|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
PietroGuida www.juzaphoto.com/p/PietroGuida  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: Sharpness even at f/1.4, excellent focus, quality construction. Cons: Very heavy despite being a "small" goal. Opinion: It 's really a great lens, sharper than the Canon 50mm f/1.4. For portraits is great with cameras Asp-c. I do not recommend purchasing online for those who do not have a camera without micro adjustment of fire. My copy is perfect without any adjustment microaggiustamenti, but in many cases it can happen with a copy frontfocus or backfocus. in that case who does not have the micro has some problems. I highly recommend the purchase if you are interested in shooting in dark locations or for portraits with cameras Asp. sent on December 04, 2011 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Excellent image quality, affordable price, fast autofocus, image stabilization surprisingly great. Cons: Slightly heavy, but it's a 70-300 Opinion: The most appropriate adjective for this is certainly surprising. At that price anyone imagine what it is able to do. The quality is excellent, the stabilizer works great, autofocus is fast and perfect. C'erto is not an f/2.8, but if you do not need to remove the background so that is something incredible. It works well without losing the automatic with the multiplier! I recommend it to everybody, beginners and even pro ... Oh, and also won the TIPA Awards 2011, such as millet lens in its class. sent on November 24, 2011 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Sharpness, good build quality, low distortion, light Cons: Price, excessive vignetting, color is too cold Opinion: The sharpness does not disappoint. E 'instead of disappointing the strong vignetting at 10 mm, and responds well to flare. The situation improves by stopping, then this lens for landscapes gives good results. One problem is the price that would require a better lens for many points of view. I prefer the sigma 10-20 that has a better price has appreciated features. Compared to the Sigma 8-16 however, this Canon is much lower. sent on September 25, 2011 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Price, robustness, good sharpness Cons: low light Opinion: It 'a good target, good for landscapes, the best if you consider the price. And 'quite sharp even at the edges, not like the Sigma 8-16, but on the other hand can mount filters, is more compact and pleasant to look at. It 'a lens that does not suffer from front-back focus because it has a considerable depth of field even at maximum aperture that starts at f / 4. I recommend it and prefer it to Canon 10-22 that has great benefits, but comes at a higher price. sent on September 25, 2011 |
 | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Pros: Clear, strong, and not only 8mm fisheye in the world Cons: Size a bit 'high aesthetics and bad Opinion: It 'a big lens for Asp. Despite the extreme wide-angle, has a good quality, is sharp even at the edges, and also has a good autofocus, which is good. Better than that you could hope for. The cost is affordable. The only drawback is the shape a bit 'strange, very long and very convex lens, with the petals of the built-in lens hood and the inability to mount filters. The cover must then be coupled to a cylinder that looks like an extension cord, all very annoying and cumbersome. So the only thing that does not satisfy me is the appearance. If someone is not interested in this aspect, then this lens for him. sent on September 25, 2011 |
 | Canon 1100D Pros: Good detail despite "only" 12 megapixels, especially in Raw Cons: Smaller monitor cameras series XXXD, largest of XXXD series cameras, flash underpowered risetto the past. Video no manual controls, with a single resolution and without external microphone Opinion: It 'a good camera, innovative, with a good video in HD instead of Full HD. The noise is well contained, but less of the "old" 1000D. Despite being the baby of the range Canon 1000D aside, it is the largest of the bigger and more LCD display has a smaller and less detailed. It 's great 2.7 "with a resolution of 320x240 px, against that of the 550D 3", with a resolution of 640x480 px. The video mode is not great, it is no manual controls, the only resolution setting and no connection for an external microphone. If I had to choose a basic camera would take a 1000D even if it has less exposure measurement zones (64 vs 35), an older processor and seven autofocus points compared to 9. But the 1000D is lighter and more manageable. Otherwise I would take a 550D superior in all respects. sent on July 21, 2011 |
 | Canon 400D Pros: Compact, lightweight, but also durable. Display very detailed and bright. Cons: The exposure sottoespone slightly and in this connection the monitor very bright deceiving. Opinion: I used it at the time as a reflex battle and despite the battles I had to change not to a fault. If it were not for her I could have continued to use for years to come. It 'indestructible, sturdy and lightweight at the same time. The noise is well contained and quality, with its 10 megapixel, not bad. The exposure of the 400D has a slight tendency to underexpose, but in reality, in my opinion, is not only a defect. Often avoids burning some points of high lights, thereby preventing loss of data. If he was still on the market recommend it to those who are beginners, but does not have the video and today (2011) technology and then the 1000D 1100D is highly superior. sent on July 18, 2011 |
 | Canon 1000D Pros: Light and compact with good image quality. Cons: No video. Opinion: The 1000D is a camera truly successful. E 'very compact and light but does not disappoint as regards the quality of image. It 'perfect for travel photography and "street photography", you can just hide in the bag and can be pulled out at any time. It has 10 megapixels and image quality, considering the price of the camera is very good and the sound of digital content, may be due to "only" 10 megapixel cameras with comparable upper class. It has a 2.5-inch LCD display with a resolution of 230 thousand pixels. The electronic viewfinder is pentamirror, the processor is the previous DIGIC III and supports memory cards Secure Digital and SDHC. Shooting at a maximum speed of 3 frames per second and the price of the camera is not bad. Unfortunately no video but has a live view of good quality even with 10x magnification. The best choice for those who began photographing with a DSLR or for those looking for easy handling. sent on July 15, 2011 |
 | Canon 40D Pros: Strong body, good controls, sharpness, good processing jpg, good burst. Cons: Display little defined even if 3 ", absence of microtaratura. Opinion: It 'a good car at low iso is less noisy than the competitors. Despite being a little 'outdated technology is still a good camera. The viewfinder is large enough to 10 megapixels is enough for most types of photography. Sin for the display poorly defined and for the absence of microtaratura. The robust but gives security. sent on July 10, 2011 |
 | Canon 60D Pros: Exceptional swiveling display. A semi-pro camera but manages to have a smaller size than the others. Image quality identical to 7D! Cons: It has micro-adjustment, which is useful in the case of Sigma lenses not perfect. Opinion: It 'a camera with professional features but is also suitable for those with smaller hands. The advice to women who shoot for work. E 'built in a robust way while not having the body of magnesium alloy. The photo quality is very good and the very fine detail (but you must use good lenses) has a low noise up to ISO 1600 in low light conditions. In light conditions discreet yet very little noise at ISO 3200! It has a large and brilliant display, outstanding! Live View mode works very well and offers a choice between phase detection with contrast mode, and even the Face Index. It also seems much improved speed focusing with Live View engaged. And 'quite small compared to 7d (of course it is much bigger than a 550d), but it is very powerful and full of features, very technologically advanced, despite a flurry not fast, for that is the 7d. Sin for the absence (as in the 40D) of micro-adjustment that is useful in the event of objectives Sigma very bright (type F/1.4) with some defect, otherwise it is not a great lack ... sent on July 08, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
