|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Robybinfa www.juzaphoto.com/p/Robybinfa  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM Pros: Opening, Three-Dimensionality, Airiness, Off-Plan, Colours, Sharpness, solid Construction, Gradual and progressive Blur, complexion Rendition, L-Series Cons: Maybe AF a little slow (but nothing dramatic), tendency to suck dust inside Opinion: Magic Lens, without a doubt the best mediotele I have ever used and not only in the house Canon. I Have recently held the "Big One", nickname that I have been able to confirm as soon as I took in my hands this "specimen". Very large and powerful, with a very special build quality, being so bright needs "space" to accommodate the large front lens and the entire optical group: 1Kg abundant glass and steel.... Amazing and in my opinion the unique design and very appealing. Lens of the 2006, then not too "young" from the optical scheme inherited from the first series (dated 1989......). My first concern was the AF, which many have seen as slow.... I state that I had the 85 1.8 USM and all this slowness I did not see it compared to the less bright brother. It is perhaps a bit ' slow when you switch from subjects on the first floor compared to subjects "far", there maybe it is a slow thread to find the fire, but close up is fast enough, so you need to take your hand. Strong Piece of this lens is definitely the three-dimensional yield that gives, with the subjects that seem to literally "pierce" the photo and the background that slowly, progressively, seems to fade in the fog.... Wonderful indeed. I Think in so many years of photography, maybe only the Canon 135 L is approaching him... But as 85mm never saw anything like it. It matches with great naturalness to the performance of the FF sensors (I use it on 5D4 and 5D3 and it is excellent) giving to the images that stamp and that paste that reminds the film photos.... I read that this lens shares the optical pattern of the previous one, which in turn had been inherited from the Leica 85.... In fact, the airy, pastel colours, the artistic and dreamlike style of the blurred are sublime and not comparable with ANY of the modern lenses Hypersharp, Hypercorrect and Anonymous... About sharpness, however, is also high to 1.2, reaching from F2 in then impressive peaks. Having had the 1.8 I affirm with certainty that at the maximum openings is sharper this of the little brother, which is beautiful, fast, practical and sharp.... But the "big one" is something else... Try to believe. Reportage, weddings, portraiture are his fields of choice, and I add that serves so much, so much practice to know how best to manage. Compared to 135 I find it more comfortable the focal (85mm for me are the Perfection for portraits), very sharp both but more rosy the complexion of 85 (a bit ' more natural in my opinion).... For the rest are the 2 lenses that in a substantial "technical" kit can not miss. I reserve to try it in depth and to squeeze it to the fullest but my initial impressions are from "first of the class" undoubtedly some. Top! sent on April 20, 2019 |
 | Canon 5D Mark IV Pros: Canon 5 Series Body, Dynamic Range, 30 Megapixel, Resolution, image Quality, Touch Screen, AF Module, Burst, Ergonomics, Wi-Fi and GPS, Tropicalization Cons: Price, maybe more operating speed, sometimes on continuous shots with two cards there is a Lag (slowing image storage) Opinion: A great camera, as for the rest of the series 5 Canon. Sturdy, solid, well-balanced... A tank-reinforced in short, that from the point of view of the quality of materials and assemblages never disappoints. I also own a Mark3, already excellent as a machine and very similar to this upgrade but boasts a sensor with more dynamic range, more resolution, an AF even more sensitive and responsive and 1fps more, as well as features such as Wi-Fi and GPS and touch screen. Personally I do not use Wi-Fi, GPS but I find the touch quite useful to see immediately the MAF of the image. With Canon L lenses reaches top quality crazy, that if they play even with the most powerful sensors Sony (really a great job of Canon on the sensor), while on the ISO and the crunchiness of the image I personally continue to prefer Canon, Especially on skin complexion and delicate tones. It is also true that with the custom profiles and with the RAW you can do everything today. I tried little the new mirrorless and I must say that will certainly be the future, but unfortunately I do not find myself with the electronic viewfinder and with all the technological features of the case, maybe in the future I'll be adept, but today as I stay in the house Canon , which always guarantees me performance and top bodies, great assistance and unreachable quality lenses. Perhaps the only "flaw" of the Mark 4 price (high, but it is used in many stores) and one thing I noticed working in RAW with 2 cards the operating speed and lag