JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2020. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 499 €;
49 users have given it an average vote of 8.8 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Canon RF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Lightweight, compact, economical, decent build quality and sharpness (in the center) almost comparable to the equivalent L series (RF) that wins for brightness
Cons:
Opinion:An honest all-rounder KIT lens that, however, has a decent color rendition and good sharpness. Maybe it lacks a bit of contrast but, at this price, it can be forgiven. I use it as an all-rounder on the road like the many who favor practicality over extreme image quality. It is true that the low (very) light is its main defect, so I bought a tripod that helps a lot to bring home some shots with low light. Of course with 400 € you can find the old EF f4 L used but then you have to hang almost 300gr more weight around your neck.... it is a choice. On the other hand, the choice not to have the classic AF / MF switch that forces you to enter the camera menu is questionable. Autofocus as good as all the latest STMs from Canon. Rating 8.5
Pros:Defined, lightweight, wide focal range. Also excellent at full opening. Good stabilization.
Cons:Nothing
Opinion:Canon has really put effort into the creation of this lens to find the best compromise between quality, price, weight, size and in this it has succeeded very well. It is the classic zoom to have in your camera backpack, to use when we are not very busy looking for the perfect shot and we are thinking more about enjoying the day, the place and / or the people who are with us. It is not a bright lens, it could not be for what it costs but it can also be used with low light by raising the ISO, at 12,800 the file is still usable. The EOS R System is a big step forward. You can find it used just over 300 euros, difficult to have so much at this price.
Pros:Lightweight, stabilization, fully in line with the new canon cameras to contain noise; Entry level cost, macro (almost) true.
Cons:Indoors only long times. Not bright at all. Extreme low-light shots. Ugly with that crow's neck on 105mm. He often struggles to find the fire.
Opinion:This zoom is a small masterpiece for the price if we consider it for what it is: an entry level all-rounder that is often sold in kits. It must be said that it fits into a Canon system that, with stabilization and the ability to work at high iso, allows you to take home shots even in low light situations. I photographed in church cursing myself for not bringing a brighter lens. Shots with 105mm at 6400 iso and 7.1 aperture I saw them very badly. On the other hand, with lightroom Photoshop and a coat of topaz de noise, I got very decent results. In short, it is a lens with a very effective stabilizer, it costs little, it is light. On the other hand, the performance is not memorable. If you have to photograph indoors, you have to be careful to be ingenious and expect a lot of noise to be corrected. Outdoors, on the other hand, it's a whole different story, even if photographing details such as a flower swaying in the wind, the autofocus panics and you have to insist several times to catch it. I paid 320 euros for it. It seems to me that for the price it is worth a visit. The added value of this zoom is the minimum focusing distance: very few cm. With a ring flash, you get macro photos that are not possible with the rich twin of the L series.
Cons:Build quality (obviously it's not L-series), brightness
Opinion:Obviously it is not the twin L series of which surely something envies but it is really an excellent economic alternative, the price is low but the lens is more than valid, if you have a high budget and are looking for a top lens this is not for you, the sharpness is not from L series but it is still good. The lens on presents lèggera. Quick and still accurate. It's a good lens kit. Too bad to be a bit dark, in my experiences she was still able to give me good shots.
Pros:Lightness, focal range, sharpness (hobby), fast enough, stabilized
Cons:Sharpness (work), darkness (apertures)
Opinion:Taken to try it during my travels but after I took back the 17-40 f4 L I resold it, but only for obvious reasons of focal otherwise it would have remained with me given the cost, lightness, stabilization and sharpness that for the photos of my travels is more than fine; I remain of the idea that if I have to travel for fun and relaxation I do not want to weigh down the journey. Used once for work and NO, ABSOLUTELY NOT. For the reasons listed above, namely that it is dark, not very sharp and I do not trust a priori.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
