|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Zeval www.juzaphoto.com/p/Zeval  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R5 Pros: Spectacular, fast and accurate autofocus, trekking face, eyes on animals you won't believe, hooks the eye even from far away. Very realistic electronic viewfinder. 20 FPS continuously is very long. Electronic shutter Silent and you become invisible. Using EF Optics ,Battery Life . 45 megapixels Cons: CF Express Type B Cost Opinion: What can we say about the R5, a great top-of-the-range machine even if we are at the end of its life... the R5 mk2 will most likely be released shortly. Before taking it I compared the "same subject" files between R6 and R5 and so the monkey started. Then RCE and Canon's Cash Back allow you to pick up something new without breaking the bank and so we got R5. Coming from the R6 it was very easy to set the car with the same parameters. The 45 megapixel sensor is a lot of stuff... compared to the R6 file, if you don't need to crop the R5 you can also not take it. The 20fps burst is compared to the R6 much much longer... the R6 after 4 seconds burst at 20fps locks buffer full. Silent electronic shutter release and the animal... People don't hear you and you become invisible. ibis high resolution I use it to play deny you and it works well. sent on May 31, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x Pros: Top sharpness - fast AF and locks well with R6 - cost used Cons: AF a hair less responsive at 560mm ( x photograph the swallows) the weight but you know this before you take it Opinion: I replaced my 100-500 RF with this MONSTER and after using it x 7 months I came to the conclusion that I did well. Before getting this Expensive lens I evaluated the PROS/CONs (weight - material - focal length type - size - price and curiosity to try this rare lens .... very expensive €13,000 on the new one). There was a short period that EF nettles depreciated a lot, this is because many users made the switch from EF to RF... and I found a 200-400mm without breaking the bank too much... now this is no longer the case, even EF optics are back at high prices. Compared to the 100-500 RF it is much sharper, there are more details in the picture. This also applies to the 300 f2.8 is and the old 500mm f4.5L. It's a lust to go from 400 to 560 by moving a stick (a lot of stuff). With R6 when you put it at 560 AF it remains fast but locks a little less than when it is at 400 (as written in the cons this applies to the bee-eater swallows). Maybe with R5/R3 this kind of problem doesn't exist. Lens to have in your photographic equipment. sent on May 11, 2024 |
 | Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 II Pros: Soap Bubble Blurred - Very interesting Macro and Portraits - metal and glass construction Cons: Who likes this kind of soap bubble effect Do not have it in your kit. Parasas does not do its job well ... In backlight it lets in a little' flare if it was slightly longer / wide maybe it solved the problem. Price. Opinion: If you like the soap bubble effect and in your kit you have the legendary Trioplan f2.8 version 1 and want something new upgrade is necessary. The quality of the blurred is the same... I didn't find any difference between the first version and this one. I have done several tests and the optimal distances for the bubble effect are subject to 1 / 1.5 meters in diffused light in backlight ... in direct light... in short, in any case the soap bubble effect comes out ..... I have photos that with light behind me the subject at 1 meter at a distance of 10 meters wax my car and the bubble effect came out... Another test made both with the new and with the old Trioplan is always the subject at 1 meter the light at the top "a classic kitchen neon" and at a distance of 2 merei of the bottles where the bubble effect was created photo the pirate with the Trioplan version 1950s https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=4482668&l=it photo the pirate with the Trioplan version year 2022 https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=4483389&l=it Closing the diaphragm the optics become super sharp. sent on March 18, 2023 |
 | Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm f/2.8 Pros: Soap Bubble Blurred - Very Interesting Macro and Portraits Cons: Who likes this kind of soap bubble effect Do not have it in your kit. The model Meyer 100mm f2.8 Exakta mount on Canon SLR goes slam in the mirror (I recommend the change) Opinion: This lens is fantastic... I tried before the Trioplan 100mm the 50mm always Trioplan ... but the effect "soap bubbles" as beautiful as the 100mm there is neither ... If you like this type of effect is to have in your photographic kit ..... very nice for macro but also for close-up portraits. I also tried the new 100mm RF Canon that has the ring that allows you the effect Meyer soap bubbles but sins in sharpness ... you give you the effect to soap bubbles but the subject in the foreground is blurred .... RF 100 macro is suitable for macro photos... Another test I did was to check in Portrait of people the blurred mile and among the optics I had " 300mm f2.8 - 50mm f0.95 - 24-105 - and 100mm Trioplan " the winner was the 100mm Trioplan. As written in the cons the version with Exakta mount if not modified on Canon SLR goes to slam the mirror and this is not good ... in the link below you can see the edit for Canon and do not slam the mirror . http://www.zeval.org/zeval/Modifiche.html It would be interesting to try the new 100mm trioplan and see if it is better than the old Meyer Trioplan ..... sent on March 12, 2023 |
 | Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM Pros: AF Speed - Construction with Innovative Material - Sharpness - Stabilization and Weight Cons: Maybe the window with the focusing distance. Opinion: What about this perspective is so much stuff ... a nice all-rounder... okay for nature photos.... It's also good in indoor arenas .... Taken with the winter Blackfridey and initially "I think like many" to spend € 3000 that perhaps with the old optics the 300mm 2.8 I did the same things? The first tests were not so exciting ... then setting well the controls of the machine R6 .... Trying trying many settings .... In the end I found the right configuration for what I do... also setting the ring C1.. C2... C3 of the R6. My answer to my initial question is Yes is it worth it... I wanted to make myself a new RF kit with this 100-500 the 70-200 f2.8 and if it will also come out the 300mm always f2.8 .... But having already had these latest EF lenses and thoroughly testing the 100-500mm I don't find it a sense to take them again. sent on March 06, 2023 |
 | Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Pros: Cheap Lightweight Sharp Af Fast Boken Cons: At night not usable - raw with vignetting lack of the AF MF button . RF optical footprint. Optional hood . Opinion: I took this lens to have in the Canon kit at least one RF lens, it is the only one at an economical price. I have tried this lens on 2 occasions and yes the sharpness there is to carry around is light . Shooting in jpg and raw the latter at 24-28mm presents a strong vignetting . To make Macro photos better use it with an extension tube and the results are really very good . I also like the blurry Boken he does in the portraits. Overall a good handyman.......... Maa..... second exit at night and unfortunately in the dark can not focus even in manual .... UNUSABLE . Tip : at the same price better take a Canon 24-105mm L first series or a Sigma 24-70 f2.8 the latter is also more stocky and with R6 more balanced ... ve well any handyman zoom but brighter. Beyond the price of rf lenses "a bit overpriced" they are also too bulky.... They should be more stocky....see size 50mm f1.2L with current 50mm RF . sent on July 29, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS R6 Pros: Quick spectacular autofocus and precise eye-to-face trek on animals not to be believed hooks the eye even from far away. Very realistic electronic viewfinder. 20 FPS.shatter electronic Silent and become invisible. 2 SD slots. Using EF lenses,battery life . Cons: Body a little plastic. Manual focus with Canon EF lenses does not go MF peaking. Very slow 2x III extender. Free kit management from Canon Ridicola. RF Optical Cost. Opinion: I have this Mirrorless since October 2020 and after 7 months of use I can only say that it is Fantastic, it has a very performing AF and the hooking with the subject is really instantaneous. Coming from Canon 1DX the difference in performance cè, has everything I had with the 1DX but with a very fast AF, I like to shoot at 20fps and with electronic shooting you are invisible because it is silent. Shooting with the closed display the battery level is very high LP-E6NH about 3000-4000 shots, with the smallest LP-E6 2000-2500 shots. I like the double slot for SD memories... I like the feeling that has been created with this machine because all the controls are at the fingertips. I would have liked not only vintage mf peaking optics to work properly BUT also with the AF Canon lenses put in MF the R6 gives you the way to focus only with square and two rods, the MF peaking with Vintage lenses equipped with chip does not work.... we expect a possible update from Canon. 