JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2020. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2929 €;

95 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Canon RF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	100-500 mm
Angle of view	24.4 - 4.9°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4.5-7.1
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	20 elements in 14 groups
Min. focus distance	0.90 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.33x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	1370 g
Dimensions	94 x 207 mm
Buy
Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 249000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Claudiocanon

sent on July 23, 2024

Pros: Sharpness, lightning-fast autofocus motor, construction.

Cons: It is impossible to bring it to a focal length below 300 mm with a teleconverter.

Opinion: Used exclusively with R3 and R5 for birdlife. I reluctantly sold the 8-year-old 100-400, but after the first test I forgot about it. The autofocus of the 100-500 is great, the lens is sharp even at full aperture. Perfect from f 8 to 500 mm. The sharpness with the 1.4X extender is also good (I have never tried the 2X). The only "flaw" is the impossibility, with the extender mounted, to retract the lens below 300 mm. Which comes to think of it makes sense. I am extremely satisfied.

Mattia Campos

sent on April 28, 2024

Pros: Optical quality, weight, autofocus, blurred nice for a low light zoom, good but not record-breaking stabilization, lens hood with window to adjust the filters. Overall it is higher than 200-800 on all fronts, except that the latter at maximum focal lengths detaches the subject more.

Cons: The external zooming mechanism is not the best, the build quality is good but the controls on the barrel are a bit too "dry", not very sensitive, and a bit "uncomfortable" to operate

Opinion: The 100-500 is a little gem. Compared to the 100-400ii, it has 100mm more battery life, slightly higher image quality and even more effective stabilization when combined with good camera bodies. The sharpness and "clarity" in the center are surprising, at the edges there is a drop but they remain excellent. In the 3k range, it's the sharpest telephoto zoom ever and probably also with the best autofocus. it's a bit sharper than all the 150-600s and even the Sony 200-600... it is slightly sharper from the center to the edges at all focal lengths. But compared to the 150-600 and the 200-800 it does not offer the same blur at maximum focal length, this may be the only "limit" in certain situations. overall the blur is really beautiful, the most beautiful of the zooms, and holds up even when the light is not optimal, juncture in which all the others lose quality, but obviously the detachment of the subject at 500mm f7.1 cannot be comparable to that of a 600 f6.3 or 800 f9 .... The only "defect" that I personally found in it, is the zoom ring .... it is a bit hard, but above all it is placed too far forward ... Being used to very soft and fluid rings and zooms that do not extend I did not find myself very well with this 100-500, the zoom system forces me to a somewhat uncomfortable hand movement and the zoom that extends does not drive me crazy. As light as it is, handheld panning is limited by these aspects, and in the end, if I don't need the zoom, I keep it fixed at 500mm ... On a professional level, an R3 or a battery grip on the R5 / R6 is required to shoot stably. I immediately removed the ring with the stirrup, because the handle is too small and uncomfortable and to gain on weight. The ready-to-use lens with the bracket and camouflage cover weighs 1640g. I like the lens hood very much, there is a very comfortable window through which you can maneuver the filters. The stabilization has not always convinced me completely. I find it very very good on R6ii, but definitely inferior on R7, and even on R5ii it dances a little too much.. I think it's a problem of the bodies... There is something to review and fix

Eliad

sent on March 28, 2024

Pros: Weight & Size

Cons: Price, Minimal Blur

Opinion: Good lens for those who want to travel light, too bad for the price not justified! Now with the release of the 200-800mm superior in all, the 100-500mm has had a collapse in sales resulting in a monstrous drop in price, now new costs 2400 euros when 5/6 months ago it was 2950 euros if not more. Otherwise it behaves like the improved 100-400 and with RF mount gains 100mm but loses 2/3 of a stop at full aperture 400mm f5.6 vs 500mm f7.1 improved dust seals!

Giallo63

sent on January 19, 2024

Pros: Portability in relation to focal range - optical quality - mechanical quality - relative compactness - stabilizer effectiveness

Cons: I prefer the zoom ring lock with slider instead of clamping ring. Cost (but that's okay...)

Opinion: Purchased used A- from trusted physical store. Only the significant discount compared to the new one made me take it, because I was really satisfied with the excellent performance of the two lenses that I left in exchange, namely RF 100-400/5,6-8 and RF 800/11. The reasoning was essentially that, since I placed the R7 (apsc) side by side with the R5 (ff) for the widlife I use practically only the smallest format; and for that reason the 100-400 was often a bit short, while the 800, for years and with satisfaction used on the FF, was far too long on the apsc. This 100-500 L turned out to be the best choice for me: the equivalent l.f. from 160 to 800mm reasonably cover all my needs; desperately, the high density of the R7 sensor allows generous crops, and I can wander around fields and hills without my back, after a while, making me regret it. Many consider this lens to be not very bright: of course, the plate data are those, but the calendar lets me know that we are in 2024, that the RAW development programs today allow me to shoot safely at ISO 12800 with excellent results, also, if not especially, for the very high optical quality of this zoom, which at full aperture is already at the top. It's useless for me to have lenses wider than half a stop, but ... it's better to aperture. I don't know if I'm making myself clear. I consider it a masterpiece on the R7. On the R5 I hope to test it better and more intensely in other areas, landscape in the first place; the tests I have done, however, confirm that it is a gem of Canon that those interested in certain photographic genres will hardly be able to give up.

