JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon 600D is a reflex camera with APS-C (1.6x) sensor and 18.0 megapixels manufactured from 2011 to 2012 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 12800 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 3.7 FPS x 6 RAW / 34 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 574 €;
185 users have given it an average vote of 8.7 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 249000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Pretty good image quality, adjustable screen, discrete videos but still in line with years and price, battery
Cons:File not very workable, autofocus effective only the central, high ISO very low
Opinion:I had the Canon 600D for a few years, my first SLR that introduced me to photography. Initially I did not feel the limits, but they came as soon as I began to understand more about it. Machine body great to carry around, light but still resistant, it is not very energetic so the battery lasts really long. I used it both to make videos and photos, and if you do not have very high demands it can give some satisfaction. The color science is that of Canon, so if you expose well you get really beautiful files, manipulable without exaggerating. The adjustable screen is also excellent, especially when shooting videos. The sore points are mainly in reliability and speed. The body is slow, the precise autofocus only on the central point forces you to recompose, which I have always hated to do, and with little light it practically does not exist. The tightness at high ISO is also just enough, already at 800ISO, especially with little light, the file is quite kneaded. This camera pushes you to improvise, to learn how to get by, because in many situations you have to compensate for the lack of technology with photographic technique and ingenuity, and therefore I recommend it to those who want to start, it is ridiculous and can be a teacher.
Pros:Good image quality, adjustable screen, compatibility with most canon optics, attractive price ratio, battery life
Cons:Low ISO hold But besides this to start it's fine
Opinion:My dear 600d... Where to start? Coming from the glorious d200 of Nikon, I was looking for a cheap car but doing its job. I was looking for an SLR machine that could make me take pictures of good quality, coupled with a decent video compartment without spending a fortune. Bought at 250 euros with matched the Canon 50mm f 1.8 (resold immediately), this machine has given me a lot of satisfaction. Perfect for beginners who look to the world of photography, but also to enthusiasts who do not want to spend a capital. The 18 megapixels are more than enough to give away fantastic shots, and counting that on the market you can find on the market the 4000d with the same sensor but at a worse build quality and with many waids, this makes you think about the importance of choosing well the Own outfit. For the video side nothing to say... 24 fps are perfect and sinceramnte give up the 60 of the 200d I do not see such a great suffering. The only negative notes I can give him is certainly the low tightness at high ISO: Try not to go beyond the 800 (personal experience, trying to shoot in a room at 1600, I had a hard time to post produce the photos). But In addition to this I assure you that you will not be disappointed by your purchase, especially if you are fledgling. I will keep it until I have enough money to spend on a 6d mark II, but until then I will always keep it with me. I hope I was helpful
Pros:Size, weight, adjustable screen, live-view, good battery life, good JPEG and RAW files (the last ones are well-workable in p.p.).
Cons:High ISO tightness, already quite noticeable noise at 1600 ISO, few AF points, sometimes insufficient burst. Live-View Autofocus is not always very fast and accurate.
Opinion:Great entry level. Light, manageable, intuitive, practical. It is a complete camera that shows some limit only to high ISO and sequences of shots. I had it, Satisfactorissimo (well 2 camera bodies replacing the Canon Eos 450d and 350d), for several years before moving to FF (6d) But I can say that the 600d performs very well its task although, as generally all APS-C, it pays the price of the sensor more PICC Ol.
Pros:Adjustable screen, general ergonomics and functionality
Cons:If you approach it as entry level anything apart from the noise at high ISO
Opinion:It was my second reflex and I had it for a long time. The leap in quality compared to the 1100d that I had before was remarkable. First of all the adjustable screen that allowed me to approach the landscape photography and other genres from new "points of view". For those who want to spend little to start I would recommend it even today paired with maybe two discrete optics such as the 18-55 is STM and 55-250 is STM. Little expense, much surrender. In short, a "must" entry level still able to give satisfactions can also exploit a widening of potential with Magic Lantern. Advised to the newbies who look out for the wallet.
Opinion:This camera baptized me in the photographic world. Used for purchase (with only 1000 shots) from a friend with the basic optics 18-55, it was my trusting companion for 4 years. Over the course of this period I added to the top quality optic kit, from 17-70 sigma to 30mm sigma art, with appreciable results. I have to admit it was a great experience to use it, I could experience a lot: the 360 ??° swivel LCD screen is a plus, with adapter ring (few euro and 2mm footprint) I fitted vintage optics. With Samyang 8mm I enjoyed the fisheye, and I started to process her Raw files with Photoshop. The battery has a good life and the built-in flash can be useful. I have to say that for video recording is really a portent, like jpegs with well-balanced colors. You sneak a bit in post production, with a few limited and "hard" Raw files to work. Other than size, not a pocket-sized, but for ergonomics there is nothing to say; like mepunch very well, like a prolongation of the hand. The menu is well done and well organized. Great entry level in essence.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
