RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF VR : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF VR

The Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF VR is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2003 to 2013 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 560 €;
30 users have given it an average vote of 8.1 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   24-120 mm
 Angle of view   84.1 - 20.5°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/3.5-5.6
 Aperture blades   7
 Lenses/Groups   15 elements in 13 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.50 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.21x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal Focus   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   72 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   575 g
 Dimensions   77 x 94 mm

 Buy

Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF VR, buy on Ebay Ebay



Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 226000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





avatarsupporter
sent on August 19, 2014

Pros: Focal length range; Very cheap now used; VR; Image quality f5.6 and smaller better than is often reported.

Cons: Image quality at f3.5; poor reputation;

Opinion: For FX use, a very usable set of focal lengths, less so on DX, where it becomes 36-180mm. Image quality will never be approaching that of a short-range f2.8 zoom, so for ultimate detailed landscapes, not the best choice. But for general use and a cheap 'all-in-one' lens for full-frame, it still has a lot going for it. Stop it down to f5.6 and image is very usable, aided by the effective VR. AF isn't too bad either but not as fast as more modern designs. Lens had now been largely overshadowed by the newer and much more expensive constant f4 version - which new, can be four times as much in cost as good secondhand example of this lens. I now use the same range of focal lengths with Nikon's DX equivalent, the excellent 16-85mm VR, which does at least have very good to excellent image quality, from wide open aperture and also has an excellent reputation, borne out by its popularity with contributors to Juza. So, for those who are FX users and cannot stretch to the new f4 version, or a 24-70mm f2.8, then there is still some attraction in this old f3.5-5.6 model. Just do not buy new - it was an expensive lens new, for what it offered. Build quality is not that special either so can get tatty with heavy use. Another contender in this market must be Sigma's new 24-105mm f4. My score 7/10

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on May 03, 2018

Pros: Compact, stabilization, lens hood ok, price.

Cons: low light autofocus,

Opinion: I use it on my d7100 and is a good all-rounder with excellent value for money. Produces good sharpness when used in manual mode, the ring is smooth and it is very good even for closeups. A little trouble with the yield at maximum aperture. The secret? I shoot with an aperture of not less than 5, finding a good balance with exposure times. Stabilization does not hurt. Finding it used at a good price I recommend it as a traveling companion. Rating 9

avatarsenior
sent on February 07, 2018

Pros: focal excursion and stabilization

Cons: limited quality

Opinion: It is a mistreated view, in the list of the worst Nikon, however it is the one that personally boasts my most published covers; I used it so much that I bought two, the second to replace the first one now 'chopped' by use and no longer resold. Used on DX (D300), it's still a worthy optics, with a fairly fast autofocus and a VR more than efficient. It is not comparable to the 24-120 f4 version (that's another planet), but it's still an all-rounder optic that gives you the most satisfaction (if you don't get too high with the sensor mpix), and allows you to travel light without giving in the eye satisfying 90% compositional choices. Now there is much better around, but when it was born it was definitely a more than valid optics for the machines of that time. I do not know how it goes on the FF, I can say though, that by doing comparative tests with the most titled AF 24-85 f2.8-4 surpassed it widely and without any effort, especially for the quality at the edges (always on DX); to the point that I sold the 24-85 to keep the 24-120 (and then flanked by an AFS 24-70 f2.8). An interesting detail: my first version was 'made in Japan' and I found that it weighed about 20 grams more than the second version I bought and that was manufactured in China; however, I found no qualitative differences between the two. VOTE 7th

avatarjunior
sent on May 23, 2017

Pros: Versatile due to the very wide focal range ...... stop.

Cons: The bad notes for me were the reason why I sold it, with open diaphragms the edges are non-existent, blurry and unobtrusive to the point where the jams are taken. Inadequate AF with low light, first-generation VR that does little and forces it to the eyebrow.

Opinion: There is little to say .... I sold it even if getting to 120 mm made me comfortable, I returned after many years to an old 35/70 f2.8 I have owned in the past and I'm sure of a A much higher level for sharpness and chromaticity. If used at "tourist" level with at least three closed day diaphragms with sufficient light it is acceptable otherwise it is better to invest a few extra euros in higher quality optics. Moving to the "old" 35/70 f2.8 I gave up the VR and the ultrasonic engine but on my D610 break the hair while the 24/120 my hair dropped me ..... on its side it has a price on the market Of the used range ranging from 250 to 350 eurozzi so if you have no pretensions to search for it, at most you resell it without breaking too much or maybe nothing. Ah .... the photos of the review are not text because with the PP all the optics become brilliant, I prefer it to be immediately.