for long bursts (nothing dramatic anyway). Excellent update of the MARK3 in the field of reportage, marriage, portraiture, still life and also photographic hunting. Today as today I consider it without a doubt the best DSLR machine at 360 ° in Canon Home and not only... sent on April 17, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM Pros: Sharpness, Blur, AF Speed, Color, Three-Dimensionality, plane break, Microcontrast and color, Construction Cons: Non-stabilized, Focal Length indoors (a bit long) Opinion: Amazing Lens, the 135mm L. If you think that this lens is born as a project in the far 1996, this says a lot about the constructive superiority/awkward optics of Canon compared to the competition, which will surely have Mirrorless with sensors equipped with great dynamic range and modern AF but from Side lenses and optics still has to make it to the road.... The construction is excellent, sturdy and well balanced, not too flashy as it could be the 70-200, so much so that it can go unnoticed if used without lens hood in different situations of reportage/street and travel. The AF is fast and it gets even quicker if you move the ring nut over 0.90-infinity, the sharpness is outstanding already at F2, closing becomes impressive. The colors are beautiful (classic Canon rendition) and the really good microcontrast. A lens that was created for the portrait set, the first/first few planes, the shooting with outdoor models, weddings and social reportage. It Gives the best of itself in ceremonies/weddings where the detachment of the subject from the background and the blurred very soft and progressive, give the image a unique stamp. In my opinion the only lens in the house Canon that has a higher blurred is the ambitious 85mm 1.2, with however minimal differences and with a very, very similar character. Today in 2019, a lens that can tell its even with Canon sensors above 22MPixel: I use it on 5DMARK3 and 5dmark4 and it seems born for these machines that manages to squeeze up to the last Megapixels. The Only drawback was the lack of stabilization (but it would have been a different perspective and would have lost its lightness). There is also to be considered that the focal is not short, so in the Churches in the halls and interiors, it would sometimes be more congenial a focal under 100mm. To have ABSOLUTELY in outfit sent on April 16, 2019 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: FF sensor, body, ergonomics, robustness, Quality Files, Dynamic Range, Speed ??AF, AF module setting, high ISO seal, silent snap, Tropicalization, Sub Video, gust, Incisiveness Files, Dual Slot (CF + SD) Versatility of use, price flea today (2017) Cons: Complexity menu, just out New Price Opinion: 26 # 8220; rate ", the multi-punched" Q "and is changed - than the MK2 - the zoom system on the photos (maybe less intuitive, but just give us a little 'hands). rnI RAW files it produces are exceptional: rich in detail and color, deep, with a large dynamic range and three-dimensionality even in low light conditions. I personally noticed, compared to FF 6D I possess, greater incisiveness of files even at high sensitivity, with a file that is more crisp and detailed. rnNon I noticed, however, a better high ISO seal of 6D compared to 5, or rather the two reflex seem to me very close as the voice of chrominance and luminance. rnIl body and ergonomics are exceptional and falls into my hands very well, like a glove; tropicalization is even better than that of the MKII, which already had a very good livello.rnMolto useful finely tuned sound and especially the double-slot that allows you to use both CF cards, either SD, mentKing did not feel the lack of Wi-Fi and GPS, for me useless accessories on an SLR. rnComparto very advanced video although personally I only care about the photographic side which is what we use in 99% of cases. rnOggi is new and used at a reasonable price with a few clicks is a reflex that can really last for long. IMHO - today - is the best Reflex high-end on mercato.rn sent on March 22, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: Exceptional sharpness already at 1.4, Aperture, contrast, correction of aberrations and distortions, Toughness, Construction, Tropicalization, Defocused, color shades, Vignette beautiful, Af (you name it!) Cons: Price, Weight (however justified both), Create strong dependence ... Opinion: This lens has replaced my trusty 28mm 1.8 USM, a lens underestimated and understood by few on this forum, excellent lens and my faithful companion for the past 3 anni.rnAvevo need something more and found a 24 L second serious virtually conditions indistinguishable from the new: of course I did not have let slip: is my third series L, my first hard this prestigious serie.rnLa lens in question is beyond my wildest expectations: so far the best Canon lens, and certainly the best of the My corredo.rnLa construction is taken care of, but solid (the goal really weighs) and is almost as big as my 16-35 (1 series), also mount the same filters as 77mm.rnL'AF is very fast, both of 5D2 that of 6D and engages fast and preciso.rnLa thing that shocked me is the impressive sharpness of the lens, which already at 1.4 is impeccable: closing improves increasingly maintaining a lofty fine detail and giving the edge to TA an artistic vignettattura that personalemente strikes me molto.rnThe blurry is dry and over-corrected, other than the most irregular and artistic 28.rnLa the blur correction and vignettattura give to photos taken with this lens a UNICO.rnAprendo character pictures to PC and looking at them well, there is a practically absent distortion and AC nulle.rnLa lens cleaning done: the photos that churns are perfette.rnReportage in low light, wedding photojournalism and its fields of excellence: Canon really has churned out a gioiello.rnPer to understand the level of this lens, i can safely confirm that the good 24-70 2.8 (professional lens of high level), remotely approaching the yield of this fixed, and as a distortion, blur, quality, color and corrections are on another pianeta.rnCredo that the square there is a 24 similar even in the house Nikon or Zeiss: really the TOP! rnrnrn sent on September 17, 2016 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Made at high ISO impressive, FF, quality grain and complexion, interior and menu display, Sprint Silent, AF reliable Cons: Commands not initially intuitive (I come from 5d2 and 7d), Lack Joypad multicontroller, gust, Viewfinder, Operation Speed ??General Opinion: I come from a Canon 7D, which is a machine of high level, but for practical genres (portraits, landscapes, reporting, event, wedding and still-life) I decided to buy a second body FF (the other is the "mythical "5Dmk2) .rnParto assume that I have not been able to squeeze it in the best, so my impressions are of use definitive.rnIl body is definitely not a good standard, certainly less solid than the 5 series or 7 series, but still it returns a very good feeling to the touch, as well as materials that seem solid. And 'slightly smaller and thinner SLR above but is being appealed and uses bene.rnIl menu is rich and quite customizable, with a nice display and a good list of funzioni.rnMolto interesting menu guide, especially on some features like correcting lenses and objectives, they can always come in handy: read the fine manual especially on AF and esposizione.rnLa quality dand it generates files that left me speechless (obviously positive). We stop at least 3 on the 7D and 1 stop and 1/2 above the 5Dmk2, which is certainly not a "dilettante" ... rnQuesto body holds the ISO in a stratospheric, with a beautiful grain (dry and pasty), an incarnate from series 1 (very natural). Above is absent banding and recoveries are really interessanti.rnAltro chapter is definitely for the dynamic range, very extensive. Compared to 5Dmk2 known a more "planed" and less crisp, but I think it had a speech to a different filter AA, perhaps less invasive. That said are two large machines, FF, with two rows still very beautiful even if different (being used for 2 years, MK2 can not see the differences) .rnHo noticed that the lenses 2.8 f4 and I (16-23 2.8 and 70 f4IS -200) can now also be used in environments less enlightened, thanks to efficient management of the above ISO 8000; across the fixed I own seem to have found new life: on APS-C ovviambody were "castrated" and now having two FF I can use them for their true value and interchange. rnL'AF is quick and accurate, but not to the levels of 7d, would be too;) It seems reliable and accurate: the normal burst (4.5 fps) .rnLo silent shutter is also interesting, especially in places such as the Churches , while Wi-Fi and GPS are gadgets that are currently not used, so for me superflui.rnLa which however I was blown away are the commands, really very different from those of the 5D2 and 7D, which seemed much more intuitive and certainly better prepared: it will be my duty to get used to the fullest, as well as the zoom button (Q + wheel) and the lack of Pad mlticontroller, as in selecting AF was comodissimo.rnPer now my impression is very positive: I was looking high ISO, image quality natural and good speed, and I must say I also found more than they imagined. Top marks! Rn sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: 2.8 aperture throughout the frame, Tropicalisation, Construction, Mechanics, Reactivity AF, appearance, materials, colors, sharpness in the center Cons: Sharpen the edges, Vignette (for me it is a PRO), distortion 16mm Opinion: I decided to replace my trusty 17-40 f4 with this 16-35 2.8, despite having heard conflicting opinions and reviews not very satisfactory, mainly on the quality bordi.rnL'ottica I really like: the construction is equal to that of brother less bright, then the highest level, the mechanical internal focus is fantastic, and