RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Nikon D800 : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon D800

The Nikon D800 is a reflex camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 36.2 megapixels manufactured from 2012 to 2014 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 25600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 4 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2348 €;
205 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  


SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuyPhotos


 Sensor
 Format   Fullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)
 Resolution   36.2 megapixel
 ISO sensitivities   50 - 25600
 File formats   RAW, JPEG

 Esposure
 Shutter speeds   30" - 1/8000
 Exp. compensation   +/- 5 stops at 1/2 steps
 Exp. modes   P, S, A, M
 Metering modes   Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot

 Features
 Mount   Nikon F (click here to view al compatible lenses)
 Stabilization   No
 Autofocus (AF areas)   51
 Continuos shooting   4 FPS
 Live View   Yes
 MLU/SS   Yes, Mirrok Lock Up
 Dust reduction   Yes
 Video mode   1920x1080p @ 30 FPS / 1280 x 720p @ 60 FPS
 WiFi   No
 GPS   No

 Built and notes
 Touchscreen   No
 LCD   3.2", 640 x 480 pixels, fixed
 Viewfinder   Optical, coverage 100%, 0.70x
 Flash   Yes, guide number 12 meters
 Storage   CF, SD
 Battery   Li-Ion, Nikon EN-EL15
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   900 g
 Dimensions   146 x 123 x 82 mm
Buy Nikon D800, buy on Ebay


Reviews

What do you think about this camera?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 181000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on August 27, 2019

Pros: Body Pro,color yield, battery life

Cons: High iso hold, white balance

Opinion: I finally bought this gorgeous car for a couple of months with only 8000 shots. I come from (in order) D200,D7000,D700,D300S,D7100. and in the kit I also have a D90 that will not leave me easily... I am not a professional photographer but I allow myself to write my impressions because now some Nikon I know and I would like to give my opinion to those who want to buy one. Well the high iso estate is the only aspect that really disappointed me (at night lamplights of streetlights with the 50 1.8 max 2000 iso... more you don't see ).really I expected more. I had the D700 with which I could take pictures at 4000 iso without any particular disturbance. I think it's because of the super mgpx. Too bad. Another aspect that they lose but for me a little negative is the automatic white balance. Especially with the setting sun you have to intervene manually otherwise something obscene comes out... I have to make a few attempts before finding the right combination, luck that has an infinity of choice in the settings The rest? It's a wonder to me! I do not take sports photos and the gust interests me little (however I have the battery grip and with this the gust so it's great ). The colors then, are really fantastic with much and little light, spectacular details. You can enlarge a lot without losing nulla.il machine body with the pro key position then it's spectacular. Valid display and beautiful sturdy construction. I highly recommend the purchase!!!!

avatarjunior
sent on August 22, 2019

Pros: Ergonomics, sharpness, colors, high ISO hold, dynamic range.

Cons: It is a professional camera and therefore to get in every shooting situation an excellent result you have to study it. Setting times and using the easel for these results. So for me no cons.

Opinion: To date I think it is the best full frame camera in value for money. The D810 and the D850 failed to outperform it. At night practically in the dark even setting the ISOs to 25600 you get noteworthy photos. And then in my opinion: noise? Yes, thank you. An endless machine. For the micro move I do not see damaged photos in any photo situation. The precaution that you should take when shooting is to set a time at least twice the focal length. Or if you want to risk having a good steady hand. In the control of the high lights D850 vs D700 the latter seems to have better yield. In the white balance I do not know errors and as far as yield is concerned the Nikon D800 is so ... is the D800. Either you like it or use another camera.

avatarjunior
sent on March 29, 2019

Pros: Low ISO from fear

Cons: Slow machine, AF every now and then dancer too loud at high ISO

Opinion: A monster!! I had the D800 years ago, well at low ISO generates files that are a pleasure as long as you use resolute optics, it is difficult to find optics that fully solve all mpx of the D800, I used it with fixed such as 105 Nikon 85, 50 the micro-blur is a rumor , come out if you don't know how to use it, it is a machine that does not forgive., l I found it slow in operation, MAF good but not excellent, removed only because the noise at high ISO was really too much, if we consider that the car was costing on 3000 euros when output bhè... Would I buy it back? Yes but definitely the E version, which generates pariah files to that of the 810

avatarjunior
sent on March 08, 2019

Pros: Sturdy body and neatly arranged controls. Very high resolution. Battery life. Good level screen.

Cons: Often encountered serious problems of F/b focus (2 models out of 3 possessed). Huge and heavy files, needs the fastest memory cards and many hard drives. High weight of the body alone.

Opinion: I state that I had 3 and twice I had to face the problems of F/b focus. On all my lenses both zoom and fixed, I had problems and often the photos were to be thrown. Also sometimes even the micro moved was noticeable and annoying. When there were no problems the files were great, amazing details in the macros and crop that did not regret the lack of pushed tele. Sold all three for all the above mentioned reasons. If I found one without those problems, I would buy it again.

avatarsupporter
sent on December 28, 2018

Pros: Virtually everything: resolution, color, detail, dynamic range, construction, robustness, efficiency, enormous malleability and "workability" of both the Raw and the JPG (and you could continue).

Cons: Practically nothing but the heaviness: an elephant in the neck if with heavy lenses and external flash (God save us with battery grip, which I don't anyway). At the moment it is "dated" species on functions like Live View (which also not even use).

