|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lucy78 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lucy78  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica Summilux-M 50mm F1.4 ASPH (2023) Pros: Excellent construction, excellent image quality, built-in lens hood sharpness Cons: Cost? but you already know it's a Leica lens Opinion: I had it, a very nice lens, built very well like all Leicas, the performance is very nice at full aperture with an excellent bokeh, but I replaced it with the Voigtlander 50 f1 as it is an extremely expensive lens but it does not add anything compared to the high end Voigtlander lenses and I am of course talking about the latest high end Voigtlander VMs such as the 50 f1. Buy it with your eyes closed of course because as mentioned, it is an extremely good lens! but in my opinion, 4800 euros for new, is really a lot! let's say that it is worth getting it only and exclusively if you want to own a Leica lens because there are very valid alternatives at a fraction of the price. If you buy it, consider it as an "investment" but the overall quality is absolutely comparable to other lenses of the same focal length from other brands. sent on January 30, 2024 |
 | Hasselblad X2D 100C Pros: Absolute body quality, finishes, aesthetics, integrated internal HD, excellent viewfinder, infinite dynamic range, crazy resolution, top-notch file quality. Cons: Very expensive but it is Hasselblad, AF not too performing tilting display when in extended position partially covered by the eyepiece of the viewfinder. Opinion: I went from the X1D markII to this new X2D 100C, from the previous version to this, the improvements were many and remarkable, apart from the resolution that goes from 50 to 100MP the improvements made were in the viewfinder, really stratospheric very faithful in colors and with a resolution of 5.29Mp a joy for the eyes really! moreover, an internal 1Tb HD capable of storing over 4 thousand photos in 16bit RAW has been introduced, very convenient as it is no longer necessary to use a memory card even if the machine can still be equipped with it. The dynamic range and quality of the file are at the highest levels is an extremely workable file where you can recover everything, shadows, lights and colors in the most difficult conditions, you will rarely have to throw a shot because of a bad exposure, you will almost certainly recover it. Good behavior at high ISO despite being a very dense sensor, you can get excellent images even at 6400 ISO (over I would not go). Aesthetically it is a modern work of art I would say, made of a single piece of aluminum and built with an uncompromising quality (and we would miss it given the cost) everything is minimal and in the right place but a negative note is certainly the display that in a folded position (cockpit to understand) is a bit covered by the eyepiece of the viewfinder. What is not yet up to par in my opinion is the AF, certainly improved, now it is phase and contrast but for my taste still a bit slow. I understand that with this camera you do not go to do sports or aviofauna, it is not designed for this, but a more performing AF would certainly have been appreciated. That said, if you can afford it, do a lot of portrait or landscape or architecture this is certainly a room that will not disappoint you absolutely, recommended for those looking for photographic perfection without asking for anything else. sent on January 19, 2023 |
 | Hasselblad XCD 45mm f/3.5 Pros: Very sharp lens already at TA, compactness in relation to the format, good fluidity of manual focusing Cons: Important cost, at TA purple and green fringes in ugly high contrast conditions. Opinion: What about this lens, it is a good all-rounder lens for X1 / 2D seire, the sharpness in the center is embarrassing already at TA, it offers many possibilities of use being a 35mm equivalent on FF, good but not fantastic the blurred at 3.5, the progression of the out of focus is appreciable but of course, it is not an optics devoted to portrait even if it can be effective in portraiture set in ambient light. Painful notes? Of course! the TA lens shows, in situations of other contrast on surfaces but also on backlit hair, purple and green fringes, these can be corrected in post production, but for a 2800 euro lens I would have expected much more honestly. In conclusion, if you are looking for a handyman lens equivalent to a 35mm on FF, opt for the younger brother, the 45 F4 P, is lighter, slightly sharper than this and more optically correct at less than half of this 45 3.5, the 0.5 aperture makes absolutely no difference in terms of blurred, you will not even notice! save 1400 euros and you will have a better