JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2015. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (Stepper Motor), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 398 €;
61 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 206000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: sharp, small and lightweight, very good image quality, low CA, weather seling, fair price
Cons: the hood... tiny plastic joke :) Check the 35/1.4, looking cool.
Opinion: Use a Fuji Xpro2, not a perfect lens, but the image quality is fine, sharp on F2 with low chromatic aberration, bokeh is good. F4 is super sharp with 0 CA, cool. Bonus specs for this price the weather sealing. So, I think this sweet lens Very Recommended, if you don't need a bigger 35/1.4 and the plus bokeh. Every Fuji photographer bag need this lens. :)
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Very well built optics, with soft diaphragm ring the right and third stop, servo-assisted manual maf that I do not mind. Personally I love extreme sharpness, which can still be reduced to pp, so at f2 I find it a little soft for my personal tastes, but from f2.8 to 16 it becomes extremely sharp and meets all my expectations. I find the minimum distance of maf a little limiting, which still remains in the norm for a 35mm (there are specific optics for the closest photo)... I had no elements to compare it with big brother 1.4, but the focus is extremely fast and the yield of 2.8 amazing and without visible distortions. Using the EVF and not looking at every single LCD frame, which I find dispersive as a technique, it seems to me that the magnification ratio is slightly slightly enlarged compared to the shot, perhaps due to the corrections applied in jpg by the camera. Beautiful optics at low price, to be permanently mounted on the camera.
Opinion:As well as appreciating the quality of its products, I also appreciate the style and aesthetics. In the aps-c series the machine bodies I consider them really beautiful and functional, as well as the objectives. This is the first "fixed" WR that happens to me in my hands. If the X-T2 finds with the 14, with the zoom 18-35, with the 55-200 the body-lens completion (all optics I have) with this conical trunk bacarozzo seems to have nothing to do with it (I do not comment on the lightguard because on this accessory in general fuji does not seem to believe it at all). This is to argue the "con". For the 'pros', I agree with all those who have spoken about it well, I cannot add anything more. To satisfy the eye I would have to choose version 1.4, but I was looking for a fixed WR to combine with the X-T2 for thoughtless exits in adverse weather conditions. And anyway, the shape of the barrel doesn't matter for the result, which is photography.
Cons:Character and personality-free as about 95% of Fujifilm digital ml optics, indecent distortion from wide-angle pushed by 30 euros, free of three-dimensionality, free of contrast
Opinion:I took with Fujifilm for years also on a professional level, then I moved to Leica. If it is true that good photography can also be done with a compact 50 euros, it is true that there must be pleasure in photographing (since it is not a question of splitting stones). I say that perfection (so sought after in the modern amateur...) is boring. Perfection in photography is a tedious flaw that only leads to long yawns. Having said that I can say that one of the favorite optics is the Simmicron 50mm/2 Rigid, optics far from perfect, but with character to sell. It is a poetic glass, which gives emotions. The opposite is the opposite of about 95% of modern Fujifilm optics. The latter, were conceived more with aesthetic than qualitative benefits. Having been shooting for years with Fujifilm I can say that I rarely had to deal with valid optics. Mostly they are lenses that work when shooting in jpeg, with all internal processor fixes. As soon as you shoot in raw... here comes the donkey. Distortions, lack of contrast, lack of resolution... In short, bottle funds designed exclusively to be processed by the machine. Not to mention the lack of character. Optical without personality, that bore, that make you pass the desire to photograph. And this 35mm is the summary of all these flaws, a trivial optics, which has distortion even if it was an old 24mm stall, of those you buy and use once. I shoot exclusively in raw, if I want to shoot in jpeg I use the mobile phone or the compact. If I use a Fujifilm I want to have total control over the image. After years of digital Leica and film I filmed an XE2s and this 35mm... bà, it made me return the desire for analog, where the final quality is given exclusively by glass and film.
Pros:Constructive quality, silence and compactness
Cons:In certain conditions of light aberration of color at full opening at close range
Opinion:I bought it back, after selling it in favor of the 35 f1.4, taking advantage of Black Friday at a super advantageous price, Fujifilm Italia guarantee. I missed it even though I think the first copy wasn't excellent. This copy amazes! Mounted on the X-H1 I didn't remember it so quiet and precise and sharp. Compared to 35 f1.4, it offers warmer colors with the same settings. I find it very beautiful, tropicalized, internal focus, a jewel. I decided to keep both 35 f1.4 and f2. Magic both!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
