Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS : Specifications and Opinions




Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSSSony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS

Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS

Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS



The Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2017. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1260 €; 53 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.

If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   24-105 mm
 Angle of view   84.1 - 23.3°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/4
 Aperture blades   9
 Lenses/Groups   17 elements in 14 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.38 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.31x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   Yes (built in lens)
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters   77 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   Yes
 Weight   663 g
 Dimensions   113 x 84 mm
Buy Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, buy on Ebay


Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 177000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on May 22, 2019

Pros: Stabilization, image quality, sharpness, AF, construction, tropicalization

Cons:

Opinion: And the best standard lens and also all do to have as a first lens despite being at F 4 starting. Having one more step up to 105 helps. The construction is very good and compact and has a balanced weight. Stabilization and a plus. AF Fast and accurate does not mistake a shot. Sharp already at F4, but for me the best comes from F 8 to F 16. Good management of flare.

avatarjunior
sent on May 22, 2019

Pros: Focus-sharpness-nice blur (for an F/4)-absence of chromatic aberrations-well-controlled distortion-tropicalization-Excellent stabilizer

Cons: Size and weight-zoom ring a little stiff-compromise lens, but already you know when you buy it

Opinion: Build quality: (9/10) Although we appreciate the quality of the materials and the design of the first Sony-Zeiss lenses, even in this G-series lens, very few criticisms can be moved. It's built like a rock. Heavy (but less than the other 24-105 or 24-120 Nikon, Canon, Sigma, Panasonic), does not overbalance the machine, but still those who seek compactness, look elsewhere. Important dimensions with lens hood mounted. Good construction materials, well made pairs. A little stiff in scrolling the zoom ring, which however prevents the zoom to lengthen when it is brought upside down. AUTOFOCUS: (10/10) frankly difficult to ask for more. With A7R III quick and precise focus. Key on the programmable barrel for special shooting modes (you can assign the Eye AF or an entire set of custom parameters to be activated when pressing the button, very interesting). Even in low light, I consider myself satisfied. But I must say, for intellectual honesty, that I have never really tested it in challenging situations. Manual focus very comfortable and precise in combination with the Focus assistant Sony image quality: (9.5/10) from a zoom handyman I think it is very difficult to do better. Universal focal Range (of course it was-120 would have been better, but we are uncontentable!). Excellent sharpness at all focal lengths (indispensable feature for a handyman, needless to have extended focal ranges if then over 70mm becomes soft) and especially at all openings (indispensable for a "dark" lens that will often be used to TA even in cases Other than the portrait and then you want sharpness all over the frame). Optically very correct from the point of view of chromatic aberrations and distortion (although sometimes these corrections are reached via software). To TA and to the longest focal even the blurred becomes pleasant, obviously without comparisons impossible with lenses with more generous openings. With the stabilizer then it allows me to shoot at 1/5 second freehand with a percentage of photos in focus of about 60-70%, really remarkable. Occasionally I took home even photos at 1 second exposure, when I had a chance to lean somewhere... Discrete magnifying capacity for photo-like macro PRICE: (9/10) high, but not in an unjustified way. Costs what it cost to list the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm F/4g ED VR that qualitatively is not comparable, obviously more of the Sigma 24-105mm F/4 OS DG HSM, €100 more of the Canon EF 24-105mm F/4l IS USM II which however is lower, €50 less than the Panasonic LUMIX S 24-105mm F /4L Macro OIS Lens. That then street price are different depends on many things (release date, market demand and company policies). In Truth it seems to me properly priced for the type and quality of the lens, they also begin to find themselves used interesting. CONCLUSION: Although not perfect (for a short while!) I find that this lens really has the features that are usually found in the "professional" 24-70 f 2.8 zooms, but with a less stop and a broader focal range. It is up to us to decide which of the two characteristics we need the most, from the point of view of image quality We do not renounce anything.

avatarjunior
sent on May 20, 2019

Pros: Discrete optical quality, even exaggerated construction

Cons: Devastating price, hard zoom ring, tenting AF in interior

Opinion: In my way of seeing things is a lens that doesn't make sense. Over €1200 for a heavy, bulky zoom, with fixed brightness at F4, when at just over half the price there is the Tamron 28-75 2.8? For goodness sake the construction is enviable, as usual Sony on the series G \ \ GM does not make you wish better. However the price is too high, and the lens is not free from defects. With light down the AF is lame, but it is still an F4. Although silent in fact, I realized how to face a little ' too up and down indoors, and a lens so expensive can not afford it. The zoom ring is also excessively friction. Accomplice this "tropicalization" of which everyone goes crazy, which then to the practical act destroys the usability of the rings for zooming (except where this happens internally), having to force things to seal as much as possible the cracks. On a zoom like that frankly I would have avoided, so as to facilitate the sliding of the cylinder. In conclusion the optical quality is discrete, the construction is Egregia, but in the end the usability is low. Accomplice an important weight, an AF that given the opening has its limits, a challenging zoom ring to rotate for hours and hours, and a price not competitive, make for me a lens to avoid. If you want to spend €1200 for the "Zoommone Tuttofare" to take you on a trip to make photos to Uncle Peppino that makes the chop in full sun, then this optics can very well satisfy you. But for professional needs, where you can not buy the 24-70 GM, you have to be masochistic to prefer this to the Tamron 28-75.

avatarjunior
sent on April 10, 2019

Pros: Color Resolution, fast and reliable AF, flare management, proper price.

Cons: Weight

Opinion: I have been using it for several months and it has never disappointed me. I use it at 50% of the focal ranges I stretch; The other is the 70-200 F/4 which did not disappoint me, indeed. As color resolution and restitution, I think is excellent, an AF that does not disappoint to 90% using it on A7 III. The weight An excessive attempt to be an F/4, but as length is well balanced on the A7, maybe with the grip or BG. Before the purchase I had compared with the 24-70 F/4 the various reviews and opinions that advised this model and although more expensive I have not regretted it at all

avatarjunior
sent on April 10, 2019

Pros: Building quality images feeling great building customizable key

Cons: If it had been 2.8 would have been the greatest, me was unthinkable to 1200 euros

Opinion: A great optics, ideal all to do for the trip, well built scales well with my a7rII return of beautiful images (excellent resolution held to flare beautiful colors) The optics weighs the right, certainly to prefer to 24 70, if he had a little of Extra brightness would be a perfect optics but the price is more than correct for the overall quality returned.




Photos taken with Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS

Foto
The Coal men of Sunrise
by Julian Lops
109 comments, 7270 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The Gems of Bajkal
by Fabrizio Fortuna
53 comments, 3971 views  
HI RES 4.5 MP

Foto
The rocks and the Bastei bridge
by Juza
48 comments, 8967 views  
HI RES 23.1 MP

Foto
Good Night, Prague!
by Juza
49 comments, 10665 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Fireworks
by Vfdesign
56 comments, 3924 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Hellish scenario-Geamana
by Juza
45 comments, 4847 views  
HI RES 22.9 MP

Foto
The Charles Bridge in Prague
by Juza
47 comments, 5203 views  
HI RES 21.5 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Krzywy Las, arched forest
by Juza
42 comments, 6321 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Geamana, everything disappears into Red Lake ...
by Juza
34 comments, 4737 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Classic Hamburg (Wasserschloss Hafencity)
by Juza
22 comments, 5686 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Reitdiephaven
by Juza
26 comments, 5820 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
The blue hour in Wroclaw
by Juza
16 comments, 6026 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Skyline
by Rene15985
33 comments, 2480 views
Foto
The multicolored Lake Geamana
by Juza
42 comments, 4809 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Abandonment
by Fabrizio Fortuna
42 comments, 1551 views
Foto
Impressions...
by Grx55
132 comments, 2690 views  
HI RES 20.8 MP

Foto
Horns
by Rene15985
33 comments, 1766 views
Foto
Halo in the Light
by Julian Lops
54 comments, 1562 views
Foto
Ballerina (Sony A7rIII test + 24-105)
by JuzaPhoto Samples
32 comments, 10979 views  
HI RES 39.5 MP

Foto
Photographer at Giau Pass
by Juza
29 comments, 1859 views  
HI RES 19.6 MP

Foto
It's mirrored in the lake...
by Grx55
131 comments, 2008 views  
HI RES 17.6 MP

Foto
Sass de Putia
by Juza
31 comments, 3213 views  
HI RES 22.9 MP

Foto
Teeth
by Rene15985
26 comments, 1254 views
Foto
In the splendor of light
by Juza
14 comments, 3344 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
The look (Sony A7rIII test + 24-105)
by Juza
27 comments, 9100 views  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Fields of bluebells at dawn
by Juza
16 comments, 3838 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Hyacinths of Lisse, the Netherlands
by Juza
15 comments, 2235 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Colle Santa Lucia
by Juza
18 comments, 3078 views  
HI RES 23.2 MP

Foto
Rathen at sunset
by Juza
17 comments, 4588 views  
HI RES 22.7 MP

Foto
Trees reflected in the colours of Geamana
by Juza
13 comments, 2429 views  
HI RES 21.8 MP

Foto
Tear and smoke
by Julian Lops
33 comments, 2131 views
Foto
Sunset from Lagazuoi
by Juza
20 comments, 1872 views  
HI RES 20.2 MP

Foto
Light and smoke
by Julian Lops
24 comments, 1283 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Last light on the five towers
by Juza
19 comments, 2022 views  
HI RES 19.5 MP

Foto
The colors of Wroclaw, Poland
by Juza
11 comments, 3637 views  
HI RES 23.2 MP

Foto
Coal Harvesting
by Julian Lops
27 comments, 1721 views
Foto
All that remains of Geamana ...
by Juza
8 comments, 3137 views  
HI RES 22.5 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me