RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Dario Rattieri
www.juzaphoto.com/p/DarioRattieri



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Dario Rattieri


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_1-4x_v3Canon EF 1.4x III

Pros: Image quality, speed and precision of AF, construction, tropicalized

Cons: Not usable on 100 L is macro

Opinion: At 5d3 and 100 400 mk2 at 400mm the maximum aperture becomes f8 (one loses one) but the QI remains practically unchanged: it is as if it was not mounted. Even the AF performance is unchanged, although only 5d3 remains active with the 4th expansion point. I also have the Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x that I paid one-third of Canon and on 5d3 with 100 400 mkII all the AF points can still be used, but it is slightly affected by the speed. IQ remains excellent even with Kenko and genuinely I can not say if Canon 1.4 III is better in this regard because they are both great. In general, what impressed me with the Canon series III is that the AF speed performance remains substantially unchanged, as if the multiplier was not there. RnA major flaw is that it does not work with the Canon 100 L is a macro that works correctly with the Kenko 1.4; Is an obvious choice of Canon marketing to keep your feet at 180 L macro. From a constructive point of view, sEnsura is really great: Kenko is much heavier than a much more plastic feel. In addition, with the Canon 1.4 III mounted, the tropicalization of the system is maintained.

sent on May 12, 2017


kenko_1-4x_proKenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x

Pros: Sharpness from the center to the edges substantially comparable to a lens not multiplied, compatibility with Canon optics not multipliable with the original, light and compact, excellent quality / price ratio, you lose one stop of light.

Cons: Lightweight lens mounted on the multiplier game but I do not think this affects in any way the performance, slight decrease in AF performance especially at the level of engagement speeds in low light, non-tropical conditions.

Opinion: Excellent 1.4 multiplier purchased at EUR 150. Excellent value for money. I purchased it for use mainly on the 100 L macro is because the original of this lens does not work, the results are spectacular because lengthening the focal, improves especially the blurred backgrounds that is more homogeneous; the image quality is similar to that produced by the objective not multiplied and also the colors remain unchanged. I tried it, and also used on other optics: 70 200 100 400 f4 L and L is mkII. In particular, on the latter goal, in theory, the Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x coupled to 5dmk3 should not work; in fact, my original works perfectly even with the 100,400 L is mkII and the AF is always responsive and accurate, even for the birds, except in low light where it is more difficult. I recommend it especially to those who have the 100 L is macro.

sent on February 23, 2017


canon_70-200_f4Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM

Pros: Construction, sharpness, color rendering, fuzzy, no AC, low price, speed and precision AF.

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: It is a lens with a quality / price outstanding, among the best in ever assoluto.rnRestituisce razor-sharp images at all focal lengths and also to the whole apertura.rnLa construction is impeccable and conveys a feeling of great solidità.rnL'AF is always precise and fast, even in low luce.rnProvato even with the multiplier 1.4 Kenko the IQ remains almost identical, and the AF is only a bit 'slower.

sent on February 17, 2017


canon_100-400iiCanon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II

Pros: Quality / price excellent, very efficient stabilizer, a TA excellent optical quality at all focal lengths, fast and precise AF, MAF minimum distance at all focal almost macro, ability to adjust the zoom strength, with three options for stabilizing function for panning, construction of tank, weather sealed, no chromatic aberration, good focus, aesthetically beautiful, the possibility of using it for many kinds.

Cons: nobody

Opinion: Canon has produced recently this view is really incredible for build quality, performance and versatility. A character that makes it unique is the minimum distance of MAF: virtually any focal I can put myself in focus even feet. This feature makes it very well suited to portraits and together with the increased focus, in my opinion, make it even better to the various 70-200 for any use. The lower brightness determined by a smaller aperture than zoom 2.8, is recovered with a stabilizer that is extraordinary and allows you to take quietly to 1/60 to 300 / 400mm. Blurred to 300mm and TA is much more enjoyable than the 70,200 2.8L II to 200mm and TA. In my opinion, do not be afraid to prefer it to 70,200 for any photographic genre. The price is very low compared to what offers this masterpiece of optics and technology.

sent on January 03, 2017


canon_24-70_f4isCanon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM

Pros: Sharp at all focal almost as much as the older brother L II, distortion totally absent at all focal lengths, colors and excellent performance, excellent construction, resistant to flare, flowing rings and no games, weather sealed, fast and precise auto focus, light.

