|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lucae www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lucae  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Kingston SDXC 64 GB r45w10 (45 MB/s) Pros: Not very high price, reliable Cons: Slow Opinion: Reliable but slow SD card. On my 5d mkiii the movies in FHD were interrupted and with the burst shot it was buffered. He has never given me any headaches and has always done his duty. In conclusion not suitable for the latest generation cameras, I solved by buying a newer Kingston card where of course the problem does not show up. sent on August 23, 2018 |
 | Patona Premium LP-E6 Pros: Reliable, durable, relatively inexpensive Cons: For efficient use at 100% requires its charger Opinion: The Premium series (compared to the standard yellow) is of a different level, reliable and long-lasting even for professional use (pictures and videos). The only downside is that it requires its loader Patona (compared to the original charge more slowly) to be exploited to the fullest, if you use the original Canon battery often not loading correctly. sent on April 23, 2018 |
 | Patona LP-E6 Pros: economic Cons: Unregistered, unreliable charge Opinion: Using batteries patona 5Dold and never had problems, for this reason I decided to buy them for the 5D3 and unfortunately I have to note that they are not exactly as I expected (maybe it's my bad lot, I hope) .rnThe biggest problem is that often the charger marks the recharge with the green light (completed then), but when you go to use, after a short time (in the case of video within 5 minutes) the camera turns off scoring low battery, leaving us practically to feet. During an event it is easy to imagine how it can bring enormous problems! RnrnAGGIORNAMENTO: rnLending the advice of some users I bought the original Patona charger and the situation has improved slightly. The battery is 100% charged but there are doubts about their actual duration.rnrn sent on December 18, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Very clear already from F / 2.8, fast autofocus and above all accurate, beautiful bokeh, cheap if taken used Cons: Good but not excellent construction, shade to be purchased separately Opinion: A lens to have in the kit in my opinion. It is used at affordable prices and has an incredible quality, very clear already from F / 2.8 has a silent autofocus and very precise, the fuzzy is creamy and the ring of fire is smooth and pleasant to use.rnOne two in the hood are not included (to be purchased separately) and a building is robust, but not excellent sent on December 07, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Price of used, construction quality, sharpness, quiet, general reliability Cons: At the edges it loses sharpness (nothing critical), a really cumbersome hood Opinion: A tank! I really do not know how else to define it.rnIt is used at honest prices and has a very good build quality (the barrel does not extend out), I have used it everywhere (saltiness, snow, water, dust) and has never (and I say never!) accused a shot, always fast and responsive when needed.rnThe sharpness is good at F / 4 and becomes excellent if closed a couple of stops, in the edges loses a little 'but the situation is not as disastrous as I read from some reviews, withstands the flare, the ring nuts are very fluid and pleasant to use. rnAttention to the hood, really bulky! in some situations I had to leave it at home to make room for the optics in the backpack sent on December 03, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: price, sturdy body, file quality, few frills lot of quality. Cons: no video and liveview, now prehistoric LCD screen, maximum ISO 3200, noisy and slow, obsolete AF system. Opinion: Few frills, much substance even at 12 years. Of course it has the latest features now typical also of bodies aps-c entry level car, but the proposed price (especially if in good condition) is really to be taken. The sensor still produces today delicious files and workable, also has a nice grain at high ISO. In landscape photography or portrait he expresses its full potential and you will be pleasantly mex. Unsuitable for photographic hunting (burst and slow autofocus system obsolete) .rnIl body is really well done (excluding the LCD display only useful for the histogram) very strong (he also endured a fall on the rocks) and the buttons instead right, with just a few seconds it sets the whole necessario.rnLa council in 2017? personally! sent on January 27, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: effective stabilization, sharp (up to 200mm), good construction, versatile, lens hood included Cons: AF not fast, and yield to TA over the soft 200mm, has not the block for the ring Opinion: I use it very often (for photos Canon version) paesaggisitche from 3 years (of old 5D and 50D), with him I am taken away a lot of satisfaction !. The stabilization is very efficient and silent, very good sharpness up to 200mm, well begins to drop, the 300mm (also closed aperture as f / 8 or f / 11) always returns soft images that make complicated crop interventions. The building is decent, with good quality plastics that return a good feeling but nothing to do with the L series of Canon. The af is precise but not lightning-fast (I do not do photo hunting, so for me it is not a big deal), the lens does not have the lock to the ring, this will mean that when you will not use, and will be facing down, optics is allungerà alone (very annoying) .rnSecondo me is worth the purchase, the price / quality ratio is outstanding! New is on € 340 (I got it used