JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sony A7r V : Specifications and Opinions

The Sony A7r V is a mirrorless camera with FF (1.0x) sensor and 60.2 megapixels manufactured from 2022. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 102400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 10 FPS x 583 RAW, 1000 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 4000 €;

55 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10

Sensor
Format	Fullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	60.2 megapixel
ISO sensitivities	50 - 102400
File formats	JPEG, RAW
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/8000
Exp. compensation	+/- 5 stops at 1/3 steps
Exp. modes	M, S, A, P
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Sony E (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	Yes
Continuos shooting (with autofocus)	10 FPS x 583 RAW, 1000 JPEG
Pre-Burst	No
Live View	Yes
Video mode	8K (7680x4320p) @ 24 FPS
WiFi	Yes
GPS	No
USB	USB-C (3.2 2x2)
USB Charging	Yes
Computing Features
ND Long Exposure	No
Pixel Shift	Partial, it requires computer software to merge the photos (241 megapixel)
Focus Stacking	Partial, it requires computer software to merge the photos
Startrail/Composite mode	No
Astrotracer	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	Yes
LCD	3.2″, 2.1 Mdots, 1024 x 680 pixels, articulated
Viewfinder	Electronic, coverage 100%, 0.90x
Viewfinder resolution	2048 x 1536 px
Flash	No
Storage	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II)
Storage, Slot 2	CFExpress Type A
Shutter	Mechanical and electronic
Battery	Sony NP-FZ100, 16.40 Wh
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	723 g
Dimensions	131 x 97 x 82 mm
Buy
Sony A7r V, buy on Ebay

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 237000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Roberto M

sent on November 04, 2023

Pros: Rear screen, menu, lossless compressed raw, sensor stabilization, 61 mpx sensor, spectacular autofocus even in rt, programmable bulb, focus staking, menu, sensor protection with shutter closure, relatively low price.

Cons: Slow readout, burst limited to 10 fps, no mechanical turret with autofocus settings.

Opinion: Let me start by saying that my main genre is nature photography, landscapes and wildlife. I had some prejudices about this camera at first because of the "cons" I highlighted above, especially comparing it with the Canon rV and, today, also with the Nikon z8. Then I decided to replace the A7rIII, and, in the field (a 12-day trip to Ethiopia) I had to change my mind! Let me start by saying that the comparison was with the A1, to which I added this camera, using it with the 200-600 and with the 70-200 gm2, while the A7rIII I used with the 16-35 GM and the 50 f1.4 Sony-Zeiss. What really impressed me was the "sniper" autofocus in real tracking on animals and birds. I found it superior to the A1 and I would never have believed this, and this for the genre I prefer, that is the "set" animals (obviously not for the birds in flight where the A1 wins hands down). That is, when you have to go and find a frosty baboon or a small bird, or the head of the Ethiopian wolf in the middle of the branches and vegetation, the A7rV wins, it quickly hooks the animal's eye or the face even from a very far away and does not let go, despite the slowness of the sensor readout, but above all it does not make mistakes when you shoot. Basically, the percentage of shots taken home with this camera is higher, and you tend to "trust more" (in the sense that with the A1 I often went DMF) for safety, with this one less) and in addition the combined operation of the new IBS with the internal stabilizer of the 200-600 is spectacular. Other positive aspects of the camera, it has the combined "animals and birds" af function (unlike the A1 where you have to choose), the tilting rear screen that today is unique, practically perfect, you have all the advantages of both the tilting and articulated screens and no disadvantages, new functions such as the programmable bulb, focus staking, lossless compressed raw and the same excellent menu as the A1. Few cons, I would obviously have liked a read out of the "true all-round" sensor as on the Nikon Z8 and Canon rV and the possibility of using only the electronic shutter, as well as, of course, the possibility of a burst higher than 10 fps, but in the end who cares, when you need those things just use the A1. In conclusion, as a "second body" compared to the A1 it is an absolutely perfect camera, and it also costs much less than the Sony flagship. Unfortunately the "ribbon" diaphragm function that was on the A7r3, very useful for me in underwater photography, is no longer implemented (at least I couldn't find it).

Nangi

sent on August 14, 2023

Pros: 4-axis variable angle rear LCD, much improved image stabilization, excellent autofocus (the focusing system has an even larger area - 693 points instead of 567 - both in Fullframe and APS-C, with the latter including almost an edge-edge section), file quality, improved colorimetric management, excellent ergonomics, monitor with its dual function for photos and videos. Build quality: magnesium alloy body - recycled plastic parts (SORPLAS) with good dust/moisture sealing.

