JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 178000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Now you can get this for under 1000 Sterling and at that price its a steel.
Shutter speed at 8fps this is great for Air shows and sport.
AF points, 19 for a crop camera that's cool.
As a crop the EF-S lens collection is still good and x 1.6.
Cons: I wish it had both SD and CF cards.
Opinion: A fantastic camera the 7D is what the 50D should have been instead of starting a new range but still this is an all round great camera. I went from 400D to 40D to this, and it is so much nicer and well worth it if you can get it for less then 1000 Sterling. Having the 3 custom settings on the main dial are just like the 40D and so this was nice to keep in line with what I was used to. The view finder being 100% means I don't include the odd unwanted extra detail at the edge of the frame any more.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Passionate about the world of "plane spotting" I decided to buy a used reflex, this time from Canon (never more Nikon). Then I also dedicate myself to sports photography, with the help of many users I realized that the 7D has everything that is needed for me: points of MAF, 8 fps, and finally, the robustness. I had the pleasure of trying it out in Malpensa, and I was pleasantly impressed by the performance of the machine, it seems to have a FF in my hand. Pleasant all in all to keep on the back, I consider it an intuitive machine, robust, and pleasant to hear work: the sound it emits is pure poetry. To be 2009, in my humble opinion, is direct competitor of other more modern machines. Although the sensor is ancient, having ISOs in third parties and not in means makes the sensor work better. Very happy with the purchase, I recommend it to all of you.
Pros:When you hold it in your hand, you realize what a real prosumer must be like... as well as with the d300 nikon. they don't do that anymore. buy it if you can. to give you an idea of what an 80d in your hand is and this. the 80d will look like a plastic toy. as well as the d7000 that I also had ... they are personal experiences... two processors that compared to the 60d I owned in the same period seemed to compare a 530d bmw series with a 400 hp m5. especially with the live view. who tells you it's not fast ... especially with the live view then you don't have to be a photographer. and buy yourself a compact.. because it has too many expectations.
Cons:autofocus at disastrous stage with cheap optics. to say the least... this wanted optics of a certain value at the light level. at least 2.8. with the stm you conclude something good in terms of quality. but with autofocus you were punching. sensor full of dead pixels when used for video continuously.... without the possibility of a solution if you do not send it to the service room that simply turns them off. was the reason why I traded it for an eos m3.
Opinion:a tank... I know colleagues who did maintenance to specimens with over 700,000 shots without yet touching the shutter. was tropicalized from head to toe. better than the second version I have in the house disassembled because it took water during a snowfall... If you use L-series optics or cannons like those of football matches take one with your eyes closed... I of 60 machine owned bodies bought broken or new ... and then repaired ... etc., etc. is the one I regret the most. Believe me.. I used to fight for autofocus. then I realized that I'm as poor as the m... I mistook it for a new eos m3. and I held my 60d. isos up to 6400 were very usable. and if someone complains about the noisy photos and then use them right on facebook. advise them to find a girlfriend.... or something like that. as long as they mate later. and let off sit. I printed a book with photos all at iso 4000 or 6400 ... with that sensor. and it's magnificent despite the years. the live view compared to the 60d sister. it was lightning to the point that in case of important and unrepeatable photos I used it as a mirrorless . sure he wasn't wrong a shot... with the 10-18 stm was a blast. and with the engine stm a lightning with the autofocus in always live ... the weight just wonderful. the only real problem that no one mentioned before ... were the dead pixels. many sold are taken from hours and hours of video. and that was the real problem.... mine had 8000 shots. but on the raw you couldn't watch. then I realized that whoever sold it to me only used it for that... Too bad.. before you buy one, send a 10-second closed cap raw to 1600 iso. noise reductions.
Pros:Ergonomics, rapid, beautiful also aesthetically, rapid and precise AF, Video.
Cons:Noise, useless if you talk to pull out the shadows in post production, AF in Live View very slow (note that it is of 2009), No SERVO af in video.
Opinion:Very respectable machine, a camera that made me think of the history of reduced-size professional machines. The 7d still in 2019 gives great results. To talk about Live View, well what about. The live view itself is great but the focus via sensor, well I by several problems with its slowness but it is accurate to 90%, I use it often because of a Sigma lens that does not work properly with the AF in Reflex mode. To talk about noise here I would like to clarify that the noise that has at high ISO and just for a car of its time, even perhaps too much, but when you palra post production you can not do anything. In case you have a picture where you have a dark area; Illuminating the shadow area means ruining only the photo. The problem is that the sensor of all 7d has the problem of creating vertical strips on the sensor in dark areas and this makes it annoying to see. As a photo camera like birdlife and wildlife what about... just respect for this beast!
Opinion:This is a professional machine that costs like a low end compact. It is now at €300 in good condition that you can mistreat. AF very fast, good level burst, nice sturdy to endure even truly SAIC Treatments. The machine is tropicalized even if Juza says No. Unfortunately all this is paid with an inability to repair files come out Bad. If you cannate the shot you throw it. Not that Canon gets used to its customers at decent sensors, but this is even worse. If instead the shot is thought as it should and balanced in exposure, the result will be TOP. 18MPX also for an aps-c I think are the limit to withstand decent ISO (except the mythical Nikon d500). In essence this is a machine for professionals or however experts who need a body to do photographic hunting or sports in very poor Condition. Having paid then €300 we say that it will make us feel less bad if we ruin it. Personally I bought it just for this, so keep my beautiful Sony at home away from the weather, and throw me in the forest to hunt or on the sidelines with this 7d. If you are amateurs do not buy it, you will not do anything, it is not a machine handyman and you risk throwing money.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
