|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
U212a www.juzaphoto.com/p/U212a  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 70-180mm f/2.8 Pros: Sharpness,AF,Weight Cons: At the moment none Opinion: I have been in possession for a few days, I took a series of photos of the niece and the results obtained are excellent on the whole focal range. Obviously the tests were done at 2.8 or at most at 3.8. The construction seems good to me, certainly not at the level of the S series but considering the price I think it's normal. The only small drawback is that before using it you must remember to unlock the objective. sent on July 29, 2023 |
 | Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S Pros: General yield, construction Cons: Vignetting visible at full aperture. Opinion: Socket used to replace the 24/70 Z f:4. The yield on the entire excursion of the focal lengths is, in my opinion, excellent. I was impressed by the good quality of the construction. The lack of stabilization is not in my opinion a defect as all the FF of the Z series have the stabilized sensor. The only "defect" found so far is the vignetting present at all focal lengths at full aperture. Definitely a lens to buy. Rating 9,5 sent on April 07, 2023 |
 | Nikon Z 85mm f/1.8 S Pros: Image quality, blurry. Cons: Price Opinion: A great goal, the sharpness at 1.8 is excellent, and closing the iris to higher values is to be used if you need more PDC. Aberrations absent, AF precise and fast. Lightweight and grips well combined with the Z6II. Together with the 50 S it is my perfect pairing for portraits. The price, in my opinion, is slightly high. sent on December 12, 2020 |
 | Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S Pros: Weight, general yield,size Cons: At the moment no one Opinion: Great zoom that replaced the 24/70 AFS 2.8. I find it clear already at full opening closing a stop the performance is, for my parameters, very good, with a uniform yield at all focal points. Vignetting is present but the problem quickly resolves with any photo editing program. Fast and precise focus. Rating 9.5 sent on November 18, 2020 |
 | Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S Pros: Sharpness, weight, fast AF Cons: At the moment no one Opinion: Taken to replace, after switching to ML, the 50 AFS 1.8; I was impressed by the sharpness, remarkable at all opening, the pleasant blurry, the speed of focus and the absence of aberrations at full opening (at least I could not see them). Excellent backlight hold and light vignetting up to f2;8 Definitely a lens to have in your bag if interested in the focal point. Vote 10 sent on November 18, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: weight, clarity, color, VR Cons: at the moment no one Opinion: Taken used, Nital with 3 months of life, tested on D750 gives me great photos. I have compared it with the TAMRON 70/200 2.8 VC in my possession. My impressions: sharp opening, precise AF and fast enough (maybe a little faster than TAMRON), excellent VR (60% of the photos taken at 1 / 5th of a second they can be used, while with TAMRON at 1/5 second I can get a percentage not higher than 30%), faster but more loud than TAMRON. The hood does not allow effective shielding even when the sun is slightly out of the frame causing a loss of contrastornMy feel to recommend the purchase especially if found to be used at a fair price.rn sent on May 24, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: optical quality, weight, resistance to flare, filters with 77mm diameter Cons: so far no Opinion: I wanted to return to wider fields of view of 24mm without spending too much. I found, after a patient in used research, this zoom lens and was amazed at the image quality that can give combined with the D750. The distortion is corrected fast in PP, the colors are pleasing and something to be reckoned, if you already have an important filter kit, the diameter of 77mm. sent on December 04, 2016 |
 | Sirui K30x Pros: Price, construction, control flow Cons: at the moment no Opinion: He has replaced my old head of the three-way Manfrotto. Mounted on a 055 Xpro has stood without flinching the weight of a D3X and Nikon 400 f: 2.8 AFS. The ball locking system is easy and the clutch adjustment is pratica.Comodo Arca Swiss type quick coupler. Beautiful, but especially useful bag for protegerla.Rapporto money in my view very good. sent on February 21, 2016 |
 | Manfrotto MT 055 X PRO3 Pros: Construction, reach, tilting column. Cons: Higher than the old model 055 Opinion: Thanks a downward price on Amazon I decided to replace the old, but always reliable, 055 with the new model. The construction is taken care of and provided with ball-head Sirui K30X has endured without flinching the weight of a Nikon D3X and 400AFS 2.8 (equipment of a friend). With more time I'll try the device for the tilting of the central column. I am fully satisfied with the purchase and dell'accopiata with excellent Sirui head. sent on February 20, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: weight, performance Cons: poorly performing AF speed Opinion: And 'the second copy of the 50cc I buy, as the first are satisfied with its performance even at full aperture, mind is not the Sigma 50 Art, and precision in focus. The focus speed is not comparable to the goals of the Nikon Pro Series but considering the price I think you can not ask for more. sent on February 09, 2016 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: sensor, high ISO performance, AF, manageability, battery life, excellent operation with flash SB900. Cons: lack dedicated AF button, with heavy lenses require the use of BG to improve the balance, inability to adjust the sensitivity in steps of one stop. Opinion: After a few months of use I feel happy with the purchase. Despite being smaller and lighter than the D700 I owned it holds well and does not tire after long shooting sessions. The 24M Pixell force me to use times higher than those of one-stop security to prevent camera shake. I think right now is the best choice in the Nikon. sent on October 13, 2015 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: Sharpness, construction, price Cons: Stabilizer noisy Opinion: I made the comparison with the Nikon 105VR and did not see differences in performance both in short distances to infinity. The stabilizer works fairly well, I took sharp photos at 1/5 second at 60 cm from the subject freehand but is noisier than Nikon. Defends himself very well in the portraits, some do not have to claim the fuzzy various F: 1.2 / 1.4, with a soft tonal contrast and transactions which if necessary can be increased. In extreme cases you can find green and magenta chromatic aberration but is easily removed in post. Combined with my D750 is no problem of Back / Front focus.rnLa price difference compared to Nikon and image quality make the purchase affordable. sent on July 09, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: AF, made on the whole range of focal construction. Cons: Weight Opinion: Taken to replace the 28/70 AFS; the use of D700 and D750, and has made, in my opinion, good delivery across the entire focal lengths. Does not suffer from front / back focus unlike 28/70, more contrasted than its predecessor but not at levels of 14/24. If purchased used, in a fair price, I think it's an excellent investment. sent on July 03, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Construction, optical performance, stabilizer, price. Cons: Yield 200 to F: 2.8, sometimes uncertainty in the focus Opinion: After reading several posts and forums I decided to take this light to replace my Nikon AFS 80/200 devoid of stabilizer immagine.La made, especially wide open, I was pleasantly surprised and my optic notice a slight drop af performance: only 2.8 to 200mm. The construction seems good with a good tripod socket, valid hood and stabilizer works very well. I notice that sometimes the focus is not clear in the medium / long distances at longer focal lengths. Update 12/01/2016, I sent the lens in Germany, through Polyphoto, returned calibrated and now no longer any problem. sent on June 22, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Filters 77mm, natural colors, excellent construction Cons: Chromatic aberrations and made the edges of D750. Opinion: I own this perspective for several years and has always satisfied on D700. Stopping down to F: 5.6 yield was, in my opinion, good beyond perfect. D750 now on some flaw in most appeared, even at F: 8 edges are not perfect and aberrations, enlarging the photo to 100% are clearly visible, but with a little patience in PP are eliminate.rnIl my AF after a storage period long enough began to whistle but after three years continues to perform well. sent on June 03, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
