|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Kobezzz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Kobezzz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7r V Pros: Autofocus, Tracking, Viewfinder, Grip Cons: Cost Opinion: Arrived a couple of months ago, I can say that it is an excellent machine and I am very satisfied. The solid handle; exceptional, precise and fast autofocus; fast and great tracking; The viewfinder is stunning, sharp and defined. The curtain that closes electronically is an interesting option, but it does not eliminate the fact that the sensor gets dirty. These days I will see how RAW can be worked, but from what I see the results are excellent. The cost is high by 500-700 euros, correct price 3800-4000. sent on January 08, 2023 |
 | Sony FE 12-24mm f/2.8 GM Pros: Construction, Autofocus, Sharpness, Vignetting, Flare, Materials, Rear Filters Cons: Nothing Opinion: Let's start with the very first impressions. Arrived about a week ago, the optics are built very well. Both the size and the aspheric lens are greater than in the 12-24 f4 and not by a little, despite this increase in hand it is not at all heavy. The design of the lens is eye-catching compared to 12-24 g. Improved the fixed light rail, larger than 12-24 g and this helps protect the aspheric lens from shocks and scratches. The angle of field is equal to 12-24 g and at 12mm it is absolutely fantastic. There is no stabilization, not bad, but autofocus has improved a lot (speed) compared to 12-24 g. The flare is practically absent from f11 to f22 with solar and artificial lights alternating with a star spendila, with long, short tips alternating. In the edges the sharpness is excellent at all openings. Surprised in positive for the vignetting which is very but very light from f8 to f16. Interesting the possibility of installing the filters in the appropriate back thread (in addition to the specific holder), too bad that there is only one slot. In the box there is the appropriate shape to cut the filters of the right size. Surprised positively by the warranty extension (2+1) once the lens is registered on the Sony website. The price is perhaps the only thing that goes out: 3300 euros (price list), they are too many but for those who have the 12-24 g the passage is almost automatic as between the two optics the difference is very noticeable, also with an ultra wide-angle zoom like this with this quality all fixed from 12mm to 24mm become useless. sent on August 18, 2020 |
 | Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM Pros: Construction, sharpness, Blur, AF Cons: Opinion: And built impeccably with excellent materials. Fantastic sharpness at 2.8 with a blurry creamy, but the best from when you close with 11 to 22. It does not suffer from flare ne from sunlight that artificial. I would have preferred a focal start to 14 with a greater field width because at 16 in some contexts it is long. sent on May 23, 2019 |
 | Sony FE 12-24mm f/4 G Pros: Angle of field, construction, image quality, sharpness, AF Cons: Price, fixed lens hood Opinion: Wide angle pushed with a high angle of field. At 12 fabulous, pity it only comes to 24, it would have been perfect to have one more step at 26/28. Lightweight, compact and very well built, accurate and fast AF. The image quality is excellent. From the best from F 11 to F 22, it does not suffer too much flare and it lacks chromatic aberrations. And very expensive and the fixed hood does not allow to use screw filters. sent on May 22, 2019 |
 | Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Pros: Stabilization, image quality, sharpness, AF, construction, tropicalization Cons: Opinion: And the best standard lens and also all do to have as a first lens despite being at F 4 starting. Having one more step up to 105 helps. The construction is very good and compact and has a balanced weight. Stabilization and a plus. AF Fast and accurate does not mistake a shot. Sharp already at F4, but for me the best comes from F 8 to F 16. Good management of flare. sent on May 22, 2019 |
 | Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM Pros: Construction, sharpness, detail, compact Cons: Flare Opinion: And built impeccably, excellent materials which makes it sturdy and compact in size which make it also very portable. At maximum aperture returns a fantastic detail. The lens is free of aberrations and any artifact, but suffers from the effect of flare with both sunlight and artificial light. The blurred and absolutely creamy at maximum opening. sent on May 21, 2019 |
 | Pentax SMC FA 31mm f/1.8 AL Limited Pros: under construction Cons: Opinion: Premium lens, excellent construction with exceptional materials. The hood is incorporated in the lens the aperture ring and perhaps a little hard, given the price would have been perfect to have the ability to vary the fluidity of the ring nut. Stabilization and AF not present but its nice and use it in manual focus. At maximum aperture the blur is not creamy and and a bit ' kneened better with F 2. At night at f 10-13 returns great photos. sent on May 21, 2019 |