lens, this in relation to its performance, has a cost too high and is older than the 45 F4 P. sent on October 06, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm GF 45-100mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Pros: Optical quality like the best fixed, blurred, excellent construction, extreme versatility of use, very effective stabilizer Cons: Heavy and big, important price, 82mm filters, plastic hood Opinion: Purchased together with GFX100s I am using it in the most varied conditions, from portrait to landscape to street (even if it does not lend itself much to the street given weight and bulk) I must recognize the great work of Fuji to create a very versatile zoom (a 35-80mm on FF equivalent) with a quality worthy of the best fixed always in the GFX house. Do not be fooled by the aperture of only F4, we are talking about medium format and this zoom returns approximately the PDC of a 2.8 zoom on FF, this means that the TA images ensure an excellent three-dimensionality in fact, on the long side (100mm) we have a very good rendering in the portrait, with a pleasant and progressive blur at F4. As for the stabilizer, this is really excellent allowing me to shoot freehand at 1/10 sec. at 100mm having still images, impressive considering the format of the sensor!. Painful notes? sure! there are, the price that on the new touches the 2400 euros (I bought it used at 1900 as new) and then the weight, we are talking about 1Kg that are not very much but combined with the body of the GFX100s it makes itself felt and then the 82mm filters that have their cost if quality. In conclusion, if you consider the purchase of a GFX body and you want a single lens, if you can afford it bet on this 45-100, you will really do everything and you will do it very well!if instead you plan to buy more lenses, then bet without if but on the fixed ones that are equally excellent with less weight and bulk, I wanted to take the zoom because I do not know when and if I can buy other GFX lenses given the crazy costs that they have! with this zoom I am fine for the photographic genres I do and for me at the moment it is more than enough. sent on October 02, 2022 |
 | Canon EF 200mm f/2 L IS USM Pros: Record-breaking sharpness, free of aberrations, divinely constructed, high bokeh, effective 5-stop stabilizer. Cons: Not having it, weight, bulk and cost. Opinion: The best lens I have ever owned, the optical quality achieved by this lens is at the top is the best you could want from a lens of this class, the sharpness already at full aperture is embarrassing from edge to edge, but it is not only this ... the returned image has an incredible micro contrast and chromatic aberrations are absent altogether even when photographing in conditions of light reflected on metals in an extreme way. Bokeh is really superb, soft, buttery with passages between the poetic out-of-focus areas, a painter in the true sense of the word! built like a tank, solid as a rock and with a really good stabilizer that allows you to shoot 1/20 freehand at full aperture. The real cons is not owning it! while the weight, the bulk and even the cost are not real cons, those who take this lens know what they are buying and know that it will meet an important weight (2500 gr) and a considerable footprint, while for the cost well ... it is a very expensive and rare lens also to be found in the used but it is certainly a solid and important investment. Nothing else to add, vote 10 and praise in all respects, probably the best 200mm super canvas ever made. sent on April 26, 2022 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Apo Sonnar T* 135mm f/2 Pros: Record-breaking sharpness, build quality, record-breaking micro contrast, indescribable colors so beautiful they are. Cons: Manual focus but it is not a real con. Opinion: Incredible lens, characterized by a sharpness that is unrivaled already at full aperture, you will hardly find a sharper lens! The blur it gives is very pleasant and progressive while appreciating an extraordinary micro contrast. It is a Zeiss there is little to do and you can see it in everything including the all-metal build quality with a buttery and perfectly frictioned focus ring. It does not have auto focus so it could discourage different types of users, but using it is not a big problem, it invites you to a more reflective and calm photograph. I vote 10 in pretty much everything, I think it's the best 135mm I've ever had the pleasure of trying. sent on April 18, 2022 |