the AF is even faster than that of the 17-40: 2.8 is really fulmineo.rnA utilizzabilissimo - I thought not - and closing becomes more and more clear. The edges in fact are not high quality, but I knew that this was the price to pay to have this lens. At the center instead my copy af 2.8 is already very nitido.rnI genres that are practical reportage, street, still life and figure set, weddings and events: the maximum aperture of f4 had become not just a limit, especially in low light: with this in mind I will not have big problems, considering the fact that the edges will not have objects / subjects of note from evidenziare.rnQuello I noticed & egrave; vignetting high (which I like a lot so I consider it a PRO), and a distortion evident in 16mm.rnIn PP can overcome the drawbacks mentioned above by software with Photoshop or Lightroom.rnDevo admit - needing a bright lens - was the only logical choice: the second set cost much and what they say is not worth the money, as it is also full of difettucci edges compresi.rnNon I have not tested the resistance to flare, which was impressive in 17-40 .rnLa most pleasant thing optics is the blurry soft and gradual, which gives the picture a unique look: on this aspect of the 17-40 was back: the blur was hard and dry, in my opinion the most "obvious" and less artistic : surely the diaphragm 2.8 helps a lot in this circostanza.rnAltra pleasant surprise colors: warm and saturated (very similar to those of 17-40), and not as cold as someone had noted (typical yield "hot" Canon) is .rnUsato in reasonable numbers, and applies them all: both of which FF on APS-C is great: on 7d even eliundermines the "defects" thanks to CROP 1.6, and it becomes quite a handyman luminoso.rnAlla end a bell'upgrade my 17-40. I feel really consigliarlo.rnrnrn sent on March 24, 2015 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: Machine Body Fantastic, Ergonomics, Commands, Functions, Tropicalisation, Robustness, Duration, Aesthetics, Form AF, AF Customizing, 100% viewfinder, Gust, Quality materials, FullHD video, access to menus Cons: Performance above 2000 ISO, sensor dense (but quality), incisiveness files at high ISO, sensor APS-C and FF (otherwise it would have been TOP) Opinion: A wonderful machine, a real tank with emotions and performance leader.rnHa replaced my first SLR (EOS 600D), from which it inherits a similar sensor but otherwise we are on another world (something obviously different reflex band) .rnAl touch is fantastic: rugged and tropical conditions, ergonomically perfect, mechanically flawless: gripping it seems my MK2, with commands and functions very simili.rnLe two cars actually look identical at first glance, of course apart from the AF sensor and f, respectively complementary between the two models, which together form a pairing pazzesca.rnE 'robust but easy to handle, perfect for my hands without the need for BG. The controls are quick and intuitive, the viewfinder is great (really seems to be "in the scene"), the AF module is thrilling in every situation, with avalanches of settings and customizations (which I am discovering little by little) .rnLa flurry is very high (with 8fps you can photograph of all) and the file it generates is very good, but obviously not at the level of5D2 (comparison in favor of FF) .rnIl file 5d2 is perfectly usable up to ISO 5000, in 6400 still great and workable; the file of the 7D comes to max 3200 workable, well need a lot of post-production to get results buoni.rnSi can get best results shooting in mRAW with less noise, a covenant not to crop the file, and using the very comfortable surroundings of ISO (essential ) .rnSpecifico that the 7D has a sensor different from 60d and 600d, as I confirmed my friend who works for Conon and had the opportunity to talk to an engineer: every SLR Canon has a different sensor apparently; yield much suoeriore of 7d at high iso it is proof palese.rnIn couple with 5D2 with emotions, and today the exit of 7D2, has an affordable price and is in excellent condition and with a file still present, as well as performance that offers: an APS-C performance really elevate.rnrn sent on January 14, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Blurred, Great brightness, Three-dimensionality of FF focal Yield on APS-C, Construction, Af Cons: Hood sold separately, ring MAF (a bit 'too smooth) Opinion: A lens that I love, the brightest of my outfit (f 1.4). Together with the 28 1.8 USM and the legendary 85 1.8 USM complete my series of fixed lights. All lenses Cool: MAF fast, beautiful bokeh, otiima construction and great robustness. I come from the 50 1.8 II series lacking for brightness, build quality and auto focus than this, certainly better than the 1.4 that makes it better especially on FF. Globally, however, the fifty I've never been disappointed, and taught me how to take pictures with pdc and effects creativi.rnSu Mk2 reduced the yield is good, on