Cons: Cf type A cards too expensive even today (but necessary if you want to take full advantage of the "power" of the medium), raw files really heavy in the "overall management", keys not back-lit and finally menu still too messed up

Opinion: It has been written a lot before... In my review I would like to emphasize some aspects practicing mainly nature photography. a) great pro is certainly the overall quality of the file (colorimetry, detail and engraving) including the possibility of crop in the room by customizing one of the multiple function keys (therefore instant to be inserted and removed); the con is that shooting a lot in bursts in nature serve the "expensive" cf type A both to exploit "the beast" fully in its functions and to be able to have maximum speed in gusts ... As a result, the photos to be viewed, selected, deleted and post-produced etc. are all mainly "heavy" photos (maybe even raw 61 megapixels uncompressed) and engage a lot in terms of both electronics and "total" working time. b) the sensor is exactly the same as the a7RIV, but the electronics, the computational functions and the processor with AI module according to Sony should improve many aspects of the camera, such as noise management: now, in my opinion, the chrominance / luminance noise is just better than the previous model (let's say narrow sufficiency "type APS-C") ... instead it has absolutely an excellent dynamic range, perfect tones and colors and a depth that does not even seem to be full frame. c) I emphasize that this is a camera "for all uses" - it is described like this - instead in my opinion we must take into account that it has a stacked sensor that limits the readout speed: for this reason, we are not talking about Sony A1, we must prepare to meet an annoying rolling shutter (which in practice means throwing the photograph: in my experience in flight photography at times greater than 1/2500-3200 it is invasive and heavy). The rolling shutter can obviously not be labeled as a "defect", because precisely this is not an "eminently" sports camera; Since it can be very invasive it must be emphasized ... d) recognizes man, animals of various kinds, birds, insects, cars, motorcycles, bicycles, planes but also human and animal eyes, faces and body parts from many different angles: this thing combined with real time tracking allows you to have a much better AF-C accuracy compared to the previous model ... e) in my opinion it is a "second body" in the field of nature photography ... I do not judge the video functions because they are not videomakers. NB There are many options in the AF menu so the machine must be studied thoroughly I would say "in the field" to exploit it: this means that the "learning curve" is not very fast. I do not consider it a camera for "newbies" (AF-C settings for flight and nature photography to be studied with care) ... f) I close these impressions of mine by focusing on the USB-C port (generation 3.2 2x2) that allows both to charge the battery and transfer files; You can shoot even while the camera is charging and this thing is a plus not just ... It's a camera that can excel in a wide range of applications, from landscapes to studio portraits, weddings and events to product photography, although it's not the all-rounder that the a1 is. The technology to provide a combination of high resolution and high speed is not yet available at this price.

Gianlucasimonella

sent on May 01, 2023

Pros: monitor,viewfinder,file quality,grip

Cons: Price,lack of a small monitor in the left shoulder, expensive cf type A cards

Opinion: I am a landscaper so for me the perfect car, clear files, excellent recovery of lights and shadows. I also deal with weddings, in that field I prefer to use the compressed file otherwise I would find myself with a slaughterhouse of busy hard disks, among other things in that field I still see some limits in the iso seal, but as we all know many pixels means that too. Speaking of the machine, FINALLY a monitor as it should, I have always envied the Fuji X-t2, and even today I wonder why all manufacturers do not adopt this solution, it really satisfies everyone. The excellent ergonomics, excellent button customization, the menu is not there yet, it is translated by a drunk bear .. I come from Sony A1, of that machine I appreciate the controls in the left shoulder, I wonder if sooner or later they will decide to put a small monitor with basic information to consult quickly, type, times, iso, diaphragm .. I always hope, it's a cabbage of unused empty space...

GiuCir

sent on February 14, 2023

Pros: Excellent image stabilization, very good autofocus, file quality, improved color management

Cons: nobody

Opinion: I have previously used both the a7R3 and a7R4 for a long time. When I replaced the R3 with the R4, I was not entirely satisfied with the change, especially for the yield of the sensor that in my opinion was worse than the previous one especially for the yield at ISO from 1600 upwards. On the other hand, the transition from R4 to R5 was completely satisfactory. Although the sensor is basically the same, the camera as a whole has improved making it much more usable and reliable. I find the file of better quality and this is probably the result of several factors: stabilization of the sensor much more effective that makes much less frequent the presence of the shake that on such a dense sensor is always lurking (also you can get perfectly sharp photos freehand even at 1/10 - 1/15 of a second), excellent dynamic range, significantly more accurate color management, noise at high ISO less impactful despite the sensor is substantially the same. This last data seems to contradict the evidence on dpreview, but in field use the file is cleaner (shooting only in RAW). Finally, the camera is very responsive, very well built and gives a remarkable sense of robustness. Excellent both monitor and viewfinder

Topo74

sent on January 17, 2023

Pros: Build quality, solid and ergonomic body, buttons and dials with excellent feedback, Autofocus both in performance and configurability, Menu, general system speed, file quality, WB, Battery life ,