 | Sigma 24-35mm f/2.0 DG HSM Art Pros: Excellent construction, 3 fixed focal lengths of greater wide-angle use in 1, microcontrast, excellent yield on the entire frame, excellent bokeh, impeccable AF (on 1Dx mark II Canon), attractive quality / price ratio. Cons: Heavy and coarse, filter diameter 82, is a compromise. Opinion: I bought this lens because I was looking for a lens that would integrate the classic 3 focal lengths of greater wide-angle use such as the 24, 28 and 35mm. As soon as you take it out of the package and taken in hand you immediately realize that the optics are of great quality, you can see it in the choice of materials used, from the fluidity and softness of the rings and the quality of the details, a convenient case is supplied to store it really well made. You mount it in the car and shoot: wow!!! It's amazing the quality of the image it returns! At 24mm it is monstrous at 28 gorgeous while at 35 perhaps it loses a thread of sharpness while remaining exceptional and we are talking about the whole aperture, just close at f2.8 and at every focal length, it becomes a blade in the true sense of the word, very sharp at the borders of reality. The microcontrast is really excellent, as well as the bokeh, f2 and 35mm gives a beautiful blur ideal for example for portraits set both indoors and outdoors. The autofocus, infamous in the Sigma Art 50 and 35mm f1.4 here is just a memory, I use it on CANON 1Dx markII and it is impeccable! Out of 100 shots, at least 95 are in focus, practically never wrong, I do not know maybe they have improved the algorithm or I have a good pairing camera body in any case the error is almost nil. Now let's talk about the focal length, it is certainly a compromise the zoom range is minimal and you go on the fly from 24 to 35mm so it is not suitable as a handyman but you have to see it as a fixed that if necessary can provide a wider or narrower image depending on the needs. I find it excellent as a lens for a photographer of events such as ceremonies as it allows you to have a good versatility giving the need for excellent bokeh thanks to the f2 aperture. The fact remains that it is large and heavy and I do not see it suitable for genres such as street for example because for this type of photography I see more indicated a fixed 35mm for example as could be the Canon 35mm f2 IS. In my opinion another masterpiece signed Sigma in its Art series, if the primary intention is to have the quality of 3 fixed in 1 buy it with your eyes closed and you will not regret it absolutely, as long as you accept its "defects" or weight and bulk but in the end, in a bag how much weigh and clutter 3 fixed lights? Grade 10 laude, great Sigma. sent on March 29, 2022 |
 | Zeiss ZM Biogon 35mm f/2 Pros: Optically superb, high-level build quality, excellent all-rounder on Leica M, low cost compared to the Leica counterpart, is a Zeiss. Cons: Hood to buy separately, a bit "big" compared to its Leica counterpart Opinion: Well... what about this glass... excellent from practically all points of view! at full aperture in the center already very very sharp, as the aperture is closed it improves until it becomes perfect between the center and edges at F8, but already at F5.6 the sharpness on the entire frame is amazing!. I owned the 35mm f2 Summicron ASPH version 2016, great lens absolutely but this Zeiss equals it without doubt as optical performance maybe it is just a hair below as build quality, but let's talk about the quisquiglie, the Leica in my opinion has a slightly better mechanics but really ... not by much! Let's talk about costs now... the Leica costs more than 3000 euros!!! but you know, Leica is Leica and you also pay this, this Zeiss instead you take home at 1000 euros round new, a really competitive price in relation to the great qualities that this lens possesses. If you don't have the money for the Leica, take this! you will not regret it at all, if instead you have the money for the Leica well ... take this!! and with the rest go and take a nice trip to the place you like the most! good light to all sent on December 10, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm XF 50mm f/1.0 R WR Pros: Bokeh reference, reference construction, diameter filters 77, AF lending to be an F1, excellent price/performance ratio, crisp enough, unique f1 auto focus on APSC format. Cons: Weighs... but there really is so much glass to move!, important dimensions inevitably. Opinion: I had the 56 f1.2, excellent lens equipped with a beautiful bokeh at TA, then... then I tried this and immediately fell in love with it! I use it for now on Xpro3 waiting to buy X-T4... The very first shot I took was a portrait of my daughter at F1... the first thing I said when I saw the image on PC was "wow!". Yes, this F1 lens is just crazy and the thing that surprised me the most was the fact that, it manages to combine a sharpness more than good on the chosen