JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Canon 400D is a reflex camera with APS-C (1.6x) sensor and 10.1 megapixels manufactured from 2006 to 2008 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 1600 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 3 FPS x 10 RAW / 30 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 600 €;
47 users have given it an average vote of 7.9 out of 10
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 193000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Robust-light-reliable-with good light you still get some nice light photo files
Cons:Noise above the 400 ISO-maybe the side points
Opinion:It was my first reflex, bought by my father in 2006 and always shared in journeys made in these years, he never abandoned us. The fly, if you use the center point (unlike the sidebars), is not a problem .Over 400 ISO is better not to push because the noise is noticed much, but under "normal" light conditions it is still possible to make very pleasant clicks, even with the "plasticotto" 18-55 .Pur having big hands, I have never been awkward to handle. I recommend to those who want to start taking photos because the first body is definitely fine. Now I'm thinking of buying a 6d and holding the 400d as the second body, because it has never disappointed me and the factor Of crop of crop always makes it comfortable.
Pros:Indestructible - compact - performance still appreciable
Cons:Does not have the liveview - viewfinder dark - small display - very high noise above 400 iso - cf slot mechanism a little fragile
Opinion:I have it for 9 years and I never risparmiata.rnAi time was satisfactory in all, now it shows the weakness of the lack of liveview that combined with the classic sights of mediocre entrylevel does not allow to easily use manual lenses. Even the noise at high ISO is very high when compared to the models most recenti.rnLa construction but I always seemed superior to his heirs, the brainchild of robustness that has been confirmed by my numerous "crash test" .rnIl display a little small, not the maximum in review photos. The 10 megapixel sensor alone has the advantage of bringing out light files to be processed even if you do not have a super computer. I never felt the need to have more megapixel.rnManca spot metering but ... installing the software on the CF 400plus you can easily add, and it works well!
Pros:Convenient to carry around / Menu simple and intuitive / Advantage of low resolution for storage and use of slow economic
Cons:Noise ISO / Tendency to underexpose / Easy to inadvertently change ISO, and other settings in situations "stressful"
Opinion:And 'my only SLR, the possess since 2007. It 'quite simple and intuitive to use. Sforna file 10MP and I consider this an advantage for archiving and for those who use me as a cheaper lenses (18-55 / 17-85 / 55-250 / 50 1.8) and therefore not very resolvents. The autofocus in relation to the price, it behaves discreetly; clearly in low-light situations (churches, interior, etc ...) is in trouble but the limit is also given by the lens you are using. For example, it is already known the difference between a 50 1.8 (slow enough nell'autofocus) and a 18-55 (first series / discreetly fast nell'autofocus considering the price). To focus using the center point (a much more powerful than others), and recompose. Many complain that it is impractical to hold for those with big hands: although big hands I have never found it difficult to hold it. However, if this were a problem, simply attach the battery grip (optional). One problem I have insteadfound (which I think is common to many other machines) is the ease with which under conditions of "stress" is easy to change ISO and other settings by accident. Example: you are photographing a couple in a park and you move frequently and do many shots. In these cases, sometimes without realizing it I inadvertently changed the ISO setting (fortunately shooting in RAW!). At high ISO is not the best but you have to consider the fact that it is a APS-c.
Pros:compact and light conditions are not difficult, still excellent
Cons:does not have the live-view, noisy above ISO 400 ..
Opinion:My first SLR, bought in USA in 2008 (rebelXTI) ... that still produces great pictures ... rncerto conditions must be excellent in the evening without a tripod there is 1.8 which takes ... and the focus is often on the fritz, but to learn is definitely favolosa.rnCon good lenses, frankly plasticotto 18-55 do not even remember where I put it, churning out photos of all rispetto.rnLa lack of live makes it very difficult for macro, but frankly novice even if the photos are slightly blurry ... who cares rn
user5958
sent on May 22, 2013
Pros:Lightness, reactivity, goodness of the files in the presence of light, the durability of the camera body. Good location of the controls.
Cons:Poor performance at high iso.
Opinion:Using the machine since 2006, currently about 30'000, and I have never had problems. You can can appreciate its true potential are combining it with good targets. Personally, since the use with fixed focal lengths, I can say that at low ISO (100-200) produces excellent file. At high ISO 400-800 photos make it very well printed, while the screen there is a lack of detail rendering, with electronic noise. rnLe major limitations so you have photo with low light, while the rest, the limit is as usual the photographer. I recommend it to everyone especially to those who must begin by deciding that the budget is oriented more on goals than on camera bodies. rnL'Af, it has never given me too many problems, but I do not do photo hunting so I do not comment. For normal use it does the job.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