in good condition at about 230 &€;), at those prices I would absolutely recommend, you will have a versatile lens (70-300mm) with some changes that will give great shots! sent on October 10, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Bright, crystal clear already at TA, blurred fabulous, fast, lightweight AF Cons: chromatic aberrations and vignetting to TA Opinion: The use of 5D old, and it's really a unique show, if you are interested in the portrait is a necessary purchase, quality / price very good. Blurred creamy and sharpness already at 1.8, can also be used indoors since the AF very fast, the construction is not from L series, but not even by "plasticotto", only negative notes (but that are fixed in one minute on lightroom) are the chromatic aberrations present in large openings and vignetting at room temperature (although in the case of close-ups do not mind at all!) also in the field street is able to give great shots :) sent on April 07, 2016 |
 | Manfrotto MT 293 A4 Pros: Stability, construction materials, solid, heavy usage without worries Cons: Last section fine, column positioned vertically only Opinion: I use it intensively for two years now (with head MG460), I bought it for about 110 € .rnNon has never disappointed me, exceptional stability, I used on sand, mud, dust, filled with salt, beaten almost anywhere and still it works as it should! :) RnrnLe 3 legs are two ways of opening a standard and the other a little more enlarged to further decrease the minimum distance from terra.rnLa column can be unscrewed and reversed "upside down" in a couple of occasions I was useful this feature (you can however reverse the position from vertical to horizontal) rnMateriali construction excellent, allowing intensive use without worries, when paired with a quality head becomes truly exceptional and very suitable for the landscape genre. rnrnNon very suitable for macro for its "rigidity" overall, but still you can not tame it with a little experience sent on July 10, 2015 |
 | Canon 50D Pros: Body, micro lenses, robustness, quality files, burst, LCD good quality, excellent central AF Cons: High ISO, requires good optics (but could be a pro), recovery shadows at high iso difficult Opinion: I have this body for the past two years and I am fully satisfied. Combined with good optics (optical low does not accept invoice) returns file really good and manageable in PP. The noise at high ISO's, but can be corrected in post production with a little forethought. rnIl body is something exceptional, very strong (like a real pro) has double ring top LCD and buttons at the right place, once you're comfortable you control everything with incredible speed. The menu is easy to manage and includes many advanced settings (including micro lenses), necessarily require Compact FlashrnIl AF module is good (maybe 9 points are a bit short), the center is very precise and responsive, a little less side, the burst is ottima.rnIl lower display is really great big and defined (but fixed), has the live view which is very convenient in the case of photographs macrornSe installed Magic lantern can also do video (without audio course) sent on April 08, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Compact, maf silent, sharp at TA, build quality Cons: If used for the video of the engine is still audible maf Opinion: Discreet, quiet and crisp. I am fully satisfied already in TA proves excellent, I used it for a concert at the theater and I was not disappointed at 2.8. Cartoon a little TA but it really makes up with a moment of lightroom. Build quality feels in your hand. If you use the engine for videos of maf remains quite audible, so be careful. On FF becomes deadly for the Street. sent on December 15, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 460 MG Pros: Robust, precise, economic Cons: At that price no one, certainly is slow (but who buys a head in three movements knows this) Opinion: I come from a head-to-three movements, always Manfrotto, but cheaper ... given the quality I decided to buy another head of this brand and I was very soddisfatto.rnAl touch looks solid, excellent material, non-slip rubber lining knobs, in short, a really good impressione.rnUna've mounted the SLR (tested with Canon 50D + Tamron 17-50 and Canon 100mm) head holds up well, the movements are fluid and very precise (also has a bubble), no games or cedimenti.rnIl Detent mechanism for the rapid is very intuitive and safe (the plate has a butterfly screw without the use of a coin) .rnTutto this for € 103, value / price! sent on November 24, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto MH293A3 - RC1 Pros: Economic, fluid resistant. Cons: Not so accurate. Opinion: Using this head (which will soon be replaced by 460MG) on Manfrotto series "290" .rnDopo two years of heavy use I can speak my mind on this head: rnSi presents solid feel, excellent materials and little plastic, I really used in very different climatic conditions and weathered bene.rnUna really small lever operates the vertical position, the coarser the other 2 movimenti.rnLa head handles very well the weight load stability even in their usual positions, movements are fluid and nothing jerky (at least in my case), the use is very intuitive and in a short time you can configure the tutto.rnIl sore point is the non-millimeter precision you would expect from a 3-head movements, obviously nothing so tragic, but often've had to give some "tidying up" for the composition proves accurate, in macro photography could create some problems then. sent on November 20, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