APS-C is a 80mm with a nice design and excellent nitidezza.rnA 2.8 the lens is super-sharp, but even at f2 is fantastic second me.rnIn low light always saves the shot; does not have a high cost and versatility ottima.rnMolto satisfied the objective, only a slight fluidity of the ring of MAF compared to 28 and 85 (AF above), but that's okay. rnParaluce purchased separately (not a fault of the lens), for & ogravand; Canon could add in kit.rnMeglio of this - of this focus - there is only the big brother 1.2 (sublime), but it costs more than four times this ... rnrn sent on November 22, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Cost above all, value for money, great openness and brightness, sharpness even at high apertures, light Cons: Autofocus noisy and cumbersome (not USM), construction materials, Robustness Opinion: My first drive, bought for the past two years, only now I write the review on the lens at oggetto.rnIl "fifty", is a lens that teaches photograph: very easy to control the depth of field and give effect creativi.rnLa lens is very Autofocus and plasticky with a "prehistoric", but the yield of this little gem is indiscussa.rnUsato 600 d is a 80 mm interesting with a fabulous performance on full-frame (50mm) remains a focus with a nice yield, lower than the brother 1.4 (a stop in more and materials / f completely different) and certainly less than the big brother superluminoso 1.2.rnA this price I think there is nothing paragonabile.rnCredevo, going to FF, the lens would have highlighted all the flaws, but after 1 year I can still use to talk about it much more bene.rnLo use on APS-C than on FF, as they attract me more than the focal 24-28-35 mm compared to the 50, but every time I use it I have absolutely nothing to imputargli.rnLa first fixed lens a must have supplied, especially if sietand novice: recommended !!! sent on November 03, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Price / quality / performance, Sharpness, Three dimensional image on FF, optical quality, build quality, USM Autofocus reactive, brightness, weight and size, bokeh Cons: Hood not included (just ....) Opinion: Great Canon lens, a fixed superb quality and very low price for the services in question garantisce.rnLa lens is sharp from 1.8 to both the center and at the edges, and f2 on rasoio.rnLo becomes a blur that gives is wonderful, it seems that the images are shrouded in mist, I think the best uncompromising 85mm I provato.rnL'85 L is superb and brighter, but its AF is slower than this embarrassingly (I speak of 1serie - the only I've got to try), absolutely not justify that price ... rnIdeale for portraiture, for details, for details and to shoot in low light, a lens for reportage but also figure set, staying away from subject: the autofocus does not miss a beat and hyper-fast even in low FF luce.rnSu the quality is awesome - really by Top Category, while on APS-C may be an interesting alternative to low-cost quality 135 f2 (amazing by the magical lens blur) No .rnUnicoand or the lens hood is not included in the price; its coupling does not seem as dramatic as many say, but certainly a little more could fare.rnLa the Canon lens belongs to the same series of 28 1.8, 50 1.4 and 100 f2 lens and all glass and FANTASTICHE.rnQuesto 28 1.8 drives are my favorite, I could not get out of abandoning or leaving them at home - also saw the space they occupy and the services regalano.rnAggiungo which is not always necessary to shell out an excessive amount for the Top: this lens is the proof. rn sent on October 29, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Construction, Series L, AF, Stabilizer, Image Quality, Incisiveness, three-dimensional (especially on FF), Sharpness, Easy handling, lightweight, excursion Focal, Bokeh, Tropicalization, is also multipliable Cons: "Solo" f4, ring not included in the price ...... nothing Opinion: Fantastic Canon telephoto lens, the "Whitey" is my first objective above 70mm, and my second series L (The other is the excellent 17-40 f4) .rnLa construction is bulletproof: solid, sturdy, easy to handle , tropical conditions: just hold it to understand what he is made this little gem ... the thing that impressed me was the weight: only 760 grams for this lens; accustomed to 17-40 with fixed lenses and it pleases me very much, because I do not like to travel pesante.rnEsteticamente is also very nice, with a great design to my taste, plus it's weather sealed, and then constructively we are really at my Top.rnLa second option was the Sigma 70-200 2.8 stabilized, but weighs more than twice and really think there is an abyss at the level of construction and quality of materials, despite having more or less the same APS-C costo.rnUsato on the quality and 'excursion are significant, it returns an incredible detail and sharpness to the images; the stabilizer allows you to earn at least 3 stops buoni (also 4) and Autofocus Lens is truly