Carlo1404

sent on August 07, 2023

Pros: Autofocus, sharpness, focal range, weight and handling

Cons: Cost, and maybe only the white livery that for the photos I take must be more discreet and the window of the hood that often remains open, but they are 'quisquilie'

Opinion: Taken after a year and a half of use of the RF100/400, which I recently sold for unused. Initially I fought to 'adapt' it to the R7 while on the R6 I had no problems. After some 'tips' read here on the forum I made custom settings and 'everything changed. I use it for birdlife and does its job excellently, fast in the MAF, very sharp even at full aperture and with the focus always active it does not lose the subject even in motion. I had to 'hide the white livery by buying a 3M film to be applied on the whole lens, I avoided putting it on the barrel of the zoom excursion for fear that it would get stuck inside. Practical use is well balanced, I use it freehand without the collar that I put only when I go out with the monopod, together with the machine it does not exceed 2 kg and compared to when I went around with the 5DMk3 / 7DMk2 and the Sigma 150/600 Sport is a real liberation. I also use it in combination with the RF 1.4x and I must say that the decay is imperceptible, maintains all the potential and with the R7 it is like having a 1200mm equivalent even if it becomes an f10 of maximum aperture. The stabilization allows you to take pictures of static subjects even at 1/30" holding the camera on a stable support and at 1/60" freehand. For the minimum focusing distance, very welcome for close subjects, I made 'semimacro' shots of excellent quality at maximum focal length. I had many doubts about the considerable expense but I must admit that compared to the RF100/400 and 'certainly better, while recognizing that the 100/400 RF is not bad at all for what it costs ...

There are 21 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM

Wall Surges 2021

by Luciano Casagranda
96 comments, 23536 views [editors pick]

Lesser Tenrec Hedgehog

by Maurizio Lanini
90 comments, 5672 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.2 MP

A magical moment

by Alessandro Beconi
76 comments, 8387 views [editors pick]

Jeep n.2

by Giuseppe Tognarini
115 comments, 6548 views [editors pick]

HI RES 10.7 MP

Untitled Photo

by Stefano Ceci
73 comments, 5710 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.0 MP

Jay

by Stefano Ceci
64 comments, 6790 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.7 MP

Ermine

by Emilio63
60 comments, 5630 views [editors pick]

Southern shrike with prey...

by Paolorossi
95 comments, 6479 views [editors pick]

HI RES 6.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Minor male shrike

by Stefano Ceci
59 comments, 8975 views [editors pick]

HI RES 13.4 MP

Sardinian magnanina

by Stefano Ceci
63 comments, 4600 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.3 MP

The spirit of the Mountain echoes in you...

by Troise Carmine - Washi
90 comments, 2909 views [editors pick]

HI RES 8.8 MP

Chamois

by Emilio63
75 comments, 5580 views

Roar time

by Eleonora Trombetta
38 comments, 4393 views [editors pick]

HI RES 41.5 MP

" The expert of LENSES... He rejected this equipment.

by Feliciano Maurizio
72 comments, 10666 views

HI RES 18.5 MP

Female sparrowhawk

by Marco50
121 comments, 7402 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

The two little brothers

by Nic1978
49 comments, 5419 views [editors pick]

HI RES 13.5 MP

Sparrowhawk

by Marco50
114 comments, 8376 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Redpoll

by Carlo Tavallini
64 comments, 4057 views [editors pick]

HI RES 16.7 MP

Flying Checo / Part Two

by Mattia Campos
59 comments, 6410 views [editors pick]

HI RES 19.3 MP

Between earth and sky

by Diego Occhi
47 comments, 5697 views [editors pick]

Bickering between arctic terns

by DrChris.
64 comments, 4751 views [editors pick]

HI RES 6.5 MP

Green woodpecker (F)

by Marco50
99 comments, 4149 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Sea jay with prey

by Marco50
95 comments, 4985 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Dwarf owl

by Emilio63
64 comments, 4461 views

Look into the camera! (Phelsuma grandis)

by Juza
27 comments, 5927 views

HI RES 11.8 MP

Life and death at the Masai Mara, 4:11 pm and 12 seconds

by _Axl_
89 comments, 8833 views [editors pick]

Sea jay

by Marco50
99 comments, 3916 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Sparrowhawk

by Marco50
106 comments, 5579 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Camogli

by PannaeFragola
52 comments, 3199 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Female sparrowhawk

by Marco50
109 comments, 4283 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Castle of Sarzano and Cusna

by Andrea Frassinetti
35 comments, 1709 views [editors pick]

HI RES 15.4 MP

Wallcreeper

by Pietro Giorgio Favaro
64 comments, 3357 views

HI RES 5.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

African Watercolor

by Susy Dan
71 comments, 2847 views [editors pick]

HI RES 6.0 MP

The bath of the spotted woodpecker (F)

by Marco50
81 comments, 2815 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Sea jay with covalletta

by Marco50
95 comments, 3563 views

HI RES 15.4 MP

Bulbul on the hunt

by Juza
32 comments, 4213 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

The elf and his cloak

by Nangi
71 comments, 2747 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM

Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM