|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dariun www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dariun  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Photoseiki TB-101 Pros: Robustness Cons: Footprint, cost. Opinion: I use it for about a year, and I am extremely felice.rnLa I used with the 1D3 (5D3 now) and the Sigma 120-300 / 2.8 + 2X, first of Benro tripod and currently on a Systematic Gitzo GT 3532 LS and form a pair perfetta.A despite its size it is light enough, and is, in my view, essential for those super telephoto superpesanti.Vengo by a ball head and the difference is remarkable. sent on August 13, 2014 |
 | Gitzo Systematic GT 3532 LS Pros: Very solid, sturdy, good and practical system of stretching the legs, fairly light Cons: Price Opinion: Taken a few months ago, he manages to convey a feeling of solidity incredible. rnIl system to stretch your legs is practical and veloce.Ha the hook (metal) for hanging weights and anchor more to terreno.rnCosta a lot, but it could be the final tripod also comes with various accessories (type of plastic washers for do not sink into the snow) that could always buy back servire.rnLo Yes, immediately sent on August 13, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 303 PLUS Pros: Solid, sturdy, very accurate. Cons: Weight and dimensions Opinion: I use it (a little) for a couple of anni.La find it indispensable to take panoramic pictures, especially in church interiors, or where there is a graphic pattern / architecture from resume (in each case a soggeto not far) .rnNon is light and it is very cumbersome, even disassembled (actually two pieces) .It easily adjusted thanks to unlock worms and millimeter (thanks to the worms) .rnE 'rather easy to find the point nodale.rnNon the council to who would only use it (I stress only) for landscaping (for landscape) .rnSecondo me, its price is equo.rnLa buy back? Ni (I use very little) sent on August 13, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 410 Pros: Solid, sturdy, very accurate to the millimeter, the correct price (according to me) Cons: Weight and dimensions Opinion: I use it for a few months and in my opinion is the best head I've ever avuto.rnIn Previously I had a ball head, but after I had placed the 'shot, going to lock the head, I moved around too much ... rnCon this head I eliminated the problem !!! Absolute Accuracy, precision adjustment, in a word, a favola.rnMa there is a downside ... Unfortunately not the weight and size make it an easy trasportabile.Ma is the 'single I buy another neo riscontrato.rnLa Yes, right away. sent on August 13, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm X-E1 Pros: Quality 'jpg, weight / size / portability, construction, held at high ISO awesome, vintage aesthetic. Cons: Charging the battery ridiculous. Opinion: I took questaa machine, used by poco.L 'I got to have something more than a simple compact you always have with me when I go skiing or in the mtb.Quando' I tried, I could not believe what I was seeing : virtually no noise at 6400 iso ... excellent sharpness, great contrast, colors incredibly belli.Oggi to work the 'I showed it to a colleague of mine, who runs with Canon 1D4: l' I set it to 6400, then also to 12800 : you should have seen his face! not sell my 5D2 just because I have an important optical park (I would say very important), but if I had goals "normal" I do not know how it would end ... sent on January 10, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM Pros: Sharp already at room temperature, blurred beautiful, very fast and accurate AF, size, quality / price ratio exceptional Cons: A bit difficult to use at all TA 'inizio.Crea addiction, a lot of addiction. Opinion: Superb lens from fantastica.Nitidezza excellent yield already at RT, blurred bellissimo.Resa color very very good, fast autofocus (not lightning) and precisissimo.Indicato for tight portraits, to 'start a little difficult to use at room temperature (it is easy to mistake the point MAF) but after a bit of protic, it can not be more help meno.Comprato about a year ago, sold in mid-November, yesterday 's I bought back (used). sent on January 04, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: Sharpest even at room temperature, good three-dimensional and detachment of the plans, excellent color rendering, light enough and compact taking into account the brightness Cons: Lens hood cap (but how do you make something like that?) Opinion: I'm using it for a few days, but I quickly found the feeling giusto.Impagabie 's use of the aperture ring positioned on the body of direttameente' obiettivo.Resa colors and sharpness are its compactness and forti.La the (relative) lightness make it a top lens from street.Unica discordant note, the lens hood cap, simply unusable (if you do not want to miss). sent on January 04, 2014 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 Pros: Construction MAF ring, all glass and metal, hood compreso.Nitidezza, color rendering. Cons: Weight, size, costo.A TA just a trifle to misplace the MAF. Opinion: As with all Zeiss, even the 35/1, 4 is impeccably constructed of glass and its quality are metallo.Le color rendition and sharpness throughout the frame already excellent TA.Chiudendo a couple of stop becomes a razor . The only drawback is the possibility of making a mistake if the fire used to TA freehand ... Make no mistake it is preferable to use it with LW (perhaps magnified by 10 times) on a beautiful ring cavalletto.Della MAF, do I have to mean??? sent on May 17, 2013 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 25mm f/2 Pros: High quaità meccanica.Resa optical high-level and color performance spettacolare.Molto sharp in the center already in TA, while the edges have to close a couple of stop.Tutto glass and metal, hood compreso.La ring MAF is a real pleasure. Cons: Perhaps the weight to want to find the hair in the 'egg. Opinion: Beautiful manual focus lens, flawless construction, as usual Zeiss.A my humble opinion, is the 'most optical snubbed (wrongly) in the house Zeiss.Resa optics in general, color rendering, excellent sharpness across the frame closing of a couple of stops are its points of forza.A his favor, although the cost is not excessive / impossibile.E 'was my second Zeiss, bought after taking the 18/3.5: I buy another one with my eyes closed. sent on May 17, 2013 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 15mm f/2.8 Pros: Construction impeccabile.Qualità optical fantastiche.Tutto metal and glass Cons: Weight, cost and cover, which takes off on its own every time I remove the camera from the bag, with the risk that goes into the water (if you are close to a river, sea, etc.) or under the wheels of a 'car. Opinion: Excellent optical performance even at the edges already closing of a stop.Al center is incredible already TA.rnNessuna chromatic aberration and color rendering spettacolare.rnPesa much and is really bulky, but in my humble opinion, is very much a lens eccezionale.rnCosta (you buy a 50L and a 135L with the respective UV filters!) but worth the money spesi.rnFocheggiare with this lens, as with all other Zeiss, is pure godimento.rn sent on May 17, 2013 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 18mm f/3.5 Pros: Mechanically perfect with optical characteristics of high general level. As I touched it and Focusing, you can have feelings of enjoyment only. The manual focus does not present any problem as long as you turn the dial very slowly. Cons: Not cheap, but worth all the money spent. In my humble opinion, slightly heavy. Opinion: It 's the first manual lens you purchase, and are strafelice.Nell' use gives unique sensations, has an 'excellent color rendition is crystal clear in the center, but loses a hair of sharpness at the edges until it is used to f5, 6.Da here on it is great. I do not give, but it is worth all the money it costs: the ricomprerei stesso.Anzi today, so if you give me time, I might even think of selling the Canon 17-40 and also get the 21 f2.8. sent on April 10, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
