JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 175000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Body, AF Excellent, dynamic range, high ISO noise management, Wi-Fi and GPS, touch screen, RAW files really very malleable, double slot CF and SD
Cons:Battery life (you download first and you have to be careful not to leave the Wi-Fi active)
Opinion:I was happy possessor of the 5D (old) who accompanied me in the world of FF, after a few years I switched to the 5D Mark II (still in my possession) and I used both the Mark III and the 5DS, the 5D Mark IV is worthy heir to the aforementioned machines , ergonomics is unchanged and finally has a sensor in step with the timing with a dynamic range worthy of a PRO and a file management in excellent post. CANON is always a guarantee in my opinion is missing nothing, the only flaw that I found is the battery life, especially with the various features active, I think I'll have to be more careful.
Pros:Canon 5 Series Body, Dynamic Range, 30 Megapixel, Resolution, image Quality, Touch Screen, AF Module, Burst, Ergonomics, Wi-Fi and GPS, Tropicalization
Cons:Price, maybe more operating speed, sometimes on continuous shots with two cards there is a Lag (slowing image storage)
Opinion:A great camera, as for the rest of the series 5 Canon. Sturdy, solid, well-balanced... A tank-reinforced in short, that from the point of view of the quality of materials and assemblages never disappoints. I also own a Mark3, already excellent as a machine and very similar to this upgrade but boasts a sensor with more dynamic range, more resolution, an AF even more sensitive and responsive and 1fps more, as well as features such as Wi-Fi and GPS and touch screen. Personally I do not use Wi-Fi, GPS but I find the touch quite useful to see immediately the MAF of the image. With Canon L lenses reaches top quality crazy, that if they play even with the most powerful sensors Sony (really a great job of Canon on the sensor), while on the ISO and the crunchiness of the image I personally continue to prefer Canon, Especially on skin complexion and delicate tones. It is also true that with the custom profiles and with the RAW you can do everything today. I tried little the new mirrorless and I must say that will certainly be the future, but unfortunately I do not find myself with the electronic viewfinder and with all the technological features of the case, maybe in the future I'll be adept, but today as I stay in the house Canon , which always guarantees me performance and top bodies, great assistance and unreachable quality lenses. Perhaps the only "flaw" of the Mark 4 price (high, but it is used in many stores) and one thing I noticed working in RAW with 2 cards the operating speed and lag for long bursts (nothing dramatic anyway). Excellent update of the MARK3 in the field of reportage, marriage, portraiture, still life and also photographic hunting. Today as today I consider it without a doubt the best DSLR machine at 360 ° in Canon Home and not only...
Pros:File Quality, dynamic range, ISO seal, autofocus, live View, ergonomics, menu, touch
Cons:Nothing relevant
Opinion:I use it with great satisfaction by more than one annetto, a really good handyman in all respects. AF Module Excellent, detailed file, excellent high ISO, a GD that allows me to work without any mood, the live view that does not need comments, the menu is the typical Canon simple and easy to navigate. The battery life was criticized, as far as I am concerned, with the BG and 2 batteries, I do 2300 shots of which a 35/40% in live view and I still have autonomy. Promoted with full marks, also considering the price at which I had it, €2400 new with official guarantee.
Pros:File Quality, dynamic range, ISO seal, Autofocus, live View
Cons:Nothing... Indeed perhaps the lack of the adjustable screen
Opinion:I use it from now on and I find it really a perfect machine for my needs. An Excellent handyman with an excellent image quality, a high ISO good, I can push myself without too many problems until 12800iso maintaining a good detail of course not in conditions of dark pesto and a dynamic range finally noteworthy... It will not be the top but for me what it offers is all fat runny. The first time I opened his raw file I noticed immediately how much elasticity and possibility of maneuvering allowed in post compared to my old and glorious 5d2... It didn't feel right. I also noticed a certain softness of the files compared to those of the granny, but it easily remedia increasing the sharpness. So it's all another way of working... You just have to be careful not to exceed in Recoveri and other similar amentià not to fall into the trap of fake photos and unnatural effects-which with 5d2 was practically impossible to do. The Af Department is excellent, much more stable and less nervous than the 7d2 in my possession. A real sniper... If I'm wrong it's not the fault of the reflex but mine. The Live View with the touch screen is exceptional. Focus in the dark, even with nd1000 filters, which can be Set with 5D2, with a touch that is a real gem, good reactivity in one shot and AI-servo. Had had the tiltable or articulated screen-Canon damn-would have been perfect, especially for macro photos. Good Battery but not great... The 5d2 was consuming a lot less. Video Side I do not express myself as I never use for this purpose. However I am enthusiastic and I would do a thousand times the choice that I made well a year ago, with my eyes closed.
Pros:Lightness, ergonomics, dynamic range, RAW file elasticity
Cons:Value for money, file sharpness, battery life, speed and AF reactivity.
Opinion:I am possessor of the Canon 5d Mark IV for a few months, in which I got to test it at work and I must say I am quite disappointed. It has a bad value for money, I have had a lot of SLR cameras including the 5d III which in some respects is even better. Also the next to the flagship 1DX old, which despite being much less young is 10 spans above (dynamic range apart). I vote 8/10 and I was very generous!!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
