JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2019. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2487 €;
26 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe Canon RF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 223000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Autofocus speed, sharpness, very low chromatic aberrations, stabilization
Cons:It's "just" a 2.8
Opinion:I was disappointed with two previous experiences with 24-70 2.8 from other brands. I thought I had to give up this zoom with great versatility. The Canon made me change my mind. The speed of the autofocus, the stabilization, the sharpness, the almost absence of chromatic aberrations and the contained flare are positively striking. I do not put among the cons the weight knowing that it was not a feather: however, the ergonomics of the R bodies is so good that it withstands the fatigue well even for hours with the machine in hand. And in reality it is not a real defect for me even the detachment of the planes at 2.8 light years away (obviously) from the fixed 1.4. Just take the measurements and use it properly. If anything, with the extension of the body when going from 24 to 70, I have some doubts about the dust tightness. Currently I only have this lens and I am satisfied with it.
Opinion:Exceptional lens, combined with the r5 is the perfect companion for ceremonies, very sharp already at full aperture, at f / 4 it is practically a blade, excellent stabilizer and focusing speed. The weight is not a problem, the price could be even if it is the best 24-70 ever produced by canon, in short, if you have a mirrorless R series this is an indispensable lens
Opinion:Absolutely the best 24-70 f2.8 ever owned, extreme sharpness at all apertures. There is not much to add. Before buying it I saw comparative tests with the counterpart ef L ii with which it beats well. But on a general level it is superior to all openings especially at the edges where it reaches an unparalleled definition. The sharpness is very high but never of the "electronic" type. And that's where it really makes the difference. It is a sharp, clean but non-invasive and artifact file. The weight is felt on the Mirrorless and clearly unbalances the weight forward and after a while tired. But it is not necessarily a bad thing about the lens, but about the ergonomics of the machine in my opinion. This consideration, unfortunately, applies to this objective as for all those of a certain weight and value. The additional bezel is a plus but for where it is placed it is inconvenient, in my opinion. Had they put it immediately after the attack it would have been perfect and could have been used in an "analog" way assigning it the function of the openings. Absolutely recommended. 10/10
Pros:resolution, construction, stabilization, Nano-USM autofocus, aesthetics and additional programmable bezel
Cons:cost
Opinion:I bought after a thousand indecisions and second thoughts this lens as a replacement for the excellent EF 24-70 f/2.8 II. Basically I had to add an amount equal to the cost of a 24-70 EF used in excellent condition or a new 24-105 f/4 RF, a madness for amateur use. But it is known that not all decisions are guided only by lucid reason. I say right away that the aesthetics and ergonomics of the lens are of a high level and already these factors are very satisfying. The optical characteristics are of excellence surpassing those already high of the EF brother. Nothing super striking but tangible both in the center and at the edges where the EF paid a little duty. It works well at all focal lengths even at full aperture. I find it particularly more effective than the EF 70mm version. The stabilization is a plus because combined with the internal one of the R5 makes the torque formidable even in low light conditions. The Nano-USM autofocus is definitely more responsive and quiet than the USM version. Distortion correction is always well managed even at maximum focal length. Probably at this focal point a certain work is also done by the software. The additional bezel is a significant plus and very comfortable. For example, I use it to change the autofocus method. In addition to all this, the R5+RF coupling is slightly more compact than the tripleT R5 + adapter + EF version, another element that does not hurt. I did not report flare problems, indeed probably the management of the backlight is slightly improved compared to the EF version. In short, a little better everything except for the dimensions and weight if considered, however, net of those of the possible EF-RF adapter.
Pros:Image quality, extraordinary sharpness, construction, tropicalization, very precise af
Cons:cost
Opinion:Crazy color rendering. I state that on my specimen I did not find problems of excessive flare as someone complains. Solid L-series construction, very fast and silent autofocus, very pleasant blurry, tropicalization and, finally, stabilization. The customizable lens ring is a real treat, it provides greater versatility in programming ISO, aperture or shutter. I do not agree with those who had to complain about the keys and plastics, it is an L series in all respects with the quality that is expected. Since I am used to testing all the lenses I buy on my own, especially to see if I have a good copy, I can tell you that compared to that sacred monster of the EF 24-70 f/2.8 L II it is slightly sharper in the center from 50 to 70 mm, while at the edges it is sharper over the entire range. With the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 there is no match at all. Last consideration the price: it is quite expensive and you can not have an interesting discount, not that the competition costs less, but you pay it practically at full price if you want it with Canon Italia guarantee like me. I hope I have been useful to you.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