Cons: Cf cards type A, EVF, maybe I would have preferred a few MP less

Opinion: I state that coming from the 7r3 the leap in class is there and is substantial, starting from the camera body, solid robust with great ergonomics and without fingers that escape from the handle, as well as the various key doors and rings everything in this machine releases sensations of excellent materials. Finally Sony has created a well-organized and intuitive menu with..... hear hear .... The help for each command So even if the item "Int.dv.Cont.Per.Sat.Civ.Rot.Lat." may be incomprehensible to most, just press the Info button and here comes a clear description of the command and its settings. The autofocus is really effective finally an automatism that is really worth using, fully configurable, even more than satisfactory performance even with Nikon lenses mounted on adapter The machine is extremely responsive, fast in ignition immediately ready and in general throughout the workflow, finally at the levels of the latest SLR pro produced, I cursed Sony when during a shooting the 7r3 planted and took its time. The files are really good, normally I manage the WB by hand but out of curiosity I let the machine do it with exceptional results, perfectly calibrated tones. Excellent battery life 600 shots with a cleat. It is obvious that as already widely said, the best results from this sensor are obtained with a system at the height, therefore GM, Zeiss or at most Sigma ART optics and a processing chain at the height. Were 61 MP so necessary? In my opinion no, the best performance in terms of resolution / ISO and file management, personally I found it around 40/45MP, however for management there is always the compressed raw even if it is not the same thing. I put among the defects the EVF not because it is not valid, but for how many millions of billions of MP can put in unfortunately I can not make me like, I always find it an artificial vision compared to the dear old optical viewfinder, but as Guzzanti Quèlo said we have and Quèlo we adore. A consideration on CFE type A, when the whole world adopts CFE type B, Sony must use proprietary formats with lower performance, off-market prices and poor availability of manufacturers, currently it seemed to me that only Lexar and Sony itself make them!!!! Fortunately the dear "old" SD V90 are a wonder. Last thing, although there would be a lot to talk about this machine, the articulated monitor, not essential but a great cool

There are 7 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sony A7r V

Incense making in Quang Phu Cau

by Juza
41 comments, 7760 views

HI RES 9.3 MP

Colored pencils

by Fabrizio Fortuna
53 comments, 4163 views [editors pick]

Beauties of the past..

by Gianlucasimonella
92 comments, 4757 views [editors pick]

Thu Sy, transport of fishing traps

by Juza
36 comments, 5813 views

HI RES 60.2 MP

Glutton

by Walter Bertolotti
58 comments, 4178 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The red dress, Hang Mua

by Juza
30 comments, 6216 views

HI RES 32.7 MP

The bright red of incense

by Juza
17 comments, 6094 views

HI RES 32.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

A flower of incense

by Juza
23 comments, 3633 views

HI RES 60.2 MP

Hawk Cuckoo f.

by Andnol
111 comments, 2556 views

HI RES 17.9 MP

Absorbed in her thoughts, Xín Chai

by Juza
25 comments, 4821 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Nymphalis antiopa 2

by Andnol
86 comments, 1962 views

HI RES 32.7 MP

The welding machine, Thu Sy

by Juza
14 comments, 4351 views

HI RES 30.6 MP

Goshawk

by Andnol
95 comments, 1432 views

HI RES 11.8 MP

Once there was the lake

by Fabrizio Fortuna
48 comments, 2358 views

Tufted

by Andnol
82 comments, 2398 views

HI RES 16.3 MP

Life

by Fabrizio Fortuna
29 comments, 1913 views

Along the streets of Quang Phu Cau

by Juza
6 comments, 4871 views

HI RES 39.0 MP

Patagonia

by Fabrizio Fortuna
26 comments, 1654 views

Clivo Argentario - Rome

by Maurizio Verdecchia
39 comments, 2629 views

And Snow was also in 2023

by Maurizio Verdecchia
49 comments, 2442 views

Invitation to drink tea

by Juza
9 comments, 3959 views

HI RES 57.5 MP

Memories from the desert

by Fabrizio Fortuna
25 comments, 1583 views

Yen Bai Railway Yard

by Juza
11 comments, 3571 views

HI RES 27.7 MP

Thu Sy pots

by Juza
8 comments, 2984 views

HI RES 55.3 MP

Fishing trap manufacturers, Thu Sy

by Juza
11 comments, 4026 views

HI RES 46.3 MP

In its environment

by Andnol
101 comments, 1775 views

HI RES 7.6 MP

Handicrafts of Thu Sy

by Juza
5 comments, 3158 views

HI RES 53.7 MP

Buzzard

by Andnol
77 comments, 2187 views

HI RES 23.7 MP

Processing of wooden cable ties

by Juza
4 comments, 3055 views

HI RES 25.2 MP

Nymphalis antiopa

by Andnol
76 comments, 868 views

HI RES 41.6 MP

The Good Night Messenger

by 66ilmoro
47 comments, 1342 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The little girl in red, Bat Trang

by Juza
16 comments, 3739 views

HI RES 14.1 MP

Greater spotted woodpecker m.

by Andnol
68 comments, 1430 views

HI RES 36.7 MP

Notturni D'Abruzzo - Pacentro

by Maurizio Verdecchia
36 comments, 1426 views

The alleys of the Bach Mai district

by Juza
18 comments, 3329 views

HI RES 32.7 MP

In Mangystau

by Fabrizio Fortuna
16 comments, 1279 views

Lake Nakuru

by Walter Bertolotti
32 comments, 820 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Sony » Sony A7r V

Sony A7r V : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Sony A7r V