JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Sigma 24-35mm f/2.0 DG HSM Art is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2015 to 2023 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 803 €;
39 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Sigma SA: this lens is compatible with reflex and mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sigma SA-mount.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Crisp everywhere, solid, fast, bright, and more
Cons:The ones we already know before: big, heavy, without stabilization and with a limited focal range
Opinion:A crazy goal. Do we want to start with the flaws? He has them, but if he didn't, it would be science fiction. Did we mention it's big and heavy? But it is solid and balanced on an important body; Is it "only" F2 and not stabilized? But it's already razor-sharp like this and there is plenty of light; vignette to TA? Yes, true, but nothing that can't be solved in post; Does it have a limited focal range? Very true but it has the performance of a 24, a 28 and a 35 pro in a single element; Is it too dedicated to events and weddings? It is, but it's also amazing for landscapes, portraits, astrophotography, reportage... In addition, it focuses very closely, has no chromatic aberrations, limited distortions and manages to have a nice bokeh despite the wide focal lengths. I forgot: you can plant the sun in the middle of the glass and it only gives you a more beautiful photo. It's clearly a particular lens that you "have to use", of course, but when you need it, it does its job in an incredible way.
Pros:Sharpness, colors, robustness, beautiful bokeh, last but not least the autofocus!! Ps. update after many more photos...
Cons:Not having had it before two days ago... Maybe it's the fact that the zoom ring rotates in the opposite direction for us canonists..., but it's a trifle!!
Opinion:A truly superb, wonderful lens! Really three fixed lenses in one! Sharpness really at the highest level and not annoying! It's sturdy and solid! It has a really creamy blur and makes every photo a 3D! Excellent auto focus that is enhanced with mirrorless cameras and makes it stand out!! There are those who say that it weighs too much, in my opinion it is the physical proof of how excellent this 24-35 is and how much substance there is!! It strengthened my thinking... Mirrorless lenses cost proportionally a heresy!! I think they can hardly reach this quality, with a much higher cost! If you are undecided, do one thing, buy it used on Amazon and at worst send it back, but I warn you, it will be a lot of love at first sight and at first shot!! Ps. update after many more photos... Apparently the focal range is little... Actually, there really is a world from 24 to 35mm!! It's an amazing lens that the more I use it, the more it excites me!!
Pros:Sharpness, overall quality equal to fixed optics
Cons:F2 vignetting, slight distortion,
Opinion:Evident vignetting at TA correctable in post production, slight distortion at 24mm, already at 25mm disappears. Obviously you have to do the calibration. For the rest it is a wonderful optics. Perfect for wedding photography or various events. It is at its best from F/2.5 to F/11. The weight I do not see a problem the quality in this kind of lenses weighs but not so much. Many see the 35 as a limit in reality it is not. Because getting to 35 with this quality repays you in all respects I consider it much better than the various 24-70 on the market as regards sharpness not to mention the general quality of this lens between focal lengths 28 and 35 is Equal to fixed lenses or even better!
Pros:Excellent construction, 3 fixed focal lengths of greater wide-angle use in 1, microcontrast, excellent yield on the entire frame, excellent bokeh, impeccable AF (on 1Dx mark II Canon), attractive quality / price ratio.
Cons:Heavy and coarse, filter diameter 82, is a compromise.
Opinion:I bought this lens because I was looking for a lens that would integrate the classic 3 focal lengths of greater wide-angle use such as the 24, 28 and 35mm. As soon as you take it out of the package and taken in hand you immediately realize that the optics are of great quality, you can see it in the choice of materials used, from the fluidity and softness of the rings and the quality of the details, a convenient case is supplied to store it really well made. You mount it in the car and shoot: wow!!! It's amazing the quality of the image it returns! At 24mm it is monstrous at 28 gorgeous while at 35 perhaps it loses a thread of sharpness while remaining exceptional and we are talking about the whole aperture, just close at f2.8 and at every focal length, it becomes a blade in the true sense of the word, very sharp at the borders of reality. The microcontrast is really excellent, as well as the bokeh, f2 and 35mm gives a beautiful blur ideal for example for portraits set both indoors and outdoors. The autofocus, infamous in the Sigma Art 50 and 35mm f1.4 here is just a memory, I use it on CANON 1Dx markII and it is impeccable! Out of 100 shots, at least 95 are in focus, practically never wrong, I do not know maybe they have improved the algorithm or I have a good pairing camera body in any case the error is almost nil. Now let's talk about the focal length, it is certainly a compromise the zoom range is minimal and you go on the fly from 24 to 35mm so it is not suitable as a handyman but you have to see it as a fixed that if necessary can provide a wider or narrower image depending on the needs. I find it excellent as a lens for a photographer of events such as ceremonies as it allows you to have a good versatility giving the need for excellent bokeh thanks to the f2 aperture. The fact remains that it is large and heavy and I do not see it suitable for genres such as street for example because for this type of photography I see more indicated a fixed 35mm for example as could be the Canon 35mm f2 IS. In my opinion another masterpiece signed Sigma in its Art series, if the primary intention is to have the quality of 3 fixed in 1 buy it with your eyes closed and you will not regret it absolutely, as long as you accept its "defects" or weight and bulk but in the end, in a bag how much weigh and clutter 3 fixed lights? Grade 10 laude, great Sigma.
Pros:crisp, bright, precise and fluid, Art series construction, lightning-fast and precise focus, colors
Cons:Weight
Opinion:I have this lens for a long time and it is rare for me to write a review about it. But I feel like I have to leave a comment to one of the lenses that is accompanying me in my small and short career as a photographer. I have tried many lenses, no one else has ever given me unlike this such a feeling of solidity precision and reliability. The photos it returns are gorgeous. You can work on f2 already but give the best of yourself to f4. The f2 vignette is light and often personal-flavored can also please. The distortion is really minimal and can be easily corrected in ps. Having also had the 24-70 2.8 canon and the 35mm sigma art 1.4, I can compare them and say that with the former it shares the reliability, speed and precision of focus with the second colors, weight and goodness of the image. I recommend it to those who report of any kind and who have no problem carrying such a weight. The fashion of mirrorless is justified but when we talk about glasses guys or they use good or we might not have them and we know that if the glasses are good to force they have to weigh a little more.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
