JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 II is a mirrorless camera with 4/3 (2.0x) sensor and 16 megapixels manufactured from 2015 to 2019 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 5 FPS x unlimited RAW, unlimited JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1013 €;
81 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 206000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Camera well built, light and compact but solid and professional. Revolving display, tropicalization and optimal layout of controls make it a valuable tool. Notable technical features, all at your fingertips. Compatibility with a lot of excellent optics. Delicious little swivel flash.
Cons:Schizophrenic menu; but how can you ruin a beautiful camera by inserting a menu that to be so bad had to require a considerable effort? A 14-150 series lamp that takes a good half-hour of trying to fit in.
Opinion:It is a camera that I would call delicious, complete in its functions, built with high quality materials and nevertheless compact and light. The technical features are also respectable and even the movies that usually on the cameras and OLYMPUS are not much, here instead are acceptable. Too bad for the menu that partly spoils all the great work done by the designers. Olympus to make menus should take lessons from Leica
Pros:Light and compact, stabilized sensor, hight res, tropicalized, image and color quality, orientable display, price used
Cons:Battery life, grit and HIGH ISO noise
Opinion:I took this olympus a year ago, used cheaply, coupled with the nikon d610, I needed a light camera to take to the mountains during my excursions, saw many in a year, snow, sand, direct water under the waterfalls, never made a crease, tropicalized in an egregious way, a faithful companion in trips of any kind , the battery if used with electronic viewfinder lasts the right, better to have one spare and for the day you stay calm, at 6-700 Iso you see grain in the photos and raising still noise appears, it is to say that the cameras must be bought according to your main needs, not surprisingly... For landscape photography, travel etc. is fantastic, combined with quality lenses, for photos with low ambient brightness better to orient yourself on other... stabilized sensor that does its job, jpeg files practically ready to use, high-resolution click, etc. In short, for the daytime use that I do I definitely promote it, a tank I assure you.
Pros:portability, dier, aesthetics, pro functions, orientable flash, stabilization
Cons:Complicated menu, battery, bottom paint
Opinion:I bought this camera to have a laptop with semi-pro functions, and with the ability to buy pro optics in human digits, which in my opinion make the difference, my feedback is undoubtedly positive, given the price of the beauty of the product and its many functions (initially complicated to manage through the menu), in addition to the pro lenses that inevitably increase the weight and clutter are on the market numerous tiny optics that can still allow you to take home a result Liked. The battery is absolutely insufficient if you use so much the active display, with sight instead comes for me to be enough, but a spare should always be kept, finally side construction the paint of the lower part tends to go away, I solved covering it with one of those faux leather linings that are little on amazon that do not spoil the aestheticbut definitely protect when resting the machine.
Cons:Sensor, menu, two-tone quality, viewfinder, batteries, cost, iso noise.
Opinion:Sensor that works "well," only with full daylight. Unsustainable iso noise from 1600. The two-tone loses all the color from the bottom and viewfinder, the batteries have a ridiculous life, bosogna carry two spare batteries behind, the viewfinder is indecent because you can not frame in the eyeball the whole photo but you lose all the edges , then if one wears glasses, he has to do the jumps to figure out what you're in. bought 3 years ago at 1500 euros (in kit with the 18-55), it would have made sense to buy it at half the price and keep it only for travel without who knows what it claims, in short, keep in mind that with a compact of 200 euros or the mobile phone you take the same photos!! concluding, indecent!!! Who sings the praises, trust, does not have um great photographic eye, or is the "photographer" of the Sunday who is believed that to make a photo serves to post it on Instagram or Facebook and then yes. But print them out, then let's talk about it. I repeat, indecent!!!
Cons:Depth of field of the M4/3, cervellotic menu, Batteries
Opinion:I took it as the second camera, plus 6d. I immediately appreciated the body weight/lens, the stabilization is truly remarkable. Wi-Fi allows you to use your smartphone as a remote control and immediately export your photos. The defect (if you can consider such) greater I find it in the exaggerated PDC due to the nature of the M 4 3, and the battery a bit ' poor. Accustomed to the weight of the FF I find myself a featherweight, and if paired with a pancake is almost pocketable. The menu is really to be studied well, it is a concentrate of technology, I will never be able to exploit it to 100% this to say that it offers more than what I need. I printed a photo 50x100 and the result is scary, super sharpness and challenge to recognize the difference from a picture of a full format. I can only recommend it, it is a jewel of camera.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