point of fire, along with a progression of the bokeh and the detachment of fairytale plans! The out-of-focus areas are of incredible softness and as mentioned, the blurry is very progressive, really wonderful!. Af side, even here the 50 F1 is doing very well, the speed of the AF for a lens of this size and this opening is really good, moreover, it has a safe AF even at TA, especially if you use face/eye recognition. As a portrait lens in the house Fujifilm is unrivalled! And it surpasses in every aspect the exceptional 56 f1.2. The disadvantages are the weight and the size, we are talking about 850gr of fixed optics where inside there is really a lot, a lot of high quality glass and on a body such as an X-T30 it is really very unbalanced. It is not a super versatile lens obviously and is aimed at a specific user, if you do a lot of portraiture and fashion for example it is the definitive optics! Especially in the professional field, if instead these photographic genres are not the primary activity I would certainly recommend the 56 f1.2 that weighs half and is very close to it as yield and performance. To conclude... superlative optics in all things absolutely recommended for those who make the portrait its first photographic genre vote 10. sent on March 20, 2021 |
 | Voigtlander VM 35mm f/2 Ultron Pros: Excellent construction quality, attractive aesthetics, small, sharp from the center to the edges, good value for money. Cons: Paraluce not closed and very expensive, a bit of vignetting but nothing serious. Opinion: I have recently been a happy owner of a Leica M Monochrom Typ246, and as my very first goal, after having already literally fainted for the body machine, I took this Ultron 35mm f2, postponing the appointment for the purchase of the various Leica glasses. I can say that this lens surprised me! it is built very well, all in metal of excellent workmanship, the rings are really well frictioned and fluid, the body is small and therefore makes the body/lens set compact and discreet. The optical quality is very good already at full opening in the center, and then progressively improve from the center to the edges as the diaphragm is closed, I did some tests and I have to say that, from f5.6 to f8 it achieves its best optical performance. Ok, at the opening there is a bit of vignetting, which, in some ways, could also be a plus because it gives the image a very vintage look that I do not mind, in any case, correctable in a click on LR. Surely, the various Leica optics will be better, although, I got to watch a comparison with the respective Summicron 35mm f2 and this Voigtlander comes out with its head held high, winning on the Leica in some respects, in short... as a first optics on an M body I would say that it is really recommended because it has all the cards in order to churn out excellent photographs! another small negative note the paraluce not closed and rather expensive, I on Amazon found a third-party one at the modest amount of 50 euros !! for heaven's sake, equal to the original but dearest. In conclusion, really very good optics and at a good price, I recommend it as 35mm even definitive, if you can't or do not want to sell yourself a kidney for the very expensive optics of the red sticker. sent on February 02, 2021 |
 | Canon 5Ds Pros: Amazing quality of the file that churns out, fantastic resolution for exaggerated crops, Pro body, beautiful viewfinder, excellent AF, original anthracite coating that differentiates it from smooth 5D3, possibility of on-camera cropping 1.3 and 1.6 directly on the RAW file at your fingertips, very accurate exposure meter and improved WB compared to 5D3, infinite possibilities (with series lenses) Cons: Noise, noise, noise, you have to deal with the extremely dense sensor, 6400 ISO are already emergency, absolutely needs SERIES lenses!!, not for all genres. Opinion: Then... let's start by saying that, this is a machine that caters to some photographic genres and can never, ever be a handyman like 5DMk4 for example. Portrait and landscape are his favorite genres, his sensor is truly extraordinary in the range between 100 and 3200 ISOs capable of churning out extremely detailed images and with exemplary colors! great quality therefore of raw that remains really very workable. with 50Mp the crop possibilities are almost infinite in more, genius of Canon it is possible to crop / cut directly in the machine on the RAW file in various formats, 1,3, 1,6 4:3 etc... this involves the possibility of exploiting the available optics in a very flexible way especially with clipping 1.6 (APS-C format) and, at crop carried out you still have a file of about 20 Mp of great quality. But... every medal, always has its downside