|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sax61 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sax61  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Pros: Size, weight, quality, price. Cons: Brightness, backlight. Opinion: After the heavy and bulky f 2.8 on Nikon Z I switched to 24-200 and I rediscovered the pleasure of going around without the bulk and weight of the "traditional" kit. Certainly in extreme conditions (backlight, low light, etc.) there are some limits but everything is amply rewarded by the great versatility that allows you to capture a much wider range of events. Versatility is the strong point of this lens and in addition it is also sharp and with good color rendering. The dimensions and weight are absolutely adequate and the tropicalization is very appreciable. With the Z6 or Z7 it fits very well in a small bag and I recommend a nice pancake to complete (28 and / or 40 mm) for photos in low light. sent on January 13, 2023 |
 | Nikon Z 40mm f/2 Pros: Size, brightness, price. Cons: Nothing considering the pros. Opinion: The 28 mm and 40 mm combination makes the high-performance Z6 and Z7 light and small. I also own 2.8 lenses but practically impossible to take on demanding trips for size and weight. The 40 mm is versatile suitable for night photos, street and the performance is excellent, especially considering the price. I also own the 50 mm 1.8 for Z but much heavier and bulkier (about double). An optics that can not miss in the kit and once used will hardly go in the bag. sent on January 13, 2023 |
 | Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Pros: Excellent in every condition, one step ahead of the already excellent 24-70 f 2.8 VR. Cons: High price. Opinion: With the Z6 it achieves levels of sharpness at every point, it's fast and precise, and the colors have a magnificent yield. An optics that represents a step forward compared to the G series. Compared to the excellent 24-70 f 4.0 always for the Z has more weight but the advantage of the diaphragm in some situations allows you to capture so much excellent light. SUl price maybe you have exaggerated a little too much and a 500 euros less are there, however if you can spend it definitely worth the effort. sent on August 18, 2020 |
 | Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S Pros: Fast, silent, tropicalized, sharpened Cons: Size Opinion: I already own a 50 mmm G 1.4 and the only positive note compared to the "new" are the dimensions. For everything else the new is a really perfect match on both Z6 and Z7. If we really want to find a flaw this lies in the size maybe a little excessive for a 50 f 1.8 but it is worth all the money it costs. sent on January 21, 2020 |
 | Nikon Z6 Pros: Size, weight, high ISO, versatility Cons: Memory cards still only branded Sony and therefore very expensive in relation to three although with greater performance Opinion: I do not want to add the same things already written that I share but I think the Z6 a FF with excellent technical features and what not just that the stabilizer on the sensor is much more effective than previous systems and moreover it is also effective on Nikon optics that They are lacking and dated giving a new life to kits that many are fond of. For me this last aspect is really fundamental and puts it a step higher than the competition. The adapter ring works fine even if with the dedicated optics you have the maximum performance. The battery lasts less than traditional SLRs but if used with care lasts more than stated even if it remains indispensable to bring at least one more. In Short it is the ideal machine for street. sent on January 06, 2019 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Construction and handling. Cons: Flare (but normal with this type of frontal lens). Opinion: Recently purchased to implement the Olympus excellent kit for the street since the FF with its size often "scares" the subjects especially in some countries. It is a wonderful lens that is worth every € that costs as yield, size quality construction etc. Together with the 12-40 F 2.8 Pro is a perfect pair that is in a small bag and allows you to shoot almost in any situation. In short, the ideal kit for the street. sent on May 06, 2018 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Pros: Dimensions, weight, photo and video functions, stabilizer. Cons: Cost, unintuitive menu, battery life ,. Opinion: The image quality combined with the small size and weight make it an ideal object for the report. With a small but bright fixed lens it fits in your pocket and becomes a perfect companion for traveling and in daily life. And if we combine the pleasing aesthetics then it really becomes a beautiful object. The quality of the ORF file is outstanding considering the size in Mb. Stabilization is outstanding and allows use even in difficult conditions. A perfect second outfit for all occasions without sacrificing quality. sent on February 05, 2017 |
 | Nikon D810 Pros: And 'the D800 improved and without any defect of the D800. Cons: It needs high quality optics. Opinion: A big machine where all the defects of the previous model that allows you to adapt to different kinds of photography always with great satisfaction were eliminated. Excellent with fixed lenses and with quality zoom. I use it mainly for reportage and street with great satisfaction then allowing post production also crop images without loss of quality. As already reported the only drawback is that it needs optical quality which is known to physically and weigh in your wallet. sent on July 05, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 E ED VR Pros: Optical quality, behavior with digital high definition. Cons: Price, weight and diameter filters. Opinion: Finally it arrived and after intense use of fixed on D800 and D810 now a nice stabilized zoom. I would say that is fine of D810 highlighting the qualities. Only faults the price, but is a little more than € 2000 import with 2 years warranty, which are still so many but certainly less than reported on other "lists" and overweight. For the rest it behaves very well and lets you take up to 1/20 without problems for magnification 200x or more. sent on December 26, 2015 |
