JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF 1.4x III is a extender lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2011. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 485 €;
62 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 221000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:When used with the right optics, camera and light conditions, it doubles the focal length without significant loss of optical quality and AF.
Cons:Subject to the above, nothing.
Opinion:I use it to "double" my EF 500 L f4 IS III. I find it great (read the pros and cons) for what it allows me to do when the distance becomes prohibitive for the lens. Together with the little brother 1.4x is fixed in the backpack that houses the equipment that I carry in the circuits. Not to be used, of course, in the presence of strong rises of hot air where the bad result would be attributed to the photographer and not to the combination lens + dupli...;-))
Opinion:Tested with 7D MK2 and 100-400 II Identical light conditions, shooting with and without multiplier Images without duplicator have always been slightly better (sharper) , despite the greater crop of photos without multiplier. So it is useless and therefore unusable. I don't understand the many enthusiastic comments.
user218602
sent on May 05, 2021
Pros:Quality of materials; Rendering of immagins up to its focal point; Tropicalized; Lightweight; Size; Autofocus speed
Cons:It's no use... at least with my Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM
Opinion:Well done, definitely worthy of being an L series, but beyond its focal point, it loses enormously details. When I tried to take two photos keeping the same settings of the machine, both at 200mm without multiplier, and at 280mm with multiplier, then making the magnifications until it reached the same size, the photo taken without multiplier was sharper than that taken with the multiplier. I don't know if it behaves the same on other targets, but on the Canon 70-200mm F4 L IS USM. I initially put it up for sale, but then in doubt that the problem arises with all the lenses, I preferred to return it to the store
Pros:All in the truest sense of the word I think in Canon they have overcome themselves.
Cons:Maybe the cost a high hair but the quality you pay
Opinion:I use it paired with the Canon 100-400 is ii and I have to say that it is phenomenal both from a quality and quality point of view af. Also tried on 500 f4 and 600 always Canon and goes great. From what I've heard and read a little bit around you say it's not so punchy on non-series optics L waved Competing Brands.
Pros:small and light, with the right lenses it works great
Cons:with some lenses goes slow but does its duty, perhaps too expensive.
Opinion:Tried with the canon 70-200 II 2.8 on 1dx II to photograph the bikes on the track and I was very satisfied. It is true that you go from f2.8 to f4 but the speed of the shot remains practically unchanged while on the canon 300 f4 is you lose here a stop (who cares) but the speed of the shot drops a lot and you notice the difference however the work in the end I brought it home with the latter because despite going slower than the 70-200, in the burst shot was still accurate and reliable. really satisfied. I did not do a careful analysis but the photos came out well are to my eye as sharp as those without and I did not feel any loss of quality (I repeat I did not do a micropixel analysis !)
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
