JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 E ED VR is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2015. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2185 €;
106 users have given it an average vote of 9.1 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Phenomenal optics. I'm coming from a 24-70 competition that I had to change due to some wear and tear issues. I was immediately impressed by the excellent build quality of the optics, which is also felt in the weight and size. Very sharp and engraved optics from the center to the edges of the frame, with high chromatic fidelity, and very pleasant bokeh; VR does its job very well. Worthy of note, in my opinion, is the idea of the bayonet mount directly on the objective barrel instead of on the ring of the front lens: it gives the sensation of increasing the general tropicalization. Nothing to envy to so many fixed lenses. Super recommended for those looking for versatile optics without sacrificing quality
Opinion:In this period I am trying many optics I happened to this 24-70 VR. Given the price I expected moolto, much more. Apart from the vignetting that is almost impossible to correct and disappears if mounted on Aps-c. But I got to notice that the quality and colors compared to the NON VR version are less engraved even if very little and in any case the current price is still high compared to the final yield. We are talking about small things but in such a perspective I preferred something more. This does not mean that this lens is amazing with a faster and more responsive AF, the vr does its great job.
Opinion:The overall optical quality is truly remarkable as well as the sharpness and autofocus. The stabilizer does its duty great. I do not consider the weight, size and price of the cons as you know before buying it. What instead is a real con and it turns out only after buying it is the fact that it vignettes so much, too much. It is true that for my photographic genre the vignette does not disturb too much and it is also true that it is easily removable but it is still an optical defect that in a lens of this level and this price is not expected! Even if it were a Voigtlander f1.4 from 15 years ago it is a few hundred euros!!! for the rest this 24-70 is a great glass that in focal lengths up to 50mm has very little to envy to the fixed. Max
Pros:Quality on all focal points from 24 to 70 mm.
Cons:Too much (weight, price, size), Impigrisce.
Opinion:A lens that is quite indispensable if you have to do some work, i would go back but I would orient myself on a tamron and use the money saved for some excellent fixed, the quality of the images is great, but at what cons? as mentioned the price, then the size and weight, decidedly exaggerated. In addition, changing with focals so impigrisa a lot and you tend to photograph still stops by rotating the dial of the zoom, for some it may seem like a crap but the limits increase creativity.
Opinion:What about the displeasure of the optics I come from the smooth 24-70 not vr ,sharpness on the whole frame at 2'8 I seem to have a fixed optics,bokeh fantastic from fairy tale . Despite many negative reviews on doxomark and photography sites I found this lens stratospheric, and in addition taken (thanks to Mr Fanetti of Fotomoderna ) a great used equal to the new. The only thing I noticed is that from 50mm to 70mm if I shoot from less than 60 to 70cm to 2.8 the image turns out to me a little soft in the middle, but closing a stop is perfect. To those who find reviews about the nikon as happened to me ,in which you make comparisons with sigma art or tamron you are not to hear anyone try the nikon if you can I on d850 I think I have never found such a perfect optics, in all. Extra advice, pocket permitting, the 24th 70 vr nikon . I don't talk about weight because I come from the old man and I knew it but I noticed that even if it weighs 170 grams more it is very well balanced. I forgot he also has the vr that sometimes makes a difference, and it goes that it's a fairy tale. I think the nikon has made a really good lens I dare not think of the new 24-70 2.8 s for nikon z. They say that the nikon s per ml is better according to those who tried them both. I do not think that nikon does not allow to use the optics with adapter on ml z, there will be a difference but not exaggerated as they describe, also because they cost equal. What I understand is that all the old optics say old, they go better on nikon z.Maybe it's physiological no mirror, stabilizer in the car ,etc etc... I remain of the opinion that if I were to switch to the system ml z the optics that I now have the earths , because the glass is good and always good.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.