JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Olympus E-Zuiko Auto-T 135mm f/3.5 is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, discontinued. The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is €;
10 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Small, light, compact, beautiful blur. Extremely finely made in metal and glass.
Cons: I did not have the 2.8 version but I think it is always nice to have this extra 2/2 of a stop of light available (especially on film cameras).
Opinion: I think this was one of the best lenses I ever used. It gave amazing half person portrait images that I still remember today. I think it cost back then (around maybe 1990 or 2000) about 100USD - an amazingly inexpensive lens compared to the prices we pay today for ridiculous lenses from some big brands. In fact I may buy an adapter soon and try the lens with our digital cameras.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Used on full frame, it will certainly give different results, compared to the sensor of my current olympus. My specimen is like new, paid a foolish, and, solves a dense sensor (micro4/3) very well, having said that, its attitude is the portrait. Gorgeous is the only word that sums it up, not contrasted, very delicate tone passages and extreme acuteness make it perfect, the manual focus in this lens is instinctive, as if the first time was the millionth time you shoot with it. If you intend to buy this lens you will not regret it, compared to its cousin 2.8 it is irrefutably superior.
Pros:Compactness and lightness like all Zuiko optics, sharpness and bokeh
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:When I talk about the OM system I am biased, there is little to do. I bought this lens as a portrait lens in a hurry to do a workshop, and I didn't even have high expectations, being the cheap version of the 135/2.8. However, I was pleasantly surprised, already at full aperture it returns an excellent engraving that is appreciated even more on 30x40 prints. The compactness and construction are at the same levels as a Telyt with a red sticker
Pros:Construction, colors, sharpness in the center, weight and dimensions
Cons:Resistance against light, bayonet clip
Opinion:There are lenses that probably have no age, this 135 small and compact and slender, and is built really well both in terms of quality of the materials used (metal) and to see my specimen on the glasses; it is not a modern lens and does not have modern treatments, in short, it does not keep the backlight but it is also beautiful for this reason, appreciable in certain portraits with its marked tendency to lose contrast; it is sharp enough already at 3.5 in the center with a bit of astigmatism at the edges that goes to reduce closed 5.6, the optimal range of uniformity center edge f8-f11, with infringement to f16 (But not even so much); the colors are beautiful and natural, micro contrast right, in short, balanced; the bokeh suffers from the ungenerous opening and the minimum focusing distance of 1.5m, in any case it is pleasant with a good blur; if you can find a defect is in the bayonet attachment, internally the closing spring of the clip is held firm by 2 pins of the only hard plastic element that I found, perhaps the age maybe just the choice in the specimen that I found (immaculate for everything else) one of these 2 pins had broken making the spring go off-site, for now I have solved by creating a thickness to hold the spring in place, alternatively you can think of creating 2 holes to the bayonet and screw the spring to the same with 2 small glasses screws.
Opinion:Great goal,well built,metal and glass as Olympus knows how to do,great sharpness already at full opening, even blurry not bad, I do not feel the need of the AF focuses well ,very precise and fluid, f8 and very sharp .I use it on MC Nikon from d200,d7000,d610,d750 with much satisfaction, after replacing the bayonet. (pixco ). If you happen to try the 75/150 f4 zuiko on the forums is not appreciated. but personally I have to say the opposite especially on FF great, and well built. try to believe. and hard to find a shoddy zuiko. good photos
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
