|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Boulangerie www.juzaphoto.com/p/Boulangerie  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Voigtlander VM 35mm f/1.5 Nokton Pros: Sharpness, micro-contrast, weight Cons: Absence of lens hood Opinion: Necessary premise, I have type I and I shoot in black and white. Excellent sharpness and microcontrast, on the blur I can't say because the aperture ring is almost always at 8. All this with a very low weight. Smooth focus ring and, in the rotation angle, the same as the Leica one. Of course, Voigtlander could make the effort to add the lens hood that must be bought separately. That said, I don't regret either Summarit 35mm f2.4 or Summicron 35mm f2 fifth version: splendid lenses but the quality/price ratio sees the Nokton winning sent on April 20, 2025 |
 | Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) Pros: Grayscale, ISO sealing, battery life, reliability, overall quality Cons: Base ISO, Power Button, Screen Opinion: I had it for a few months taking a few thousand photos and learning to think in black and white, in fact the experience of 30 years earlier with film had not been so formative. I won't dwell on the build quality, it's literally a tank. I too, like others before me, put among the positive aspects of the Monochrom the possibility of having a remarkable grayscale with fine tone passages. This characteristic, if combined with the versatility of DNG files, allows great workability and important recoveries, especially for underexposures. An example: having a clean file after developing a photo that had been underexposed by 4 stops at 1,600 Iso. The grain, in fact: fine, pleasant, elegant, present but not intrusive thanks also to the 24 megapixel sensor. I shot without problems up to 12,500 Iso. Exposure meter mostly set at -0.7 and obviously exposure always for lights. And then the battery: I took two spare, practically never used. Used in a desert environment it didn't give me any problems. The shutter is not particularly quiet for a Leica but not even among the noisiest ones, in the street with a few people around you can hardly hear except shooting in the face of the subject. There are three things that, relatively, I didn't like: not liking ND filters very much, I found the base ISO to 320 limiting in situations where I wanted creative blur; the shutter button with more functions that sometimes ended up on continuous shooting without me wanting it; the screen resolution which is a big step up from the M9 but is dated (one more good reason to use the screen as little as possible). The rangefinder is smaller than the M10 but with the 35mm I was very happy with it. The sensor gets dirty easily but cleans just as easily as far as I'm concerned. I exchanged it for an M10 in a moment of strong nostalgia for color, I regretted it almost immediately and took it back sent on December 25, 2024 |
 | Sony A7C II Pros: Size, autofocus, customization capabilities Cons: Flash sync, crowded screen Opinion: Practically perfect camera for an advanced amateur photographer who wants a body with modern and performance features, autofocus in the first place better than on the A7 IV in keeping the subject locked, but who wants to save something in terms of space and weight. If these are the priorities, obviously the perfect match is with compact lenses (preferably fixed) that are not ultra-bright. The issue of the lack of the joystick can be overcome rather easily with the help of the touch screen. Just one card, you know what you're buying; viewfinder from the functional resolution but in short, you are what you are buying. Keys and dials to customize as needed and even more. The 33-megapixel sensor is an excellent meeting point between resolution, dynamic range and high ISO resistance. The only real annoyance, as far as I'm concerned, is the screen too full of icons. Watch out for the flash sync which is at 1/160 (1/200 in Aps-C): it can be remedied with the hss. Good autonomy. However, as far as I'm concerned, the feeling didn't click. sent on August 18, 2024 |
 | Leica Q3 Pros: File quality, sensor, ergonomics, ease of use, lens, autofocus, use with flash Cons: A "freeze" every now and then. A certain slowness in starting and starting from standby Opinion: The qualities of the camera are known and punctually verified: construction, ergonomics, ease of use, lens, menu, app (not only for the Q3), autofocus, tilting screen (for me), very silent mechanical shutter. The first thing that struck me about the Q3, however, the one that made me say "wow", was the workability of the DNG files, or the sensor: spectacular. Recovery of shadows, highlights, noise quality, colors, microcontrast. A pleasure to open files in Camera Raw (which unfortunately does not have the correction of the Summilux 1.7, but with the Summilux M it is fine for distortion). I use it, mostly, at 36 mega and I feel very good. The other aspect I want to emphasize is the use with the flash: being a camera with a central mechanical shutter you can do interesting things at high shutter speeds without the need for hss. For my type of photography, the combination with the LightPix Labs M20, or Q20 II, is great. Also with the latest firmware 2.03 the autofocus (I come from years of Sony) has improved even if I have used it occasionally. Out of about 3,000 shots taken in five months three times I had the problem of the camera blocking which was solved by extracting and putting the battery back on after waiting about ten seconds, Certainly the 28 mm must be evaluated very well (in doubt I recommend a ride of a few months with a Ricoh GR III); You can also cut in post but the focal length is demanding about the composition but permissive working in hyperfocal. Putting its qualities together, the Q3 is a unique tool, provided that Sony, already having the sensor at home, does not decide to make an RX1R III. sent on May 26, 2024 |
 | Ricoh GR IIIx Pros: Excellent lens, excellent file quality even at high ISO, pocketable, versatility Cons: Continuous autofocus just enough, constant anxiety about dust on the sensor Opinion: Used with great satisfaction when traveling and for some city outings. Used in different genres: prevalent street but also landscape, architecture without forgetting the macro function. The restrictions imposed combined with the size of the camera have changed the way I photograph. PROS: The quality of the lens and the files have been widely cited. It is not afraid of high ISO even up to 6400 (in several cases). Fits into the back pocket of your jeans. Good stabilization. Mostly I used it set in the usual way with zone focus, i.e. on Snap Focus, aperture at 8, speed at 320 and automatic ISO. Very interesting is the combination of snap focus with the possibility of focusing in single AF by touching the screen, which is particularly responsive and therefore effective. I got a lot of satisfaction. CONS Continuous autofocus is just enough, it's not his job (but I come from Sony and Canon). I won't dwell on the price and the duration of the batteries, you know what you buy. If anything, as far as I'm concerned, I've had a constant anxiety about the possible entry of dust inside the body mitigated by the metal lens cap that has done a great job so far. I sold it, regretted it, and bought it back sent on August 13, 2023 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II Pros: Sharpness, AF speed, few chromatic aberrations, flare resistance, weight Cons: Vignetting over 50 mm up to 3.2 Opinion: For photographic use it is a zoom not optically "practically perfect" like the Canon RF 24-70 f2.8 however it is a very (but very) valid tool. On the road I appreciated first of all the low weight for the type of lens, during a reportage the versatility combined with the optical qualities. It does not have the stabilizer but the 695 grams declared (205 less than the RF) make it very manageable and easy to grip. And then sharpness, very fast AF coupled with the A7 IV, the few chromatic aberrations and the excellent flare resistance. Interesting option to rub more or less the zoom. On the other hand, the vignetting is quite evident from about 50 mm up to f3.2 (but it is a common feature to this type of zoom) as well as the distortion at the edges at 24mm (as above). In any case, it's a different lens than the GM I that disappointed me. Rating 9,8/10. sent on September 04, 2022 |
 | Canon EOS R6 Pros: Autofocus, speed of operation, high ISO tightness, ergonomics, dynamic range Cons: Not all the functions that can be assigned to programmable keys and rings, optical park to be evaluated well Opinion: After a long period with the Sony Alpha (7 2, 7 3, 9 and 9 II) I decided to return to Canon. Boom, surprise autofocus. Very good in single, excellent continuously, a step and a half ahead of the A9 II especially in tracking and face / eye recognition. For the use I made of it (street mainly) the percentage of shots out of focus was less than 4%. Of this machine I also greatly appreciated the speed of operation, the dynamic range, the ergonomics (need I say it for Canon?) and the high Iso seal with well-usable shots with few corrections up to 6,400 Iso. Instead, I find incomprehensible the choice not to make keys and rings fully customizable: some functions are not assignable (or I was not good at finding a way to do it). The body coupled with RF lenses (I had no EF given the Sony past) forms an extremely reliable combination and, for me, of great satisfaction: I refer in particular to the 24-70 f.2.8. I conclude with an obviousness: before buying an R body it is necessary to evaluate well the available optical park. sent on August 21, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Autofocus speed, sharpness, very low chromatic aberrations, stabilization Cons: It's "just" a 2.8 Opinion: I was disappointed with two previous experiences with 24-70 2.8 from other brands. I thought I had to give up this zoom with great versatility. The Canon made me change my mind. The speed of the autofocus, the stabilization, the sharpness, the almost absence of chromatic aberrations and the contained flare are positively striking. I do not put among the cons the weight knowing that it was not a feather: however, the ergonomics of the R bodies is so good that it withstands the fatigue well even for hours with the machine in hand. And in reality it is not a real defect for me even the detachment of the planes at 2.8 light years away (obviously) from the fixed 1.4. Just take the measurements and use it properly. If anything, with the extension of the body when going from 24 to 70, I have some doubts about the dust tightness. Currently I only have this lens and I am satisfied with it. sent on August 05, 2022 |