remarkable (a wire noisy but it is a detail) .rnSu FF (5D2) the yield is still higher ... the thing that left me speechless is the His extraordinary incisiveness and dimensions to f4, if you close to 1 stop embarrassing the quality that the bianchino can regalare.rnInoltre from 70mm up to 200mm optical perfection has a disarming, and it is totally free of distortion and chromatic aberration in any diaframma.rnI are saturated colors, rich detail, high contrast and very nice bokeh (we consider that it is f4 !!!): ques'ottica is a MUST for every canonist ... now that I own I can understand what the field words that it is hard to descrivere.rnParaluce and soft case are standard, while the tripod ring (expensive in my opinion ...) must be purchased separatamente.rnIo I use it for landscapes, architecture and urban details, photos " stolen "around the city, manifestations / outdoor events, reportage (really light), Closeups posing and "improvised" and also dark places such as churches where the stabilizer (very useful in both modes) is richiesto.rnNon practical photographic hunting and outdoor sports , but I think the second option for this lens is able to get away with egregiamente.rnSe you need a 2.8 stabilized by steering the harrier, but if you do not require a diaphragm so open, this tele for me is the # 1 !!! Obviously stra-recommended to all rnrnrnrnrn sent on October 01, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Building, Weight, lightning-fast AF, 7-blade diaphragm, colors, versatility and performance even on APSC Cons: No lens hood and pouch in the delivery made to the edges at TA FF (but not dramatic), AC Opinion: Also I have decided to buy the lens in question since I needed a wide angle lens is very bright for churches / interior and love the 28mm focal length on Photo-Reportage and giornalismo.rnPremetto who are in possession of the 17-40 f4 lens spectacular in many points of view - landscapes and perspective with this exceptional 17mm glass - but I needed more light and I could not economically opt for the 24 1.4 L2 (The top of the house on the market in Canon). rnHo read on the forums a bit 'of everything on this lens, but the review of Misterg had convinced me to first lettura.rnL 'I purchased the 9cento of Pavia (which I recommend as a shop at 360 degrees) and also the shopkeeper, an expert on the subject, I suggested buying. rnMi would say that this lens is OUTSTANDING davvero.rnLo use on FF (5Dmk2) as a wide-angle lens and focal 600D as "normal" and I must say that the performance of my specimen is exceptional in both casi.rnAd an affordable price you will come home a lens with a solid construction and fine - you can already see the first impact - and with a perfection and an optical qualitynotevoli.rnL 'AF is lightning-fast and accurate in all situations, the colors are bright, saturated: beautiful, it is fuzzy and soft that gives the drama and atmosphere that only those who use landlines can understand, use, by choice, very white black and sepia tones in Post Production, and I must say that this lens seems made for this purpose: sensazionale.rnIl control the depth of field is nice and the ring of MAF manual is soft and smooth to the point giusto.rnNon I noticed this tremendous drop in sharpness at the edges of FF that many annotate, and already at 2.5 the lens is a blade opening you can use fast times, suitable for the Reportage and marriages; on APS-C 45mm Focal is a beautiful, very interessante.rnVengo from an L series, and I've tried the 24 1.4 II series courtesy of a friend (SPACE, mind you: already f 1.8 is a razor and the edges are stratospheric) but I guarantee that there is a gulf between the two lenses, especiallyWhereas the second coast three times this .... rnLo detachment of the subject / object from the background is stunning, on FF the images seem to have "life" covering the reportage shots, people, street and portraits ambientati I would say this lens returns "something" missing fotografo.rnPurtroppo hood (purchased separately), and soft case (I have a lot of care of the lenses and both are very important for me), but you can still buy separately; as for the 85 1.8 - another fantastic lens of the same series - there is the problem of chromatic aberration - however solved with Lightroom or Photoshop in post-produzione.rnOnestamente are positively impressed by this lens that I recommend 100% for those who practice my genres and I never sell: I repeat that the 24 1.4 L II and I also believe the 35 L are higher but the difference is minimal when you consider the price of the two lenses: 28 1.8 for me this is in effect a series The mancato.rnrnRobertornrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn sent on May 06, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Top construction, quality optics, focal range, resistance to flare, weather sealing, weight, color, sharpness Cons: Chromatic aberration, distortion of