|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alexander52 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alexander52 ![]() |
![]() | Nikon D700 Pros: Full frame Cons: None in my opinion Opinion: Camera purchased 3 months ago at 300 € with 13500 shots practically to be tested, I have seen specimens with 400000 shots with the shutter still working, before doing the review I wanted to test it with a thousand shots, from portrait to landscape, I was stunned by the images it brings out. I mainly use it with 28 105 afd, but it behaves well with all the optics in my possession... what can I say fantastic machine, it only takes photos (not movies) these do them with your mobile phone which is better ... in my opinion the camera has to take pictures, and the d700 despite being 15 years old, does them really well, I also have the d750 another nice camera, but this tank really amazed me, despite its 12 MP, fantastic colors and well manageable noise, with the new AI programs it is no longer a problema.ci would be many other merits, (fast AF battery life, possibility to use any lens etc....) if you want a real full frame I recommend it... good photos sent on February 13, 2024 |
![]() | Tokina AT-X 12-28mm f/4 PRO DX Pros: SHARPNESS, ROBUSTNESS, FOCAL RANGE Cons: FLAIR Opinion: LENS WITH VERY GOOD QUALITY RATIO. THE CHROMATIC ABERRATIONS THAT MANY COMPLAIN ABOUT, IN MY SPECIMEN ARE IMPERCEPTIBLE, ALMOST NON-EXISTENT AND ONLY WIDE OPEN. YOU HAVE TO PAY MORE ATTENTION TO THE FLARE, WITH SOME PRECAUTIONS YOU CAN AVOID, SHARPNESS AND COLORS EXCELLENT, THE WEIGHT IS HIGH, BUT FOR ME IT IS NOT A PROBLEM. OVERALL AN EXCELLENT WELL BUILT LENS, NOT EVERYONE KNOWS IT BUT IT WORKS VERY WELL EVEN ON FX SENSOR FROM 18 TO 28, PERSONALLY I USE IT ON NIKON D610, NIKON D750 WITHOUT PROBLEMS EVEN IF IT WAS BORN FOR DX SENSORS... I RECOMMEND IT TO THOSE WHO TRAVEL, THOSE WHO DO STREET, AND ESPECIALLY LANDSCAPES .. RATED 9 sent on November 23, 2023 |
![]() | Olympus E-Zuiko Auto-T 135mm f/3.5 Pros: Compact, well-built, sharpening, blurred Cons: I don't know Opinion: Great goal,well built,metal and glass as Olympus knows how to do,great sharpness already at full opening, even blurry not bad, I do not feel the need of the AF focuses well ,very precise and fluid, f8 and very sharp .I use it on MC Nikon from d200,d7000,d610,d750 with much satisfaction, after replacing the bayonet. (pixco ). If you happen to try the 75/150 f4 zuiko on the forums is not appreciated. but personally I have to say the opposite especially on FF great, and well built. try to believe. and hard to find a shoddy zuiko. good photos sent on April 30, 2020 |
![]() | Tamron 80-210mm f/3.8-4 Pros: Sharpness.. Colors... fire puter Cons: Weight Opinion: I'm probably in possession of the first model. with the built-in lampshade. despite saying it's the worst. 3 objectives. products, my exemplary and very sharp diaphragm of a single stop, fantastic colors,ease of mf, use it on bodies Nikon d200,d7000,d610,d750, behaves very well,optical vintage look, I am very satisfied to have found an optics that has little to envy to more expensive optics... good photos sent on April 27, 2020 |
![]() | Tamron 1.4x AF Pros: Great brightness. Price Cons: Loss of sharpness at full opening Opinion: All in all for the sale price a good extender 1.4 x. No loss of brightness, in my case in combination with some goals behaves well just diaphants at least one stop to get good results. e.g. 200 2.8 afd,50 1.8 afd. 100 2.8 series e. You have to test and evaluate on which optics satisfy you the most. I use it on FF and apsc. D750... D610... D7000... D200 with satisfaction.. keeps af.. and what to say is worth the expense. Bought for 100 euros... Good photos sent on April 23, 2020 |
![]() | Nikon D200 Pros: Robustness ,sensor ccd tropicalization,colors Cons: Estate over 800 iso Opinion: Purchased 14 years ago, I am now in possession of a d7000, a d610 and ad750. what to say programs and sensors continue to advance great beautiful machines but the real colors of the d200 are dreamy ... I will use it until the end of its life to date 32000 shots a jewel that from how I use it and able to get over 200000 shots. and a tank. those who own it are unlikely to get rid of it or if they do so, they have understood little of its potential,..... good photos..... sent on March 14, 2020 |
![]() | Olympus 50mm f/1.8 OM F.Zuiko Pros: Lightweight design quality blurred sharpness outer diaphragm bezel sharpness Cons: Do not have it in the propio kit Opinion: I think the best. 50 1.8 in its category, I used it with om 10, very sharp does not foul in anything from the center to the edges already open, I use it now on nikon d200, d7000, d610 after changing the bayonet, pixco per l , Accuracy purchased on ebay at 15 euros without lenses with infinite mf, great on all the perfect machines on the d610 where it resumes all its features, such as the movie of a vote, even better on sensor, compared with nikon 50 1.8 afd Wins in sharp contrast and uniform image, manual but soft, quick note due to the fluidity of the ring, which say if you like the vintage and perfect optics .. I highly recommend it. sent on April 30, 2017 |