2x III extender with Canon 300mm f2.8 compared to the 1DX is very slow and sometimes even if you use the original canon EF RF ring the R6 goes to Block.. here too we are waiting for an update from Canon. Of Canon I did not like the management of the free kit which was an adapter ring, this kit arrived after 5 months... according to Canon I had to wait 5 months to start using the R6?... Ridiculous... Canon policy on failed kit management. Of course I immediately took a non-original ring, the latter modified to be able to use the ND and Ir filters. Although rf optics are sharper "so they say" the price is still too high at the moment, you can have excellent sharpness even with EF optics. Currently the only inexpensive optics is the 24-105 stm rf which "so they say" that it is crisp but platical. ultimately I'm counting on the purchase I made and I recommend it to everyone. sent on April 09, 2021 |
 | Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 50mm f/2.9 Pros: F.A.N.T.A.S.T.I.I.C.O soap bubble Cons: Nobody Opinion: A Mayer Trioplan opticist is to have in the propido the 50mm version compared to the legendary "most famous" 100mm costs a third and you have the same blurred to soap bubbles . The meyer exakta version can be modified (the bayonet can be used on ff while keeping it in focus indefinitely. Immaculate construction aluminum diaphragm with 15 no plastic blades, looks a lot like a Leica summicron 35mm. sent on December 23, 2019 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Price in used - AF fast - focal range - weight . Stabilizer - Arca swiss trescan attack. Cons: Difficult to use at 600mm - AF sometimes loses the subject and then hangs it up - soft 450-600mm - very expensive protection filter - Opinion: I replaced my 500mm Canon L first series for this newer zoommone where they say it's a big lens. Bo personally I thought that coming from the 500mm use a focal a longer hair I would not have problems to keep framed the bird but unfortunately it is not my focal I can not.... 4 degrees of field angle are very few. Then there is the question that the static subjects at 600mm are sharp but not very sharp and to me this does not satisfy me , if then the subject is moving then you lose definition ... this happens from the focal 450 to 600mm. if it is used from 150 to 400mm then the sharpness of the cè... To have a decent sharpness at 600mm you have to find the right compromise between shooting times and iso .... if we raise the iso too much we lose sharpness and if we go down too much time we risk the photo being moved (this applies when you want to make a bird in "flight").. difficult to find in certain situations the right compromise....... The value for money is there .... Cè if you need a low cost 600mm focal range. Maybe Better to wait a few more months and take a canon fixed 500mm or the 100-400 version II .... something more professional, they are much more expensive but more defined optics. As for the protection filter a good brand 95mm UV costs 120-150 euros a little caruccio . The weight is ok 2kg you handle well even without easel, the buttons for The focal draft are pen balanced, even the stabilizer does its job well, with 3 variants . sent on August 24, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM Pros: 10x focal length from 35 to 350 a handyman, sharpness, pump zoom, L-series Cons: No more spare parts, brightness, price and non-duplicate 1.4 2 X is no longer repairable Opinion: I have tried this lens for 2 years and I have to say that it is a nice sharp lens fast AF speed hyper fast a lens to have in the right photo kit,a great everything do . Only sin the price and no longer assisted by Canon because vintage. This Canon policy is not permissible, at least in the l lenses L should have spare parts and assistance ALWAYS! sent on August 18, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 500mm f/4.5 L USM Pros: Sharpness-very Fast AF-weight-price Used. Cons: Canon politics on old but high class L pieces no more spare parts/revisions Opinion: I took this lens used year 1992 maybe one of the first specimens... but in good condition because the 300mm F4 is was a bit too short.... short for the photos I currently do. What about a whole other lens, a whole other way to photograph because the angle of the field is only 5 ° but once you take the hand becomes easier. Compared to newer specimens the weight of this 500mm is the lightest, I use this lens even without tripod and the weight is not a problem because when I go around I put the tripod collar between the strap of the "trousers" and the weight becomes ZERO. As for is that there is no this is not a problem because the shutter speed that I usually use is very fast-used for photos of (birds in Flight-sport motorcycles etc.). I tried this lens with 1DX and 6d MkII and AF in both cases it is very fast... Spectacular. The biggest problem is that if you have problems you can not lead to a center Canon this because they do not dare even remotely revise it or if by chance you break fix it.... a real pity.... good is that you can find at a really low price 1500 /2000 Euro. I recommend it to everyone especially if one is not really convinced to spend 3000/4000 euros for a 500mm "used" although newer. sent on October 06, 2018 |