and after all these Pros that are many, let's talk about the cons ... Noise! ehhh yes, forget about going around in the evening using it freehand, the range available to get a good file must not exceed 3200 ISO, beyond the noise it becomes quite invasive and is rather difficult to eliminate without losing the finer detail, therefore, for any night you will need a good easel. Another sore note... THE LENSES! even here, there is no escape, to make it to the maximum of its possibilities, it is necessary to equip it with OBJECTIVE GENTLEMEN such as fixed of the Art series of Sigma (BEN TARATI!!!) and L Canon series optics, in particular I recommend the 35mm f1.4II and the 135mm f2 L, beautiful in combination with this body. In conclusion, I can say with extreme certainty that the 5Ds is a fantastic reflex for lovers of portraiture and / or landscape able to show the most meticulous details of an image that often escape the eye during shooting but ... mind you, she's NOT a handyman!!! it's like a Formula 1 Ferrari to make a comparison, it only runs on the track and that's enough to understand us, you can't do everything about it, so much better the 5D4 is a machine with an extremely limited ISO range, 6400 ISO are the latest native sensitivity but they are already to be used for emergencies! so no night outings with reflex around the neck :-) but exclusively with easel as a result, SERIOUS LENSES without compromise otherwise, the high browning will highlight all the crap of underperforming lenses and the shot will be a all kneaded. With TOP lenses, therefore, for portrait and landscape no one will be disappointed by this reflex that, if used properly will create not a little dependence, recommended absolutely to be combined with a reflex all do or as the only machine body for super fine palates in search of the maximum possible detail and giving up stratospheric ISO and the use and abuse of the freehand chamber. sent on December 24, 2020 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Exceptional at all openings, unattainable bokeh, sharpness from edge to edge, top construction quality! Cons: Heavy and bulky as a result not very discreet, the AF must be calibrated well with Dock station absolutely (do not take it home without the Dock station, you may be disappointed without knowing that you are wrong). Opinion: I have been aiming for about a week, used equal to the new one at an affordable price in a well-known store in Turin. Let's start talking about the cons, which are only 2. First, the absolute mistake you can make is to mount it in the car (I'm talking about reflex and not mirrorless) and photograph, you could run the risk of being disappointed, because, like all Sigma Art, it must be calibrated well with Dock station, easel, optical aim and patience, if you do not want to do this job before using it forget it! I speak naturally for reflex owners. The other against is the "sweet" weight once it is engaged in the car, I use it with EOS1D X, which already weighs on its own, mounting it in front of me I need a sherpa help to keep it on :-). These are the only 2 cons, let's move on to the pros. Once calibrated well with the Dock station, it becomes almost infallible in the fire, the images at 1.4 are extremely sharp (if you will be stopped with your hand and if you manage to "peck" the fire where you really want, because at f1.4 and 105mm it becomes difficult to master the fire since the PDC is extremely reduced). He, he is always sharp, shooting at 1.4 is like doing it at 2.8 or 5.6, it makes no difference other than in the blurry, crazy, gorgeous and extremely soft and buttery, I had never seen so much beauty in the out-of-focus areas with other specialist lenses like this. Let's talk now about the build quality... a tank (certainly heavy) built to last, a jewel of mechanics and optical quality with its 105mm diameter lentona where you can also mirror it! (Nikon and Canon... we want to learn how to do things right???) in short... the L series are well built goals, but just take hold of this Sigma to understand that, in terms of construction quality, there is an abyss!, ahhh I forgot it is also tropicalized well, (Sigma on the manual declares that it can be used in the rain) although I believe that with this lens you will go little around in the rain but you never know ... :-). In conclusion, if you are willing to do some biceps with your arms, given its huge weight for a 105mm fixed and if you are willing to calibrate it well with the dock station (I always speak for traditional REFLEX owners such as my Canon EOS1D X) it will give you magical shots in every aspect! There's not one aspect where this lens doesn't really excel is a crazy lens and deserves all the money you need to buy it, "The bokeh Master"! It's true... sent on November 03, 2020 |
