JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon EF 1.4x III is a extender lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2011. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 485 €;
58 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 204000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:All in the truest sense of the word I think in Canon they have overcome themselves.
Cons:Maybe the cost a high hair but the quality you pay
Opinion:I use it paired with the Canon 100-400 is ii and I have to say that it is phenomenal both from a quality and quality point of view af. Also tried on 500 f4 and 600 always Canon and goes great. From what I've heard and read a little bit around you say it's not so punchy on non-series optics L waved Competing Brands.
Pros:small and light, with the right lenses it works great
Cons:with some lenses goes slow but does its duty, perhaps too expensive.
Opinion:Tried with the canon 70-200 II 2.8 on 1dx II to photograph the bikes on the track and I was very satisfied. It is true that you go from f2.8 to f4 but the speed of the shot remains practically unchanged while on the canon 300 f4 is you lose here a stop (who cares) but the speed of the shot drops a lot and you notice the difference however the work in the end I brought it home with the latter because despite going slower than the 70-200, in the burst shot was still accurate and reliable. really satisfied. I did not do a careful analysis but the photos came out well are to my eye as sharp as those without and I did not feel any loss of quality (I repeat I did not do a micropixel analysis !)
user72463
sent on December 30, 2018
Pros:Quality, lightness
Cons:Nothing, maybe the price but worth every penny that costs
Opinion:The ideal playmate for Canon telephoto lenses, excellent yield both with 70-200 f/2.8 and above all with the 100-400 is II, especially because it allows the focus with all points at F/8 on the 5d Mark IV... maintains a very good speed of focus and loses very little from Point of view of the sharpness, sure Canon does not give it to you but for me it is a must buy
Pros:Constructive levels from series L, nnitid, lightweight
Cons:Maybe the price ....
Opinion:Purchased mainly for use on the 100-400 IIrnin as the Kenko name does not work and the Canon 2x iii loses the automatisms. RnrnThough crisp and responsive despite stealing a stop on the openings, so far it does not seem to be mounted. The price is a bit excessive, but in the end you have a great and working product ... rnWarned where '2x iii does not work.
Pros:Image quality, speed and precision of AF, construction, tropicalized
Cons:Not usable on 100 L is macro
Opinion:At 5d3 and 100 400 mk2 at 400mm the maximum aperture becomes f8 (one loses one) but the QI remains practically unchanged: it is as if it was not mounted. Even the AF performance is unchanged, although only 5d3 remains active with the 4th expansion point. I also have the Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x that I paid one-third of Canon and on 5d3 with 100 400 mkII all the AF points can still be used, but it is slightly affected by the speed. IQ remains excellent even with Kenko and genuinely I can not say if Canon 1.4 III is better in this regard because they are both great. In general, what impressed me with the Canon series III is that the AF speed performance remains substantially unchanged, as if the multiplier was not there. RnA major flaw is that it does not work with the Canon 100 L is a macro that works correctly with the Kenko 1.4; Is an obvious choice of Canon marketing to keep your feet at 180 L macro. From a constructive point of view, sEnsura is really great: Kenko is much heavier than a much more plastic feel. In addition, with the Canon 1.4 III mounted, the tropicalization of the system is maintained.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
