JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
If you want, you can even enable or disable specific cookies on the page Cookies Preferences.
The Fujifilm S5 Pro is a reflex camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 6.1 megapixels manufactured from 2006 to 2010 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 3200 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 3 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1600 €;
29 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 214000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:CCD sensor, spectacular complexion, very natural colors, delicate tonal passages, excellent dynamic range
Cons:High ISO, menu can be improved, display.
Opinion:Bought, sold and then repurchased again. Those who try this sensor are unlikely to give up because the performance in portraits is something different from modern CMOS but also from past CCDs. Although I have the habit of shooting in raw, the S5 churn out the already ready and very workable JPEG, visually better than the raw with a "flat" setting. There is a program that manages the S and R pixels separately for an even more accurate file management making editing even more enjoyable. In the flaws I can not list the slowness of operations in all its forms, because those who buy a reflex like that does not do it to photograph sport, its field is the portraiture and it is there that makes the difference. For me a full 9
Pros:magnificent photos. Recover colors in a surprising way. Professional body (but not tropicalized)
Cons:no burst, you can see noise already at 800 ISO. The original software is obsolete for new PCs, and there are additional files for Lightroom and Photoshop that can interpret RAW files only with difficulty.
Opinion:I state that I do not consider a limit that the s5Pro face photo "targati" 12 Mpixels (in fact 6 MegaPixel "pumped"). RnFor me the 3MPixel photos that you download Win10 at startup are already so beautiful, and among other things I look at an exceptional 6Mpixel screen (xps13) !! rn____rnHe made night photos from tripod and I recovered stars and magnificent colors. rnConfrontata with d500 (photo at home, 200 iso) using a Nikkor 18-200 (optics not optimal) is still a little less clear in detail. rnThe dynamic range of the S5Pro is better than the d500 for me. For a close-up I prefer Fuji, even using a 35mm prime. In this case it is significantly less detailed, but the photo is the most beautiful in the colors.
Pros:CCD sensor, ergonomics, body solidity, Mount F
Cons:General operational slowness
Opinion:Purchased with 24,000 shots, it gives emotions after many years. Sought and bought with, in mind, a precise mission to assign them: the meditated portrait - thanks to the qualities of its sensor -. Associated with Sigma 85 1.4 Art proves perfectly at ease (even if you can only shoot at f / 1.4), waiting for the Nikkor 50 1.2. Slow in writing and in 'AF but who owns it ... or knows what squeezes in his hands or, probably, he found it in a box from his uncle. If you find it at a fair price (paid € 300 with 50 1.8D), do not miss it.
Pros:Sturdy, well-built, high color rendering and flesh tones, possibility to use all the Nikon lenses, including those of 40 years ago.
Cons:Size of the display insufficient to give the idea of ??the picture taken. overweight, rumorisità shooting.
Opinion:I wanted to buy a used body but practically new (14,000 shots) to take off on a whim, given the positive reviews of users and have not regretted. The biggest flaw, that none of the advertisers found, in my opinion, just the dimensone of the display and the low light, especially in pienarn light that does not allow a correttarn exposure assessment of rnfoto reproduced. Despite all the rnricomprerei, it is a product rnsenza time, a true icon. rnPurtroppo I also noticed that during the night rnfoto some, several, pixels are burned, leaving white dots on blacks funds, such as the sky or dark parts, albeit irrelevant defect that day, requires corrections in postproduction.
Pros:color gamut, made of white gorgeous with the absence of burned areas, unequaled tonal depth, underestimated resolution, absence of noise in the night pictures up to 400 ISO, wealth of information in the details.
Cons:Slowness and weight.
Opinion:I own this camera since 2007 (the year 2016) and, having tried many of the latest generation of curiosity, so far I would not change with any, even with full frame ... you're probably wondering why rightly. I'll explain it; before taking this camera, I came from the Nikon f6 that I used with Provia 100F or 400F and sporadic use of a 4x5 'shen-hao always used with Provia 100F.rnBene, the images coming out of this camera have nothing to envy to these films ... the fuji has specially developed this type of SuperCCD which has characteristics as those to be designed, as well as taking as a reference the human eye, also that of the technology to silver halide of their films fuji slides . I can assure you, shooting on a tripod night pictures at 100 ISO, you can draw out of this camera unrivaled quality for typical characteristics of its Super CCD technology! Just want to talk about this ... this sensor is now out of production, eqT his regrets to me not a little, thinking of a subsequent replacement for the s5 with super CCD and a fullframe from (eg.) 24 or 36mpx. It was the last of a generation of CCD spectacular ... if you notice there is no digital camera that uses a CCD but now all come with CMOS ... this is because the CMOS consumes less batteries and costs less in its production ... but the CCD brings out a higher quality ... it is no coincidence that scanners use CCD and not the cmos. Anyway associated optics high quality boys have a camera that is still afraid! My 100x70 prints are in the Art Galleries. I not sell it mai.rn
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