 | Nikon D300 Pros: Tank, range, sensor still valid today, excellent ergonomics, crop factor 1.5 with lenses for FF. Cons: Intrusive noise over the 1600 ISO, sight a little small. Opinion: Found as new (3600 shots) at 200 euros, what to say, an icon of digital photography signed Nikon, when Nikon with the series D3, D700 and D300 still did good things. The body is robust, tropicalized well and ergonomically great, which then the D500 is better in everything well... I think it's obvious, but this is a reflex from as far back as 2007! let's not forget this. The RAW file is very good even today, it has a good dynamic range, the shadows open well and keeps the detail great! the noise, needless to deny it there is absolutely, but you can get great shots up to 1600 ISO and if you want, even at 3200 ISO as long as the photo is displayed impeccably. Among the defects (the very few defects) I find the scope perhaps a little small even if the cover is 100% I think, a slightly larger viewfinder would certainly have benefited. Good autonomy, especially if you use its BG MB-D10 in this configuration we have 2 batteries, one in the reflex body and the other inside the BG, can be abundantly exceeded the 1000 shots and beyond. If you find it in perfect condition, with a few shots under 200 euros take it without thinking a second! at the price of a current low-level compact, you bring home a state-of-the-art reflex body, plus if you also have an FF body with various lenses, you can use them with crop factor 1.5 which is very useful especially for long focals. My final judgment is absolutely positive, on the other hand, reflexes like D3 and D700 have made the history of Nikon and the D300, made in the same era, is no exception. sent on June 07, 2020 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X Pros: Ergonomics at the top, excellent build quality, excellent autofocus, extremely customizable, great battery life, super stabilization. Cons: Expensive (but falling in price), sights not on par with competitors. Opinion: I've owned this ML of Olympus house for about a month, what about... I find it a fantastic car far superior to its younger sister EM1 mark II. Many have called it "big" and "heavy" for the M4/3 system, it may be true, but it should be remembered that it is a machine designed for the professional who uses it with heavy optics such as the 300f4 for example or with the 40-150 2.8 Pro. It fits perfectly in your hand and never tires your grip, the ergonomic look has been studied in a maniacal way, all the controls are there, where you would like them! The buttons are recognizable to the touch because they are shaped each one differently. The build quality is at the top really granite and weather-proof, the autofocus is very fast, precise and never loses the subject in motion and moreover is totally customizable. Thanks to the built-in grip, it allows you to accommodate 2 batteries, so that the lifespan in terms of range is excellent, comparable to that of a classic DSLR. The stabilizer reaches an even higher level, guaranteeing as much as 7.5 stops with IS optics. Let us come to the cons now, although the wider scope has remained that of the M1II in terms of resolution, which, on such a machine should not exist given the fact that the competition here has done much better with crosshairs with almost double resolutions ( Panasonic S1), however, remains a good lens but not worthy of a car of this category. The cost. The cost still penalizes this fantastic ML (price at launch 3000) decidedly high, although lately you can bring home new at 2000 a figure decidedly more reasonable and in line with what is also offered in relation to the competition. In conclusion, this camera is really the best that Olympus has ever made! It is not for everyone, absolutely it is a machine designed exclusively for a professional user that requires uncompromising performance, a machine that is difficult to exploit 100% certainly not suitable for beginners or amateurs who seek compactness and compactness lightness while remaining more compact and lighter than the Canikon top range reflexes. I am extremely satisfied with this little monster that I absolutely recommend to those who make photography a professional sector without compromise. sent on October 12, 2019 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark II Pros: Series 1, extremely sturdy and tropicalized body, AF, viewfinder 100%, infinite battery, amazing file quality to any ASA. Cons: LCD screen practically useless (in 2004 there was that), complicated menu and discomfort in changing the settings, heavy but you