JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
The Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2017. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1181 €;
65 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 188000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Great all-rounder, thrust and effective tropicalization, selectors stabilizing and af on goal, sharp with good resistance to the flare.
Cons:Zoom ghiera too rigid and with long range, lens size at 105mm exaggerated, distortion at 24mm high (very small in PS), at 24mm the size of the possible screw filter must be contained anltritis invade the framed field losing mm.
Opinion:The lens is all to do that covers a lot of needs and that is in fact what for practicality you always carry with you. I was impressed by its tropicalization, 30 minutes of rain pushing mixed snow and thermal jump in the car without any particular consequences. Autofocus fast and very precise to all focal and blurry appreciable at 105mm for portraits. Sharp and with good resistance to flare, ok colors without praise. To be used is cumbersome and rigid in the variation of the focal, probably due to the thrust tropicalization, a problem that is amplified by the size of the Body A7 that do not offer the right support compared to the action that is done on the target. It would be useful to have an additional grip on the machine body. At 24 mm you can only mount a screw filter and small size otherwise it invades the image.
Opinion:I am very happy with this slow, sharp and well built. the distortion is very limited to all focal lengths, the af is very quiet and very fast. it's worth everything it costs, even more. too bad just for its size, which in my opinion worsens a bit the compactness of Sony's ML system. In conclusion, a view that I would buy again tomorrow!
Pros:Great all-rounder, well built, tropicalized, robust, good focal excursion, excellent AF
Cons:Plastic lampshade, lens not very light and still overpriced
Opinion:I use it with an A7RIV and I almost always get good results. The minimum diaphragm is not a problem because the stabilization is great. It is an irreplaceable travel companion, without serious defects. I just vignette a little bit. It suffers a bit of flare and it is better to avoid the extreme backlit, but this is something that applies with every zoom
Pros:Sharpness, focal excursion, 9-blade diaphragm, tropicalized, not very heavy
Cons:nothing if it is used for the purposes for which it was designed (travel-reportage)... if then with this lens you make other specific genres like macros then...
Opinion:Anyone who has spoken ill of this lens that I have been using for more than a year, or has never tried it thoroughly or has had a faulty copy in hand. To be an F4 excels in almost everything... In my opinion, it's one of Sony's best-successful lenses. Great for those who travel a lot and don't want to carry an arsenal... Along with this lens in fact, it is enough only a wide angle possibly bright as the 16-35 F2.8 GMaster and you are covered for 95% of travel photos. Also great for reporting in general. In short, I would change it only and exclusively for the new Sigma 24-70 f2.8 FE but I already know that I would probably regret it... I'll think about it... Over-recommended to all those who want high quality and do not want too many pounds on their shoulders when they are traveling... those 35mm more than a 24-70 really make a difference...
Opinion:I have this average zoom for a month and I got to use it and try it most days on the street making the only type of photo that interests me. The street. I would like to contradict a user who previously commented on this lens by defining it as a good object to take photos of Uncle Peppino while cooking the chops. Nothing more inaccurate. The 24-105 is a lens that every house has in the catalog and also in the pro line. Precisely because the type of lens lends itself very well to reportage photography, journalism and travel services. So it's anything but a useless object!!! I was pleased with this purchase. After years of using only fixed lenses and many of them manuals, returning to a zoom gave me pleasure. To be honest I was not going to buy a zoom but, having entered a Sony store in Phnom Penh that is in total closure, I saw that I could take it home for almost 400 euros less than it costs in Italy. New, with two years' warranty. I didn't let him get away. The image quality is very good already at f4 on almost the entire focal excursion. Only at 105mm you notice a small drop in sharpness. Nothing exaggerated but detectable. At 105mm it is preferable to shoot at f4.5 or better still at f5.6 The stabilizer works well and is quiet, as well as the af system. Reliable, accurate and medium-speed. Factor this that changes depending on the body machine on which it is mounted. The images that returns this lens are faithful, contrasted and with interesting colors. I don't like the concept of external zoom. The body that stretches zooming bothers me by concept. But this is more of my problem than a real problem. The zoom dial is quite frictiony and This I like. Tropicalized, and I like that. Big and not very light but all in all very manageable. The range of focals it covers is ideal for doing almost anything. I would have preferred it to be made of metal instead of hard plastic, however, it also conveys a feeling of extreme robustness. The maximum aperture of f4 was, in my opinion, more limiting years back but today, with the sensors we have, it is not a big problem to use f4 even in the evening and in dimly lit environments. I mean, overall, I really like it. At full price I do not know if I would have bought it since I had not got to try it. Now that I use it every day I can say that it's still worth what it costs. Vote 9. Recommended
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
