JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5 : Specifications and Opinions

Lens photo unavailable

The Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5 is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1976 to 1980 (discontinued). The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price was 45 €;

30 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.

Specifications
Focal lenght	135 mm
Angle of view	18.2°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/3.5
Aperture blades	11
Lenses/Groups	4 elements in 3 groups
Min. focus distance	1.2 meters
Reproduction ratio
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Manual Focus
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	52 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	410 g
Dimensions	x mm
Buy
Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Rolubich

sent on September 18, 2024

Pros: mechanical construction - sharpness - bokeh - 12-blade diaphragm

Cons: Flare

Opinion: Excellent and cheap lens built very well; the main quality is in my opinion a very good blur, the main defect is a very strong tendency to produce flare as soon as there are strong lights in the frame (you don't need direct sunlight, but also for example a certain portion of light gray sky in the frame produces a visible haze), and mine is the MC version. Good sharpness already at TA, excellent at f/5.6. Be careful when buying the oil on the reeds (very frequent) because I have an idea that it worsens the internal reflections and therefore the flare. Highly recommended.

Alberto.Costa_Ph

sent on May 21, 2024

Pros: Construction, vintage flavor, sharpness, bokeh, flare, price

Cons: Dim

Opinion: My first vintage lens. Bought a couple of years ago and mounted on my Nikon D3500 it moved me from the first photo. Colors and dough with a vintage flavor impossible to find in modern optics. Amazing creamy bokeh and excellent sharpness even at 3.5. To point out, but I consider it a strength of the lens. The construction is of fine workmanship, completely made of metal with the focus ring that is smooth and pleasant to operate. The price is ridiculous, absolutely to be bought with your eyes closed.

user109536

sent on January 09, 2022

Pros: All metal construction, small, elegant, sharp, great colors, smooth rings

Cons: Nothing for the price but manual focusing after years of autofocus requires some attention and adaptation.

Opinion: It cost me 65 euros including shipping from distant Russia. It arrived in a month perfectly packed. I use it on micro 4/3 with an adapter of about 10 euros bought in China that I also use for other vintage lenses. The lens I received is in perfect condition without any sign of wear, it looks new. The rings are fluid but hard enough and very convenient to use both for apertures (without shots) and for focusing. The lens is small even with the adapter and seems made especially for the micro 4/3, in my case the G80. It is very sharp, the colors are warm and the blurred very nice. It is good for portraits and flora thanks to the beautiful blurred but also for street and landscapes. Recommended without reservations.

MaurizioRosato

sent on July 01, 2021

Pros: Bokeh, sharpness, colors, construction

Cons: flares, flares, flares

Opinion: Removed the backlight flare also present with mounted lampshon, otherwise I fell in love with it, precise focus ring, nesting even at full opening to envy to newer designed, opening F 3.5 does not make it a very bright lens but, for my use it is more than fine, Bokeh amazing, I often carry it with me mounted on XT3 for my landscape outings

Cmg

sent on January 05, 2021

Pros: Sharpness, colors, 12-slat diaphragm, with continuous movement, smooth and precise focus ring.

Cons: It suffers the backlight and needs a light.

Opinion: Taken yesterday out of simple curiosity in the 1980 Moscow Olympics. The guy who sold it to me had built him a handcrafted lampshed done very well I would say, given the ease of assembly and efficiency. 12-slat diaphragm, excellent manual focus, precise and of the right fluidity. Out-of-focus light points always with perfect rims that you can't count the sides, at least up to F/8. Well, I wanted to compare it with two giants of the same focal length, zeiss apo sonnar 135 f/2 and sigma art 135 f/1.8. I would have expected, as is rightly reliable given the cost of the two giant (11 to 13 times the price of jupiter) a remarkable difference that was not in all respects. Saturated colors, high sharpness, pleasantly rounded blurry but with less detachment of planes and less open shadows. The home trials I did were a short distance away and at least in this situation the ugly duckling behaved very well, given the derisory market price I would give a nice 10 cum Laude.

There are 11 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5

Housefly portrait

by Shahbazi
33 comments, 5443 views

Jumping Spider

by Shahbazi
18 comments, 3629 views

Moon landing

by Michela Checchetto
36 comments, 4130 views

Untitled

by Shahbazi
7 comments, 4209 views

The farmer

by Memfoto
19 comments, 3742 views

HI RES 12.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Józef Wilisowski
13 comments, 2365 views

Untitled Photo

by Józef Wilisowski
11 comments, 1224 views

HI RES 16.4 MP

Year 2024. First attempt at a bird flight to the Moon.

by Warszawski
56 comments, 1226 views

HI RES 7.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Untitled Photo

by IvanRudenko
2 comments, 2238 views

HI RES 6.2 MP

Untitled Photo

by Warszawski
57 comments, 849 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Tulip

by Ehsan
8 comments, 3418 views

Agatea Car Hire

by Sestri1970
23 comments, 1204 views

HI RES 15.6 MP

Varso Tower is the tallest in the European Union

by Warszawski
50 comments, 1449 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Eristalinus aeneus

by Shahbazi
14 comments, 2592 views

Untitled Photo

by Józef Wilisowski
6 comments, 2211 views

Ju Ju and the sun

by Marco Cristiano
10 comments, 2673 views

HI RES 5.6 MP

Colors star

by Tore Serra
7 comments, 2491 views

Untitled Photo

by Yurkascorpio
2 comments, 3170 views

HI RES 5.0 MP

Where is your god?

by Efus
24 comments, 2008 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Memfoto
5 comments, 2388 views

Light vs Dark

by Marco Mottillo
10 comments, 2377 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Gale force wind

by Otello56
8 comments, 684 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Bad

by Bigisbetter
2 comments, 4287 views

Ju Ju in jupiter 37A

by Marco Cristiano
10 comments, 2060 views

Untitled Photo

by Józef Wilisowski
6 comments, 1104 views

Untitled Photo

by Warszawski
39 comments, 870 views

HI RES 7.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Tore Serra
4 comments, 3331 views

Street Portrait

by Pierluigi Andronico
12 comments, 822 views

HI RES 21.2 MP

Untitled Photo

by Warszawski
25 comments, 640 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Echinacea

by Pietro9458
7 comments, 1531 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Eugen Frunza
2 comments, 1449 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Impressive imitation

by Magic74
6 comments, 980 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Józef Wilisowski
1 comments, 1515 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Music of the heart

by Pijei
6 comments, 1678 views

Backlit only plan

by Pijei
5 comments, 1396 views

Threats from 'high

by Marco Mottillo
9 comments, 2050 views

HI RES 16.0 MP

Swan Lake

by Pijei
2 comments, 2249 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Zenit » Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5

Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Jupiter-37A 135mm f/3.5