RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Marco Patti
www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarcoPatti



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Marco Patti


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_z50_f1-2Nikon Z 50mm f/1.2 S

Pros: TA sharpness, blurry, microcontrast, great AF

Cons: too long, lens that is not easily cleaned, materials used

Opinion: Hi, as in all my reviews I make years of use go by before opening my mouth, I don't like to review products after a month of use. I have currently owned the lens in question for exactly 3 years, and I can say that I have used it intensively. Optically you can't say anything about it, it has a sharpness of 1.2 unthinkable until a few years ago in reflex systems. It has a scary blur and a very high micro-contrast. The lens has a tendency to cool colors. I don't really like the material with which Z lenses are produced today, I much preferred those of reflex cameras (they were easier to clean and were much more resistant to scratches). I also noticed that particularly in this lens I find it more difficult to clean the glass with the microfiber cloth, while on other lenses the transition seems more fluid, here it seems slightly more complex, have they used different lenses on the outside?! I don't know. The af is very very good. Essential optics. A very sore point, not the weight but rather the LENGTHAA... really too long to be a 50mm

sent on July 31, 2024


nikon_afs28_f1-4Nikon AF-S 28mm f/1.4 E ED

Pros: 1.4 sharpness, af precision, bokeh, microcontrast, three-dimensionality

Cons: that there is no same lens for ML and I have to use the adapter

Opinion: I have been using this lens for 4 5 years now... what to say... it became my first lens, that optics with which I do EVERYTHING. I had the 35 art, extraordinary optics, but I found it a bit tight, so I decided to take this lens, and it was love at first sight. It has a hallucinatory optical quality, certainly superior to 35 art. At 1.4 it already has a sharpness and a frightening three-dimensionality, it seems almost a 50 mm from the detachment it has, and the contained distortion allows you to get very close to the subject, perfect optics to set, to tell, af very reliable, in short, an optic to have necessarily. Too bad there is no equivalent version for ML, but until then, I will hold on to it.

sent on June 07, 2022


manfrotto_pixi_evoManfrotto Pixi EVO

Pros: small..portable .. resistant..so its duty well

Cons: no one for that for which it was created

Opinion: a real discovery ... bought for a long time but never used ... I took advantage of the Venice trip to take it along with d750 + bg and nikon 14 24 .... say ... do not miss a shot ... regfe fine the weight ... drops just a little while you hit it but after you know it's highest and solve the problem ... recommended for trips to big cities to make long exposures without having to wear enormous tripods and break the back.

sent on September 09, 2017


nikon_afs105_f1-4Nikon AF-S 105mm f/1.4 E ED

Pros: Clearly crisp, accurate, blurry magic ... what do you want more?

Cons: It suffers to blink in the backlight ... Heavy ... it's worth it ... it's plasticous (can not do them all like that of the 70 200 vr2?) Expensive ...

Opinion: Since I have this optic for outdoor I no longer use any other optics..and that's all because I have optics like 35 and 50 art..70 200 vr2 nikon..rnAnd when I want to frame more scenarios i prefer to do some pad back if i can I'm literally in love with this optic .. it has a creamy blur and a sharpness at 1.4 absurd..just what I look for in an optician.rnCosta a botto ... I had to sell 58 and 85 1.4 nikon to pick it but the gear is Worth the money. Recommended

sent on April 18, 2017


nikon_85_f1-4gNikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 G

Pros: small, light, soft and nice blurred, af good, good yield backlight

Cons: sharpness at TA good but not excellent, nothing else

Opinion: Optical super under the aspect of manageability, 560gr very few to hold all of this quality. optical perfect for traveling. bokeh scream, pleasant and delicate blur, excellent optics for portrait. Maybe because I'm used to optical super crisp (my first optics were 35 art) I consider Unclear in TA..Ma nothing problematic ... I think I'm used to that too well. Rate 9

sent on November 18, 2016


manfrotto_bug_mb_pl-bg-203Manfrotto Bug PL-203 (MB PL-BG-203)

Pros: sturdy, well-finished, from hand luggage measures

Cons: inside pockets

Opinion: Great backpack, robust, quality ... there comes a d750 + 85mm + 35mm + 24 + 14 70 200 vr2 + flash + triggers and remains a bit of space. Certainly a super tele could never go in with these things, but considering it is a backpack to transport as hand luggage goes more than bene.rnSe I have to find a negatica known inner pockets when I open many times I have to lose something. ..avrei preferred larger with deep pockets and high zipper

sent on August 24, 2016


nikon_d610Nikon D610

Pros: lightweight, dynamic range, held at high iso

Cons: -1ev, Af few points and too central, 1/4000 sec

Opinion: I do not like a product review after 1 month of use so I'm doing after one year and an intense use. I made 39k shots and a photographic trip to Cambodia with this little gem and I must say it is a very formidable machine, sealing very good at high ISO, dynamic range stratospheric, relatively light, perfect for traveling. Do post production with files that churns out is really embarrassing for the resilience of shadows and lights. I decided to change it solely for the af ... to focus maximum -1ev often proved frustrating, and the few points of f (and very central) I find it restrictive. I do not hide that f is not the most reactive. Another shortcoming is the lack of 1/8000 that with optical light serves. But this one can fly, I can safely say that if the af did not do tantrums in non-optimal lighting conditions l would have held. For the rest excellent machine definitely recommended to those who want to switch to FF and have a respectable machine.

sent on February 08, 2016


sigma_35_f1-4Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art

Pros: High Sharpness already in TA, very blurred, imposing building, three-dimensional full-aperture embarrassing prezzorn

Cons: Front Back focus, focus shift, hood unworthy

Opinion: Lens absolutely pro .. highest quality already Ta. . A f4 / f5.6 from the best. .costruzione rocciosa..al feel a sense of immortality. rnUniche pecche..f / b focus and focus shift that in many situations I have created many problems especially when it requires speed and there is no time to lose. Plastic hood that remains ingrippato the thread with the use frequente.rnper me the weight is not a problem.

sent on December 02, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me