avatarjunior
sent on October 30, 2015

Pros: Compactness, zoom range handyman, good sharpness, excellent VR price of used

Cons: Slight drop in sharpness at the edges to TA, attack hood little solid

Opinion: I bought it used about 5 years ago and it has never disappointed me. Both with my 'old' D200 that with the new D750 returns picture quality even if the maximum aperture not excellent not allow you to isolate the subject from the background with excessive decision. Despite having other seven original optical quality (all at least f2.8), I have always mounted thanks to its enormous versatility of focal (covers 70-80% of the situations). If you want to travel light, a budget handyman and have a view of good-quality is the lens for you. The stabilization allows you to take time to relax with 2-3 times below the safety times, offsetting the maximum aperture is not too open. I am very happy with it and even when I tried the new version f4 I gave up to change it because, in my opinion, the price difference is not equivalent to the difference in quality. Rather, if you find around 200-250 €, take it on the fly and, with the price difference resppound equivalent new F4, take a nice 50 F1.4! There are, in my opinion, many prejudices unedifying about this lens but if you are not professionals who need prints 70x100cm, is a great traveling companion with whom you will click with satisfaction the 80% of the photos. My score is 8.8.




Photos taken with Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6 G IF VR

Foto
I take away
by Expòstudio
164 comments, 28004 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Avebury
by Timk2
285 comments, 19547 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Dario Rapino
54 comments, 13735 views  
HI RES 9.9 MP

Foto
The Invisible Man
by Marchese75
83 comments, 6134 views  
HI RES 25.7 MP

Foto
Flight of steps
by Giorgio Meneghetti
56 comments, 5083 views  
HI RES 8.2 MP

Foto
Light in the forest
by Roberto Degli Uomini
88 comments, 4747 views
Foto
The Perfect storm
by Ulpio
39 comments, 1685 views  
HI RES 14.6 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Dark City
by Free Spirit
56 comments, 3868 views
Foto
Fusine Lakes
by Roberto Degli Uomini
53 comments, 3838 views
Foto
Castelluccio in the winter / 01
by Claudio Zucchi
76 comments, 4022 views  
HI RES 7.4 MP

Foto
Radius mystic.
by Roberto Marini
33 comments, 8091 views
Foto
Magic Fountain
by EnricoGiuliani
48 comments, 1655 views  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
Enchanted
by Sax61
54 comments, 5387 views
Foto
Fiat 600 Multipla - 1956
by LucianoSerra.d
73 comments, 1034 views
Foto
Yellow shadows
by Giorgio Meneghetti
35 comments, 2782 views
Foto
Venetian
by Giorgio Meneghetti
39 comments, 2964 views
Foto
SAGRES-ALGARVE
by Moretz
25 comments, 910 views
Foto
Water games
by Giorgio Meneghetti
46 comments, 2647 views  
HI RES 11.7 MP

Foto
Confusion II
by Free Spirit
39 comments, 2798 views
Foto
National Park "Montagne del Fuego" Timanfaya
by Roberto Degli Uomini
53 comments, 3265 views
Foto
Cars and Fashion 2015/20
by Claudio Zucchi
57 comments, 7092 views  
HI RES 6.8 MP

Foto
Urban door
by Giorgio Meneghetti
30 comments, 2196 views
Foto
Archi-sphere
by Giorgio Meneghetti
23 comments, 2831 views  
HI RES 8.0 MP

Foto
Stewardess
by LucianoSerra.d
36 comments, 2570 views  
HI RES 31.4 MP

Foto
My Aunt Luisa
by LucianoSerra.d
85 comments, 1501 views  
HI RES 15.9 MP

Foto
Castelluccio
by EnricoGiuliani
41 comments, 1458 views  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
Forgotten
by Judith Balari
19 comments, 2810 views
Foto
THE brat
by Roberto Marini
26 comments, 7836 views
Foto
Alfa Romeo Giulietta Spider 1° Serie - 1956
by LucianoSerra.d
36 comments, 354 views
Foto
Tibet Italian
by EnricoGiuliani
40 comments, 1220 views  
HI RES 4.2 MP

Foto
YOU'RE GOOD THERE THAT WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK...
by Moretz
19 comments, 608 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Sax61
33 comments, 6667 views
Foto
China vs India - London
by Roberto Degli Uomini
38 comments, 1779 views
Foto
Fog
by Claudio Zucchi
56 comments, 2665 views  
HI RES 7.5 MP

Foto
Polis-ball
by Giorgio Meneghetti
22 comments, 2168 views
Foto
Evening on Lake Garda
by Antonioceriani
39 comments, 1402 views
Foto
Graphics Autumn
by Roberto Marini
21 comments, 1794 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me