JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 174000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user1160
sent on February 17, 2017
Pros:Robust and all-rounder. And Nowadays (2017) definitely the bargain price, for those approaching the world SLR think it's a smart choice.
Cons:It is now almost ancient and "Against" there are, but you have to consider it a nice granny ...
Opinion:This old lady accompanied me for many years and now I am going to pensionarla I decided to write some praise ... RNLA robustness makes sure an excellent companion for the trip, certainly not tropical conditions but just knowing it and store it in conseguenza.rnIn well if the flow in relative safety from countries know where to turn out if you happen some disavventura.rnNel meantime I also had a 5D mkII, definitely much better in the quality of the file, but in the end I re-exchanged with my nephew saw he does much better landscapes of my while I preferred a volley a bit 'faster and above the 1.6 factor that was missing in FF.rnQuindi, even today, as mentioned in "Pro", to approach the reflex would be to certainly a smarter choice that some low-cost ciofeche with plasticotto abbinato.rnSe I found several used at very attractive prices.
Pros:Falls well in manornFacilità of utilizzornQualità files in RAW + JPEG excellent
Cons:RnPosizione weight of the power button / spegnimentorn
Opinion:339; age who has on his shoulders. I have joined to my beloved Pentax Kr that now I use only (and not always) at night as it has a screen (unlike the 40D and night in a live view is absolutely unusable) deserve to be called such, very much detailed and bright and with a graduated grid to adjust well with the horizon plane. The Canon 40D is truly a remarkable camera, that despite the years that he is far more valid and usable for many of today's cameras that can be ridiculous and unnecessary (considered their prices). I have a Sigma 10-20 f3.5 for panoramic (practically only this use), and a Sigma 70-200mm f / 2.8 EX DG OS HSM for details that gives beautiful emotions, nothing to envy to the harrier Canon f2.8 .
Opinion:We are talking about a so-called "semi-professional" SLR, that is a digital machine which, on the one hand, can be seen as second body for a professional photographer (reportage, but also photos of weddings and photo studio), while the other allows fans demanding a quantum leap compared to the "entry level" to get something meglio.rnIl SLR camera body provides adequate protection against dust and sprays (although not tropical conditions) and also the cover for the slot access memory is well sealed; size and weight of the body are contained, the handle is comfortable and the SLR perfectly balanced. Despite the registry age, offers three put glasses of "only" 10 megapixel CMOS sensor fire intercambiabili.rnIl may seem inadequate by today's average standards, but are much more important fidelity in color representation and / or the ability & #8220; pierce "the shadows, showing the details and well represents the highlights. rnFino 800 ISO the response of the camera is excellent, both in terms of resolution and color than on the always thorny, of the disorder, with an amazing range dinamico.rnIl autofocus system does its job without infamy and without praise (remember that it is an old technology over ten years) and, provided you have a "fast" memory card, the burst working quietly at a rate of up to 6.5 frames per second, almost without limits using JPEG files but with a limit of about 15 images in sequence before the memory buffer appears clogged shooting in RAW.rnUnica real flaw mode, the use of Live View system: beyond the "black out" caused by the movement of the mirror using the autofocus system, with manual focus can instead take advantage of the adjustment "end" (magnification up to 10x) on any area of ??the screen. The mode & agrave; Live View operation always involves a rapid depletion of the battery (autonomy is reduced to about a quarter), making the purchase of Battery Grip dedicated almost mandatory (which I highly recommend) .rnIn conclusion, I consider the EOS 40D SLR semi professional high quality despite the long length of service, especially for the price, really interesting, allowing you to take home a lot more than what you could let guess the corresponding expenditure: does not mislead the lack of "frills" such as wi-fi, GPS, or touch-screen, totally unnecessary (if useless) for the execution of shots qualità.rn
Pros:- High Construction livellorn- Buffer and Burst notevolirn- AF Efficentern- Raw File workable particularly nitidezzarn- Shock and constant work rn- has 9 years but still has its say
Cons:- Low-Screen Menu risoluzionern- a little graphic osticorn- Range Dinamicarnrn
Opinion:The Canon EOS 40D is a machine that dates back to 2007 with 'just' 10 megapixels, which in reality are not a limit, because it allows you to print without problems even in A3, to compose in a better way, and to have lighter files, suitable to those who have pc very potenti.rnOnestamente I listed defects above, the comparison because it is done, and it is fair with most modern car bodies, although now it never is from 150/200 Euros, or with a little more with Battery Grip original, batteries etc. which it is an advantage and a very pro rilevante.rnLa advice to those who need a second body in high gust machine, or who want to have a Semi-Pro body to start to get serio.rn
Pros:Building, colors, high burst, used very affordable cost
Cons:nightmarish ergonomics, power key that deserves the oscar the worst position in the history of the SLR, high noise already from 800 ISO, dynamic range pathetic as almost all Canon. rear display absolutely unusable.
Opinion:2Cma age is what it is ... Dynamic range is pathetic, as in many Canon also professional and serious attention is paid to exhibit well, basically the meter underexpose by about 1/3 EV, flash underexpose at least two diaphragms, the rear display is so bad that you can not tell if a photo is in focus or no.Per luck then, viewing the PC you realize that most of the photos are on fire! Only recommended Canonists hardcore, I love that kind of colors and they can only spend 150-200 euro. Sconsigliatissima to the rest of the world, primarily to people like me, comes from the universe Nikon.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
