JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 G is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2010. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1699 €;
83 users have given it an average vote of 9.7 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 235000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, overall clean and lively images, acceptable MF
Cons: Some longitudinal CA wide open; moderately fast AF; some coma wide open. Expensive.
Opinion: The focal length is somewhat odd (I feel more at ease with either 58 or 105), and is traditionally used for (shoulder) portraits. In this roles, it is an excellent lens, with adequate sharpness wide open already.
Widest aperture is however not very useful for shoulder portraits, depth of field being insufficient in most cases. I found this lens particularly useful at f/2.2, where the blur is less pronounced and the bokeh still excellent. Full aperture may be useful in very low light, or for "creative" shots.
Another interesting area is night shots, where this lens performs well thanks, inter alia, to its coatings. There is some visible firefly-like coma wide open, which is acceptable because it is not "smeared".
Handling is quite good: this lens is biggish but not very heavy, and acceptable as a walk-around lens if you do not mind drawing attention (or if you *seek* attention).
On the negative side, this lens costs an arm and a leg. Please note that for portraits, you could as well use an old 105/2.5 wide open and get nice, though not identical, results.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Really excellent lens, if you do portrait you must have it, creepy sharpness, low weight, vignetting and chromatic aberrations not received, sometimes under intense light sources some flare, but in large diameter lenses it is quite normal. Maybe a better designed hood would have improved the situation. Perhaps the hood is the weak point of the lens. Pleasant and soft colors. Lightweight, and it's no small thing on a SLR. Taken used, although difficult to find it, The price of the new is only for professionals.
Opinion:I was a happy owner of a new nital AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8G that I really liked then I found version 1.4. From a photographer I knew, I bought it for 750 (used). If I have to look at the purely economic point of view it was not worth changing it, in the end I paid over 1000 euros with the capital loss of 309 euros of 1.8. With that price you buy a used one and you have some money left. If I look instead at the extra step I made in terms of quality, well a nice convinced. The portraits I take them at TA and a focal length to have for this type of photo. If you don't have budget 1.8 is very very good. if you want that something extra 1.4. Beware that the pieces the new round of the series g are now few. (just go to the site photo Colombo and you notice at the time of writing they have nothing of the G series. Now nikon is focusing on Z that I do not like at all, cost more, are mediocre (I had the 50 1.8 taken and resold new. I prefer to use AFS 1.4 with FTZ adapter). 50mm 1.8 new over 600 euros crazy stuff that with 250 you take 1.8 and 499 1.4. Rating 9,5
Opinion:a lens that gives pleasure to use and own. Give each image a touch of art. Very beautiful colors and a sharpness appropriate to the use for which it was conceived. The af quite responsive and definitely precise. Weight and bulk quite contained since we are talking about an 85mm f1.4 for ff reflex. price in line with those of the "pro" line of Nikon. The hood is actually "poor". When you insert it into its bayonet I almost have the feeling that it melts in my hand. the blurred that produces, in my opinion is already worth 'alone the money it costs! Definitely recommended!
Pros:Sharpness over the whole frame, contrast, very soft bokeh both behind the subject and in the transition, aberrations completely absent already from f2.
Cons:Color rendering a little too much tending to heat, bokeh fringing sensible, blurred front so so, price of the new out of the market.
Opinion:Given that obviously we are talking about a lens of the highest level, the mix of performance, weight and autofocus accuracy make it the most versatile 85mm f1.4 for Nikon. I bought it because coupled with my D750 I wanted maximum performance while maintaining portability for my travels and in fact does not miss a beat, almost boring for those like me coming from the previous D. Saturated colors like all modern lenses, it gives excellent shots even in sluggish light conditions where the previous D showed a bit 'the side. However, it maintains a good fidelity even with a temperature significantly shifted towards the heat. Chromatic aberrations very well corrected, a nice step forward compared to the D, except for a bit of imperfection at TA in the area close to the fire where I would have expected an improvement compared to the predecessor and instead it is identical. Easier to use and more versatile compared to the D, compared to this it pays the price of a color rendering of the complexion a little less magical but that in my opinion goes very well with everything else, nature in the first place where it gave me magnificent shots in autumn. The only real objective defect is a bokeh in front of the subject who in critical situations is a little nervous. The bokeh behind instead is even softer than the D (the numerous online tests confirm, those who say the opposite are wrong), but in practice it is difficult to see differences. Referring to my specimens, a TA goes strong, the center is slightly lower than the D but the homogeneity on the frame is far superior, it does not split the hair like the 35 1.4 art or the 180 2.8 but it is fine, then already at f2 it is an absolute blade, I would say that considering all aspects it has about 2/3 stop in favor on the D. If for you the weight is not a problem, the 85 art is an even more performing lens, but since this G also has detail to sell I would evaluate more than anything else which color rendering and level of portability are more for you. If you prefer sweet portraits with more neutral and soft complexions in optimal light conditions, taken for passion and you have the desire and ability to manage a lens a little more difficult, then the D could be the best choice given the economic savings, but with the cost of losing the AF on mirrorless. The price of the new is out of the market but at the price of the used (about € 900 for a specimen equal to the new) is valid.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.