JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Reviews
What do you think about this product?
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I took this Patona as my second battery three years ago, in conjunction with the purchase of the 6D MarkII. I wanted to take the second original too, but my trusted dealer, instead, advised me WITH COURTEOUS INSISTENCE to take this one, stating that it was identical but paying a third party. I let myself be convinced and, I repeat after three years of use alternating with the original, I can say, in all honesty, that it is IDENTICAL IF NOT EVEN SUPERIOR to the original, both in duration and in charging times (in the original Canon battery charger), to the point that to realize which of the two is I have to look at the color below. I haven't bought another one yet just because I don't need it (we all know the longevity of the batteries on 6D MarkII), but if I felt the need I would buy a Patona again without the slightest shadow of a doubt. N:B.: My Patona (unlike the one shown here) reports 2040mAh and 14.7Wh, against 1865 mAh - 14Wh of the original.
Opinion:I review the Pattona LP-E6N purchased instead of the original canon which costs 110 euros. I found an offer of two Pattona at a cost of 75 euros. I use them on R6 and R7 dive need batteries forfifmanti. Attracted by the price I wanted to try them, well I was very but very disappointed. Charging time slightly higher than the Canon, time of use even the mere of the "old" LP-E6 In the end my opinion is very negative.
Opinion:I am using this battery on both Canon 6D and Canon 5DMK4. It has 2040 mAh at 7.2V, for a capacity of 14.7 Wh compared to the original Canon LP-E6N which has 1865 mAh at 7.2 V with a capacity of 14 Wh. The result is that the duration is comparable to the original and, after a few years of use, I did not find drastic decreases in yield, which I found instead in the original batteries. Given the really low price accompanied by great features, I recommend these batteries.
Opinion:I took two for the 5div, from new lasted already less than the originals, now after six months last few shots. Of cons, so black, are more desing of the original Canon I do not recommend, I had already had a bad experience with Pantona on bp511 and a good on the LP-E4. Money thrown away, I can't even send her back, to avoid
Cons:Are worth little and nothing, but on the other hand the cost is economical
Opinion:My personal opinion, keeping in mind that I had the chance to test one a few years ago, with disastrous results because at the time of need I managed only to make very few shots, and when I say little I mean a dozen, or anyway wanted to do this test, which I It has led to the conclusion that it is not worth putting a battery of dubious quality in cameras that maybe have a high cost.
Opinion:They're worth what they cost... Maybe... Taken in pairs, one after a few months is practically dead, holds only about fifty shots, the other goes a little better, but nothing to do with the original. This was really the last time I buy compatible batteries. The originals will cost just as much but since they make me a dozen years and these only a few months, in the end you save by buying the originals.
Cons:For efficient use at 100% requires its charger
Opinion:The Premium series (compared to the standard yellow) is of a different level, reliable and long-lasting even for professional use (pictures and videos). The only downside is that it requires its loader Patona (compared to the original charge more slowly) to be exploited to the fullest, if you use the original Canon battery often not loading correctly.
Opinion:the purchased specimen I paid for it 1/4 compared to the original, but it is even less, uncommon time, problems with some charges (not completed and overheating effect on the charger) rnIn single-snap use does not pull after a few days of unused use it also loses its charge with the OFF switch selected on the camera: it needs to be loaded and used in the imager. It can be used to preserve the original when there are expected to be very hard outputs; this may be the discovery. some charge cycles but very far from canon
Opinion:On 6d the battery life is similar to the original only when used with "normal" temperatures (18 ° -22 °). It is used for "cold" and does not last for 20 minutes. "I had an experience where the original it lasted a day of shots at -27 ° while Patona lasted 20 minutes.rnThere is little to do, the quality is paid.
Cons:the original canon charger does not charge them correctly "at first" shot
Opinion:they last like the original ones (about 7dmkii about 1000 shots ...) but the original 7DMKII battery charger is "IMPALLA" and you have to take it off and put it several times to load it to 100% .nnever seen the very low cost (about 24 € from photocolor that from 2000mA) it's worth having them as spare battery. I'm still trying to use the Patona battery charger to see if it's charging better ...
Opinion:Good price, virtually the same as the original, but the fact that the charge level is not exactly reported or that when the battery is exhausted, the machine is shaken without any safety stoppage as with the original batteries. The battery very unreliable and dangerous.rnI do not think I will buy more.
user2860
sent on August 11, 2016
Pros:At the moment only against
Cons:Downloads by 40% without having done a single photo!
Opinion:Taken after three years of honorable of lower standards Patona sisters. She arrived Tuesday. Loaded with Canon original charge is put in 5d mk3 with 99% charge level. Turned on the car today and the level showed 60%. Not bad for the moment I would say ........ total disappointment. I'll try to buy another original canon. Even if it were defective, for 17 eur paid not even I lose time to make me change.
Opinion:bought on ebay, at less than half the original price CANON.rnHo took the version to 2000mah, I use it in my 5DM3 with battery grip.rnMai had a problem, he charging, any of eternal life !! rnrendono the duration of uses the machine, charging time of all'originale.consigliatissima !!! rni Germans know their .......
Opinion:On my Canon 70D is fine and I find its duration is equal to the original, recommended, even for the really good price, it costs one-third the original, I knew already 'classic Patona, no such premium, and already' those were good, used on other bodies, lens reflex mirror, these confirm the high quality 'German.
Opinion:I purchased two premium Patona Lp-E6 as extra batteries now six months ago and I set to work immediately (I batteries are fully charged you arrive) and I would say that behave like the original: they have the same duration and cost less. Maybe the charging time (using the Canon charger supplied with the machine) is a little higher than the original battery. I would recommend their purchase.
Pros:cost, capacity ', value for' / price, compatibility '
Cons:when anyone.
Opinion:Bought on Amazon to 42 EUR, the kit of two LP-E6 batteries Patona Premium (2000mAh - 14.4W) which I added the valid dual charger always Patona (13 EUR). I am very pleased and the duration and 'almost' similar to the original. The use of couples in the battery grip of my Canon EOS 7D Mark II; on first use, they have been recognized by the camera after 5-6 seconds. Subsequently, each time the case with the usual rapidity '.
Pros:Economic, it has the recognition chip as lp-e6 and works as the original canon
Cons:nobody
Opinion:I purchased a premium Patona Lp-E6 as second battery and I would say that is identical to the original, for the same duration but costs less than half. It can be charged with the charger supplied with the machine. compared to Patona classic has more capacity and duration're ready to .. the absolutely recommend !!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
