|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vincenzo f www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vincenzo_f  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm S5 Pro Pros: color rendering, jpeg, dynamic range Cons: Very slow, heavy raw Opinion: It was my first DSLR I had two weddings and it accompanied me on many trips, exceptional sensor with color rendering and dynamic range incredible not only for the times. Possibility of adjusting jpeg and those in the room in order to minimize the pp. Unfortunately it is really slow, not slow slow, after a short burst you have to wait for the buffer to drain. The management of flash light is also excellent. I still have it and sometimes I use it. sent on May 23, 2023 |
 | Nikon F6 Pros: dimensions, autofocus construction Cons: nobody Opinion: It was my last film camera, I still have an m4 and a fe2 but I keep them for fun at the time it was -in 2004 and I kept it until 2008 when I sold it and took a fuji s5pro- my daily use SLR, exceptional and customizable viewfinder, did not make me regret the interchangeable ones of the f5, I had a set of slides, great autofocus, really accurate light meter, no problem ever. Resold at the same price or almost the purchase given the scarce availability. An exceptional refl4ex. sent on May 23, 2023 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 II ASPH Pros: Compact, really good image quality, great all-rounder for reportage Cons: Autofocus not at its best, chromatic aberrations in backlight Opinion: I had the first version that I resold when I bought the 25 1.2 olympus, but I discovered that in many situations I missed it, such as outings with two lenses only or reportage with only one fixed. I happened to have an opportunity for 160 euros I took the II version, the af has not improved and the aberrations are always the same, but the merits are all confirmed, I also recommend it as the only fixed for reportage to be coupled to the zoom, even in Ta has a very good yield. My judgment applies only to photography as I do not make videos and I can not tell you if it is indicated. sent on April 03, 2023 |
 | Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III Pros: Satisfactory yield throughout the excursion, low weight and size Cons: Nothing considering the all-round usage and price Opinion: Bought to pair it to my son's olympus epl7 goes very well stabilization on the sensor is very effective coupled to this lens. Paid used 20 euros giving behind the 20 panasonic that I did not use, my son is very happy and I can say that as yield is in some ways surprising considering the excursion and the price. Recommended Without reservation if you are looking for a light and small holiday lens with a more than decent yield. sent on November 12, 2022 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Overall clarity and color rendering, construction Cons: inability to mount filters, not having them Opinion: What can I say? I went from the tiny 9/18 to this masterpiece, I do not find any particular defects, if not the caution in use, the same that I used col14/24 nikkor, I must say that as quality are on the same level. Very satisfied with the purchase I recommend it without reservations, with 12-40 and 35-100 2.8 you have a compact kit of sltissima quality, they are in a small shoulder strap and light travel without sacrificing brightness. sent on November 07, 2022 |
| Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Overall clarity and color rendering, construction Cons: inability to mount filters, not having them Opinion: What can I say? I went from the tiny 9/18 to this masterpiece, I do not find any particular defects, if not the caution in use, the same that I used col14/24 nikkor, I must say that as quality are on the same level. Very satisfied with the purchase I recommend it without reservations, with 12-40 and 35-100 2.8 you have a compact kit of sltissima quality, they are in a small shoulder strap and light travel without sacrificing brightness. sent on November 07, 2022 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro Pros: Construction, already excellent rendering at ta, color rendering, blurred Cons: Not received Opinion: I am repeating myself after the 17 1.2 I took the 25 1.2 the yield is extraordinary, even the dimensions are not excessive, the leap in quality compared to the 25 1 8 zuiko is remarkable. Even compared to the panaleica 25 1.4 that I kept to mount it on the epl7, up to f2 they do not equalize, leaving out the difference in construction and af as speed and precision sent on December 19, 2021 |
| Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro Pros: Construction, already excellent rendering at ta, color rendering, blurred Cons: Not received Opinion: I am repeating myself after the 17 1.2 I took the 25 1.2 the yield is extraordinary, even the dimensions are not excessive, the leap in quality compared to the 25 1 8 zuiko is remarkable. Even compared to the panaleica 25 1.4 that I kept to mount it on the epl7, up to f2 they do not equalize, leaving out the difference in construction and af as speed and precision sent on December 19, 2021 |
 | Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN C Pros: Sharpness, color rendering, price Cons: Nobody Opinion: I have the version for m4/3 taken at 360 euros new, I was amazed at the yield of this little jewel, beautiful colors, blurred pictorial and soft sharpness on the plane of focus already good at ta precise and fast autofocus. I used it for photos under the stage at a concert and I got great results. Recommended without reservations at this price and also absolutely difficult to find better. sent on December 07, 2021 |
 | Voigtlander Apo-Lanthar 125mm f/2.5 SL Pros: Beautiful construction, makes you understand the meaning of apochromatic, made color and blurred beautiful Cons: Nobody Opinion: I had it with nikon mount and used on d600 and fuji s5pro, used for portrait and fashion, I was lucky enough to pay very little. It has an extraordinary yield and a beautiful blurred construction is luxurious the very precise focus ring, I exchanged it when I switched to the leica m240 but I consider it one of the best lenses I have been lucky enough to own, if you find it buy it also as a portrait lens. sent on December 07, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF Zoom-Micro 70-180mm f/4.5-5.6D ED Pros: Color rendering, sharpness, construction Cons: None, maybe the weight Opinion: I had it and used it with the fuji s5 pro and the nikon d600, I took still life photos, fashion and portrait, real macro little. The color rendering is beautiful as well as the blurred at a portrait distance, the af is not fast but remember that it is a macro lens, the only truly macro zoom. One of the goals I regret selling. sent on December 07, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 Pros: Good yield in proportion to the price, more than discreet in absolute, really pocket size. Cons: Construction Opinion: Taken waiting to find a used 7-14 2.8, I'm using it and I feel pretty good, on nikon I had the 12-24f4 on the right format and I find the olympus in step below as overall quality, closed from f8 up is very good, the corners also arrive, and the dimensions are really pocket-sized, I do not like the construction that gives me a sense of fragility, I recommend it to those looking for a light wide-angle zoom and at an affordable price. sent on December 06, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: Construction, dimensions, yield also at ta, colti speed af Cons: Nobody Opinion: Zoom built very well, light perfect with my em1 mkIII, beautiful blurred, very nice color rendering, price especially on the used excellent, absolute tropicalization autofocus very fast, another Olympus pro lens that I recommend without reservations, even at full aperture has an excellent yield, perfect at 40 mm per portrait. If they asked me for a single lens for the m4/3 system I would recommend this one. sent on December 06, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro Pros: Construction, yield even at full aperture, blurred beautiful, fast focus I can not find a defect even the price is all in all correct when compared with equivalent optics Cons: Nobody Opinion: I was happy with the 17 1.8 but when I had the opportunity to test the 17 1.2 it remained attached to the car, I was used to the summicron 35 IV series on Leica m240 and I can say that I found a very valid replacement. Recommended without reservation now that you can take it for free together with the em1 mkIII. The blurred is soft pictorial the excellent color rendering I can not find a flaw, now I wait for the 25 1.2 that I ordered. sent on December 06, 2021 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 III Pros: Construction, jpeg, high resolution mode, silent shooting and compact size to be a flagship. Record-breaking stabilization. Cons: Complicated menu and viewfinder that can be improved, although it can be used without problems. Opinion: I come from Nikon and Leica M, and I traded due to vision and weight limitations my m240 with a new kit based on this SLR. Camera body built very well, autofocus for my perfect use, image quality for me usable without patemi up to 3200 ISO, 1600 without problems. After 9 months of passage I do not regret in the least the Leica m240, which I no longer used even as an image what little I lost I do not miss. Ah I forgot the jpegs are perfect to my taste in 80 percent of cases in natural mode. Very convenient nd filter in the car and excellent stabilization. sent on September 07, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
