JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Panasonic GX80 / GX85 is a mirrorless camera with 4/3 (2.0x) sensor and 16 megapixels manufactured from 2016. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 10 FPS x 13 RAW, 100 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 511 €;
57 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 224000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Compact.Excellent construction. Fast and accurate Af except in extreme situations. Display with touch pad af very useful. Great videos. No more selection of micro 4/3 lenses
Cons:Headphone and microphone output not present for videos. Electronic viewfinder only discreet.
Opinion:I carried it in my belt bag on several excursions with a pair of lenses supplied. (I recommend a 15 PanaLeica or a 17 Olympus + 45 Olympus) and it gave me a lot of satisfaction. Clearly in situations of limit light better to put even brighter optics such as the 1.4 of Sigma to make up for the small sensor that still behaves well up to 1600/2000 ISO. NOT EXCITING JPEGs. I recommend shooting in RAW. In all cases a gem with an excellent price / performance ratio (it is also found at € 300) that if you know how to use and if you have no pretensions gives many satisfactions.
Pros:Small, compact, stabilized, very easy to use, great files, viewfinder, cheap
Cons:It is not tropicalized, a characteristic that I sometimes need but it is not serious
Opinion:Tiny camera of 2016 still very current. Combined with Panasonic or Olympus tiny lenses (eg 20 mm 1.7, 45 mm 1.8, zooms 14-32 and 35-100 ) it is little larger than a compact but with very different performance. It holds well up to 1600 iso, the menu is easy to use, The batteries do not last very long but with little expense you can take many compatible. Now that I have equipped myself with other less compact cameras (G80 and Olympus OM-D) I use it often, as well as with the lenses mentioned, with particular lenses such as the LAOWA 4 mm f2.8, the pinhole and the Olympus 8 mm cap is always when I want to be light. 6 years after arriving on the market it is still very advisable.
Opinion:Small tank, although not tropicalized, it resists well to sand and small splashes of water. Manageability is its greatest value: with the thumb and index finger of the right hand you can do everything, even with one hand (for those who have a child in their arms as has happened to me several times, you can turn on and make a "point and shoot" on the fly in a second). Taken by a photographer who "did not find crunchiness in the files" using the 12-32 pancakes, mounted the 12-45 or the 12-60PL the crunchiness comes out of it. Like all small m43, the best gives it with the fixed, both the 1.4 (Sigma, PL or Zuiko) and the 1.7 (15 or 25mm). It is definitely a travel camera and focused above all on photography, even if the video side makes excellent 4k slightly cropped (had they put 150 or 180fps it would have been exaggerated but would have made other Lumix cameras useless) given the great stabilization. Negative sides certainly are the viewfinder (too small and on which you can not mount an additional eyepiece as on gx9, which for those who wear glasses helps a lot) and the battery with which you make just over 200 shots (does not keep the day, so get at least 1 or 2 more batteries). Machine still valid and contemporary in 2022 despite being released 6 years ago: the 16mpx are enough for the vast majority of people. It recharges in the room and this is something that today can only be positive since even a single power bank is enough and in an hour the car is charged. Flash not powerful but very useful in case of need especially indoors, and particularity can be oriented upwards with a finger. If set properly, it also produces excellent jpg ready to be published or printed. Sold to test the Olympus m10 mkii. Regretting the choice. Still recommended today.
Pros:Small Handy Quality Sensor Some Interesting Advanced Function Stabilized Tiltable Monitor Mobile Phone Connection with App
Cons:Menu a bit messed up
Opinion:Absolutely perfect machine to always have with you. Instead of the pancake that is actually not of great quality, associate it with the excellent and very thin 20G 1.7 and you will have a perfect machine for the street. I use it mainly for my walks in nature with dogs, because the mobile phone, however good (Samsung Note 10 +) does not even come close to the quality of this sensor. going out early in the morning or in the evening at dusk I must say that I have never suffered from the scarcity of light. The noise tends to be very low. For landscape photos, typically backlit (sunrises sunsets ...) I use the wonderful function of BKT with 5 shots in bursts that I then mount very easily with Photomatix. Thanks to the wonderful stabilization and the steady hand I can almost always get some satisfying photos. If you are very social, the connection to the app is simple and you can share the shots after a short pp with LR or Snapseed
Pros:Almost pocket size with non-pro bleeds, transportability, ease of use and operational speed, stabilization.
Cons:Ergonomics, management of high lights, very improveable viewfinder.
Opinion:I press that I use M4/3 for work (video) and I delight in photography only for passion. I bought this machine at the end of 2017 to always have with me a high-performance and comfortable photographic body to slip into the backpack for holidays and social occasions. Despite the premises, I have never used it enough. cause? Ergonomics, handling. I found it too small and it gave me back an unin fulfilling shooting experience (also thanks to a somewhat underling viewfinder). Things improve with pro targets (M4/3) but they fall on transportability.. follows, he was often with me, but I did not use it when and how much I wanted/could/should. On the quality and yield of the files (also RAW) I always found it adequate with the kit 12-32 and the 35-100, more than discreet with superior category glasses. After 8,000 shots I think I can point to the tendency to burn the other lights as a defect (the 20mpx sensors do much better). The recovery of shadows is good. Nice and fun 4k photo and post focus technology features. Excellent operational speed and stabilization. Do I recommend it as an everyday machine? If you are used to more consistent and ergonomic bodies you can meet the limits that I have encountered.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