already know in the beginning. Opinion: What about this little monster churched out by Canon in the far 2004?! A fantastic reflex still able to give you wonderful sensations, you just have to challenge it to understand right from the start that the various 5/6/7d are toys in comparison. Here there are no automatic ISO, sensor stabilization and various bales, here you are you and her, if you can photograph, she will always support you and will repay you with fantastic images thanks also to her sensor that churns out a raw with colors and a grain that remind me of the old Kodak Portra 400 film to see To believe! Otherwise if you do not know how to do and do not know the basics of photography and its laws, you will often cannerai because the LCD screen of this machine is almost useless, you want for the size, you want for the very low resolution, which allows you to understand little Or nothing, in fact I disabled the revision of the shot as if I took to film. Difficult to understand and also use the menu, rather messed up as well as the way to change the settings of the machine that always forces you to use 2 buttons in a simultaneous way to do almost everything and then bind the 2 hands together. Among the pros, point out also a beautiful and bright viewfinder with coverage to 100% It's really a pleasure to look inside! And a really performant AF with well 45 points, hard to err MAF with this machine. I found a used specimen kept very well but with 95k shots! That for this type of body are not a problem considering that the shutter is tested for 200k loops so I hope it can make me company still for a long time. In conclusion, is an SLR still very good today and the file that churns out is really incredible at all ISO (3200 is the maximum value), but it is certainly not a machine for Novelli indeed.. I do not recommend to those who use the camera in AUTO mode to shoot and those looking for technological frills/various AIDS, here you have to be able to photograph, which means not being good photographers, but it means knowing what you are doing then have the basics of Photography. If you click "to Muzzo" without knowing what you are doing, you can hardly realize that you have done good or bad, because the display does not allow you to understand almost anything if not perhaps the correct exposure, the automatic ISO are not there and therefore in relation to what you frame Rafa, you need to understand her and set her best. sent on November 27, 2018 |
 | 7artisans 35mm f/1.2 Pros: Barrel Building Cons: of each! Opinion: Well, I wanted to leave my opinion on this lens that I took for my Fuji X-T2 and immediately made it to Amazon within 24 hours. Just pull it out of the box you say, wow! It's all made of metal and built discreetly, with fluid and well-cut nuts, and so far all right then, once mounted on the machine start to try it at TA, or F 1.2 and say: God!!!! But what is this rubbish????? A f 1.2 In focus there is nothing! Tests carried out with camera on stand and remote shutter release, so no vibration or anything... When you start to close to F4 then something sharp can be seen in the center, really bad very bad bad, not to mention the flare that in many users complain having tried it. I assure you that 152 euros to buy it are better in your pockets, alsciate lose and maybe if you want bright and quality lenses put aside the pennies, including these to buy this rubbish, not recommended. sent on November 08, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR Pros: Build quality, Optical quality, bokeh, razor sharp already at f2, AF Speed. Cons: Dimensions not really compact, lens hood OBSCENE. Opinion: Taken used at a great price (650 euros as new) just mounted on X-T2 and tried for a dozen shots what I came to say is WOW! Incredible sharpness already at f2, a razor from edge to edge! It has no aberrations is very correct and the distortion is virtually absent. The AF amazed me for rapidity and precision, it is true, the machine off is noisy because of the 4 engines of focus that make "dance" the optical groups inside, but nothing worrying, machine turned on no longer warns anything and the speed of AF is really neither thunder And. The bokeh, which is very important in this perspective, conceived mainly for the portrait is really "buttery" very very pleasant and gradual, if the plays on par if not a better spin with the 56 F 1.2. The dimensions are not really paperless, but besides the optical quality adds weight, the lens hood is a scandal! Looks like a plastic gutter pipe cut! It does its job of course, but it brutifies this wonderful glass!. To have without reservation if you are fond of outdoor portrait because indoors, it is quite long! It is