JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon Z 85mm f/1.2 S is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2023. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 3099 €;
25 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon Z: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Nikon Z.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Quoting one already present: "it is the sum of Nikon's optical skills"
Cons:inevitable heaviness
Opinion:I had the opportunity to buy this lens to accompany the 50 1.2 and I can only be enthusiastic about the result. I use it with the Z6 III and the combination is definitely a winner. After the first weddings and events I couldn't find fault. It is difficult for me, in terms of image quality (sharpness) to find differences compared to the 50mm 1.2, indeed there is an advantage, that healthy distance from the subject on important close-ups: it avoids the awe that last year I often perceived in front of a lens (I'm talking about the 50mm) that they found themselves practically "in the face". This is a huge advantage. On focusing, when Z6III locks on to the eye, it's great, a blade even close to 1.2. I don't know if Nikon has changed, between now and last year, the type of lens hood, but the one I have, with the same attachment as the 50 1.2, seems sturdy and light to me. The price is very high, as for the 50 1.2 - and as has often happened over the last few years - I had to rely on foreign dealers who save up to € 1000 compared to the Nital branded product.
Opinion:Recently bought selling, reluctantly, the Nikon 105 f1.4, a truly extraordinary lens for sharpness and blur but which I used with FTZ. Not liking adapters I decided to sell the only F lens still in my possession for this amazing 85 f1.2. What can I say, soft and progressive blur that creates dreamlike, almost dreamlike imprints and that, due to the extreme sharpness even at f1.2, takes your hand and you would always shoot wide open. The optics are very versatile and less limiting than the 105, especially indoors, and have an excellent build quality, except for the lens hood that looks like the tube of a stove (they could do it at least petal like that of the 50 f1.2). It's a focal length that I love and that I was waiting for a long time seeing the images that the Canon counterpart returned, the only sore point is the price, even if in part justified by the quality and the lens, and the size: it weighs and weighs almost like a 70-200 2.8 !! I managed to find a refurbished specimen on Nikon Store and, given the favorable price together with the sale of the 105 1.4, I couldn't resist. Did I do it right? I'll know in a few months when I use it in more demanding jobs than a few shots on the fly of a model, but I think that this lens only to the Z9 with which it matches perfectly, will give me great satisfaction. Last but not least, I have to mention the speed and silence of the AF that with Z8/Z9 doesn't miss a shot even at TA
Pros:It's the culmination of Nikon's optical expertise
Cons:The lens hood, not even third parties would be able to make it so poor
Opinion:I love very bright lenses so after buying the fantastic 50mm f1.2 I couldn't miss this beautiful lens too! What can I say, over the course of decades of amateur photography I have owned the best 85 but something like this had never happened to me, finding together a fairytale bokeh and a devastating resolution is certainly not everyday stuff! And like the "little brother" 50mm is an easy lens, you immediately get in tune with it and after a hundred shots you feel it is yours, it is as if you have had it for a lifetime. No chromatic aberrations, no vignetting, and mounted on a Z9-type body it falls into your hand like a glove and gives you a rare lust. And you immediately forget about weight, size and economic commitment (moreover, in my opinion, commensurate with the value of the goal). The only drawback is the lens hood: it is not petal-shaped like that of the 50 but rather tubular and built with a plastic so poor that you feel discomfort just touching it. I understand everything but with such a lens hood is not worthy of a big brand, you can't look for savings on optics of this range. And anyway in my very personal ranking of Nikon lenses this lens goes to reach the first place the aforementioned 50mm, and both overtake the 200 f2, more I don't know what else to say. I realize that it is particularly difficult to explain the advantages of an ultrafast to those who prefer cheaper lenses so I don't even try, as far as I'm concerned I'm waiting for the next 28 or 24mm from Nikon, obviously f 1.2! To close an observation: in over 40 years of amateur photography I have owned and duly tested a huge number of Nikon lenses but these 85 and 50 always 1.2 are imperiously at the top of my very personal ranking. The Plena, a great lens that I also own, comes only a moment later...
Pros:CT rendering, Colors, Three-dimensionality, Aesthetics, AF,
Cons:Decades of waiting to make it happen, price in some respects
Opinion:There are 85mm and there are 85mm, this is out of category! Lens that you obviously buy to shoot at 1.2, closing below f/2 is equivalent to throwing money away. The performance is superb, the aesthetics of the lens are fantastic (the 1.8 in comparison looks aesthetically like a roll of black toilet paper although it is qualitatively excellent. It would have been a great lens if they had kept the form-factor of the G for F-mount), and the weight on the z7II is balanced. Of course then, session album printed in a3 and some 90cm prints on the short side, they are jaw-dropping! I have a friend with the Canon counterpart (r5+ 85 1.2) and we really enjoyed this portrait session! These two lenses are superb, mine is obviously my favorite being me in Nikon but they are more or less the same thing! Other brands are thousands of light years behind. Price is only a problem for those who want to see price as an issue! Rated 10L.
Opinion:It took at least 30 years and a bayonet change to finally get an 85mm 1.2 AF from Nikon.Ma it was worth it... As a lens manufacturer, Nikon has always been a bit above average and is now taking the stage in defiance of the competition: this lens is absolutely the best it has been possible to conceive. It is true, it does not cost little and weighs a lot, but it is excellently balanced both on Z6II and on Z9, as if to reiterate that it is prestige optics. To me it seemed better balanced than the 50 1.2 and, with these weights and dimensions, it was not at all obvious. Superb sharpness, Digital Camera puts it far above the equivalent Canon Rf (which I remember erased forever the magic of the old EF, which I still own ...), even at full aperture. Never annoying or surgical, only very important at all openings, it sports exemplary bokeh and optimal highlight control. For the rest it is the wand of Harry Potter: from him arise spells and magic that no brand today can give in equal measure. It will become the new reference for this focal length. I quickly compared it with the Canon EF which is a real masterpiece and, although it came out victorious, it reconfirms the goodness of the Canon project of the time. the Canon is less sharp, especially at full aperture and with aberrations and flare much more pronounced, but we are still talking about a very old optical scheme. Nikon has the merit of having exceeded certain limits, but of having maintained the magic. Coast? And we would miss it!
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