 | Canon 6D Mark II Pros: Focusing system (hyper fast and hooks well also the Volateli) 45punti all close, silent-sensor Digic 7 of the latest generation Cons: It's not a 1DX I miss the 12 \ \ 14 frames per secondo....la 6d has only 6.5 Opinion: I'm laughing, also I wanted from canonist switch to Sony A7III, after seeing so many videos on YouTube that AF chases the person + of 600 points of focus, so much nice stuff but with so many but... asked several times but with Sigma Ring and Canon optics the volatile comes AG Hooked up well? I have not had serie...ma answers could work... better its native optics... At this point I had unfortunately already sold my 1DX (noooo I had to wait..) The native lenses Sony G or Zeiss expensive both in the new and in the used, I tried to buy something Canon from non svenarmi and the only camera was the 6d Marck II, taken because By many criticized and because the price on and global very convenient. Apt Choice, AF Lightning I would not say but faster than the 1DX, I like the 45 points all close and in the middle. Another positive note is that if many are migrating to Sony many used lenses but new Canon L's are at really low prices. With long lenses type 500mm better take the battery grip this to better balance the machine. I consider an excellent product Qalità/price. The video aspect N. N (at the moment I do not) sent on June 08, 2018 |
 | Yongnuo EF YN 14mm f/2.8 Pros: Price lens construction-sharpness, distortion and vignetting. Cons: A bit of flare-Af not too fast Opinion: I got this lens to play a used Sigma Af Costs the same amount of money this Yongnuo, new on ebay just over 480 euros (optics, postage and customs duties) and I'm fully satisfied. Mechanically it is built with quality materials (not the usual plasticaccia) looks like a Canon. The light produces a small flare but I think it's normal for these lenses. Very interesting price/quality ratio. Yongnuo's engineers have plugged a usb port I think for different firmware. Rating 10 A ++ sent on April 28, 2018 |
 | Canon 1DX Pros: Robust Well Balanced Machine - Gust at 14 fts - Af Fast - Battery Life . Used at low cost Cons: a little noisy Opinion: Of the series 1 I tried many (Canon 1n in film then 1ds mk1 - mkII Canon 1D mk1 and mkIII). I must say that I have the hobby of trying out optics and machine bodies from reflex ff to aps-c - mirrorless (on my site www.zeval.org you can find many reviews). This summer on vacation I left home the fuji x-t1 to take me behind the canon 1d mk3 and I can only say that I did not regret the choice,although the fuji is smaller I did not find much difference between the two (they are both "big" ) where you go with a mirrorless there you can an give great even with such a reflex. Then the turn my friend Rudy made me try his 1DX and knowing me I did not wait long to buy a used one with a few shots (as new). The first few months I tried to try all the controls and I can say that it is fantastic ,shot in bursts af very fast, it is always a pleasure to take pictures with this machine even if it is sturdy and bulky I do not see the need to shoot a mirrorless. After a small 9-month break with a 6D mk2 (selling the 1DX) or resumed another 1DX two completely different machines the 6D quieter a toy .... 1DX .... I missed the gust. sent on March 18, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM Pros: How many of you many times to leave home a Tele xchè bulky and heavy as to make it unusable? RnBè the Canon EF 70-300 DO IS USM is pretty much how long the 17-40 f/4L wide angle, Easy to carry and always on the Stock Exchange . Focusing fast, image quality levels of the series L.rnHo noticed that needs to be shut down a couple of stops to get good sharpness, but this is not a problem because you raise your iso Macchina.rn Cons: Price a little high in the new ..... Opinion: If like me you want to experiment, this view is found Deale used to have in the bag a nice Tele Zoom 70-300 of excellent quality and the size ridotte.rnHa focus only one of its kind and the only DO technology the world to be equipped with a diffractive optical element. The introduction of a 3-layer diffractive optical element not only makes the lens lighter, but also ensures superb image quality. :-) Rnrnrn sent on March 16, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