Cons: F4 maximum aperture only

Opinion: He is very close to his older brother Canon f2.8 L II that more than double the coast and weighs much more. Obviously the 2.8 L II is probably today the best standard zooms to the world and the fact that this f4 IS there approximates closely, suggests it may be valid. He 'definitely a step ahead of the 24-105 and I recommend it than the latter who personally has never convinced me. The Af is really fast and quiet and not miss a beat. The stabilizer does a great job. Fairly light and compact, it is hard to take more and behind. Recommended.

sent on July 16, 2016


canon_35_f2isCanon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

Pros: optical quality, no ac, fast and accurate af, stabilizer.

Cons: Lack tropicalization, hood not standard.

Opinion: Optics at good value price. Sharpest already at TA. is almost no chromatic aberrations. Great for street, landscapes and portraits ambientati. Compared to f1.4 L II, the opening to f2 does not let you easily get blurred: a stop in more than 35mm is not little; for the rest of the f2 is is very close to his older brother. rnNon is weather sealed but is built well and while lightweight, by a feeling of solidità.rnConsiglio to buy the original lens hood that, while costing 50 euro, worth combined with such an excellent optics.

sent on July 14, 2016


canon_100is_macrolCanon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM

Pros: Color, yield, blurred, versatile, fun, great stabilizer

Cons: Not multipliable with Canon

Opinion: high quality lens with which I am approaching the fantastic world of macro photography. Also great for portraits at full aperture is not as resolving as when you close and has a beautiful blur. The stabilizer is among the best in the home Canon. Now this goal has become my handyman. Sin is not compatible with Canon multipliers.

sent on April 22, 2016


canon_16-35_f4isCanon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Pros: Sharpness, even at full aperture, color, precision and af speed, constant f4, tropicalization

Cons: Distortion at 16mm. It is f2.8.

Opinion: really clear from the optical center to the edges. I use it mainly for landscapes where in my view be the best. At 16 mm the distortion is pretty obvious and not always entirely correctable but the results are spectacular. Perhaps one of the best ever optics for those who make landscapes. The latest generation of stabilizer can be useful in some cases. Definitely a recommended purchase.

sent on April 02, 2016


canon_6dCanon 6D

Pros: High quality files, high resistance to high Iso, managgevolezza, central AF point that engages in the dark, construction and weather sealing quality. Value for money.

Cons: Not perfectly suited to all types of photography. spot metering point is not anchored to the af points (even on 5D3). Tropicalization not at the level of 5. Lack dual memory slots. very quiet shutter: you do not feel that nice "clack" of 5D3.

Opinion: fairly compact and handy camera but at the same time solid and functional. Sforna of extremely high quality files, comparable to those of 5dmkiii. Wifi and GPS do not use them but someone might be useful, although personally I would have preferred a tropicalization greater than these. The resistance to high Iso is at the top of the current technology. The price is similar to that of 7dmkii which I think is more indicatata for birds and outdoor sports because most AF performance in these areas and for the upper barrage. With the middle of the AF 6d manage to connect also almost in the dark and the side points, although not to cross, they are in any case always accurate. My specimen exhibits properly. Recommended for those seeking the highest quality files, but a body to handle the car and not overly expensive.

sent on March 19, 2016


canon_85_f1-2_v2Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM

Pros: blurred magic, sharpness at grand openings, AF accuracy, construction, value priced right.

Cons: nobody

Opinion: The undisputed king of the portrait. Give dream images. An absolutely excellent lens in every aspect. Quality of sublime shots already in TA. Heavy, full of great glass inside and built with painstaking care, to the lens hood. It offers a dreamlike blur and a unique three-dimensionality of its kind. With 5DmkIII, but also with 6D, the autofocus is surgical. Personally I use it mostly in AI Servo and never to again. Absolutely fantastic and flawless. Turn photos into dreams. Can not speak ill of him. The focus continues forward but just put it in MF and portray him manually before storing. Sin is not weather sealed. Crazy goal.

sent on March 17, 2016


canon_50_f1-2Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM

Pros: openness, clarity, color, three-dimensional, AF speed and accuracy, building, tropicalization

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: Colors, excellent sharpness and focus. The detachment of the plans is remarkable. It offers a blurred and a truly unique deadlift and you buy it especially for this. In my view, the objective in question is to be used mainly for the human figure (environmental portrait, etc.) And large openings. I recommend it to anyone looking for these features. Surely it is a unique object of its kind, also for the high quality of materials and construction. AF precise and fast. Beautiful lens!

sent on March 17, 2016




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me