon D7100 this still produces higher quaility images. Both my zoom lenses were just plug and play, no adjustments necessary that I have noticed. Is there another camera body out there that I would swap my D750 for? All things considered not one! Love this camera!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:The best machine for generalist use. The best car in its price range. Falls into his hand perfectly. Image quality (ISO seal and dynamic Range) and focus for non-sporting use
Cons:Maximum shutter 1/4000-defective video compartment-Non-complete customization-all inherent defects in an SLR (no electronic viewfinder, no MIF in Live view poor,
Opinion:PREMISE: I write my opinion now that I sold it, moving to Sony, as I can be more objective. I used it with Tamron 15-30 f/2.8, Nikon 28-300, Nikon 35 f/2 D, Nikon 50 F 1.8 AF, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary (hence a medium level kit). Build Quality: 8/10 machine with perfect dimensions, which seems to fall into your hand forever. I find myself much better with the arrangement of ring nuts and Nikon commands than Canon (obviously subjective opinion), as well as I find the ability to customize discrete but not perfect commands. I do not understand why, but for each key the customizable functions are limited, for some very limited (2-3 functions). Objectively I think anyone can find the perfect setting of custom commands, but I think something a bit ' annoying. Feeling a bit plasticky (given by the lightness of the machine), but all in all materials that hold well to use even intensive. Too bad for the maximum shutter 1/4000s which in full light is a bit limiting. AUTOFOCUS: (9/10) I shoot a few photos of sports and challenging birds, so I can not give a competent opinion in this situation, but for other genres, coupled with my lenses, I may only express extremely positive opinions for both speed, accuracy, That for sensitivity in the dark. Even the coverage of the frame from the points of MAF, albeit only partial, has proved more than enough for landscaping, street, portraiture and reportage. Frankly it is a machine that did not disappoint me in 98% of the situations where I had to focus, and the remaining 2% were situations where objectively wondered the impossible. As a good part of the SLR is not made for focusing in live view, setting where the speed is scandalous and usable only for landscaping. Image quality: 9.5/10 Excellent ISO seal, usable up to 1600 and even more in good light conditions. Enviable dynamic range, which sometimes tended to take me to force to open the shadows. Too bad for the lack of image stabilization that took me sometimes to risk the blur (although the number "human" megapixel sometimes I did take too much of the hand). More than satisfactory resolution for non-professional use. Excellent gust. Disappointing on the video industry, for those interested. CONCLUSION only now that I have changed it for the Sony A7R III I understand how good it was, considering the age and the objective limits derived from the structure with the mirror. The faults personally lead them back to the type of Reflex machine rather than to the specific model. Definitely with what costs now a good used it has an incredible value for money, maybe the best on the market. With Sony I have a car definitely better on virtually all fronts, but that are only in slight improvements in everyday use, at a price double. I believe that even today, 5 years after its release on the market, is the best machine for generalist use in the round. Not excels in anything, in each technical specification there is some model that does better even in its own price range, but none with a medium level so high: With the D750 you can do any kind of photographic limited only by your skills and not by those of the machine.
Pros:Extraordinary ISO seal for a 2015 machine, very good work files, compact but quality body, adjustable display
Cons:For now if I have to find him a 1/4000 as faster time
Opinion:I bought this machine for a few months to update and support the d7100 that I now use as a second body. The difference in the transition to full-frame contrary to the opinion of some you see all right, especially opening the raw have an incredible detail and cleanliness. From a technical point of view, the D750 has an extraordinary ISO seal, so almost you can forget what ISO value you are taking, often I can barely see the noise in the files, which are excellent and very workable, compact body but quality, since it is magnesium and MONOSCOCC a carbon. The adjustable display that, using almost only the viewfinder to shoot, I always considered a super secondary accessory in so many cases I found it useful or over the crowd or placing the car in the ground for a point of view out of the ordinary in some situations. The only flaw that I can find for certain photographic genres, kind of sporty photography is the limit of the 1/4000 as a shutter speed that I would have preferred to 1/8000 as the d7100 recommended
Opinion:Great machine, I replaced the d800 at the time with the 750, no matter how big the D800, I would never have gotten rid of it if it wasn't that high ISO was too noisy.. If then we put that the car was costing on 3000 euros just exit.. All that noise could not be accepted for a machine like that, passed to the D750 I found many points in favor in addition to a high ISO yield really good, AF significantly better than the D800 and a greater reactivity of the machine The 750 is a machine that gave me And it continues to give me great satisfactions, also excellent mechanics, missing 1/8000 as time, many say that it is not necessary, well if you shoot during the day and look for special effects at Open diaphragms and with the Flash in HSS serves.. Absence of the AF button on, which you can reprogram but go to lose that of the exposure block. Are the flaws that surely will not take much to a really beautiful SLR one of the best products of Nikon
Opinion:I bought from a few weeks the Nikon D750, after over a month ago to decide whether to take her or the D850. What about it? I find the D750 a reliable and versatile model, able to work well with different photographic genres. Excellent quality of raw files and above all light with regard to its weight, especially with fixed lenses. Also proven inside almost light-free places with high ISO, also in this case has returned highly workable files.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