a specialized lens born for the portrait, so not very usable for other photographic genres (even if it is not so true) my vote is 9/10 because it is really a TOP lens. sent on October 06, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR Pros: Excellent optical and constructive quality, light, performing and silent AF excellent quality / price ratio. Cons: Nobody except the obscene hood! Opinion: So ... I wanted to try this lens thoroughly before reviewing it, it is an excellent lens, it is built really well, the shots of the ring of the sarm well sno frizionati, hard at the right point, I tested in the rain mounted on X-T2 without encountering any kind of problem then really well tropicalized.rnThe AF is quite silent compared to for example at 35 f1.4 XF and is clearly more 'performante.rnChe still, its weak point is the hood that Fuji it comes really ugly! I replaced it with a very well made Leica JJC style costing 39 euros on Amazon, expensive but gives it another look.rnIf you look for a 50mm equivalent focal and maybe you own a body like X-T2, H1 or Pro2 is the best choice you can make so 'a photographic means able to deal with any weather, in addition' is small, light and optically fantastic characterized by a good bokeh to be a f2 and a beautiful color rendering, recommended without reservation can ' %3B only make him "kit". sent on March 12, 2018 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Excellent sharpness already at TA, quality of materials used, superlative construction. Cons: Weight and footprint, stop. Opinion: I have this glass for more than 2 months, just take it in your hand for the first time and go and grab it on the bayonet you say "my mom how big the front lens is!" a show! then start snapping and shots right at TA, wow! this is what you say later, an awesome sharpness already at f1.4 and a great bokeh, though I think more as to say ... pictorial than the 85 f1.2 Canon (I'm a Nikon user, but I know the pictures that it returns the Canon "Big One" .nn you feel the weight and the size, so much so that if you mount this lens on a "little" body you will soon feel the need to use a BG.rnPeso and bulk as a part (only defects for me) the rest is just wow! especially in relation to the price I would say more than proportionate to the performance that this lens has.rnIf you have Nikon like me, it is more unlikely to have focus problems, I do not have it on my D800E, with Canon perhaps some more problem with ' it's surely%2C I therefore recommend trying it out well before making the purchase and considering the AF Adjustment Dock as it is a super bright lens that still needs fine calibration to make it better. What else to say ... I absolutely recommend buying, because it is really a top lens in virtually everything, the Nikon equivalent costs twice as much and does not offer the same features starting with the rather poor construction of the barrel and the slowness of the AF, to have absolutely the focal point you like and make the portrait your passion or photographic work. sent on September 01, 2017 |
 | Olympus PEN-F Pros: meticulous care in design and materials, fantastic sight, full of neat and functional dials, very customizable, crazy stabilizer! Cons: And 'expensive, the image quality is very good but not comparable to a reflex course FF Opinion: Well, I do a first review on the fly, I own this room for less than a week, it was my ball, I wanted it and I got it with 17mm f1.8.rnAppena pulled out of the box, I take it in your hand and say: "my mom quality!" yes, this is state of the Pen F in the design and care of materials and this is out of the question, then I start to use it, customize it and I realize that nothing is missing, absolutely nulla.rnIl viewfinder is really beautiful, very much fluid and crisp in general is a machine that is loved for street photography, light, practical, with an AF excellent (very fast), the stabilizer 5-axis does a tremendous job! shooting in hand with times of 1 "is unheard of in other macchina.rnCosta bodies, and not a little! But it must be acknowledged that a quality never seen in every aspect and quality, s pay! IQ is very good, but it remains always a M4 / 3 sensor so you do not expect the detachment of the plans that can 'give a FF DSLR, going upISO 3200 ie beyond the noise is heard even if, thanks to the super stabilizing you can keep the ISO low and avoid mosso.rnIl My advice is try it at home first to take her there is a very particular car body, in all respects and must convince and pleasure since we are talking of almost 1,400 € (in kit with 17mm) I like very much and are extremely sodisfatto purchase. sent on January 28, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