![]() | Mir-1b 37mm f/2.8 Pros: Construction, blur, sharpen Cons: A bit of vignetting on ff, fixable in post Opinion: I dusted off this light after 15-year break, used very little of minolta md, x300s reading reviews on this vintage lens I decided to adapt it to nikon, I made a lens of body surgery and ring in order to make the draft without suitable for nikon loupe correction touching of 0.3 mm, the mirror, and it worth the penalty and excellent color sharpness already at full aperture of D610 on d200 and d7000 becomes a 54 mm handyman highly recommend sent on April 22, 2017 |
![]() | Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5 Pros: Sharpness extraordinary already 3.5 very flexible continuous diaphragm making precise micrometric fire all metal construction Cons: He suffers backlit and recommended constant hood Opinion: I am in possession of the model 37 A thread m42 I use it recently on nikon after years of inactivity, I discovered that by removing the M42 support with three small screws that block it and placing a nikon t2 graft, after having removed the thread fits lens and keeps the focus to infinity, I can not help but most fantastic razor sharp this point, I recommend it especially to the great portraitists of focus. ... With no plug nikon lens correction .... Good pictures ... sent on April 01, 2017 |
![]() | Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5 Pros: Sharpness extraordinary already 3.5 very flexible continuous diaphragm making precise micrometric fire all metal construction Cons: He suffers backlit and recommended constant hood Opinion: I am in possession of the model M44 to thread m42 I use it recently on nikon after years of inactivity, I discovered that by removing the M42 support with three small screws that block it and placing a nikon t2 graft, after having removed the thread fits lens and keeps the focus to infinity, I can not help but be more in fantastic razor sharp this point, I recommend it especially to ritrsttisti very blurry. sent on April 01, 2017 |
![]() | Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D Pros: Sharpness build quality Cons: Weight Opinion: I own this fantastic optics for 15 years My model is afd pump in perfect condition, great goal I would not change any similar optics. It gives me great satisfaction, great crystal clear already 2,8.lo use of d 200 d7000 and D610 nothing to add 1300gr weight is not a big deal, pero`c'e '.buone photos and happy new year to all sent on January 03, 2017 |
![]() | Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8 Pros: construction sharpness Cons: Opaque lenses in almost all samples Opinion: I bought this magnificent lens to 180 euro with a slight opacity of the doublet group of lenses placed before the iris I decided to take it apart, starting from the rear lens mount lifting the plug without removing it then with 3 screws it comes off the first group in the first unit is removed with a compass with iron spikes the investigated group are cleaned well the lens with a cloth and liquid lenses for refitting all ..the're done ... but I risked it was worth pena.se glue the pair has invaded the lenses do not have to do anything to replace it and the parts are sadly slow service ... good ... good photos sent on November 12, 2016 |
![]() | Nikon AF 28mm f/2.8 D Pros: light economic sharp light Cons: Af slow but not problematic Opinion: I find it a great goal is the use of right d7000, d200, which fx D610 with much satisfaction, and practical and light is damage close the iris especially on the right, from where the best of themselves .... no stopping down known much difference. of D610 is a slight vignettaura wanting correctable with lr and other programs, however, is a goal from very crisp pleasing colors, I highly recommend it for both reportage landscape sent on November 03, 2016 |
![]() | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Construction, sharpness, price Cons: slight distortion Opinion: I am in possession of the latest model with contacts for Nikon, the use of D610, d7000, ED200 everything worked, MFC manual but with indication in the viewfinder nothing to say of this beautiful goal, crystal clear from F3.5, fantastic f8 higher I think the nikon original very well built, can not miss in the bag of an amateur and professional landscape designer, I highly recommend it. sent on November 02, 2016 |
![]() | Nikon D610 Pros: rugged, lightweight, fast silent autofocus sensor, fantastic, nikon successful .... congratulations ... better than the d700 use with vr 24 85 35 70 2.8 afd, afd 90 80 200 2.8 macro tamron 2 8 af 28 2.8 50 1.8 afd af all optical sensor for this worthy Cons: points of focus central to my way of photographing is not important Opinion: excellent machine ... I am very satisfied from nikon d 200 nikon d 7000 of which I still use with great satisfaction, the sensor acting and however another world yield a very different format than the right, and once you try it hard to go back makes it hard (my opinion) I recommend the use of optical grip and better balanced with heavy machine ... so good sent on July 26, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me