ff (both correctable), f4 Opinion: Amazing lens canon, my first L series: comparison with other optical seems ridiculous. Just took in his hands the impression has been that of a tank: solid, durable and tropical conditions: really superb. On APS-C is an excellent all-rounder thanks to the crop factor (sin is not IS), on ff behaves as a wide-angle pushed through a perspective that I particularly like. The colors are beautiful, the clarity and sharpness of this lens are great: it gives its best from f6 to f16, focal which really seems a blade. The heavens that gives this lens postcard, resistance to flare the lens is breaking, the colors sublime. I use it for landscapes, architecture, photos in the city / metropolitan, still-life, and particularly suitable for weddings and events in which you have to gather a lot of people in a few areas. It distorts and suffers from chromatic aberration, but both are correctable with LR or PS. Also great for street and reportage around the city is great as it is very light. The secondor best short zoom on these focal Canon: the first is the 16-35 f2.8, but it costs twice as much and it's just brighter: the rest of the two approaches are very close as optical perfection and made to travel cromatica.rnIdeale light and do not give up a sublime picture quality. RNA MUST HAVE in my opinion a short focal lengths: strategic advised also saw the value for money: well worth every penny! rn sent on January 13, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: Sensor, FF, magnesium alloy body, Ergonomics, Controls, Display, Dynamic Range, RAW File, robustness, yield impeccable high ISO, Videos Cons: Autofocus, Burst (for sports use) Lack dual slot, Tropicalization compared to the latest releases (1Dx, Mk3) Opinion: My first Full Frame: really a fantastic car. rnCorpo very solid and well built, his hands returns a really good feeling, heavy but not bulky, good feeling with the handle: an ergonomic design. From the first shot I noticed that the sensor of this camera is great: with 21 Mpx you can do all the clippings as possible and the image definition is sublime; 50 ISO is incredible, fully usable up to 3200! The RAW that generates are perfectly workable in PP, the dynamic range of the sensor is very wide. Great for reportage, portraits, landscapes, still life, architecture, fashion, glamor. I tried to shoot in low light and has never missed a shot! RnL'Autofocus I do not think so scarce as many point out, the focus is accurate and fast, the lateral ones still usable: Obviously I think it is a bit 'slow to birds and sports use, as well as the burst; personally however not practical these genera, for which to date do not feel the need for a 7d Or elseand a 1d3. Is perfect for fashion shows, coupled with the 70-200 f / 4 L IS offers many, many emozioni.rnCon L series optics is really the Top: I come from a 600d, which I use as a second body, and really the difference feels! rnIl display is OK, even if it is not touch, the controls are simple and intuitive, the multicontroller Pad is convenient and useful, there are also good opportunities for customizing the settings, as well as the setting of obiettivi.rnIl viewfinder is accurate, the possibility shoot video 1920x1080p @ 30 FPS is really a lusso.rnHo tried the 5D3 and I must say that the sealing is better, but really is a must for every dettaglio.rnComplessivamente a Canonist, I recommend it to anyone who wants a FF 360 ° . rnrn sent on December 21, 2013 |
 | Canon 600D Pros: 18-megapixel sensor, image quality, rotatable display, ease of use, quality / price ratio, full-hd video, battery life Cons: Grip BG without small (for me), not 100% coverage viewfinder, only 9 AF points, burst in RAW Opinion: My first SLR, I can only speak well. A great car, with a very satisfactory image quality. The sensor 18 Mpx (the same 60D and 7D) is really "saturated" and the quality of image, consequently, is great: generates RAW files perfectly workable in PP. rnHo mounted battery grip because the handle was too small, now it is much more robust in his hands. The battery is long-lived, the swiveling display excellent for shooting in live view, and very useful for the video capabilities. Very simple and intuitive to use, excellent inter alia, the Canon interface, simple to understand. The seal at high ISO is not great, but superior to other competitors: I take the max up to 400 ISO, then I do not like the texture più.rnOttimo value for money, if we consider that the same image quality of the bigger 60D and 7D. RNLA viewfinder coverage is not 100%, and the autofocus is certainly not to the levels of a 7D, but the rest is not si is a machine with professional vocation for sport or bird life. rnCredo needs appropriate optics to enhance the fullness of the sensor, such as the EF-S series LE LO High qualità.rnDavvero happy with the car. sent on September 28, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
