JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN C is a tele lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2018. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 462 €;
41 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EOS M: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon EOS M.
Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Canon RF.
Nikon Z: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Nikon Z.
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Sony.
L-Mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C L-Mount.
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 249000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Fantastic portrait lens for mft. It doesn't make you regret the FF. Crisp already at full opening. At F2.8 it is a blade. Nice soft blurred it. Too bad sigma has stopped producing x mft lenses. I own it together with the 16. Now I will also take the 30. F1.4 does not differ so much from the pro 1.2 lenses. In terms of light, it is blurred. Of course, those are even better and built with better materials. Slightly tropicalized. But for the cost of these 3 sigma lenses you can't get any better. Halfway between the prime 1.7 lenses and the pro 1.2. Promoted
Opinion:My favorite lens with the Sony a6700. Superlative optical quality, always sharp, the images have a particular three-dimensionality. Soft and mellow bokeh. Perfect autofocus. The stabilization on the sensor of the a6700 with this lens works particularly well compared to others, I tried to shoot even at 1/2 second.
Opinion:Used for a few years on the Eos M5, it won me over immediately, undermining the excellent EF-M 32, and becoming the lens always mounted on the camera. Used in every context, from portraits to landscapes, from sports to macro (with extension tubes) it has always performed very well with sharp images (already at CT), well contrasted and practically free of defects (not even a hint of fringing). Behavior more like a macro lens than a medium-telephoto portrait lens. Of course it is not stabilized, and this on Eos M bodies can be a limitation, especially in night photography, but perhaps also thanks to this it remains small and light. Too bad I can't reuse it on R8, it's a lens that I really miss (and it makes me want to pick up the M5 again), although the 100 2.0 behaves well, the performance of the small sigma is of another level.
Pros:Lightweight, crisp and economical. Blurred not only at TA quality
Cons:AF still not up to par. ( Fujifilm X mount)
Opinion:The optical qualities are so favorable that they are often the lens that I mount for general use, it forces you to new perspectives by moving away and changing angle but this is also the beauty of amateur photography. Slightly cold tones enhanced in the morning and contrasting with the Fuji heat. Lightweight. The lack of an aperture ring is not a defect, just a habit.
Opinion:For me a very good lens for the portrait (if we talk about the exterior; clearly in interiors too narrow). I notice a slightly different color rendering of the complexion from the Olympus lenses I usually use, but I don't mind. With MFT the blur is pleasant, "natural", not too extreme. In certain light conditions there is a certain chromatic aberration, the "classic" purple which, however, is easily corrected in post production. However, for me a lens to try and buy, possibly evaluating the price of 'used, often ridiculous.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.