 | Pentax SMC FA 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Blurry, bright Cons: Materials Opinion: At a price below 350 euro There is a light lens with an extraordinary maximum opening. The materials are cheap but very light and very portable. On Pentax K1 It seems to have a dial instead of a lens. The fire is very soft and almost creamy at maximum opening which makes it great for me. Suffers a bit ' flare but and quite content. The lack of stabilization and AF is not a problem being an old school lens is the aperture ring and maybe a bit harsh. sent on May 21, 2019 |
 | Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM OSS Pros: Weight, AF speed, optimum with multiply 1.4, balanced Cons: Zoom Block Opinion: Let's start from a point: and expensive but worth all the money spent. Extremely light 1.3 kg with bracket included on the A7 III is also very well balanced. AF and very precise as well as fast this thanks to the update to version 3, before was it fast but not always accurate and every now and then leaked focus on the subject. I tried it with the two multiply 2x and 1, 4x: With the two you lose much detail at minimum f and 800mm, instead with 1, 4x works excellently without losing detail and the minimum f is not affected too much. The construction is excellent despite the materials are not precious but probably was made a choice of weight and balance. Good idea the possibility of having two types of zoom excursion a softer and a tougher but I would have preferred the zoom block, this because more than once it happens that the zoom is "stretch" when it is extracted from the bag. sent on May 21, 2019 |
 | Sony A7 III Pros: AF, battery, Price, ISO, Gamma Cons: Viewfinder, Touchscreen Opinion: It is a balanced machine, usable for many types of photography: Avifauna with its 693 points of AF, landscaping with its dynamic range, nocturnal for its high ISO hold, portraiture for its precision of the AF. The 24mpx are enough, sure a couple of more mixes were fine, but 24 are more than enough for all uses. The battery lasts a lot and can make about 1000 photos. At night it contains a lot of noise over the 6400 ISO and the dynamic and fabulous range. The touchscreen can be improved in addition to very slow and cumbersome and the viewfinder does not have a high resolution also because for Sony this machine and for an amateur user. It would have been nice to have a second function nut on the left of the machine, as in A9 to select the focus mode and autofocus type. At a price slightly higher than 2000 euros you can have a balanced machine and very performanant. sent on May 21, 2019 |
 | Pentax-D FA * 70-200mm f/2.8 ED DC AW Pros: Construction, price, optical yield Cons: Weight Opinion: The construction is excellent against weather and dust and a real gem for a tele. Of cons and a boulder, very thinking if you use it freehand after a while it accuses thoughtfulness to the arts. Better use it on a tripod. The rendition is fantastic at any focal length and aperture. The price is right for the type of lens that it is. It would have been perfect to have the zoom block. sent on May 27, 2018 |
 | Pentax D FA 24-70mm f/2.8 ED SDM WR HD Pros: Compact, construction, optical yield Cons: Opinion: Compact lens with a solid construction against dust and Interperie. The possibility of zoom blocking and a very interesting gem. The yield is good at all openings and at all lengths. It holds the flare well with both artificial light and sunlight. To use with a FF to get the best from this lens. The price is perhaps a bit excessive sent on May 27, 2018 |
 | Pentax HD FA 15-30mm f/2.8 ED SDM WR Pros: Constitution, optical yield Cons: Flare, Price Opinion: The construction and perfect and protection from poor and Interperie are formidable. and a particular lens with that spherical lens but it has a good yield to all apertures and lengths. The flare and its weak point both with the sun and with artificial light, especially lights in the foreground and f22. For use with a FF for landscape, street and long exposures. Excessive price sent on May 27, 2018 |
 | Pentax K-1 Pros: Image quality, price, stabilization, functionality, double-Slot, handling, size, construction Cons: Video, Autofocus Opinion: After 6000 shots we move on to the review. First FF of Pentax and they made a real masterpiece. With a competitive price, they managed to build a handy FF, not big and from the right weight. The image quality and fantastic, 36mpx are perhaps too many, but you can have a great detail. Freehand I never pushed over to 6400 ISO and generally holds it well, but maybe you could do something more. The stabilization helps to avoid wavy shots and the many features are a real gem: ability to save directly RAW in DNG, enter the timer for laying B, GPS, Pixel Shift increases the resolution and detail of images, astrotracer for photos to Starry skies. The construction in magnesium alloy with dust and weather sealing and top class and the monitor with its mechanics exalts it. The better the camera from it on a tripod by snapping landscapes, sunsets, sunrises, long exposures, starry skies; Because the speed of the autofocus is insufficient and very often it snaps without focusing. The videos are enough but it wasn't born for that. Few optics but of excellent construction, quality and price help to have a great shooting experience. Recommended! sent on May 27, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