Opinion: Eagerly desired and bought after heavy economies, he has been with me for almost six years. I struggle to find them real faults, and, personally, I do not match those that are commonly affixed. For example the susceptibility to vibration due to the mighty (and noisy-but I like it) shutter. When I get the blur, it's my fault. Even without special precautions on tripod (the rare times I use it), I do not get micromossi. Obviously, its powerful Raw from 36 mpx reveal to 100% every minimum defect and softness of each lens, but much is corrected by the firmware, and a lot is correctable via software (especially those who use modules optimization of individual lenses). And then, let's be clear, starting from files like that, you have to make really big prints to notice something, or it's all "razor sharp" anyway! Even if the press was huge, and revealed a clue of softness and micromosso, you should look with the nose on the paper, but who is watching a poster with the nose on the paper?!? The dynamic range is something fantastic, the headroom from Raw allows astounding recovers of highlights, as well as shadows. To the point that one could quietly shoot with strong exposure "to the Left" (the opposite of what many advise) and then raise shadows and blacks without obtaining particular damage (it is known that to do so with certain canon were obtained patterns from "kilt Scottish "Terrifying! But they should have solved the thing in the last models). The depth and the power of the color are extraordinary. You do not feel particularly the slight lack of sharpness compared to the model and especially the next 810: The details are so many, and respond so well to sharpening that you really have to resort to microscopy to find differences Significant! Some signal a certain noise at high ISO. And, especially from Raw, there's really some noise over the 3200, and it gets a lot from 5000-6400. But reducing it with good software, it still remains such a quantity of details (even in the shadows) that the shot, on large print, is virtually identical to the 100-1000 ISO band. Here too, to find differences it takes the magnifying glass. I have no problems even in different shots at ISO 12800 and even someone besides, here using techniques of "expose to the right", pulling down the exposure from Raw and maybe then using a good denoise. I would now be tempted to move on to 850, but finances do not allow, and also allow, sincerely there is no real stringent reason! Other point: The results are also dear with DX lenses! The Raw output can be "pulled up" up to 24 mpx (higher side led to 6000 px) without any significant deterioration! So it's like "containing" a 24 mpx DX of equal efficiency inside! By updating the firmware, it works excellently with the excellent 18-55 AF-P DX VR, and with the equally excellent 35 1.8. We try to find flaws: it is heavy. At the neck with two bison like the 28-300 VR or the Sigma 12-24, it's osteopath stuff... and after a while it can give the wrist cramps. It's flashy, noisy and indiscrey. It's "slow" (I personally though practically never need an ultra-fast "burst"). For types of photos requiring great speed (I think the edges of a circuit from Moto GP) certainly is not the best. But I don't do this kind of photo. It is now "outdated" compared to the latest Sony monsters (for one). But here are flaws that, at least as far as I am concerned, are virtually non-existent.




Photos taken with Nikon D800

Foto
Between heaven and hell
by Fabio Marchini
464 comments, 161907 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The end of the word is coming
by Fabio Marchini
298 comments, 108054 views  [editors pick]
Foto
O sun that lights are born poor 'land is
by Albieri Sergio
747 comments, 43405 views
Foto
Sea Giants
by Fabio Marchini
177 comments, 14249 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Magic Sound
by Stefano Campo
135 comments, 17798 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Po preserves what man abandons
by Albieri Sergio
400 comments, 21204 views
Foto
Crepucolo in Sacca
by Albieri Sergio
368 comments, 19793 views
Foto
Hodr
by Leonardo670sv
138 comments, 13711 views  
HI RES 6.0 MP
 [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
The miracle of Jamnik
by Fabio Marchini
131 comments, 11107 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Cyrustr
84 comments, 38822 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The hour draws to a desire
by Albieri Sergio
492 comments, 14383 views
Foto
Marrakech - Jemaa el-Fnaa - Famous place
by F.Naef
142 comments, 32197 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The striatum embankment
by Albieri Sergio
347 comments, 12584 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Going back home
by Albieri Sergio
388 comments, 16114 views
Foto
Lake Bled in winter
by Gljivec
93 comments, 7983 views  [editors pick]
Foto
No Pain No Gain
by Mikaelmasoero
95 comments, 23450 views  
HI RES 5.1 MP
 [editors pick]
Foto
The host
by Gennaro
133 comments, 43405 views  
HI RES 5.2 MP
 [editors pick]
Foto
Mountain goat
by Gljivec
87 comments, 4949 views  
HI RES 5.8 MP
 [editors pick]
Foto
Spirit Island on Maligne Lake
by Franco Bergamini
116 comments, 13896 views
Foto
Dead Calm
by Albieri Sergio
316 comments, 13449 views
Foto
Scraps Delta at sunset
by Albieri Sergio
332 comments, 11938 views
Foto
A thousand red poppies
by Albieri Sergio
256 comments, 14356 views
Foto
Milky Volaia over Lake
by Mooploop
94 comments, 25574 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Orzaglia
by Luca160
339 comments, 18731 views
Foto
But.
by Alan
48 comments, 25721 views  [editors pick]
Foto
A charge of energy
by Albieri Sergio
326 comments, 16187 views
Foto
The Gash in the sky
by Albieri Sergio
286 comments, 5880 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Sweet Sound of Sunshine
by Leonardo670sv
82 comments, 6354 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Passo Giau
by Mooploop
84 comments, 28719 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Medieval village
by -Eric Draven-
144 comments, 8692 views  
HI RES 35.6 MP
 [editors pick]
Foto
Helena 2
by Marco La Rosa
64 comments, 28883 views  [editors pick]


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Braids and reflections
by Albieri Sergio
296 comments, 14981 views
Foto
Ishmael the carpenter
by LucaRossi76
165 comments, 12354 views  
HI RES 36.2 MP
 [editors pick]
Foto
Gonepteryx rhamni
by J.rigo
145 comments, 18934 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Nika
by Cyrustr
59 comments, 13050 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The sun salutation
by Albieri Sergio
233 comments, 11715 views
Foto
Zip
by Roberto Marini
112 comments, 10852 views  [editors pick]

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.






 ^

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me