 | Panasonic Lumix GX7 Pros: It has everything you need: adjustable viewfinder, stabilizer, adjustable screen, large park optics, excellent technical characteristics. Cons: Price and tropical conditions. Opinion: It can be part of a second kit lightweight, and versatile to wear during long trips where weight is likely to make the day a torture maintaining a good quality use. The sensor stabilized saves money, weight and size of the optical viewfinder swiveling becomes critical in some situations, and the image quality is very interessante.rnCon these features can also be a good first kit with body and excellent optical pancakes Wearing sempre.rnFino ISO 1600 does not appear to be problems in quality and then, albeit slowly begins to descend increasing sensibilità.rnImportante then is the wide availability of optical and Olympus that Panasonic.rnGhiere and controls are all present, and you can shoot in manual with ease using the dial aperture and that regardless of the times. sent on October 26, 2014 |
 | Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM Pros: Great! Very sharp at all apertures and acceptable cost. Cons: Weight, low light and poor protection of the front lens. Opinion: The lens has immediately showed his skills in terms of sharpness and image quality with both body that recently with D90 D800 body. Used during trips to various parts of the world proved to be a faithful traveling companion in all conditions. The picture quality is excellent at all apertures and focal lengths. Only problem is due to the considerable weight that is felt after a long day. sent on April 29, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Optical light, quite cheap and universal, but not especially great pretensions to f 1.4. Cons: AF slow and distortion at full aperture. Opinion: Optics that I have used before on D90 and D800 now on with good results. The AF p a faster would be interesting as well as increased quality at full aperture. Using the Optical often at night for street during my travels and the brightness is important having to use quite quickly. Along with the 24 and the 85 are a nice outfit for the night, light and thin in the optical changes that need to be fast to prevent dust to enter and capture the moments. However absolutely worth the cost. sent on April 27, 2013 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Excellent Camera I use now for over 4 years in all conditions. Cons: Noise at high ISO. Opinion: Just passed the D800 I decided to keep the "old" D90 as I have always given great satisfaction in all conditions. I travel a lot for work and is a faithful and reliable travel companion that allows you to bring home great shots. The only drawback is the lack of tropicalization that in some circumstances it is very utile.rnNaturalmente with the Full Frame is another thing as well as also the investment, however, the D90 is a great second body with some advantage being APS-C. sent on April 26, 2013 |
 | Nikon D800 Pros: A body of new generation with all the skills to make great shots in all conditions. Cons: If you really want to find fault with the cost, autofocus which required a calibration (under warranty) and the need for a gradual upgrade of the optics. Opinion: After deciding on the transition from D90 to a body full frame Nikon at home the evaluation was between the "old" and the new D700 D800. The difference in price of about 700 € made me decide for the D800 as it is like buying a new technology compared to an old one. Fully satisfied with the new body even though I is requesting an update of the optics to bring out its full potential. The response at high ISO is excellent as the definition that allows the crop without significant loss of image quality. Only problem the need to resort to collateral as required a calibration autofocus. sent on April 26, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II Pros: Grende optics in all conditions and able to enhance the excellent qualities of a body like that of the D800. Cons: The weight that is felt after a day and the cost that is felt for a longer time. Opinion: After a few years with the D90 and the 70-300 VR that gave me great satisfaction are passed to the D800 which required a gradual upgrade of the optics. I tried the optics due to the availability of the retailer and I decided to purchase. The first field trials I was immediately convinced on investment thanks to the great quality of the images and the D800 are enhanced features of this excellent body. Of course the cost is not of the lowest as well as the size and weight that are felt especially for people like me who travels a lot for work and has to add the tools of his passion (body + lenses). In short, feedback = 10 praise we leave it to future versions lighter, smaller and perhaps even cheaper! sent on April 26, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF VR Pros: Optics interesting from low-cost to be full-frame and covers a very wide range of focal lengths. If used during the day to f 8 by a good result. See photo "waiting" in the gallery Sri Lanka. Cons: Poor image quality especially at maximum aperture and hike. Opinion: On the market there is better but we need to spend more. Recommend to anyone who starts then move on to higher optical performance (eg 24-120 f 4 f 2.8 or 24-70 or the Tamron 24-70 VC) and to keep as a "mule". I used this very nl optics around the world with the D90 but with the new D800 shows its limits. It 'still a product that has always been extremely reliable. sent on April 25, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
