JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 176000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Excellent ISO hold, general QI with 6Mpx more than the previous model, adjustable screen, DPAF in LV, ergonomics and weight, AF module, exposure and white balance automatic GPS and WiFi to Condire.
Cons:Nothing that you can not be aware already at the time of purchase: If I have to enter specifically, I would say that simply equalized the performance at the IQ level of the previous 6D, both at the level of ISO and dynamic range.
Opinion:After 8 months of use also intense, I am to review this camera. It is a complete and performing "All Arounder", can do everything and can do it in a way that goes from good to excellent, but never poor. In many situations it is even superabundant, in others simply adequate. I therefore consider it suitable for virtually any kind and any demanding amateur photographer (especially if already possessor of Canon material) who wants a machine that is the point of arrival of his equipment. The cons I have listed are absolutely mitigated by the fact that it adds 6Mpx compared to the past and has a large AF module, with close points but absolutely not too central (my repositions are reduced to the bone, while doing only portraits substantially). Where there comes the AF module for coverage, we think the LV with 80% coverage of the frame to compensate. The whole is in fact seasoned by the very welcome addition of DPAF that already had on the 70D, but that here is improved as performance and speed, making the LV of Canon SLR The benchmark in this field. In the end, therefore, the list of cons is in my opinion totally forgiable, also and above all according to the Price (right) on which it has settled after all this time: at the beginning I do not deny having considered it absolutely overdone, as happens on the other hand/ Unfortunately to all the "cool outputs" Canon. The exposure and the white balance are excellent and almost always adapted to the scene (the 70D returned in situations of artificial light almost always yellow images, instead the 6D2 almost always assigns the WB "tungsten" giving a natural color to the subjects and Photo). The articulated screen allowed me shots that were otherwise very uncomfortable. WiFi used a ton of times to share and use photos immediately. GPS turned off just for habit and because I know the places where I photographed, otherwise on the road I think I would turn it on with good peace of the battery (I have spare, so much). Excellent-as a Canon script-solidity and construction, with an equally obvious feeling of immediate use, coming from other Canon bodies. In short, I can only recommend it to those who are "pointing".
user183438
sent on May 21, 2019
Pros:Overhead screen, Digic7 software, Af dual pixel in mode Lv, colors.
Cons:Mixed sensor, low ISO tightness, shadow recovery.
Opinion:Good compromise but it is not a reliable machine to work, the files are heavy and the PP must be more thought.. JPG good... Raw needs a specific program if you have older versions of Lr and Ps. What to say, I do not like. Better an honest 6d because it is not cmq the height of the pros. That's what I'm selling.
Cons:One Mark IV castrated, lack double slot, dynamic range
Opinion:Excellent machine, use for portrait and I great satisfactions with quality lenses such as the Canon 50mm 1.2 L. and the Sigma 85mm 1.4 art. I had a Nikon d750 I have to say that this is much more performanant at high ISO. But this canon I know that beats it, has something magical colors the three-dimensionality, be in conclusion a machine that I highly recommend especially if you use quality lenses.
Opinion:I have this machine for 5 months now, after having squeezed it in landscaping and naturalistic I'm ready to give you my opinion. Sensor: It is not the best sensor for recovering shadows pushed, since it introduces much noise, the light recovery is good but there are definitely more performaning sensors in the market. If you expose well, however, gives a really high image quality, full of detail and with little noise up to ISO 3200, with 6400 to 8000 for me quietly usable but with a work of post major. AF: Focusing system is definitely improved compared to the 6D and especially compared to the 50D from which I came, much more versatile, fast and reliable. For bird tracking If the quarry is coupled with a fast lens, I have not changed the settings because it seemed to only worsen the performance by intervening on the various parameters, and coupled with the Tamron 100-400 works really well. Too bad for the concentration of points in the center of the sensor, really annoying for portraits and compositions even in the rule of thirds. You save with the shot in Live View, where the DPAF is fast and accurate (not for fast subjects) enough to draw a baby on the swing (tested mainly in continuous AF with Back button focus). It also works well in low light conditions, and I mainly shoot with recent Tamron lenses, but I noticed that with Canon lenses it is more reliable in low light situations (tested with 85 1.8 and 17-40L). Usability: It's really a pleasure to use in the field. In Landscaping the swivel screen is convenient for when you have it on a tripod and not at man's height, so that you do not have to lean, as well as useful for free hand shots up and down) and the GPS helps to keep track of the shots on the map of Lightroom. The keys are all in their place and I have obviated the annoying lack of a joystick dedicated to selecting the AF points by assigning the directional pad for this purpose. In personalization you can change the functions of many keys for good customization, nothing to do with Fuji and Sony on this aspect though. The 6D Mark II was the most discussed and well-treated reflex of the 2017, but despite its flaws (sensor and AF points, as well as the lack of 4K) remains a solid choice for amateurs who want to move to FF or as a second body to be accompanied by a more professional body. It remains in my opinion a better choice than the EOS RP regarding "fast" photography where they serve fps and a solid AF, otherwise for portraits and street I would recommend the RP for the fact that the AF points cover most of the framing giving More flexibility in composition. To prefer to a 5D4? Only for the weight, the GPS and the adjustable screen; On all other aspects the 5D4 is considerably higher, as expected from the price difference. To prefer compared to an EOS R? Same as above, with more to consider that the 6D2 has 6.5 fps against the actual 5 fps of the R, but the R has the best sensor, so I would say it could be considered a draw. In This case maybe I would go on the R for more advanced technology, but there are still more than €500 difference to consider between the two. Basically: the 6D Mark II gives off wonderful shots if you know how to master it and if you're ready to compromise with the well known and cited flaws. If not, I recommend you to focus on the mirrorless Canon or 5D Mark IV.
Pros:Excellent hold High ISO, Dual Pixel, Touch Screen, discrete Burst, good general soot, WiFi
Cons:Dynamic Range (if it serves an extreme recovery)
Opinion:Finally a complete car from Canon. Bistrattata by the YouTubers and those who expected a 5d4 at half price, in reality this is the real reflex all-round. Fluid the right, with good gust for portraits. Very reliable touch and DPAF Combination. To be small, she is very well in her hand. It is a kind of Golf of reflex: very good in all respects and without real flaws. Can be Improved, maybe. A 5d4 is even smoother and has more dynamic range. The 1DX make a flurry of fear, but in the end for those who do predominantly photos this has no areas of shade and is not little. Objectively The dynamic range is not at the top of the range, but it is also true that I felt the need only in a picture in five thousand.. Where I blatantly wrong I exposure
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