 | Sony A9 Pros: Af, Raw files, ergonomics, dynamic range, battery life Cons: Not being the Alpha 9 II? Opinion: Given that I am able to use it well below its potential, it is a joy to photograph with this machine. I do not dwell on the precision of the autofocus for which I needed a period of learning while coming from other Sony bodies: once I got to know each other I ventured things unthinkable in previous years. Excellent Raw files, very well workable especially in recoveries from underexposure, good dynamic range. In combination with fixed optics can give great satisfaction. The 24.2 megapixel resolution for me is the right heaviness. Instead compared to the A7 III I had very high expectations on the response to the high Iso, however the files up to 3200 (with peaks at 6400) are easily workable in post. Good battery life, good ergonomics, excellent viewfinder, burst and absence of blackout. The menus are the usual Sony, now I have known them for a few years. The only real flaw (perhaps) is not having the processor of the A9 II, but for that, in fact, there is the A9 II. sent on November 10, 2021 |
 | Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH Pros: Sharpness, low weight, aperture ring, very low distortion Cons: Chromatic aberration Opinion: Very light and discreet lens in appearance, a perfect match for small bodies such as the GX series. The sharpness is very good at full aperture, excellent from f2. The distortion is really contained. As far as I am concerned, the presence of the diaphragms ring is a pleasure. Pleasant the blurry obtainable even on 4/3. A little chromatic aberration solvable in post production, I would have preferred a key for the transition from Af to Mf a little harder in the drive. Overall a great glass, to have if possible. sent on November 06, 2021 |
 | Sony RX100 VII Pros: Sensor, autofocus, burst, Raw quality Cons: Anonymous look (but it can also be a merit), few manual commands Opinion: The Sony RX100 VII is definitely the best compact I've ever had. Technically flawless. The strengths that strike me most are: the quality of the sensor given the size that also churns out excellent Raw; the performance of the autofocus and the absence of blackouts when shooting the burst are at the level of the A9; the zoom less bright than the VI but all-rounder. For the street it is perfect. I find it very practical also for videos, a feature on all the 3.5 microphone jack. Obviously the battery life is limited but it is so light that a pair of spare accumulators fit very well in the pocket of the jeans. The only real practical note I do are the few physical commands present, always very welcome to me, but there would have been no room to put other keys and rings. For a better grip I added a grip with accessory slide (not present on the machine) sent on October 14, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 35mm f/1.4 GM Pros: A joy: sharpness, Af, bokeh Cons: Don't have it Opinion: Taken used for a few weeks. It is a real joy to photograph ourselves, always crunchy. Very sharp lens, few (if not very few) chromatic aberrations, very fast and extremely precise autofocus on the A9, bokeh. The weight is not feather but very low for the type of lens and for its qualities. You can go street quietly. Aesthetically I don't like the hood but so much so. The only real con is not having it sent on October 07, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Pros: Versatility, weight, quality Cons: Zoom Hike Opinion: Excellent handyman with a low weight. For my needs (and skills) the optical quality is more than good. I took it to replace the 24-70 F4. The ring nuts are precise and very comfortable: the customizable button is a plus. Combined with the A7 III it behaves very well species in AF-C and in the burst; Good blurred it to be an F4. The only defect found is that at 105 mm, given the zoom excursion, becomes a bit ' bulky and flashy. sent on March 01, 2019 |
 | Panasonic Lumix LX100 II Pros: Manual Controls, size, ergonomics, lens Cons: Menu, lack of intake from 3.5 Opinion: Ever Since I took it is always in my backpack, ideal companion for the street. It Does not give in the eye and allows to indulge themselves. Excellent manual controls compared to other "little ones". This feature and the quality of the lens for me are the best perks of the machine. The lens however tends to warp a little and therefore, when it is possible, needs a little more attention in composition species with the lines at the edges of the image. The autofocus is fast and pretty accurate. Good stabilization: Sharp shots up to 1/4 seconds. It Works well linking with the app (Huawei P20 Pro): Great for Social shares. The perceived build quality and the materials used are pleasing to the touch and pleasing to the eye while not flashy. More complicated Menu than other small ones. For Videos It is a pity that there is no audio outlet from 3.5. Overall I like it very much. sent on February 28, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
