JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Reviews
What do you think about this product?
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user242173
sent on July 24, 2023
Pros:Excellent quality for a compatible, price, availability
Cons:Shorter life than the originals
Opinion:The patona I have always preferred among the compatible, sometimes I happened to the Chinese who were suddenly discharged turning off the machine out of the blue. The patona lp e6 no, I use them on the 70d and behave exactly like the originals giving you the exhaustion messages and possibly once the machine is downloaded it still makes an orderly shutdown with a lot of final sensor cleaning as if you turned it off from the switch. They cost little (2x20 euros) but last even less, this is the only flaw ... However, at events with 2 of these you are quiet all day ... rating 8,5
Opinion:For a non-repeatable event I bought two to support the original Canon. One has ceased to work on the second charge, the other is still alive but it is not possible to count on its storage capacity, in less than two weeks it self-discharges. When the machine signals that only one notch is missing, the original charger can take an hour or five minutes to restore it, so, randomly. And the charge lasts accordingly. Ditto when you start from completely discharged: the times vary unpredictably with some sign of full fake. They may seem convenient, but as far as seen the quality is consistent with what is paid and this justifies, although not totally, the cost of the originals.
Opinion:Using batteries patona 5Dold and never had problems, for this reason I decided to buy them for the 5D3 and unfortunately I have to note that they are not exactly as I expected (maybe it's my bad lot, I hope) .rnThe biggest problem is that often the charger marks the recharge with the green light (completed then), but when you go to use, after a short time (in the case of video within 5 minutes) the camera turns off scoring low battery, leaving us practically to feet. During an event it is easy to imagine how it can bring enormous problems! RnrnAGGIORNAMENTO: rnLending the advice of some users I bought the original Patona charger and the situation has improved slightly. The battery is 100% charged but there are doubts about their actual duration.rnrn
Opinion:I took two a couple of years ago for my Canon 70D. Although I do not do a camera intensive use (less than 20 thousand in over two years), I due to throw both of them, one at a time because they are both dead. Even when they worked they gave to problems using the SLR in live view. It will be true that are cheap, but totally unreliable. Now I have two of the Premium series, one of which (acquired last year) is already showing problems. Spend little is fine, but spending goes badly wrong. If the original cost more for a reason.
Opinion:I bought two of amazon (I think I paid them both about 20 euro) for my (now ex) 6D. Moral of the story, the battery after three years Canon has started while the two Patona work fine, without ever having had the recognition encountered problems, I read now, from other forum users. All at 1/4 the cost of the original battery!
Pros:Price ratio if you use very little equipment.
Cons:Lower capacity than the original, decaying strongly pronounced time (several times greater than originals), no charging performance info, totally unsuitable for intense use.
Opinion:I possess it since the summer of 2014, after a generally positive first time, impressions of use have become more and more negative: the battery is only valid if the equipment is really poorly used, with normal or worse uses being hacked money because the decay Of these batteries is exponentially higher than that of the originals with the result that my original that is more than three years older despite the maximum wear features still a lot, but much better than this patona (I speak in proportional terms, of course taking into account the lower capacity) , If you use the equipment or keep it so much you are purely cash thrown because compatibility is good, but the original battery that costs 4 times this is all the more money in terms of shots and time, not at Case first months of 2017 3rd and 4th battery I took them genuine used sure that they would surely be better (and so was). Rn But m Little agar is usedThe equipment for a few thousand photos a year and often changes body with different batteries can almost make sense.
Pros:very advantageous price compared to the original canon
Cons:see below
Opinion:He took 2 batteries with relative charger in order to have a little more autonomy for my long runs, but unfortunately and inexplicably 90% of the time that I put into the battery compartment, are not recognized by both my canon. (60D and 6D). try it on a friend's Canon but nothing to fare.Davvero a bad Buy.I remedied by buying two original batteries Canon.Ma more non-genuine !!
Pros:price! 2 pieces less than € 30.00 on Amazoncompatibilità guaranteed dall'infochip
Cons:light lasting less than Canon
Opinion:I state that the use of a Canon 60D exclusively for video recordings (LCD always on). The first purchased in 2010 still works fine: the charge and duration remain constant over time with the original charger Canon. Here in August 2015 I took 2 more on Amazon at a great price. To date a total of I 2 originals and 3 Patona. Advise.
user67391
sent on June 19, 2015
Pros:Cost per hour
Cons:we will see with time
Opinion:Just buy on Amazon 1,600 mh, but I received, to my surprise the 2000. Little more 'than 50 Euros and I took the battery charger that can be fed to the wall, in the car with the adapter, and via USB mini and not . All these things, together with two LP-E6 batteries by 2000. For now, I can not say anything about the actual quality of the product. But surely at that price just I took us to the original.
Opinion:Batteries Patona have a great strength: the price! The Patona LP-E6 costs a quarter of the original (with about 28 euro will bring home the pack of two batteries, then we are at 14 euro / battery against the original 50/60). I used this battery for about a year with no problems, apart from the length a little less than the original, as also stated in the technical specifications (9.4 Wh compared to 13 Wh of Canon). I 'a good product, although recommend spending a little more to take the Patona LP-E6 Premium version with capacity 11.5 Wh.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
