JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Lenses
Lenses Olympus
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro is a standard lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2016. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1141 €;

28 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

Specifications
Focal lenght	25 mm
Angle of view	46.3° (equivalent to a 51mm in Fullframe 24x36mm format)
Format	4/3
Max. aperture	f/1.2
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	19 elements in 14 groups
Min. focus distance	0.19 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.11x
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	62 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	410 g
Dimensions	70 x 87 mm
Buy
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 237000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Vincenzo f

sent on December 19, 2021

Pros: Construction, already excellent rendering at ta, color rendering, blurred

Cons: Not received

Opinion: I am repeating myself after the 17 1.2 I took the 25 1.2 the yield is extraordinary, even the dimensions are not excessive, the leap in quality compared to the 25 1 8 zuiko is remarkable. Even compared to the panaleica 25 1.4 that I kept to mount it on the epl7, up to f2 they do not equalize, leaving out the difference in construction and af as speed and precision

Vincenzo f

user132716

sent on January 19, 2021

Pros: Full-aperture sharpness, fast and precise autofocus even in low light conditions.. And then top construction

Cons: If I really have to find one, at f 1.2 I noticed that slightly vignette, which already at 1.4 seems to disappear.

Opinion: I was very wary of this goal, perhaps more for the love/hate relationship for the 50mm or equivalent as in this case, or perhaps conditioned by some criticism when it came out. I have had it for a few days, but I squeezed it a little, not in tests that measure its peculiarities in a scientific way, but relying on comparisons, with similar lenses and where the only judge is visual perception. Taken to replace the 25 1.4 panaleic, with which I made a satisfactory path in my opinion, so I do not feel to criticize it now that no longer in my possession, if not for a really unreliable autofocus in many circumstances. So first of all I struggled to show a small gap between 25 1.4 pana, and this 25 1.2 pro, this in good light conditions. Then going further, and good or bad shooting with similar parameters, in conditions of really poor light, in addition to the efficiency of autofocus, a rendering of details emerged, of the creaminess of the blurry, and above all in really difficult conditions, an extraordinary color rendering.. And I already considered the panaleic one excellent, but this is definitely on another level. But still hesitant about a form of bias, I put it to the test with brother 17 1.2, identical in appearance and function, same speed and autofocus accuracy. There are multiple shots with the same opening and the same light, with the only precaution of getting a little closer to the subjects with the 17, to maintain proportions. Result: for sharpness on most image, I would say equal to the excellent 17 1.2, which I consider a masterpiece of lens, I did not deepen in the extreme corners of the image, but overall I did not notice great differences, if not more neutral and slightly colors, colder in 17 mm, warmer and tending to magenta in 25mm.. But values that then in posts are managed at will. What really surprised me, and removed any doubt about the very high yield of this goal, were some shots in a semi-dark church, and something That I had already partly noticed, this lens returns beautiful colors even in shaded areas, almost as well as well-lit ones, and... This fact is surprising because with the naked eye these colors are not so full of intensity and nuances, as evidently in the dark we perceive them desaturated.. And so it usually happens with goalses, not so pure glass. In summary: He sees as a cat.

Aznavour65

sent on February 16, 2017

Pros: Sharpness at TA, great bokeh considering system 4/3

Cons: Maybe the price?

Opinion: I had 50 mm sigma art 1.4 having taken off all the Nikon kit I could not replace the 50 with this. Those who complain of the weight to me are coming to smile, is half the sigma. However I essentially use it in portraits, excellent rendering, sharpness already af / 1.2 that does not exist in full size, fast focus and precise. I feel it better at sigma but for clarity and weight. Excellent construction as all pros

Chin8

sent on February 16, 2017

Pros: Construction, precision and af speed, sharpness, blur ... pretty much everything

Cons: Nothing, maybe the price but the quality you pay at the top

Opinion: I do not understand those who say that it is great. Maybe a comparison of other fixed lenses tiny m43, but all is not great nor heavy. The building is at the top, the optical qualities also, and the autofocus is fast and very accurate. In my opinion, allowing shutter (1/16000 at f1.2 on sunny days can be reached fairly easily) has long been used in TA seen that the yield is already eccellente.rnNel m43 system there are many alternatives with regard to 50mm equiv., all excellent. But for those who want the best, this perspective is buying from fare.rnConsiglio to use it on em1 / em1 II of em5 / em5 II with extra grip, or panasonic G / GH series to not be uncomfortable in presa.rnVoto 10 :)

There are 2 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro

The suitcase of memories

by Ivan.pirina
116 comments, 15420 views [editors pick]

Angelina!

by Riccardob77
16 comments, 6762 views

Clear

by Riccardob77
11 comments, 4702 views

AURUM

by Eppuresoffia
27 comments, 2801 views

HI RES 16.3 MP

Travel Fatigue

by Ivan.pirina
8 comments, 4387 views

Leaves

by Eppuresoffia
20 comments, 1205 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Angelica

by Riccardob77
12 comments, 3742 views

HI RES 5.6 MP

Caress

by Ivan.pirina
14 comments, 3497 views

Light painting

by Japandrea
50 comments, 814 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

LEAVES

by Eppuresoffia
16 comments, 1022 views

HI RES 14.8 MP

Princess black and white

by Ioluca
13 comments, 3060 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

Sophie

by Eppuresoffia
17 comments, 2340 views

HI RES 14.9 MP

Mary

by Valerio Tagliabue
5 comments, 2911 views

HI RES 16.3 MP

Different ...

by Beppe Cavalleri
10 comments, 2666 views

Untitled Photo

by Zindo
13 comments, 2815 views

BODY PAINTING

by Eppuresoffia
16 comments, 1395 views

HI RES 17.4 MP

Jade

by Aznavour65
4 comments, 2105 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Hops... Excuse me, but I could not resist ...

by Eppuresoffia
15 comments, 1636 views

HI RES 11.2 MP

The gold and silver in Rome

by Ivan.pirina
4 comments, 2349 views

Martina

by Stefanostf
7 comments, 2413 views

Imperfection

by Stefanostf
14 comments, 3690 views

Mary

by Petegiu
6 comments, 1136 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

THE LIONESS.

by Eppuresoffia
25 comments, 1625 views

HI RES 13.8 MP

Reading at the bar

by Petegiu
8 comments, 1652 views

HI RES 11.6 MP

Mediterranean charm

by Bigisbetter
0 comments, 4927 views

Louis Mendes in Brooklyn

by Matteobelletti
4 comments, 1504 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Sarah

by Dierre.ph
2 comments, 479 views

GASTROCNEMAS

by Eppuresoffia
13 comments, 2683 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Self Portrait

by Petegiu
0 comments, 2007 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Sophie

by Eppuresoffia
11 comments, 838 views

HI RES 16.9 MP

Shan

by Eppuresoffia
11 comments, 1685 views

HI RES 11.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Ylenia

by Valerio Tagliabue
7 comments, 968 views

HI RES 8.2 MP

The only companion

by Petegiu
7 comments, 1293 views

Choppy Water

by Ioluca
9 comments, 2149 views

Untitled Photo

by Fabio_portrait_ph
0 comments, 1072 views

HI RES 19.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Ilcentaurorosso
4 comments, 3931 views

HI RES 4.8 MP

Martina

by Stefanostf
8 comments, 2177 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Olympus » Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm f/1.2 Pro