JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon 1000D is a reflex camera with APS-C (1.6x) sensor and 10.1 megapixels manufactured from 2008 to 2011 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 1600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 1.5 FPS x 5 RAW / 3 FPS x 20 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 320 €;
45 users have given it an average vote of 7.4 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 205000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Af disastrous and very slow, a400 iso already noisy pixels.
Opinion:My first reflex, when I think I remember now full of flaws, but at the time ... How many soddisfazion !!! It is still a Canon and its "craft do" then obviously everything rapportato.rnLa maf was a penalty, a few points and then if there was little light, saved! beautiful colors, pity about the noise for me was already annoying to 400 iso.rnUna wide range of objectives of all prices and brands, all in all I'm happy to remember it is also me a bit 'of nostalgia.
Pros:Economic, lightweight, easy to use, great for a beginner
Cons:ridiculous ISO management, lack spot mode (as modern 1200/1300).
Opinion:It was my first SLR, and after a year of use, after having compared with my new 650D, I can sum up: it is used at bargain prices, siciramente if I had to choose between a 1000 or 1200/1300, the better old woman. rnSforna rows of 10 mpx, lightweight and easy to work with. rnDato not turning out beautiful and ready jpeg must gain experience with post production, and I consider it an advantage, after all if I want jpeg ready snap with your phone. rnNonostante is a max ISO of 8 years the entry level are only in 1600; ISO max files are manageable (for personal use limit), but already at 200 ISO noise is there and it vede.rnQuesto is one of the reasons why I changed: in certain situations, such events, ceremonies etc. , you just can not shoot. rnL'altro reason is the lack of spot mode for exposure, apparently not available for Canon SLR lower end. rnDevo mention that with a few euro more my 650D has many extra things: touch screen orientsible with good definition, improved autofocus, better burst. rnih conclusion, I recommend it to all those who want to start this amazing journey that is photography, you'll understand why when I needed something more, it means that you will have improved your technique or you have specific needs that will allow you to express yourself to the fullest. Definitely better this than a new entry level rather spend in rn objectives
Opinion:My first digital SLR, excellent to start, surely now (2015) have been made huge strides in the world of digital SLRs but I keep using, inseparable, lightweight and comfortable, does not shine in any environment is clearly a camera designed to get close to photography and in this succeeds very well. Now discontinued replaced by the new 1000 series.
Cons:Sensor noisy especially at high ISO, the files need to post, shutter sound terrible, difficulty focusing in situations of poor visibility or poor contrast.
Opinion:It 'a great macchinuzza to begin the approach with the digital SLR photography. It has everything you need, nothing more, nothing less. Its price is very attractive to enter on tiptoe in this mondo.rnGrazie to its small size and low weight, it is not a tragedy to bring her wherever you vada.rnrnLe its limited performance lead to want to learn more, to achieve better results, is to maximize the tool in the recovery both during post.rnVenendo from analog photography, where adjustments are limited, learn to shoot with this tool was quite simple and intuitive. rnI file that produces need a bit of post-production, one of the main Pecce is that if you want to pull out a bit of sharpness produced from the image file you run into very noisy even at low ISO, so the "clean" are absolutely necessary. rnPer me that I am neither an expert nor a lover of post-production is a defect, to those who like to tinker can not be a real proprio defect, but a "has become so" .rnA times when you do not want to put a fire there's no way, forcing the manual focus in low light conditions and even the eye can be a little hard to see where to turn the dial until you find the red dot accesso.rnDal my point of view the viewfinder coverage is not complete strain on the composition of the image a bit and my very humble opinion that has nothing to do with the result is the noise it makes the mechanism of 'shutter a bit from "toy", direi.rnNon unbearable that I can give a positive vote considering tutto.rnBuona light
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
